News

San Jose transit board fights bill that would reorganize leadership

A VTA light rail at the Mountain View Station on Sept. 18, 2018. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Silicon Valley transit officials are standing firm against a legislative proposal that would dramatically change VTA's governing body.

The VTA board of directors voted unanimously Thursday to oppose Assembly Bill 2181, introduced in February by Assemblymember Marc Berman. The bill would eliminate the current board of directors on or after July 2023 and shrink the board from 18 to 12 members, at least six of whom would be private citizens as opposed to elected officials. The proposal also calls for the inclusion of members with expertise in construction or finance and would eliminate alternate directors.

The board's vote follows Berman's bill sailing through the Assembly on a 69-2 vote, with dissenting votes from Silicon Valley Assemblymembers Ash Kalra and Mark Stone. The bill is now headed to the state Senate's transportation committee, and VTA board members hope their opposition will sway lawmakers in Sacramento to kill the bill.

"We're close to the end of the legislative session, and I think we have to make our voices very clear that we're opposed because there's really no way to fix this bill," VTA board member and county Supervisor Cindy Chavez said during the meeting.

AB 2181 is Berman's latest attempt at transforming VTA's governing body. Last year, he tried and failed to pass a bill that would have limited the board's size and cut out elected members.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

No changes to VTA

Berman held a town hall in March where he expressed concerns about the current governing system, which he blames for problems like high operating costs, deteriorating service and poor fare recovery. He also cited findings from a 2019 civil grand jury report that identified inexperienced board members and lack of continuity in VTA leadership as systemic problems.

Berman told San Jose Spotlight he respects the VTA board's decision and will continue to seek opportunities for compromise as the bill moves forward. He said he has incorporated feedback in the legislation, but noted reform is challenging.

"VTA staff, who many have complained hold too much power over the board already, have led efforts behind the scenes to create confusion and sow opposition," Berman said. "And none of the elected officials on the board want to give up their power to members of the public. Even if they will acknowledge privately that the current system is not working."

VTA board member and Sunnyvale Councilmember Glen Hendricks submitted a letter to Berman last month raising concerns about his bill, noting it reduces the role of elected officials with policymaking experience and eliminates the current rotation system for giving smaller cities equal representation on the board. Elected officials from Mountain View, Palo Alto and Cupertino have also filed letters opposing the legislation.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Hendricks seemed bewildered by the intent of Berman's bill, which he argues doesn't clearly identify any existing governance issues.

"One of the problems I keep struggling with is, what is the problem we're trying to solve?" Hendricks said, adding Berman's bill suggests members of the board aren't doing a good job. "If that's true, rather than hearing generic comments, I'd like to hear specific names... who (is) not doing a good job on this board?"

Morgan Hill Mayor and VTA vice chair Rich Constantine said Berman's bill doesn't guarantee South County's representation at VTA. He told San Jose Spotlight VTA members requested to speak with Berman about their concerns in advance of the Assembly vote and he never responded.

"No bill is perfect — I'm always saying one key doesn't open all doors," Constantine said. "But when there are concerns that aren't addressed — that's not how we should do things. But that's how Sacramento always seems to work."

San Jose transit advocate and San Jose Spotlight columnist Monica Mallon said governance reform at VTA is a distraction from more critical problems. She said board members who thought they could work with Berman didn't raise serious opposition to the bill. Now, however, she expects that will change.

"By the time it goes to committee later this month, there's going to be opposition from VTA and probably from the majority of cities in the county," Mallon said.

State Sen. Dave Cortese, a former VTA board member, told San Jose Spotlight the agency needs reform — but Berman's bill doesn't get to the heart of the issue, which is lack of funding, low ridership and a lack of cohesion across transit systems in the Bay Area.

"The answer is not to reduce direct accountability from voters and disenfranchise residents even further," Cortese said.

This story, from Bay City News Service, was originally published on San Jose Spotlight.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local political news. Become a member today.

San Jose transit board fights bill that would reorganize leadership

by Eli Wolfe / San Jose Spotlight /

Uploaded: Tue, Jun 7, 2022, 9:28 am

Silicon Valley transit officials are standing firm against a legislative proposal that would dramatically change VTA's governing body.

The VTA board of directors voted unanimously Thursday to oppose Assembly Bill 2181, introduced in February by Assemblymember Marc Berman. The bill would eliminate the current board of directors on or after July 2023 and shrink the board from 18 to 12 members, at least six of whom would be private citizens as opposed to elected officials. The proposal also calls for the inclusion of members with expertise in construction or finance and would eliminate alternate directors.

The board's vote follows Berman's bill sailing through the Assembly on a 69-2 vote, with dissenting votes from Silicon Valley Assemblymembers Ash Kalra and Mark Stone. The bill is now headed to the state Senate's transportation committee, and VTA board members hope their opposition will sway lawmakers in Sacramento to kill the bill.

"We're close to the end of the legislative session, and I think we have to make our voices very clear that we're opposed because there's really no way to fix this bill," VTA board member and county Supervisor Cindy Chavez said during the meeting.

AB 2181 is Berman's latest attempt at transforming VTA's governing body. Last year, he tried and failed to pass a bill that would have limited the board's size and cut out elected members.

No changes to VTA

Berman held a town hall in March where he expressed concerns about the current governing system, which he blames for problems like high operating costs, deteriorating service and poor fare recovery. He also cited findings from a 2019 civil grand jury report that identified inexperienced board members and lack of continuity in VTA leadership as systemic problems.

Berman told San Jose Spotlight he respects the VTA board's decision and will continue to seek opportunities for compromise as the bill moves forward. He said he has incorporated feedback in the legislation, but noted reform is challenging.

"VTA staff, who many have complained hold too much power over the board already, have led efforts behind the scenes to create confusion and sow opposition," Berman said. "And none of the elected officials on the board want to give up their power to members of the public. Even if they will acknowledge privately that the current system is not working."

VTA board member and Sunnyvale Councilmember Glen Hendricks submitted a letter to Berman last month raising concerns about his bill, noting it reduces the role of elected officials with policymaking experience and eliminates the current rotation system for giving smaller cities equal representation on the board. Elected officials from Mountain View, Palo Alto and Cupertino have also filed letters opposing the legislation.

Hendricks seemed bewildered by the intent of Berman's bill, which he argues doesn't clearly identify any existing governance issues.

"One of the problems I keep struggling with is, what is the problem we're trying to solve?" Hendricks said, adding Berman's bill suggests members of the board aren't doing a good job. "If that's true, rather than hearing generic comments, I'd like to hear specific names... who (is) not doing a good job on this board?"

Morgan Hill Mayor and VTA vice chair Rich Constantine said Berman's bill doesn't guarantee South County's representation at VTA. He told San Jose Spotlight VTA members requested to speak with Berman about their concerns in advance of the Assembly vote and he never responded.

"No bill is perfect — I'm always saying one key doesn't open all doors," Constantine said. "But when there are concerns that aren't addressed — that's not how we should do things. But that's how Sacramento always seems to work."

San Jose transit advocate and San Jose Spotlight columnist Monica Mallon said governance reform at VTA is a distraction from more critical problems. She said board members who thought they could work with Berman didn't raise serious opposition to the bill. Now, however, she expects that will change.

"By the time it goes to committee later this month, there's going to be opposition from VTA and probably from the majority of cities in the county," Mallon said.

State Sen. Dave Cortese, a former VTA board member, told San Jose Spotlight the agency needs reform — but Berman's bill doesn't get to the heart of the issue, which is lack of funding, low ridership and a lack of cohesion across transit systems in the Bay Area.

"The answer is not to reduce direct accountability from voters and disenfranchise residents even further," Cortese said.

This story, from Bay City News Service, was originally published on San Jose Spotlight.

Comments

Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 7, 2022 at 10:28 am
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jun 7, 2022 at 10:28 am

It is very apparent that VTA leadership prioritizes San Jose over north or even farther south SCC.

We all know that San Jose is the largest city by population but many of those who depend on VTA, particularly to get to downtown San Jose, live outside the city.

I don't know the answer, but if VTA is to grow, then movement of people in an efficient, reliable, timely and affordable fashion, has to be county wide. If not, then they will continue to lose ridership. At present, those guidance points are ignored.


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 7, 2022 at 12:06 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jun 7, 2022 at 12:06 pm

To Bystander. I agree.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.