News

Ravenswood community weighs pace, transition of closing two elementary schools

School board set to vote in December on which campuses to merge

Parents and community members who have attended public meetings on consolidating schools in the Ravenswood City School District appear split on the pace of the closures, with some supporting the more aggressive approach of closing two schools next fall and others preferring to spread them out over two years.

The district held meetings on Saturday, Monday and Tuesday to solicit public input on shuttering two elementary schools, which staff have said is necessary to keep the district fiscally solvent in the face of steadily declining enrollment. All of Ravenswood's five elementary schools are operating at close to half capacity this year, and the district's overall enrollment is just over 2,000 students.

Brentwood Elementary School is the largest of the five elementary schools this year, with 330 students, followed by Willow Oaks (297), Belle Haven (276), Costaño (267) and Los Robles-McNair (224).

A majority of board members and interim Superintendent Gina Sudaria have voiced support for closing two schools next fall to help close a looming budget deficit. The district is aiming to cut $1.35 million from next year's budget and has identified potential cuts from legal costs, transportation spending and contracts with outside consultants.

Closing a single school represents savings of about $400,000. If the district did not close a school next year, it would face a $1.12 million deficit, Sudaria told more than 30 community members at a meeting at Ravenswood Middle School on Tuesday morning.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

"Our resources are spread too thin right now. We're stretching what we have across five elementary schools when we only have enough money to run three elementary schools," she said.

On Tuesday, some parents said they would prefer closing two schools next fall both for financial and other reasons. Doing both at once would have the biggest impact on the district's budget — saving the most money and freeing up two campuses as potential property rentals to bring in revenue — while also keeping up morale, minimizing disruptions for students and focusing staff's energy on the three remaining schools.

"Parents would rather know sooner rather than later where kids will be," one poster documenting a group's feedback from Monday's meeting reads. "Waiting may cause more kids and families to leave."

Others at past meetings, however, said that staggering the consolidations would allow the district to learn from the process, see how the students deal with the first closure and give families time to adjust. (The district has posted feedback from the meetings on a webpage on school consolidation.)

Meeting participants also discussed what factors the district should consider when deciding which schools to merge. Many said they want Ravenswood to maintain its English-Spanish dual immersion program, which is currently housed at Los Robles-Ronald McNair Elementary School.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Others mentioned student safety, traffic, school capacity, facilities (some campuses have been updated more than others), teaching quality and school performance as important elements to consider.

They also talked about factors that would ease the transition if their children's school closes or receives new students, chief among them being district leadership's clear, frequent communication with both families and staff. They also suggested holding social events, forming parent-teacher associations and "rebranding" the merged schools to avoid an "us versus them" mentality. Other ideas included incorporating student input into designing the new schools and providing transportation for students who live farther away from their new campus.

Sudaria has described the consolidation of two schools as a "tough decision" that Ravenswood wanted to avoid, but one that now presents an opportunity for the long-struggling district to revamp and strengthen the remaining campuses to attract and retain more students.

"We design our schools in such a way that families that are in the Tinsley (inter-district transfer) program come back to Ravenswood, that families who are considering leaving Ravenswood change their mind and new families that come into Ravenswood don't overlook us; they choose us first," she said on Tuesday.

Rhonda White, president of the Ravenswood Teachers Association, suggested at Tuesday's meeting that the district consider creating three magnet schools with focuses such as STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and music), visual and performing arts or dual immersion. Other participants mentioned the need for the district to consider how to prevent more students from leaving Ravenswood through the Voluntary Transfer Program (or Tinsley program) or charter schools.

At a special meeting last week, several board members said they would prefer closing two school years next fall.

"I just want to consolidate as many costs — and by costs I don't just mean monetary," President Tamara Sobomehin said. "The energy, the emotion, the anguish, the stress ... for me ... it feels like it would be easier to take it all at once."

Trustee Marielena Gaona Mendoza pressed Sudaria to be specific about the potential redesign of the remaining schools, which "sounds really, really good, but I want to know the details so I can buy into it," she said.

The district will continue to host drop-in office hours this Wednesday, Nov. 6, and Friday, Nov. 8, between 9-10 a.m. at the district office (2120 Euclid Ave., East Palo Alto) for people who couldn't attend the community meetings. An online survey is also open through this Friday.

Sudaria will summarize all of the public feedback at the Nov. 14 school board meeting in advance of making a recommendation later this month or in early December of specific schools to close. The board is set to make a final decision at its Dec. 12 meeting on which schools to shutter.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Ravenswood community weighs pace, transition of closing two elementary schools

School board set to vote in December on which campuses to merge

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Tue, Nov 5, 2019, 8:44 pm

Parents and community members who have attended public meetings on consolidating schools in the Ravenswood City School District appear split on the pace of the closures, with some supporting the more aggressive approach of closing two schools next fall and others preferring to spread them out over two years.

The district held meetings on Saturday, Monday and Tuesday to solicit public input on shuttering two elementary schools, which staff have said is necessary to keep the district fiscally solvent in the face of steadily declining enrollment. All of Ravenswood's five elementary schools are operating at close to half capacity this year, and the district's overall enrollment is just over 2,000 students.

Brentwood Elementary School is the largest of the five elementary schools this year, with 330 students, followed by Willow Oaks (297), Belle Haven (276), Costaño (267) and Los Robles-McNair (224).

A majority of board members and interim Superintendent Gina Sudaria have voiced support for closing two schools next fall to help close a looming budget deficit. The district is aiming to cut $1.35 million from next year's budget and has identified potential cuts from legal costs, transportation spending and contracts with outside consultants.

Closing a single school represents savings of about $400,000. If the district did not close a school next year, it would face a $1.12 million deficit, Sudaria told more than 30 community members at a meeting at Ravenswood Middle School on Tuesday morning.

"Our resources are spread too thin right now. We're stretching what we have across five elementary schools when we only have enough money to run three elementary schools," she said.

On Tuesday, some parents said they would prefer closing two schools next fall both for financial and other reasons. Doing both at once would have the biggest impact on the district's budget — saving the most money and freeing up two campuses as potential property rentals to bring in revenue — while also keeping up morale, minimizing disruptions for students and focusing staff's energy on the three remaining schools.

"Parents would rather know sooner rather than later where kids will be," one poster documenting a group's feedback from Monday's meeting reads. "Waiting may cause more kids and families to leave."

Others at past meetings, however, said that staggering the consolidations would allow the district to learn from the process, see how the students deal with the first closure and give families time to adjust. (The district has posted feedback from the meetings on a webpage on school consolidation.)

Meeting participants also discussed what factors the district should consider when deciding which schools to merge. Many said they want Ravenswood to maintain its English-Spanish dual immersion program, which is currently housed at Los Robles-Ronald McNair Elementary School.

Others mentioned student safety, traffic, school capacity, facilities (some campuses have been updated more than others), teaching quality and school performance as important elements to consider.

They also talked about factors that would ease the transition if their children's school closes or receives new students, chief among them being district leadership's clear, frequent communication with both families and staff. They also suggested holding social events, forming parent-teacher associations and "rebranding" the merged schools to avoid an "us versus them" mentality. Other ideas included incorporating student input into designing the new schools and providing transportation for students who live farther away from their new campus.

Sudaria has described the consolidation of two schools as a "tough decision" that Ravenswood wanted to avoid, but one that now presents an opportunity for the long-struggling district to revamp and strengthen the remaining campuses to attract and retain more students.

"We design our schools in such a way that families that are in the Tinsley (inter-district transfer) program come back to Ravenswood, that families who are considering leaving Ravenswood change their mind and new families that come into Ravenswood don't overlook us; they choose us first," she said on Tuesday.

Rhonda White, president of the Ravenswood Teachers Association, suggested at Tuesday's meeting that the district consider creating three magnet schools with focuses such as STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and music), visual and performing arts or dual immersion. Other participants mentioned the need for the district to consider how to prevent more students from leaving Ravenswood through the Voluntary Transfer Program (or Tinsley program) or charter schools.

At a special meeting last week, several board members said they would prefer closing two school years next fall.

"I just want to consolidate as many costs — and by costs I don't just mean monetary," President Tamara Sobomehin said. "The energy, the emotion, the anguish, the stress ... for me ... it feels like it would be easier to take it all at once."

Trustee Marielena Gaona Mendoza pressed Sudaria to be specific about the potential redesign of the remaining schools, which "sounds really, really good, but I want to know the details so I can buy into it," she said.

The district will continue to host drop-in office hours this Wednesday, Nov. 6, and Friday, Nov. 8, between 9-10 a.m. at the district office (2120 Euclid Ave., East Palo Alto) for people who couldn't attend the community meetings. An online survey is also open through this Friday.

Sudaria will summarize all of the public feedback at the Nov. 14 school board meeting in advance of making a recommendation later this month or in early December of specific schools to close. The board is set to make a final decision at its Dec. 12 meeting on which schools to shutter.

Comments

Mark Dinan
Registered user
East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 9:21 am
Mark Dinan, East Palo Alto
Registered user
on Nov 6, 2019 at 9:21 am
5 people like this

I appreciate the strong leadership shown by Acting School Superintendent Gina Sudaria, Ronda White from the teachers union, and the newly invigorated School Board. This is something that should have happened years ago, and consolidating school sites is a common sense and practical solution to the fiscal issues plaguing the district. I especially appreciate White's idea of creating magnet schools to attract the many students currently heading out of district via the Tinsley Program, private schools, and charter schools. Actions like these give me and many other community members increased confidence in the leadership of RCSD.


Fernando
East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Fernando, East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 4:02 pm
2 people like this

When you’re in a death spiral, you don’t prolong the agony. 50% or less capacity for five schools = closing two schools ASAP. ASAP in education is the next school year. Affected credentialed personnel need to be notified on March 15th of the intent to lay-off and May 15th of the final layoff. Of course, Ms. White is interested in saving jobs not about facing the fiscal realities. Ravenswood has been crushed by Charter School expansion for years and is now at the point where it can’t effectively afford to run a public school system. The District is the poster child for the ills on California education! Sad.


What a Waste!
East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 6:06 pm
What a Waste!, East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 6:06 pm
4 people like this

I heard that as part of the union contracts Gina gave 2,000 dollars to each employee who returned to work this year. There a lot of employees at the district so I ask myself, why did she do that,when she new the budget was bad. All the money she used on that should have been given to the parents if they brought back the students to Ravenswood District. This is why all employees love her and want her as superintendent. That was a waste of money that they do not have.


Dear What a waste
East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 9:16 pm
Dear What a waste, East Palo Alto
on Nov 6, 2019 at 9:16 pm
3 people like this

Do you happen to know the difference in pay between a Ravenswood teacher and those 5 miles away? Hint ... it is NOT a $2,000 difference.

If it weren’t for my EPA love I’d be working 3 miles from my house for $20,000+ more and an hour shorter on my commute. (Yes, I meant all those zeros)

Trust when people tell you it is NOT for the money.


Gus L.
Barron Park
on Nov 7, 2019 at 5:10 pm
Gus L., Barron Park
on Nov 7, 2019 at 5:10 pm
Like this comment

Perhaps they are planning on closing the schools(Just as Palo Alto did) to sell off the property to Real Estate buddies and profit from it?
Years from now they will kick themselves in the arse for selling the schools.
Now every Palo Alto school has Temporary buildings to accommodate the kids.


Not Selling
East Palo Alto
on Nov 7, 2019 at 8:51 pm
Not Selling, East Palo Alto
on Nov 7, 2019 at 8:51 pm
Like this comment

They’ve said in meetings they will not sell. Only lease for money. They will still own the space. They seem to be thinking long term.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.