Fires point to risky conditions in Ravenswood Triangle

Homeless encampments threaten protected areas, endangered species

A homeless encampment in a habitat restoration area is one of an estimated 30 in the marshy Ravenswood Triangle area. Fires, human waste and garbage connected to the camps are putting endangered wildlife, nearby buildings and water quality at risk. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

News

Fires point to risky conditions in Ravenswood Triangle

Homeless encampments threaten protected areas, endangered species

A homeless encampment in a habitat restoration area is one of an estimated 30 in the marshy Ravenswood Triangle area. Fires, human waste and garbage connected to the camps are putting endangered wildlife, nearby buildings and water quality at risk. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

The brown and white sign along Bayfront Expressway in Menlo Park clearly describes the purpose of the open marshland: "Habitat Restoration Area — Environmentally Sensitive Area. Keep Out." But the 60-acre site known as the Ravenswood Triangle is anything but pristine. This year alone, the grass-and-marsh area, most of which is supposed to be protected habitat for endangered species, has been besieged by 23 fires. Since 2017, there have been 77 blazes, according to a report by the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The Ravenswood Triangle is bordered by Bayfront Expressway, University Avenue and Willow Road in Menlo Park. Courtesy Google Maps.

The area, which is bounded by Adams Drive, Willow Road, Bayfront Expressway and University Avenue, is littered with debris: mounds of rusting bicycle parts, tires, toilet paper, discarded clothing, boxes, makeshift tents of cardboard, wood and plastic, and other detritus of human habitation. Pit toilets filled with human waste dot the green reeds and tall, tawny grasses hide trip wires that guard the entrance into the approximately 30 illegal homeless encampments, some hidden among shrubs and others dotting the landscape with bright blue tarps and flapping sheets of plastic.

Cars whizzed by on bustling Bayfront Expressway to the Dumbarton Bridge, down University Avenue and up Willow Road on May 22 as firefighters worked hotspots from a 10-acre fire. A flock of geese poked their heads up out of the reeds, watching intently as crews in yellow vests doused the smoke with hoses and a dozer cut fire breaks to prevent future fires from spreading quickly.

Offices and businesses at the Menlo Business Park, just steps away, abut the Triangle, and just beyond them are homes. Black scars across the land showed how close the flames came to licking the sides of the warehouses and buildings.

Commuters stuck in traffic get a ringside seat to the happenings in the marsh, but few likely know about the area's protected status and the pollution that seeps into the ground or that mingles with rainwater during winter storms and is carried away into San Francisco Bay. Pumps drain the area to keep it from flooding the business park — a concession after a long legal battle to protect the park from flooding during the storms.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

The pollution being generated at the Triangle is a direct violation of the federal Clean Water Act, which prohibits so-called nonpoint source pollution — pollution that can enter waterways and storm drains from non-industrial sources where the point of discharge is more diffuse and not from a specific source such as a business.

But who takes responsibility for the mess and environmental degradation — and the safety of the homeless, whom fire officials fear could be injured or killed in a fast-moving fire?

Facebook headquarters can be seen behind scorched land in the open area in Menlo Park on June 29. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Menlo Park fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman has been trying to get answers. The property is a patchwork of ownership and easements, among them San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SamTrans), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Pacific Gas & Electric, Facebook and the Kavanaugh-O'Brien tract.

The number of fires has been rising over the past few years, according to a May report from the fire district on the "Encampment Area on Bayfront from Willow, to University Ave." In 2017, the area had four fires. There were 19 blazes in 2018 and 31 in 2019.

About six weeks ago, Menlo Park Mayor Cecilia Taylor convened a subcommittee to address the issue after the May 22 blaze threatened nearby commercial structures. Finding solutions isn't easy, however. The Triangle and its homeless encampments are a thorny issue, said leaders of environmental groups.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

The welfare of wildlife and the health of Baylands ecosystems is pitted against the very real human needs of people who have become homeless mainly due to a lack of affordable and low-income housing, health and mental health issues. As one environmental advocate put it, no one wants to simply kick the homeless out with no place for them to go.

Scorched earth and dead plants on train tracks in the open area near Bayfront Expressway, University Avenue and Willow Road in Menlo Park on June 29. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Yet, their continued presence is compromising the health of the estuary and violating federal law. The site is not only within the boundary of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's wildlife recovery for the protected salt marsh harvest mouse and the California (Ridgway's) clapper rail, it is also adjacent to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. The Triangle's wetlands, now mostly dry, are fed by the Ravenswood Slough, which is connected to San Francisco Bay and adjacent wetlands areas.

Rhonda Coffman, Menlo Park deputy community development director, said in an email that public agencies such as Caltrans and SamTrans are responsible for Clean Water Act compliance.

"If we have information about encampments occurring on private property, we can investigate this further in regard to the monitoring (of) nonpoint source pollution or potential Clean Water Act violations," she said.

Caltrans is the largest property owner. The agency purchased about 47 acres in the Triangle for about $350,000 as part of 200 acres of wetlands on both sides of the bay for constructing the Dumbarton Bridge. The purchase was to offset loss of wetlands and tidal marsh taken for the bridge approaches, according to a 1988 mitigation report analysis of San Francisco Bay tideland restoration projects by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.

Caltrans further noted its responsibility last week.

"It, in part, compensates and provides habitat in perpetuity for the salt marsh harvest mouse and other various animals that would use the habitat," Caltrans District 4 said in an email through spokesman Alejandro Lopez.

As for what Caltrans is doing to protect its property from human habitation, fire, ecosystem degradation and nonpoint source pollution, Lopez said the site is not being cleaned during the coronavirus pandemic so that Caltrans' workers are not put in danger.

He did not respond to follow-up questions about why Caltrans allowed the encampments on its property far prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, nor did Caltrans respond to a question regarding the department's requirements for cleanup under the Clean Water Act and compliance with the Statewide Storm Water Permit and Waste Discharge requirements. The statewide 2015-19 Trash Provisions of the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California sets forth requirements for Caltrans to prevent significant trash discharge that could impact waterways through storm runoff.

An encampment in the open, protected area near Bayfront Expressway in Menlo Park as seen on June 29. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

On Feb. 13, 2019, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board voted unanimously to approve a "cease and desist" order against Caltrans to speed up trash removal through the year 2026 from 8,800 identified acres or face $25,000-a-day fines. Caltrans must also address trash in its other locations, identified by visual assessments to be conducted through 2030, according to the order. It's not clear if the Triangle is among the identified acreage.

In a January 2019 letter to the San Francisco Bay Regional Quality Control Board regarding the order, environmental advocates San Francisco Baykeeper noted the reticence of public enforcement agencies to clash with social welfare issues:

"There is currently little incentive for Caltrans to enhance lines of communication with local governments or social service providers, let alone conduct cleanups of active homeless encampments — and local communities refuse to patrol or enforce illegal camping on Caltrans ROWs due to real or perceived lack of jurisdiction. In cities with the most acute homeless crises, Caltrans ROWs and urban creeks have become de-facto homeless shelters," the letter states.

"Unfortunately, homelessness lies at the heart of some of the most serious water quality issues in our region. If the Water Board is serious about trash management, and restoring or reducing harm to urban creeks, permits must require greater action to compel enforcement of existing laws related to illegal camping and dumping, while increasing the availability of social services and coordination with providers."

Keith Lichten, division chief for the Regional Water Quality Control Board's watershed management division, said the agency issues water-discharge permits that require trash control. The permits allow municipalities, industries and agencies to drain water through storm drains and pumping during rains or the course of their operations. The permits give the control board leverage for the permitees to manage their trash and hazardous waste.

An encampment is surrounded by tall foliage in the open area bordered by Bayfront Expressway, University Avenue and Willow Road in Menlo Park on June 29. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

When it comes to addressing homeless populations, the water board is looking to collaborate with agencies and city staff. Lichten said his agency is working collaboratively with Menlo Park to address the issue. The problem is not isolated to Menlo Park but stretches throughout the Bay Area, he said. Some cities are taking creative approaches.

"The city of Oakland looked at a combination of leased land, Caltrans property and the Kaiser Convention Center to create community cabins," he said. The city offers limited services such as portable toilets and washing stations and works with nonprofit organizations to provide services.

East Palo Alto has addressed one aspect of homelessness by using a municipal location for a "safe parking" program where people in recreational vehicles receive vouchers to discharge their waste tanks at a legitimate station, and have access to portable toilets, showers and social service programs to find housing and address other needs. The program helped reduce thousands of gallons of waste and trash from the street and storm drain.

In Menlo Park, Coffman said a coordinated homeless outreach has been ongoing by multiple agencies and is conducted several times each week with the goal of connecting them to support services and resources to get them into stable housing.

Taylor, Menlo Park's mayor, said the new subcommittee on the Triangle includes herself, Councilman Ray Mueller, city staff, Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, the Menlo Park Fire Protection District and nonprofit service providers, including the county Health Department, Ravenswood Family Clinic, Project WeHope, LifeMoves and pastors from local churches.

On Monday, the subcommittee met to discuss ways to protect the environment and the health and safety of the encampment dwellers. Members hope to streamline communication regarding dangerous situations so that first responders and firefighters can gain easy access. Potentially, they might add amenities such as wash stations and portable toilets as short-term solutions, she said.

"My goal is to have no one living there at the end of the year. Where they would live is a big question," Taylor said in a phone interview on Tuesday.

Schapelhouman, who said he is always concerned about the safety of the encampment dwellers and surrounding community, said on Tuesday that he is pleased with the direction the new subcommittee is taking.

"There are more resources dedicated to this than anything I've ever seen. But what does that translate to? At some point talk needs to stop and action needs to take over," he said. "At the end of the day, it's a fire risk; it's a life-safety risk."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Fires point to risky conditions in Ravenswood Triangle

Homeless encampments threaten protected areas, endangered species

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 6:59 am
Updated: Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 2:05 pm

The brown and white sign along Bayfront Expressway in Menlo Park clearly describes the purpose of the open marshland: "Habitat Restoration Area — Environmentally Sensitive Area. Keep Out." But the 60-acre site known as the Ravenswood Triangle is anything but pristine. This year alone, the grass-and-marsh area, most of which is supposed to be protected habitat for endangered species, has been besieged by 23 fires. Since 2017, there have been 77 blazes, according to a report by the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

The area, which is bounded by Adams Drive, Willow Road, Bayfront Expressway and University Avenue, is littered with debris: mounds of rusting bicycle parts, tires, toilet paper, discarded clothing, boxes, makeshift tents of cardboard, wood and plastic, and other detritus of human habitation. Pit toilets filled with human waste dot the green reeds and tall, tawny grasses hide trip wires that guard the entrance into the approximately 30 illegal homeless encampments, some hidden among shrubs and others dotting the landscape with bright blue tarps and flapping sheets of plastic.

Cars whizzed by on bustling Bayfront Expressway to the Dumbarton Bridge, down University Avenue and up Willow Road on May 22 as firefighters worked hotspots from a 10-acre fire. A flock of geese poked their heads up out of the reeds, watching intently as crews in yellow vests doused the smoke with hoses and a dozer cut fire breaks to prevent future fires from spreading quickly.

Offices and businesses at the Menlo Business Park, just steps away, abut the Triangle, and just beyond them are homes. Black scars across the land showed how close the flames came to licking the sides of the warehouses and buildings.

Commuters stuck in traffic get a ringside seat to the happenings in the marsh, but few likely know about the area's protected status and the pollution that seeps into the ground or that mingles with rainwater during winter storms and is carried away into San Francisco Bay. Pumps drain the area to keep it from flooding the business park — a concession after a long legal battle to protect the park from flooding during the storms.

The pollution being generated at the Triangle is a direct violation of the federal Clean Water Act, which prohibits so-called nonpoint source pollution — pollution that can enter waterways and storm drains from non-industrial sources where the point of discharge is more diffuse and not from a specific source such as a business.

But who takes responsibility for the mess and environmental degradation — and the safety of the homeless, whom fire officials fear could be injured or killed in a fast-moving fire?

Menlo Park fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman has been trying to get answers. The property is a patchwork of ownership and easements, among them San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SamTrans), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Pacific Gas & Electric, Facebook and the Kavanaugh-O'Brien tract.

The number of fires has been rising over the past few years, according to a May report from the fire district on the "Encampment Area on Bayfront from Willow, to University Ave." In 2017, the area had four fires. There were 19 blazes in 2018 and 31 in 2019.

About six weeks ago, Menlo Park Mayor Cecilia Taylor convened a subcommittee to address the issue after the May 22 blaze threatened nearby commercial structures. Finding solutions isn't easy, however. The Triangle and its homeless encampments are a thorny issue, said leaders of environmental groups.

The welfare of wildlife and the health of Baylands ecosystems is pitted against the very real human needs of people who have become homeless mainly due to a lack of affordable and low-income housing, health and mental health issues. As one environmental advocate put it, no one wants to simply kick the homeless out with no place for them to go.

Yet, their continued presence is compromising the health of the estuary and violating federal law. The site is not only within the boundary of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's wildlife recovery for the protected salt marsh harvest mouse and the California (Ridgway's) clapper rail, it is also adjacent to the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. The Triangle's wetlands, now mostly dry, are fed by the Ravenswood Slough, which is connected to San Francisco Bay and adjacent wetlands areas.

Rhonda Coffman, Menlo Park deputy community development director, said in an email that public agencies such as Caltrans and SamTrans are responsible for Clean Water Act compliance.

"If we have information about encampments occurring on private property, we can investigate this further in regard to the monitoring (of) nonpoint source pollution or potential Clean Water Act violations," she said.

Caltrans is the largest property owner. The agency purchased about 47 acres in the Triangle for about $350,000 as part of 200 acres of wetlands on both sides of the bay for constructing the Dumbarton Bridge. The purchase was to offset loss of wetlands and tidal marsh taken for the bridge approaches, according to a 1988 mitigation report analysis of San Francisco Bay tideland restoration projects by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.

Caltrans further noted its responsibility last week.

"It, in part, compensates and provides habitat in perpetuity for the salt marsh harvest mouse and other various animals that would use the habitat," Caltrans District 4 said in an email through spokesman Alejandro Lopez.

As for what Caltrans is doing to protect its property from human habitation, fire, ecosystem degradation and nonpoint source pollution, Lopez said the site is not being cleaned during the coronavirus pandemic so that Caltrans' workers are not put in danger.

He did not respond to follow-up questions about why Caltrans allowed the encampments on its property far prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, nor did Caltrans respond to a question regarding the department's requirements for cleanup under the Clean Water Act and compliance with the Statewide Storm Water Permit and Waste Discharge requirements. The statewide 2015-19 Trash Provisions of the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California sets forth requirements for Caltrans to prevent significant trash discharge that could impact waterways through storm runoff.

On Feb. 13, 2019, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board voted unanimously to approve a "cease and desist" order against Caltrans to speed up trash removal through the year 2026 from 8,800 identified acres or face $25,000-a-day fines. Caltrans must also address trash in its other locations, identified by visual assessments to be conducted through 2030, according to the order. It's not clear if the Triangle is among the identified acreage.

In a January 2019 letter to the San Francisco Bay Regional Quality Control Board regarding the order, environmental advocates San Francisco Baykeeper noted the reticence of public enforcement agencies to clash with social welfare issues:

"There is currently little incentive for Caltrans to enhance lines of communication with local governments or social service providers, let alone conduct cleanups of active homeless encampments — and local communities refuse to patrol or enforce illegal camping on Caltrans ROWs due to real or perceived lack of jurisdiction. In cities with the most acute homeless crises, Caltrans ROWs and urban creeks have become de-facto homeless shelters," the letter states.

"Unfortunately, homelessness lies at the heart of some of the most serious water quality issues in our region. If the Water Board is serious about trash management, and restoring or reducing harm to urban creeks, permits must require greater action to compel enforcement of existing laws related to illegal camping and dumping, while increasing the availability of social services and coordination with providers."

Keith Lichten, division chief for the Regional Water Quality Control Board's watershed management division, said the agency issues water-discharge permits that require trash control. The permits allow municipalities, industries and agencies to drain water through storm drains and pumping during rains or the course of their operations. The permits give the control board leverage for the permitees to manage their trash and hazardous waste.

When it comes to addressing homeless populations, the water board is looking to collaborate with agencies and city staff. Lichten said his agency is working collaboratively with Menlo Park to address the issue. The problem is not isolated to Menlo Park but stretches throughout the Bay Area, he said. Some cities are taking creative approaches.

"The city of Oakland looked at a combination of leased land, Caltrans property and the Kaiser Convention Center to create community cabins," he said. The city offers limited services such as portable toilets and washing stations and works with nonprofit organizations to provide services.

East Palo Alto has addressed one aspect of homelessness by using a municipal location for a "safe parking" program where people in recreational vehicles receive vouchers to discharge their waste tanks at a legitimate station, and have access to portable toilets, showers and social service programs to find housing and address other needs. The program helped reduce thousands of gallons of waste and trash from the street and storm drain.

In Menlo Park, Coffman said a coordinated homeless outreach has been ongoing by multiple agencies and is conducted several times each week with the goal of connecting them to support services and resources to get them into stable housing.

Taylor, Menlo Park's mayor, said the new subcommittee on the Triangle includes herself, Councilman Ray Mueller, city staff, Caltrans, the California Highway Patrol, the Menlo Park Fire Protection District and nonprofit service providers, including the county Health Department, Ravenswood Family Clinic, Project WeHope, LifeMoves and pastors from local churches.

On Monday, the subcommittee met to discuss ways to protect the environment and the health and safety of the encampment dwellers. Members hope to streamline communication regarding dangerous situations so that first responders and firefighters can gain easy access. Potentially, they might add amenities such as wash stations and portable toilets as short-term solutions, she said.

"My goal is to have no one living there at the end of the year. Where they would live is a big question," Taylor said in a phone interview on Tuesday.

Schapelhouman, who said he is always concerned about the safety of the encampment dwellers and surrounding community, said on Tuesday that he is pleased with the direction the new subcommittee is taking.

"There are more resources dedicated to this than anything I've ever seen. But what does that translate to? At some point talk needs to stop and action needs to take over," he said. "At the end of the day, it's a fire risk; it's a life-safety risk."

Comments

resident
Menlo Park
on Jul 10, 2020 at 10:10 am
resident, Menlo Park
on Jul 10, 2020 at 10:10 am
12 people like this

Are there any homeless shelters in this part of San Mateo County that can help these people? I don't think we can morally or legally move kick the people out of this location when there is nowhere for them to go.


Dorm-style housing for homeless.
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 10, 2020 at 12:09 pm
Dorm-style housing for homeless., Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 10, 2020 at 12:09 pm
4 people like this

What about dorm-style housing for homeless? It is better than a tent. The way they are living now is not safe for them or the community.

Super small units with a small bathroom, fold up beds and compact kitchen for minor cooking all in one room. My daughter lived in something like this for a while.

It had safe running water and restroom facilities, heat, a comfortable bed, and a locked door so she could sleep safely and soundly. We can do this.


Heidi Schwenk
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 10, 2020 at 1:30 pm
Heidi Schwenk, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 10, 2020 at 1:30 pm
5 people like this

I am so glad to finally read PA Weekly’s article about the Ravenswood Triangle. There have been many articles about the issues but none about who is responsible for the land or helping the socially disenfranchised people who call
It home! The Menlo Park Fire Fighters have been the only organization responding during crisis.

I hope the Menlo Park Mayor and establishment speaks to the San Jose Mayor and establishment soon, to find out about the portable housing CA State helped them construct for the socially disenfranchised people in San Jose.

How about the old Toys R Us parking lot in Redwood City for a convenient portable housing site?


Janice
another community
on Jul 10, 2020 at 5:07 pm
Janice, another community
on Jul 10, 2020 at 5:07 pm
7 people like this

Heidi, I'm sure the neighboring Kohl's would be just thrilled (not!) to have a homeless encampment right next to their parking lot. A better choice might be the giant parking lot of the now-dead Kmart next door, which is a standalone lot.


Jennifer
another community
on Jul 10, 2020 at 8:33 pm
Jennifer, another community
on Jul 10, 2020 at 8:33 pm
4 people like this

I will always have compassion for the homeless. Homeless people are people too.


ALB
College Terrace
on Jul 11, 2020 at 9:50 am
ALB, College Terrace
on Jul 11, 2020 at 9:50 am
2 people like this

This challenge to help find homeless people alternative shelter is staggering but not impossible. Thank you Sue Dremann for this informative and important piece. One poster suggests that the committee with Mayor Cecelia Taylor reach out to the Mayor of San Jose regarding how San Jose is addressing homelessness. Why not cast the net wider and see how Mayor London Breed's program is working. I do not think that Menlo Park would embrace having some of the hotels' rooms be allowed for homeless people but why not look into what SF is doing. The Triangle is beyond a crisis on all levels. I know with research and imagination these social and environmental issues can be addressed.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 11, 2020 at 10:24 am
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 11, 2020 at 10:24 am
Like this comment

The KMART lot is blocked off and it is now in conversion to it's next end use. It has been bought and it's end use has been approved by Redwood City. You are making assumptions about how other cities are managing their growth.


Online Name
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jul 13, 2020 at 11:08 am
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jul 13, 2020 at 11:08 am
2 people like this

The Menlo Park fire chief has long been warning about the problems impeding response while Palo Alto merely virtue-signals. Given the jurisdictional disputes, maybe ABAG can do something useful for a change and coordinate a response to this rather than constantly pushing for more expensive housing that will cause more homelessness and cause more congestion that will delay emergency responses?


Anon
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 14, 2020 at 8:32 am
Anon, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 14, 2020 at 8:32 am
1 person likes this

Posted by Online Name, a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland

>> The Menlo Park fire chief has long been warning about the problems impeding response

Wasn't there another fire yesterday afternoon? I did not see it in the news. But, I guess with so many fires in the area, what is one more or less.


Alex
Menlo Park
on Jul 28, 2020 at 11:00 am
Alex , Menlo Park
on Jul 28, 2020 at 11:00 am
4 people like this

Ok, so let me get this straight. If I drop a plastic wrapper on the ground in theory i can receive a ticket for littering. How are these people able to trash a protected habitat area with mountains of debris and human excrement? Even if shelters are available some prefer the freedom to come and go as they please and they are able to use drugs. Mental health is no joke, hope nobody gets hurt or dies in the next fire coming shortly.....


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.