The year 2023 began with a historic bang — record precipitation and disastrous flooding throughout much of California. Parched watersheds soaked up the first rains, but soon became waterlogged. Runoff accelerated. Sodden hillsides collapsed. Rural levees burst and rivers spilled their banks. Towns went underwater. People died.
Meanwhile, the Pacific Ocean continued to whip up more atmospheric rivers and "bomb cyclones," and one after another, these intense storms pummeled California. Abruptly, a state emerging from the dust of three painfully dry years was inundated with more water than it knew what to do with. But the wet and wild weather over the past dozen days won't end the drought, at least not yet, and it won't undo the driest period in the West in the past 1,200 years.
About 71% of California was experiencing "severe" drought on Wednesday, dropping to 46% on Thursday, according to the National Integrated Drought Information System. That designation is based on a long list of complex metrics, including soil moisture, water shortages, levels of streams and lakes, snow cover and runoff. The storms also come at a time when scientists are predicting a long-term shift toward a warmer, drier climate.
With at least two more storms approaching California over the next week, we look at what all this means for drought conditions and water supply.
Sorry, the drought isn't over
In some places, it might feel like the drought is history. Take San Francisco. Its water supply — Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, in the Sierra Nevada — is 80% full, the ground is saturated and near-record rainfall has occurred in recent days.
"Drought is in the eye of the beholder," said Jeffrey Mount, senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California. "If you're in San Francisco, and you rely on surface storage from Hetch Hetchy, this is great … But if you're in a small town in the San Joaquin Valley, where massive pumping of groundwater has dried out your well, it will take successive years of rain like this to make a difference."
The San Joaquin Valley's groundwater basins, where thousands of wells have run dry, are just one example of drought impacts that can take years to reverse. California's aquatic ecosystems are another. Drought has harmed a variety of fish species, and it will take years for them to rebound. Some, like Delta smelt and winter-run Chinook salmon, are endangered and, faced with an array of human-induced stressors, probably never will recover.
Determining when a drought begins and ends is tricky. While many experts refer to California's 2013-2016 drought, as though it had a clear beginning and an end, others, like Mount, feel that particular drought hasn't yet ended — the current drought is just an extension of it.
After all, most years in the past 15 have produced an underwhelming amount of rainfall. Since the big water year of 2006, only three — 2011, 2017 and 2019 — have been notably wet.
Many climate experts believe California's predominant weather pattern in the future will be one of steady drought conditions broken periodically by very wet interludes.
"This might well be just another case of a wet year followed by a string of dry ones," Mount said.
Reservoir levels rising
Water is rapidly flowing into the state's reservoirs.
Lake Oroville — the largest reservoir of the State Water Project, with a capacity of 3.5 million acre feet — was 28% full in early December and now is just shy of 50%. That's an increase of 700,000 acre-feet, and experts predict it could rise by almost 500,000 more before February. (Each acre-foot is enough to support two or three families for a year.) Still, Oroville and most of the state's other major reservoirs remain mostly empty.
While a single very rainy season could refill even the largest of California's reservoirs, the same cannot be said of the Colorado River's huge reservoirs. Lake Mead and Lake Powell, which hold 50 million acre-feet combined, have been declining for decades. Seven states and 40 million people — almost half of them in California — draw from these reservoirs, and even several wet winters in a row will not come close to refilling them.
Among the many problems with this onslaught is that so much rain has fallen in such a short time. This doesn't just damage structures and harm people; it also makes it challenging to store the water. In any rain event, much of the water will fall downstream of any dam, making it difficult or impossible to capture.
But even the torrents of water entering the reservoir system cannot necessarily all be retained in storage. That's because allowing reservoirs to fill so early in the year would create flood risks later in the winter.
To avoid this, the outflow gates in some dams are being opened wider to let water out faster and prevent overflow.
This strategy is especially necessary at smaller reservoirs, like Folsom Lake. Outflow through the dam was running somewhere in the ballpark of 1,000 cubic feet per second in early December, said Michael Anderson, a climatologist with the Department of Water Resources. Recently, he said, state reservoir operators were releasing roughly 30,000 cubic feet per second from the dam. Most of this water eventually flows to the ocean. It may seem like water wasted, but it also could mean a city saved.
Not quite record rainfall
By the numbers, this blast of wet weather has been stunning, if not necessarily record-breaking. The San Francisco Bay Area has taken a heavy pounding. About the day this wet spell started, on Dec. 31, a near-record 5.46 inches of rain fell in downtown San Francisco, missing the 1994 one-day record by a tenth of an inch. Between Dec. 26 and Jan. 9, more than a foot of rain fell in San Francisco. That's more than half of the city's long-term water year average of 22 inches. In the East Bay's Tilden Regional Park, 17 inches of rain fell in about the same span.
In Beverly Hills, the recent storms have delivered 11 inches of rain, bringing the Los Angeles County city to about 16 inches for the season. The Sacramento International Airport has received 7 inches of rain since Dec. 27 and as of Jan. 10 was at about 208% of normal for this date. Locations near Santa Barbara recently recorded up to 15 inches in a day, according to Anderson. In San Diego County, 4.5 inches have fallen since the end of December. And in the Russian River watershed — at a particularly rainy mountaintop weather station called Venado — 23 inches of rain fell between Dec. 27 and Jan. 11.
Regrettably, this rainfall has done little to help water supplies, for most of it has flowed into storm drains and either right into the ocean or into rivers that lead to it.
The recent storms have highlighted the need to design and build stormwater systems capable of capturing runoff for landscape irrigation or even treated and used as drinking water. Such systems are expensive and take years to build. Santa Monica is one city that already captures urban runoff and treats it.
Even sinking urban runoff into the ground via rain gardens and bioswales is a better option than letting it escape to sea. Unfortunately, much existing infrastructure, like concrete flood control channels, is designed to usher stormwater quickly off the landscape.
Double the snowpack
The storms of late December and January have dramatically buffed up California's snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. It's now at more than 200% of average for this date, and slightly more than 100% of the amount that usually falls during the entire winter season.
In the last few days, freezing elevations have been quite low – about 5,000 feet. "Which means we're accumulating a lot more snow," Anderson said. He added that "automated sensors are registering what they would consider a full season's snowpack, about what we would expect on April 1."
That's great news for much of California. This snowpack is an important natural storage system because when it melts, it feeds the State Water Project, which provides water to 27 million people and 750,000 acres of farmland. It fills reservoirs and keeps rivers icy cold – conditions required by spawning salmon. But climate change is disrupting this cycle. Snowpack averages have been declining at an alarming rate in recent years, either melting early in the season or not falling at all, and research suggests a future of frequent "low-to-no-snow" years.
Skiers are overjoyed. According to the Mammoth Mountain ski resort, "the latest storm delivered 6 to 7.5 feet of snow in the last few days. Mammoth season total snowfall is 328" at Main Lodge and 441" at the summit — the most snow in the country!" Tahoe's Northstar Resort has received 69 inches in the last week, with a base depth of 128 inches and a season total of 280 inches.
But snow is a fickle resource, and Anderson cautioned that, with a shift toward warmer weather — or, worse, high-altitude rainfall — this powdery blessing could soon melt away. That, he said, would create "flood management concerns as that snow melts, especially if it melts too quickly."
Comments
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:10 am
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:10 am
Wallace Stegner is best known as an author of fiction, but in researching his books, he wrote a great history of the opening of the west, Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West. Within that history is a fascinating account of the history of drought in the west and federal and local government efforts (led by Powell in that early period) to understand and manage it through studies, land use and water rights legislation, agency creation, etc. The history is well written and worth reading if you want to begin to deeply understand how we got here. Aside from climate change, we have been taking water too much for granted since settlers arrived from around the world and began stripping native grasslands to farm prairies in the Midwest and tilling the dry hills and valleys of California. Waste of aquifer waters started early and continued in California with the development of statewide systems to distribute water without great catchment systems to capture and SAVE water when cyclical atmospheric rivers run through. The one we are experiencing now is record-breaking, and sadly, too little has been done to invest in capture and preserve this fresh water deluge for the inevitable drought cycle that will return. As weather cycles get more severe, we should be investing heavily in repairing and building new water catchment and holding systems--which is, in most locations, cheaper and less environmentally impactful than desalination. Fresh water is the lifeblood of our food basket. We cannot live without it. Let's make preservation of and more thoughtful distribution of fresh water a priority in California. As individuals, we can each help by using water more carefully in our daily lives.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:12 am
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:12 am
Depends who you ask!
Drought is one of those words that a dictionary definition will be different to a politician's definition which is different to a farmer's definiton. Nowadays, it is probably more to do with high tech definition because if they don't like it, they will label it false information.
Generally speaking drought is more to do with rainfall, than anything else, except in California where it means exactly what the government want it to mean.
Registered user
Greenmeadow
on Jan 16, 2023 at 12:16 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 12:16 pm
@Bystander, get real!
"There are no facts. Everything is a matter of opinion". That's about what you're saying, and it's wrong. Did you even look at the bars of snow measurement at the end of the article? Have you bothered to read about the ground sinking in the Central Valley because of too much well water taken? The entire West verifiably and seriously in the middle of a serious long-term drought. If you want to stick your head in the sand and declare otherwise, fine, but it doesn't change any facts.
Registered user
Midtown
on Jan 16, 2023 at 2:28 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 2:28 pm
One long-term culprit in this story is the Nestle corporation. They have taken water from California springs & aquifers for over 30 years, most recently raiding the Santa Barbara area. What do they do with the water they steal for free? They sell it as bottled water! Nestle had a permit at one time, which expired. Nevertheless, they continued sucking water from California's aquifers. And they aren't the only bottled-water company that's after all the water they can get from us. I ask people at Trader Joe's to stop selling bottled water, and they laugh. It's one of their best-selling items. I don't know why people in Palo Alto, with the delicious water from Hetch-Hetchy, think they need bottled water. Not to mention the leftover excess plastic that gets dumped into our oceans. I boycott all Nestle products, but you have to read labels carefully to learn which products at the supermarket are from Nestle.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 16, 2023 at 2:35 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 2:35 pm
The problems are real, not the fact that we are not getting enough rainfall. We have abundant rainfall already this year, it is poor water management that has been decades in the making that is causing the problems mentioned in the article. Water management is using the drought word to make it sound like it is not their fault. Drought is low rainfall, poor water management over decades allows mismanagement of the water resource we have.
The example of wells in the Central Valley was given. I happen to be familiar with artesian well drilling due to a family business many years ago, not in California. The well was necessary due to the mains supply not being able to provide enough water and permits and a meter monitored very carefully the amount taken and the water was being used for the licensed purpose. The cost of the license varied each year dependent on rainfall and the depth of the water table. I don't remember any problems with subsidence. It was not a perfect system, but it did at least pay attention to what was happening in the aquifers.
Using the drought word to excuse poor water management makes no sense when we are well above average if not one of the highest rainfall years on record. Manage the water better and there will be an adequate supply and the need for concern will be much less.
Registered user
Green Acres
on Jan 16, 2023 at 7:37 pm
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 7:37 pm
I agree with Bystander. Everyone should know that statistics can easily be manipulated to tell the narrative you want.
The article notes that the drought monitor "is based on a long list of complex metrics, including soil moisture, water shortages, levels of streams and lakes, snow cover and runoff"
All of those factors are trending very well. The one remaining factor that alarms some people is the groundwater situation, and the sinking of the Central Valley that has been going on for decades. Apparently, that is a major factor for this drought formula.
It's a supply AND demand problem. Let's say someone has an annual salary of $300,000 a year. But they spend $500,000 a year. That's a problem, even though the salary is good.
In a hypothetical scenario, we could have 10 straight years of average rainfall, and the groundwater could still be depleted and the ground sink, if farmers remain aggressive with pumping the aquifers hard.
In summary, depleted groundwater is a complicated situation, which includes antiquated water rights ownership laws, etc. Asserting the sinking of the ground is all due to "man made CO2" is much too simplistic.
@BruceS - The chart the author posted displaying low snow pack is almost one year old. Look closely. It is unclear why the author posted outdated data. Here is updated information about the snowpack. We are at 209%-288% of normal to date
Web Link
Registered user
another community
on Jan 17, 2023 at 9:11 am
Registered user
on Jan 17, 2023 at 9:11 am
A drought is defined as drier than normal conditions. California has been in a drought off and on for years. California has a Mediterranean climate. To deny the drought in this state is as asinine as saying it doesn't get dark at night. Get real. If you think water is being mismanaged, you're entitled to your opinion. It doesn't change the definition of drought or take away the fact that we've been in a drought a long time. Your logic is flawed.
Registered user
Community Center
on Jan 17, 2023 at 9:58 am
Registered user
on Jan 17, 2023 at 9:58 am
With over 39 million residents in California and a booming agricultural economy, there will always be a supply and demand drought.
Registered user
another community
on Jan 18, 2023 at 9:40 am
Registered user
on Jan 18, 2023 at 9:40 am
California's sources and uses of water are highly balkanized.
California crosses several distinct weather zones -arid Southwest (Colorado River Basin) to Pacific Northwest rainforest (Redwoods). California has had successive periods of dry followed by wet since .... forever. "Drought" actually has several technical definitions.
Therefore the debate over "the" "drought" is rather silly and misleading until debaters nail down their terms.
Since most news stories try to generalize to "California" as if it were singular, they tend to concentrate on SoCal which hosts 2/3rds of the population and whose source is mostly the Colorado River Basin and other sources East of the Sierras.
Sources: aquifers, surface rainfall, snow melt, desalination, reclamation
Storage sources: Which reservoir, how is it supplied?
Areas: Colorado River Basin, Sierra, Central Valley, Coastal, Pacific Northwest etc.
Historical: wet/dry pattern A in area B changing to wet/dry pattern A' in area B'.
Uses: rice farming, drinking, almond farming, watering garden
Supplier: Fed Project, State Project, Balkanized Agency, SFPUC, EBMUD, LADWP, etc.
Finally: Contractual allocations of water. Do they annually exceed what is available? If they do, if California demand is oversubscribed (it is for some uses in some areas) then there IS NEVER AN END TO "THE" "DROUGHT." In particular, some aquifers have been drained for over half a century. The subsidence cannot ever be practically replenished.
Finally. The SFPUC has a vast oversupply in enormous reservoir capacity and demand well below capacity and obligation to deliver, despite increasing populations. By its own analysis, with mild rationing, it could withstand severe drought events whose return rate has been estimated to be greater than 5000 and up to 750,000 years, including climate change scenarios under RCP 8.5.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 19, 2023 at 1:21 pm
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2023 at 1:21 pm
With or without the present historic drought, I think we can agree that water in the West is a precious resource that we should have been conserving more carefully for the last couple of centuries as we developed the state. It's not too late to start now.
We need to reform our statewide water systems to conserve and distribute precious fresh water better AND we all need to use water more carefully.