News

Environmental impact report released for SF to SJ section of high-speed rail

Trains would make 3 Peninsula stops: San Francisco, Millbrae and San Jose

A rendering of the state's High-Speed Rail train as it passes a Caltrain commuter train in San Mateo. Courtesy California High-Speed Rail Authority.

The final environmental impact report is now complete for the section between San Francisco and San Jose of California's high-speed rail project.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority released the final report on June 10 on the possible environmental impacts of the roughly 49-mile northern leg of the rail system, which will extend through major population centers in the Bay Area.

According to the report, the proposed preferred alternative would result in displacements of 14 residential units and three community and public facilities. It may also cause direct impacts on more than 100 acres of habitat for special-status plant species.

The report builds on the previous May approval of the San Jose to Merced project section to complete the environmental analysis stage in Northern California, project spokesperson Anthony Lopez said in a statement.

To reduce adverse environmental impact, the project section will blend with the existing Caltrain system, including using the two-track configuration, incorporating boarding platforms at stations shared with Caltrain, and using existing transportation corridors and rights-of-way, according to the report.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Once it's completed, people will be able to travel between San Francisco and San Jose in about 30 minutes. As the northern Bay Area terminus of the rail system, the project section also helps connect the Bay Area to the rest of the state via San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.

"The capacity of California's intercity transportation system, including San Francisco, the Peninsula, and South Bay, is insufficient to meet existing and future travel demand," the report stated.

The final environmental impact report for the San Jose to San Francisco section of the state's High-Speed Rail project will be reviewed by the agency's Board of Directors in August. Courtesy California High-Speed Rail Authority.

With a growing population and job opportunities in the region, completing this project section will help keep pace with the increasing commuting demand between San Francisco and the South Bay.

The whole project was kick-started in 2008 when California voters approved a $9.95 billion bond measure to support high-speed rail across the state. It would run from San Diego to Sacramento by design and was initially set to be completed by 2030. The timeline has been extended due to cost overruns and delays.

The San Francisco to San Jose section will consist of three stops, the Fourth and King Street station in San Francisco (interim), the Millbrae BART Station and the Diridon station in San Jose. The northern track is planned to ultimately be extended to the Salesforce Transit Center in San Francisco.

The authority's Board of Directors will consider the final document for approval during its two-day board meeting on Aug. 17 and 18.

Do you know of news happening in your neighborhood or community that hasn't been reported on yet? Send Palo Alto Online your news tips!

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Environmental impact report released for SF to SJ section of high-speed rail

Trains would make 3 Peninsula stops: San Francisco, Millbrae and San Jose

by Mengyuan Dong / Bay City News Service

Uploaded: Thu, Jun 16, 2022, 9:26 pm

The final environmental impact report is now complete for the section between San Francisco and San Jose of California's high-speed rail project.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority released the final report on June 10 on the possible environmental impacts of the roughly 49-mile northern leg of the rail system, which will extend through major population centers in the Bay Area.

According to the report, the proposed preferred alternative would result in displacements of 14 residential units and three community and public facilities. It may also cause direct impacts on more than 100 acres of habitat for special-status plant species.

The report builds on the previous May approval of the San Jose to Merced project section to complete the environmental analysis stage in Northern California, project spokesperson Anthony Lopez said in a statement.

To reduce adverse environmental impact, the project section will blend with the existing Caltrain system, including using the two-track configuration, incorporating boarding platforms at stations shared with Caltrain, and using existing transportation corridors and rights-of-way, according to the report.

Once it's completed, people will be able to travel between San Francisco and San Jose in about 30 minutes. As the northern Bay Area terminus of the rail system, the project section also helps connect the Bay Area to the rest of the state via San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.

"The capacity of California's intercity transportation system, including San Francisco, the Peninsula, and South Bay, is insufficient to meet existing and future travel demand," the report stated.

With a growing population and job opportunities in the region, completing this project section will help keep pace with the increasing commuting demand between San Francisco and the South Bay.

The whole project was kick-started in 2008 when California voters approved a $9.95 billion bond measure to support high-speed rail across the state. It would run from San Diego to Sacramento by design and was initially set to be completed by 2030. The timeline has been extended due to cost overruns and delays.

The San Francisco to San Jose section will consist of three stops, the Fourth and King Street station in San Francisco (interim), the Millbrae BART Station and the Diridon station in San Jose. The northern track is planned to ultimately be extended to the Salesforce Transit Center in San Francisco.

The authority's Board of Directors will consider the final document for approval during its two-day board meeting on Aug. 17 and 18.

Do you know of news happening in your neighborhood or community that hasn't been reported on yet? Send Palo Alto Online your news tips!

Comments

felix
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2022 at 8:16 am
felix, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jun 17, 2022 at 8:16 am

Millbrae stop because of SFO?
Will HSR even be completed?


M
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Jun 19, 2022 at 5:06 pm
M, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Jun 19, 2022 at 5:06 pm

Millbrae to BART? Yeah, right. HSR to SFO, so people can fly to LA rather than take the HSR.

Adding extra stops like this undermines what HSR is supposed to accomplish -- efficient long distance travel -- and support for the project.


Leslie York
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Jun 23, 2022 at 4:10 am
Leslie York, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Jun 23, 2022 at 4:10 am

Quentin Kopp predicts that HSR travel times will be close to those of Amtrak. Amtrak takes 10 hours to go from L.A. to San Jose IF the train is on time.

Web Link

If people want to go between L.A. and SFO in a hurry they'll still book an airline flight which will take a fraction of the time of HSR.

The article is misleading. Once HSR arrives in San Francisco it will have reached a dead end. There are no plans for HSR to cross the bay to the north or east.

When Dianne Feinstein leaves office she will no longer be pulling strings in Washington for CA HSR. Her late husband was the principal HSR contractor.

California voters were sold a bill of goods in 2008. HSR needs to be re-voted.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.