Menlo Park woman sentenced to three weeks in prison for role in college admissions scam | News | Palo Alto Online |


Menlo Park woman sentenced to three weeks in prison for role in college admissions scam

Marjorie Klapper had claimed her Caucasian son was black or Latino

A 50-year-old entrepreneur from Menlo Park who fraudulently claimed her son was black or Latino on college applications was ordered to pay a $9,500 fine and spend three weeks in prison, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Boston announced Wednesday.

Marjorie Klapper also received one year of supervised release and must perform 250 hours of community service, U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani ordered during a hearing Wednesday afternoon in Boston, Massachusetts. Klapper pleaded guilty on May 24 to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. She is the second Midpeninsula resident to be sentenced for taking part in the nationwide Operation Varsity Blues scam, in which 52 people have been indicted.

Federal authorities have brought charges against 33 parents, who under the direction of college admissions counselor William "Rick" Singer, bribed college admissions test proctors to correct their children's exams or paid for the creation of false resumes purporting athletic achievements so the applicants could be accepted into top colleges and universities under recruiting programs. Some coaches also received bribes.

Federal prosecutors were disappointed in Klapper's sentence. They had asked for four months in prison, one year of supervised release and a $20,000 fine.

"This defendant paid $15,000 to arrange for her son to cheat on the ACT and then falsely claimed on his college applications that he was Black or Latino. Ms. Klapper thereby not only corrupted the standardized testing system, but also specifically victimized the real minority applicants already fighting for admission to elite schools. We respectfully disagree that a three-week sentence is a sufficient sanction for this misconduct," U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Andrew Lelling said in a press release.

Beginning in 2017, Klapper, co-owner of jewelry business M&M Bling, conspired with Singer and others to have her son's ACT exam corrected and score inflated. She helped secure extended time for her son to take the ACT and to take the exam at a test center in West Hollywood that Singer controlled through the center's administrator, Igor Dvorskiy, the U.S. Attorney's Office said.

Klapper's son completed the exam on Oct. 28, 2017. Co-conspirator and test proctor Mark Riddell corrected his answers that resulted in a score of 30 out of 36. In November 2017, Klapper made a purported charitable donation of $15,000 to Singer's sham charity, The Key Worldwide Foundation, to pay for the fraud, prosecutors said.

Klapper also conspired with Singer to falsify her son's college applications by claiming that he was either of African American or Hispanic/Latino origin to improve his odds of admission by claiming minority status, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. She also falsely represented that neither she nor her husband had attended college in order to improve her son's college prospects.

The Menlo Park woman originally faced 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000 or double the amount gained or lost, according to federal prosecutors.

Seven other parents who faced the same charges have received prison sentences ranging from two weeks to five months. Peter Jan Sartorio, 53, also of Menlo Park, was sentenced on Oct. 11 by Talwani to one year of probation, 250 hours of community service and a $9,500 fine for his role in the scandal. Hollywood actress Felicity Huffman, 56, received a two-week sentence and a $30,000 fine (media reports indicate she began serving her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution, a low-security facility in Dublin, on Tuesday); Gregory Abbott, 68, a New York beverage business executive, and Marcia Abbott, 59, a former fashion editor at Family Circle, each received a one-month prison sentence and $45,000 fine; and Gordon Caplan, 53, a Connecticut attorney, received a month in prison and a $50,000 fine. All of their sentences include a year of supervised release and 250 hours of community service.

The heftiest sentences thus far have gone to Napa vintner Agustin Huneeus Jr., 53, who was sentenced to five months in prison and issued a $100,000 fine, two years of supervised release and 500 hours of community service; and Los Angeles business executive Devin Sloane, 53, who received four months in prison, two years of supervised probation, 500 hours of community service and a $95,000 fine.

Former Stanford University head sailing coach John Vandemoer, 41, of Palo Alto, pleaded guilty on March 12 to conspiracy to commit racketeering after accepting $800,000 in bribes for athletics programs to place students on the sailing team. He was sentenced to one day of incarceration, which he already served prior to the court hearing; two years of supervised release, with the first six months to be served in home detention; and a $10,000 fine.

The cases of other local parents continue to make their way through the federal court system.

Davina Isackson, 55, of Hillsborough, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. Her husband, Bruce Isackson, 61, pleaded guilty to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, money laundering conspiracy and conspiracy to defraud the United States. The couple's pleas were entered on May 1; sentencing hearings for them have not been scheduled.

Palo Alto residents Amy Colburn, 59, and Gregory Colburn, 61, are fighting the indictments and filed motions to dismiss the cases against them on April 15. They are each charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud and money laundering conspiracy.

Atherton residents Elizabeth and Manuel Henriquez, both 56, have each pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud and money laundering conspiracy.

On April 29, Mill Valley resident William McGlashan, 55, formerly of Palo Alto, and Marci Palatella, 56, of Hillsborough, also pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud and money laundering conspiracy.

McGlashan, Palatella, the Colburns and the Henriquezes are all scheduled for status conferences in court on Jan. 17.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


6 people like this
Posted by resident
a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 17, 2019 at 7:35 am

Did she really think being black or Latino was some kind of advantage in the Trump era?

20 people like this
Posted by Shawn
a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 17, 2019 at 8:01 am

3 weeks.????? What a joke.

17 people like this
Posted by Barron Park dad
a resident of Barron Park
on Oct 17, 2019 at 9:44 am

Why is the judge handing out so many mere slaps-on-the-wrist? Doesn't seem right.

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Oct 17, 2019 at 9:51 am

^ Housing crisis. Need more below-market-rate jails.

24 people like this
Posted by mauricio
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08 am

mauricio is a registered user.

I can only imagine the length of her prison sentence if she were actually Black or Latino.

7 people like this
Posted by melpomene
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 17, 2019 at 11:25 am

These people should be ashamed of themselves. How disrespectful and shameful to claim to be a person of color when they come from the privileged heights of whiteness. What I want to know is if their kids are even talking to them any more. How mortifying for them.

15 people like this
Posted by Not a crook?
a resident of another community
on Oct 17, 2019 at 12:07 pm

And what about the Stanford sailing coach John Vandemoer who accepted $800,000 in bribes for athletics programs.
He gets off with a 10,000 fine and a slap on the wrist.
And *one* day in jail.
Where is the rest of the money?

5 people like this
Posted by Gale Johnson
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Oct 17, 2019 at 12:54 pm

Gale Johnson is a registered user.

Look at the smirk on her face! Disgusting!

14 people like this
Posted by wander3r
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 17, 2019 at 12:56 pm

wander3r is a registered user.

@Not a Crook, it was my understanding that Stanford coach John Vandemoer received a much lighter sentence because he was the only one of the defendants not to take any money for himself personally. Yes, there was a bribe, but it went toward his program not to his pockets. Apparently, all of the others who received bribes pocketed the / some money. And I think he immediately copped to his crime, which probably helped his cause as well.

1 person likes this
Posted by DT North
a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 17, 2019 at 2:17 pm

Out of curiosity, honest question for someone who is in the know - what is the percentage “black or Latino” you should be to put this? I am about 1/3 sometimes put it sometimes not on various surveys (not college admissions!) , I honestly thought since affirmative action supposedly is no longer a thing it doesn’t really matter except for some survey somewhere?

Like this comment
Posted by os123
a resident of Portola Valley
on Oct 17, 2019 at 3:57 pm

[Post removed.]

1 person likes this
Posted by Tsk
a resident of Downtown North
on Oct 18, 2019 at 3:06 am

I read in another article that Klapper claimed her son has learning disabilities and seizures so her rationalization was that she “wanted him to feel normal.” Smells fishy.

How come no articles state which college he was applying to?

The ACT and SAT should use special paper that detects if answers have been changed, or have some machine that can detect it. Should not be difficult to do. Allow for a certain amount of changes only or disqualify the test if too many. Students have to work fast anyway so they don’t have much time to change their answers. Plus, they will know they have to be sure before marking the answer. Easy fix.

2 people like this
Posted by Kristin
a resident of Ventura
on Oct 25, 2019 at 12:17 am

I am shocked anyone in this received any prison time at all. Have any of the admissions persons involved in this had any charges brought against them? What of them?! They, in any honest argument, are the real criminals. These parents risked committing not only a sin but a crime to better their child(ren)'s chance at life. By the way, I not only know NO one of these people not even remotely, I am not a parent. The Holier-Than-Thou's on this comment board is what is truly shameful to me, I get a sense of sour grapes from some of you. Hatred for "the rich". It was an unpopular chant uttered by Communists during Lenin. Why do the dogs return to that vomit?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Anne Le Ziblatt, formerly of Tamarine and Bong Su, is back with a Vietnamese noodle bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,895 views

Truth Matters (and so does good beer)
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,531 views

You Can Help: Scents and Migraines
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,420 views

Can you Pay to Reduce your Carbon Footprint?
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 1,417 views

The E.R.A. – no real equality yet. Why not?
By Diana Diamond | 15 comments | 1,110 views