News

Water system malfunction caused pandemonium for fire crews

Dispatchers, Palo Alto Fire Department were forced to make choices to prioritize service

Palo Alto Fire Department Station 4 by Mitchell Park in Palo Alto on July 23, 2021. Photo by Gennady Sheyner.

An issue with Palo Alto's water-pressure system set off at least 24 false fire-alarm calls in rapid succession throughout the city in late January, forcing dispatchers and emergency crews to scramble.

Palo Alto Utilities and San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) puzzled over why the pressure from the SFPUC's water system dropped and possibly triggered a sudden pressure rise as Palo Alto's system attempted to compensate, thus setting off the alarms.

The succession of rapid alerts began rolling in on Jan. 26 starting 1:47 p.m. and continued for about 30 minutes, according to police scanner calls and the online emergency alert app PulsePoint. Calls continued to come in from throughout the city in one- to two-minute intervals.

Firefighters who were quickly dispatched to each location found there was no evidence of fire, Deputy Fire Chief Kevin McNally said. The alerts spanned the city, predominantly from El Camino Real and east to the bay, he said.

The false alarms put a high stress on the city's response system as fire crews dispatched to location after location.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"It annihilated dispatch," McNally said.

But the dispatchers were good about triaging, he added. They first routed crews and emergency medical services to known emergencies such as medical incidents and crashes. They also prioritized alarm alerts where there were potential signs of fire, such as reported smoke, he said. As crews were freed up, the department checked each alarm location, resetting the systems. The sprinklers were not activated and there was no water damage to businesses, he added.

Such false alarms have happened in the past when there was a water pressure drop, but it has not been of this magnitude, McNally said.

When the pressure drops from outside of the Palo Alto system such as from the SFPUC network, from which the city receives its water, Palo Alto Utilities' system automatically boosts its pressurized system. The sudden rise can cause "water hammer," a kind of high-pressure shock wave through a piping system when moving water is forced to change direction or abruptly stops. The phenomenon can set off the sprinkler alarms, he said. False alarms can also be triggered from within Palo Alto when someone hits a water line, disrupting the water pressure, he added.

Palo Alto Utilities said the problem originated outside of its system and referred all questions to the SFPUC.

Joseph Sweiss, SFPUC press secretary, said on Monday that the agency has been coordinating with Palo Alto on the city's project to replace piping and make improvements in its water system pipeline vault downstream of the SFPUC's California Avenue vault. The work is related to capping connections to operations that are no longer in use. But the coordination included a shutdown from 6 p.m. on Jan. 26 to 6 a.m. on Jan. 27, hours after the incident.

"Both utilities are working to understand the early afternoon pressure changes in the Palo Alto system given the actual shutdown schedule occurred late at night on Thursday," he said.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Sue Dremann
 
Sue Dremann is a veteran journalist who joined the Palo Alto Weekly in 2001. She is a breaking news and general assignment reporter who also covers the regional environmental, health and crime beats. Read more >>

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you city government news. Become a member today.

Water system malfunction caused pandemonium for fire crews

Dispatchers, Palo Alto Fire Department were forced to make choices to prioritize service

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Sat, Feb 4, 2023, 8:11 am

An issue with Palo Alto's water-pressure system set off at least 24 false fire-alarm calls in rapid succession throughout the city in late January, forcing dispatchers and emergency crews to scramble.

Palo Alto Utilities and San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) puzzled over why the pressure from the SFPUC's water system dropped and possibly triggered a sudden pressure rise as Palo Alto's system attempted to compensate, thus setting off the alarms.

The succession of rapid alerts began rolling in on Jan. 26 starting 1:47 p.m. and continued for about 30 minutes, according to police scanner calls and the online emergency alert app PulsePoint. Calls continued to come in from throughout the city in one- to two-minute intervals.

Firefighters who were quickly dispatched to each location found there was no evidence of fire, Deputy Fire Chief Kevin McNally said. The alerts spanned the city, predominantly from El Camino Real and east to the bay, he said.

The false alarms put a high stress on the city's response system as fire crews dispatched to location after location.

"It annihilated dispatch," McNally said.

But the dispatchers were good about triaging, he added. They first routed crews and emergency medical services to known emergencies such as medical incidents and crashes. They also prioritized alarm alerts where there were potential signs of fire, such as reported smoke, he said. As crews were freed up, the department checked each alarm location, resetting the systems. The sprinklers were not activated and there was no water damage to businesses, he added.

Such false alarms have happened in the past when there was a water pressure drop, but it has not been of this magnitude, McNally said.

When the pressure drops from outside of the Palo Alto system such as from the SFPUC network, from which the city receives its water, Palo Alto Utilities' system automatically boosts its pressurized system. The sudden rise can cause "water hammer," a kind of high-pressure shock wave through a piping system when moving water is forced to change direction or abruptly stops. The phenomenon can set off the sprinkler alarms, he said. False alarms can also be triggered from within Palo Alto when someone hits a water line, disrupting the water pressure, he added.

Palo Alto Utilities said the problem originated outside of its system and referred all questions to the SFPUC.

Joseph Sweiss, SFPUC press secretary, said on Monday that the agency has been coordinating with Palo Alto on the city's project to replace piping and make improvements in its water system pipeline vault downstream of the SFPUC's California Avenue vault. The work is related to capping connections to operations that are no longer in use. But the coordination included a shutdown from 6 p.m. on Jan. 26 to 6 a.m. on Jan. 27, hours after the incident.

"Both utilities are working to understand the early afternoon pressure changes in the Palo Alto system given the actual shutdown schedule occurred late at night on Thursday," he said.

Comments

Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 4, 2023 at 8:35 am
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Feb 4, 2023 at 8:35 am

Hmmm, is there any connection to this and the long response to the fire in Midtown?


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Feb 4, 2023 at 9:56 am
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Feb 4, 2023 at 9:56 am

A lot of road work and excavation was in process at the intersection of Loma Verde and Middlefield where the fire broke out in the midtown shopping area. Possibly the job of digging up the street triggered other issues where water, gas lines, and drainage are involved. The Cleaners where the fire started uses a lot of water and power to run the cleaning equipment. Just a coincidence that it all happened at the same time?


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:52 am
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:52 am

Excellent question, Bystander. Funny how the fault always lies elsewhere whether it's water pressure or traffic lights or traffic delays (which of course back up onto our own streets).

But sure, let's keep pushing aggressive NEW agendas for forced electrification and costly Fiber to the home.


Annette
Registered user
College Terrace
on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:54 am
Annette, College Terrace
Registered user
on Feb 4, 2023 at 10:54 am

And yet we are asked to accept that Palo Alto's infrastructure can support the existing nighttime population, a day-time population that is multiples of that, plus the growth that ABAG and Sacramento are demanding happen here. And much of the housing legislation allows developers to get around uniform development standards. This is NUTS!


Barron Park Denizen
Registered user
Barron Park
on Feb 5, 2023 at 4:36 pm
Barron Park Denizen, Barron Park
Registered user
on Feb 5, 2023 at 4:36 pm

Online Name and Annette, right on....


Hulkamania
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 6, 2023 at 2:57 pm
Hulkamania, Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on Feb 6, 2023 at 2:57 pm

Was it caused by the ghost of David Bowie?

Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.