News

Opinion: The Palo Alto Police Department's continuing problems

Palo Alto police headquarters at 275 Forest Ave. Embarcadero Media file photo.

The lack of transparency in the Palo Alto Police Department is increasing month by month, now in a worrisome way.

For the past two-plus years, the City Council has been calling for a more transparent police department. There are nods of agreement from Chief Robert Jonsen, but, as a member of the public, I feel things are getting worse, not better.

Diana Diamond is a longtime Palo Alto journalist, editor and author of the Palo Alto Online blog "An Alternative View." Courtesy Diana Diamond.

My concern is based on several issues involving the department over the past few years:

• Police Sgt. Wayne Benitez in February 2018 was arresting a man, Gustavo Alvarez, at the Buena Vista mobile home park. He had handcuffed Alvarez on his car hood, then banged his face into the car's windshield, saying, "You think you're a tough guy, huh?" In his police report, Benitez said there was no violence other than putting on handcuffs — his slamming the man's face was not reported. A few other officers were on the scene.

• Benitez's anger eruptions were well known within the force (he was nicknamed "The Fuse"). Jonsen said he was not aware of the anger issue, nor of the nickname. The video of the slamming incident was from a camera outside of Alvarez's apartment. It was revealed by Alvarez's attorney at the 2019 settlement trial. It was not released by the police department. Alvarez was awarded $572,0000, paid by the city. To his credit, Jonsen did ask the district attorney's office to get involved in the case. The DA charged Benitez with misdemeanors for assault and lying on his report. He left the department and is now out on bail release awaiting trial.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

• About two years ago, a policy was proposed by City Attorney Mollie Stump and first adopted by the council — and then rescinded — to hand over all internal police-to-police conflict issues to the city's human resources department, where cases immediately become a personnel issue and disappear from public view, oftentimes with the public not knowing what the final outcome was. The council was told these changes were minor, but it's major if police conflict investigations go to HR, not to outside investigators. The public complained, and the council changed its mind.

• In October 2020, the state's Department of Justice issued a memo on "police encryption." The memo said the ID of the individual who is stopped by police must be protected, either by eliminating public transmission of all police on-the-job interactions with the police dispatch or by finding another way to hide the identity from the public. Jonsen quickly adopted full encryption of dispatch transmissions, without knowledge or approval of the council, in January 2021. People can no longer find out through these customary radio transmissions anything about a murder, arrest, storm damage, a serious fire in town, a major traffic accident, etc. Jonsen told the council on a couple of occasions that he had searched but found no solution. Yet the California Highway Patrol found a way — it sends private info like date of birth, name, address and driver's license number to dispatch by phone, with all other police-dispatch conversations continuing through radio transmissions, as has occurred for the past 70 years.

• Early in 2021, Jonsen also issued a notice that said reporters can no longer talk with police officers nor the chief. Jonsen occasionally sends out memos to reporters who submit a question, promising a response within the next 24 hours, and if a reporter has a follow-up question, it must be submitted on a special form resulting in another potential 24-hour wait. That certainly is a delayed way for the press to get police news to the public! Jonsen has agreed to hire a police information officer, which will help.

• Just weeks ago, we learned in the press about text messages that were sent after the 2018 car windshield incident. Agent Thomas DeStefano, who was at the scene, texted Officer Thomas Mulvaney saying, "You missed out — The Fuse was lit tonight." That text conversation never went public, but it should have, and Jonsen should have known about it. Police supervision is critical since police can arrest anyone anytime and because police frequently, accidentally, carelessly or deliberately (George Floyd) kill people.

• The city has a contract with Michael Gennaco, head of the OIR Group, which has served as the independent outside police auditor for several years. In the process of auditing police work, Gennaco found problems in the department. Then a couple of limitations were put on him (i.e., all police-to-police issues go directly to the city's HR department). The public got angry; the council listened, and ended up expanding Gennaco's work.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

• However, in delving into the 2018 issue, Gennaco said he still, in late December 2021, had not received from Jonsen all the documents he needed from the incident. So, the Benitez case will not be included in his next report. How long does it take to get information on a police assault issue?

My conclusions? There are several problems in the Palo Alto Police Department, particularly lack of transparency. The department has closed off ways to get information to the public. Though police departments in the state are known for their reluctance to release information, that doesn't make the opaqueness right. We, the public, have a right to know.

This is an important issue facing Palo Alto. How can we trust the chief to tell us what is happening in our town when there is a deliberate blind being pulled down seemingly to cover up police problems?

I wonder if department staff, including the chief, want to keep things quiet so it looks to the public that we have great police officers? Or, is there less transparency because the police simply want to protect each other?

I think the council needs to carefully monitor what the department is withholding and make policy changes as needed. I know Gennaco can be a big help to the council — and I hope his work continues to expand.

Note: Most of this information came from the Palo Alto Weekly, the Palo Alto Daily Post, conversations with a District Attorney's Office staff member and Michael Gennaco, as well as my own tracking of police incidents over the past couple of years.

Diana Diamond is a longtime Palo Alto journalist, editor and author of the Palo Alto Online blog "An Alternative View." You can email her at [email protected].

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you crime news. Become a member today.

Opinion: The Palo Alto Police Department's continuing problems

by / Contributor

Uploaded: Fri, Jan 14, 2022, 6:55 am

The lack of transparency in the Palo Alto Police Department is increasing month by month, now in a worrisome way.

For the past two-plus years, the City Council has been calling for a more transparent police department. There are nods of agreement from Chief Robert Jonsen, but, as a member of the public, I feel things are getting worse, not better.

My concern is based on several issues involving the department over the past few years:

• Police Sgt. Wayne Benitez in February 2018 was arresting a man, Gustavo Alvarez, at the Buena Vista mobile home park. He had handcuffed Alvarez on his car hood, then banged his face into the car's windshield, saying, "You think you're a tough guy, huh?" In his police report, Benitez said there was no violence other than putting on handcuffs — his slamming the man's face was not reported. A few other officers were on the scene.

• Benitez's anger eruptions were well known within the force (he was nicknamed "The Fuse"). Jonsen said he was not aware of the anger issue, nor of the nickname. The video of the slamming incident was from a camera outside of Alvarez's apartment. It was revealed by Alvarez's attorney at the 2019 settlement trial. It was not released by the police department. Alvarez was awarded $572,0000, paid by the city. To his credit, Jonsen did ask the district attorney's office to get involved in the case. The DA charged Benitez with misdemeanors for assault and lying on his report. He left the department and is now out on bail release awaiting trial.

• About two years ago, a policy was proposed by City Attorney Mollie Stump and first adopted by the council — and then rescinded — to hand over all internal police-to-police conflict issues to the city's human resources department, where cases immediately become a personnel issue and disappear from public view, oftentimes with the public not knowing what the final outcome was. The council was told these changes were minor, but it's major if police conflict investigations go to HR, not to outside investigators. The public complained, and the council changed its mind.

• In October 2020, the state's Department of Justice issued a memo on "police encryption." The memo said the ID of the individual who is stopped by police must be protected, either by eliminating public transmission of all police on-the-job interactions with the police dispatch or by finding another way to hide the identity from the public. Jonsen quickly adopted full encryption of dispatch transmissions, without knowledge or approval of the council, in January 2021. People can no longer find out through these customary radio transmissions anything about a murder, arrest, storm damage, a serious fire in town, a major traffic accident, etc. Jonsen told the council on a couple of occasions that he had searched but found no solution. Yet the California Highway Patrol found a way — it sends private info like date of birth, name, address and driver's license number to dispatch by phone, with all other police-dispatch conversations continuing through radio transmissions, as has occurred for the past 70 years.

• Early in 2021, Jonsen also issued a notice that said reporters can no longer talk with police officers nor the chief. Jonsen occasionally sends out memos to reporters who submit a question, promising a response within the next 24 hours, and if a reporter has a follow-up question, it must be submitted on a special form resulting in another potential 24-hour wait. That certainly is a delayed way for the press to get police news to the public! Jonsen has agreed to hire a police information officer, which will help.

• Just weeks ago, we learned in the press about text messages that were sent after the 2018 car windshield incident. Agent Thomas DeStefano, who was at the scene, texted Officer Thomas Mulvaney saying, "You missed out — The Fuse was lit tonight." That text conversation never went public, but it should have, and Jonsen should have known about it. Police supervision is critical since police can arrest anyone anytime and because police frequently, accidentally, carelessly or deliberately (George Floyd) kill people.

• The city has a contract with Michael Gennaco, head of the OIR Group, which has served as the independent outside police auditor for several years. In the process of auditing police work, Gennaco found problems in the department. Then a couple of limitations were put on him (i.e., all police-to-police issues go directly to the city's HR department). The public got angry; the council listened, and ended up expanding Gennaco's work.

• However, in delving into the 2018 issue, Gennaco said he still, in late December 2021, had not received from Jonsen all the documents he needed from the incident. So, the Benitez case will not be included in his next report. How long does it take to get information on a police assault issue?

My conclusions? There are several problems in the Palo Alto Police Department, particularly lack of transparency. The department has closed off ways to get information to the public. Though police departments in the state are known for their reluctance to release information, that doesn't make the opaqueness right. We, the public, have a right to know.

This is an important issue facing Palo Alto. How can we trust the chief to tell us what is happening in our town when there is a deliberate blind being pulled down seemingly to cover up police problems?

I wonder if department staff, including the chief, want to keep things quiet so it looks to the public that we have great police officers? Or, is there less transparency because the police simply want to protect each other?

I think the council needs to carefully monitor what the department is withholding and make policy changes as needed. I know Gennaco can be a big help to the council — and I hope his work continues to expand.

Note: Most of this information came from the Palo Alto Weekly, the Palo Alto Daily Post, conversations with a District Attorney's Office staff member and Michael Gennaco, as well as my own tracking of police incidents over the past couple of years.

Diana Diamond is a longtime Palo Alto journalist, editor and author of the Palo Alto Online blog "An Alternative View." You can email her at [email protected].

Comments

Brian1
Registered user
another community
on Jan 14, 2022 at 9:32 am
Brian1, another community
Registered user
on Jan 14, 2022 at 9:32 am

I just read that the Palo Alto Police Chief has applied to run for the Santa Clara County Sheriff position. With these issues in a small town police force by Palo Alto I certainly hope he does not get elected as Sheriff where they already have several serious problems. It sounds like his way of leading a police force would make things worse and not better. It also sounds like Palo Alto really needs to evaluate his performance and his decisions. I guess Menlo Park dodged a bullet when he left.


White Senior fears Palo Alto Police
Registered user
Professorville
on Jan 14, 2022 at 3:11 pm
White Senior fears Palo Alto Police, Professorville
Registered user
on Jan 14, 2022 at 3:11 pm

Jonson is not suitable for his current job as Palo Alto Chief of Police nor to replace the corrupt Sheriff Laurie Smith. Palo Alto needs to fire Jonson now to both help Palo Alto reform its police dept, and to reduce his chances of being elected Sheriff.


Paly02
Registered user
Crescent Park
on Jan 14, 2022 at 4:59 pm
Paly02, Crescent Park
Registered user
on Jan 14, 2022 at 4:59 pm

Thanks for bringing these issues to light. The public gets very little oversight of the police department. I'm not even sure how to view their budget - most other budget items seem to pass through City Council (on the consent calendar, usually) but I've never seen a police department item listed there.


Black criminal fears Police
Registered user
Ventura
on Jan 14, 2022 at 7:43 pm
Black criminal fears Police, Ventura
Registered user
on Jan 14, 2022 at 7:43 pm

Police aren’t the problem, but rather criminals [portion removed] committing rampant crime in liberal cities controlled by progressive politicians who care way more about advancing their own political careers and ambitions rather than the actual safety of citizens.

Police brutality is incredibly rare statistically. [Portion removed.] If police brutality truly was an issue it would be reported in the news every day due to the shear number of police criminal interactions that occur throughout our great nation.


Jennifer
Registered user
another community
on Jan 15, 2022 at 4:27 pm
Jennifer, another community
Registered user
on Jan 15, 2022 at 4:27 pm

Police brutality is incredibly rare statistically. Most of us understand this and there are those who prefer to skew the equation to fit their agenda. They coddle criminals and they don't get it that all these cases have a common denominator. Not cooperating with the police -- resisting arrest.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.