Palo Alto looks to restore, spruce up new Foothills Park site | News | Palo Alto Online |


Palo Alto looks to restore, spruce up new Foothills Park site

City plan calls for three-phased approach to add native species, benches and tables

The 7.7-acre portion of Foothills Park that the council annexed to the park in 2014 currently includes a nursery, which is maintained by Grassroots Ecology. Weekly file photo by Gennady Sheyner.

Foothills Park is widely considered one of Palo Alto's most pristine treasures, but the latest addition to the exclusive park has been a magnet for nature lovers.

Since city officials agreed to open a recently annexed portion of the park last November, park rangers have observed about 10 park visitors per day at the 7.7-acre site near Buckeye Creek, according to a new report from Daren Anderson, division manager for open space, parks and golf in the city's Community Services Department.

Visitors typically enjoy a brief walk and often explore the native plant nursery at the site, according to Anderson's report.

The site, which the city has owned since 1981, was rediscovered by the City Council in 2012, when a neighbor, billionaire developer John Arrillaga, offered to buy it. In August 2014, the council approved an ordinance dedicating a 7.7-acre site as parkland, consistent with the wishes of Russell L. Lee, who gave the land to the city as a gift.

Since then, city staff, council members and the Parks and Recreation Commission have been trying to figure out how to enhance the site and make it more attractive to visitors. The latest plan, which the commission will consider Tuesday, calls for enhancing Buckeye Creek, gradually restoring the natural habitat and adding a walking loop, benches and picnic tables at the site.

The new plan, Anderson's report states, "allows for improvement and preservation of habitat for plant, animal, insect and reptile species, as well as the enjoyment and education of park visitors."

The plan calls for achieving these goals in three phases, starting with the restoration of the riparian habitat at the creek site. Some of that work has already begun, according to the report. Grassroots Ecology, a nonprofit that maintains a plant nursery at the site, has been engaging volunteers in removing invasive species and planting native species since 2013. The nonprofit has also been installing willow stakes in Buckeye Creek to help control erosion along the creek banks and create valuable habitat for insects and birds, according to Anderson.

The first phase of the plan includes removing invasive species and eucalyptus trees, spreading creek sediment that is currently piled at the banks of the creek and adding compost and mulch to the area closest to the creek and the nursery. The soil amendment is expected to increase the soil's carbon sequestration and permeability, according to Anderson. This, he wrote, will "increase the likelihood of natural recruitment and survivability of planted native species."

The city also plans to install a loop trail, marked with tree limbs and other natural features, park benches and an interpretive sign during this phase.

Restoration of the habitats would continue in the second phase, with the city planning to gradually remove eucalyptus trees and plant valley oaks. The restoration would occur over eight years and take place in three gradual steps, each focusing on a particular restoration area within the site. Volunteers will be invited to help install oaks, acorns and shrubs throughout the site, in natural groupings, the report states.

The third phase will focus on "creating spaces for the community to comfortably use and learn within the 7.7-acre area," according to the report. This will include installing "aesthetically pleasing planting areas," two additional benches and one picnic table.

Consistent with prior direction from the council and the commission, the plan calls for retaining the Foothills Park as a passive space for enjoying nature. When the city had initially annexed the site, some suggested using it for a dog park or camping grounds.

At the same time, the city is continuing to explore its options for the creek, which has been a subject of a recent study by the engineering firm ENGO.

The firm had recommended creating a new floodplain at the 7.7-acre site to "dissipate peak flows" by lowering portions of the parcel next to the creek. It also recommended building a new channel in an existing meadow to capture some of the creek's flow, minimizing erosion.

The council has not approved the funding to implement the plan, which is expected to cost about $9.5 million, though staff had indicated it will seek grant funding for the creek work.

The Parks and Recreation Commission will discuss the plan at its meeting on Tuesday at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Foothill fan
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 27, 2019 at 11:14 am

Just a note that neither of the photos in this story are of the new 7.7 acre area. It's pretty misleading to show a gorgeous, sweeping shot of the Valley and another of the road to the campgrounds and fail to show a photo of the new area. It is very different at the moment (but very worthy of enjoyment by park-goers after it's cleaned up.) Thanks for the article!

3 people like this
Posted by Gennady Sheyner
Palo Alto Weekly staff writer
on Aug 27, 2019 at 11:20 am

Gennady Sheyner is a registered user.

Thanks for the feedback, Foothill fan. We added another photo, which shows the nursery at the site.

Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 27, 2019 at 11:27 am

That top picture of Las Trampas Valley is a beautiful picture of Foothills Park, and reminds me of a weekday when the park was almost empty and my SO and I spread a blanket and took a nice nap under that tree. Thanks for posting it even if it was not the new land being discussed ... I assume something as bucolic is what the end goal is.

Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 27, 2019 at 11:29 am

Awww, now you've gone and changed it. It was photo 1 of 3

1 person likes this
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 27, 2019 at 2:16 pm

Since Arrillaga used this park designated land to store materials for his construction projects, why isn't he liable for some of this $9.5 Million for restoration?

How about converting some this into another campground available for scouts and other group youth activities?

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 27, 2019 at 3:26 pm

A year or so ago there were maps about improvements, diverting a creek and various other alterations. Nothing has been done about this work and the signs and maps have been removed. Has this been superseded by the new acquisition?

1 person likes this
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 27, 2019 at 6:35 pm

Mark Weiss is a registered user.

One of the relatives of the donors told me that the family loved music so I'm wondering about a yearly concert on the site, maybe to raise money for restoration or a related cause -- I know, sounds dissonant -- the concerts create wear.

It could be done an an environmentally sensitive way.
Maybe attendence could be limited, with a drawing for right to purchase tickets.
Shuttle buses to the event, no private cars.

Et cetera.

Bay Area Action Acterra produced a concert there a few years ago with blues singer Sister Monica and this got bad feedback for its failure to plan adequately.

We could do a lot more with music in the parks.

Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 28, 2019 at 10:12 am

Posted by Mark Weiss, a resident of Downtown North

>> We could do a lot more with music in the parks.

Sure. Personally, I think Rinconada and Mitchell Parks would be much better suited. Oh, wait ...

Let's change the name of Foothills to -Preserve- so that we can remind ourselves of its primary purpose. "Parks" are great, but, they are different from "Preserves" or "Wildernesses" or whatever. There is a different kind of music to be heard in Foothills Preserve, and you can hear it any day.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Anne Le Ziblatt, formerly of Tamarine and Bong Su, is back with a Vietnamese noodle bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,895 views

Truth Matters (and so does good beer)
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,531 views

You Can Help: Scents and Migraines
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,419 views

Can you Pay to Reduce your Carbon Footprint?
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 1,415 views

The E.R.A. – no real equality yet. Why not?
By Diana Diamond | 15 comments | 1,110 views