Palo Alto boosts affordable-housing project with $10.5 million loan | News | Palo Alto Online |

News


Palo Alto boosts affordable-housing project with $10.5 million loan

City Council's approval of loan raises city's funding of 59-unit project to $20.5 million

With affordable housing in short supply, Palo Alto offered a $10.5-million lifeline on Jan. 13 to a 59-unit residential development known as Wilton Court.

The development at 3705 El Camino Real, which will consist entirely of below-market-rate units, won the City Council's unanimous approval a year ago, becoming the first affordable-housing project that the city approved since 2013 (the zone change that would have enabled the 2013 project was subsequently overturned in a citizen referendum). The council also voted last June to loan $10 million to Palo Alto Housing, the nonprofit developer behind Wilton Court.

Since then, however, the project has encountered numerous financial hurdles. According to a report from the Department of Planning and Development Services, the project received $2.8 million from Santa Clara County's Intellectual and Development Disabilities Housing Funds, $1.2 million shy of the $4 million that Palo Alto Housing had applied for. It also failed to receive a $10 million state grant that it had requested.

Given the funding shortfall for the project, which has an estimated price tag of $46.3 million, the council was asked to fill the gap. On Monday it did just that, voting unanimously to approve a $10.5-million loan for Wilton Court.

The development will target residents with incomes between 30% and 60% of area median income (for a family of two, this means income less than $70,260, according to the city). Monthly rents in the new development will range from $659 for a one-person studio to $1,442 for a one-bedroom apartment for two people.

The project also includes 21 units for adults with developmental disabilities.

The council's vote makes Palo Alto by far the largest financial contributor to the development, with a total investment of $20.5 million. Palo Alto Housing also expects to get $16.6 million in low-income housing tax credits, along with $2.8 million from the county, and $1.5 million from the state's "enhanced tax credits" program (which the nonprofit expects to secure this spring), which is geared toward "shovel-ready" projects.

In an update to the council, Palo Alto Housing noted that it has been investigating various state programs to close the funding gap.

"Due to the housing shortage and the strong demand for more affordable housing, these funding sources are oversubscribed by two and three times," the nonprofit's update states. "So, in order to even be considered, each proposed affordable housing development project must meet a hundred percent of the criteria within the applicable notices of funding."

The nonprofit was banking on $10 million from a state Housing and Community Development Department program. But with the number of projects significantly outstripping available funding, Palo Alto Housing no longer considers the program a viable source, the letter states.

The council approved the contribution on its consent calendar, as part of a list of items that get approved without discussion. It was one of several actions that the council took pertaining to the housing shortage in its first business meeting of the year, along with relaxing rules for construction of accessory-dwelling units and creating a "safe parking" program for vehicle dwellers at local churches.

Sheryl Klein, chairwoman of the Palo Alto Housing board of directors, lauded the council's action.

"It's extraordinary what they've done," Klein told the Weekly. "It's really incredible."

If the project receives the rest of its expected state funding, Palo Alto Housing plans to break ground on Wilton Court in September, Klein said.

Under the terms of the loan, the funding will be repaid after the development is built through payments made from any residual receipts beyond the project's operating expenses, according to the city.

Palo Alto's $20.5-million contribution will come primarily from "impact fees" that the city charges developers. This includes $11.7 million from commercial fees, $0.6 million in residential impact fees and $7.7 million from "residential in-lieu" fees, which are provided by housing developers who wish to avoid the city's inclusionary-zoning requirements.

The council will also consider Tuesday other programs for increasing the city's housing supply when it discusses staff's Housing Work Plan for the coming year.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

20 people like this
Posted by Greenacres
a resident of Green Acres
on Jan 17, 2020 at 5:14 pm

This is exactly what we need -- housing for low-income residents (rather than mostly luxury housing with a few low-income units cynically sprinkled in) and residents with disabilities who face difficulties getting housing at all in this town, and developed with buy in from the nearby neighbors


28 people like this
Posted by Money for Low Income Housing
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 18, 2020 at 2:01 am

There would be more money in the fund for affordable housing if Adrian Fine, Greg Tanaka, Liz Kniss, Cory Wolbach and Greg Scharff had not lowered the proposed increase in the affordable housing impact fee from office development from $60/square foot to $35/square foot. Web Link

Good thing Wolbach and Scharff are no longer on the Council. Kniss is termed out this year. Remember the efforts of Fine and Tanaka to upzone for mostly luxury housing and not focus on lower income housing if they decide to run for re-election in 2020.


24 people like this
Posted by State Funding
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 18, 2020 at 7:12 am

For all the posturing about the need for more affordable housing by Fine, what he primarily supports is market rate housing, knowing full well what this article perfectly illustrates - why more affordable isn’t built - lack of funding not lack of will.

Non - profit housing developers don’t stand a chance when competing for land against richer for profit developers, Land for Wilton Court was bought long ago by non-profit PA Housing when it was cheaper. And now it struggles to fund construction.

Money is the problem when land is so valuable and funding so sparse. The State must pass funding bills for non-profit housing developers that not restrict it to vets or homeless, but build for BMR low and very low income people.

Building market rate housing in Palo Alto with 15% BMR set aside is better than nothing but barely. And the notion of trickle down benefits to low income people coming from building lux or market rate housing is nothing but a cruel joke.

We need real affordable BMR housing with a lot of funding by the state, and sensible support by city and county. And yes - up our city commercial impact fees along the lines of the Stanford GUP. Studies show such fees do not impede development. For that Fine and Tanaka will have to change their positions and shouldn’t be re-elected if they don’t. And their majority mates, Cormack and Kniss should do likewise.


6 people like this
Posted by Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jan 18, 2020 at 9:22 am

Articles in paper about Weiner's SB 50 bill moving along in the state legislature. We can assume that our local legislatures are buddies with Weiner, as are some of our PACC members. So the promise of state funding is looming. Now is the time to capitalize on the political machinations for the Fry's site. At some point in the debate political machinations will overrule the plan go for the gold. At some point the arguments from local builder's will be overcome with a movement that directs their short and long term planning. Can we please get ahead of the curve here and do something smart. And Sobrato is in the mix of CA politicos so they can do something right. And if they don't it will not escape notice and notice to Newsome and Weiner that local industrialist ae not on-board with state requirements.


Like this comment
Posted by Barbara
a resident of Downtown North
on Jan 20, 2020 at 11:52 am

WHY? The City of Palo Alto is giving 10.5 million for this low cost housing project and creating more traffic? What happened to doing something with the Cubberley site? How much worse can it get before something is done to improve or raze and rebuild?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Los Altos's State of Mind opening NYC-inspired pizza shop in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 8,680 views

Wait, wait – we’re working on it
By Diana Diamond | 20 comments | 2,831 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,731 views

Flying: How to lower your impact
By Sherry Listgarten | 6 comments | 1,661 views

Goodbye toy stores
By Cheryl Bac | 12 comments | 1,514 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details