Will Ravenswood push back against charter school expansion?

Parents, residents urge board against displacing district school

At a packed community meeting Tuesday night, Belle Haven parents, staff and residents urged the Ravenswood school board against uprooting any district school in order to provide space for an expanding public charter school, and some trustees indicated a desire to "fight" the charter's request.

The meeting at Belle Haven Elementary School was the third of six meetings the board is holding to solicit community input on KIPP Valiant Community Prep's request for a long-term site to accommodate its growing enrollment. Public school districts are required under state Proposition 39 to make facilities available to charter schools to ensure all students have equal access.

Speakers spoke Tuesday in defense of Belle Haven and urged the board to keep KIPP at its current location at the contiguous Brentwood and Los Robles/McNair campuses, where the charter school has used shared space since it opened in 2017. They also pressed for more concrete data and voiced frustration that no specific proposals have been offered yet, limiting what they can provide feedback on.

"It really seems like we're uprooting a flowering plant and putting we don't quite know what to put in its place," said Andy Westhall, the father of two Belle Haven students.

Board President Tamara Sobomehin stressed the importance of the community meetings as a source of information for the five board members. The trustees will decide whether Belle Haven, Brentwood, Costaño or Willow Oaks will house KIPP starting this fall — unless they agree to pursue another path forward.

"I am gathering information so when we come together we can look at the facts ... and see what we can fight," Sobomehin said, "so we can give them a proposal that truly supports our students across our entire district.

"If you give them seven classrooms, if you give them 11, if you close a school — that's all displacing our students and I don't want to do that," she said. "I want to fight but also know there's a risk. Do we go to court?"

Trustee Sharifa Wilson was more openly critical of KIPP, which along with other charters, private schools and the Voluntary Transfer Program have contributed to declining enrollment and funding in Ravenswood. Just under 2,400 students are currently enrolled in the district, down by more than 1,000 from seven years ago.

Wilson urged parents to "organize against the expansion of charter schools," which she said "see this district as a great opportunity for them to wipe out the entire public school system."

At the suggestion of a community member, Vice President Stephanie Fitch said she has reached out to trustees in the Ross Valley School District. The K-8 Marin County district last year offered a charter school fewer facilities than requested, prompting a lawsuit from the charter and bitter public controversy.

A request for more space from Bullis Charter School in the nearby Los Altos school district also sparked tensions and the school board reluctantly provided the charter room at a third elementary school.

The tension between host school districts and charter schools is playing out across the state. On Tuesday, Gov. Gavin Newsom called on State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond to create a panel to study the impact of charter school growth on district finances.

Two current Ravenswood trustees, Wilson and Ana Maria Pulido, served on the board that approved KIPP's charter in 2016. Pulido cast the sole dissenting vote. Wilson reluctantly supported the charter at the time given that the school's petition met all the necessary legal requirements, warning that "the only way that we're going to prevent the district from being eaten alive by every charter school ... is to keep moving forward, which we're doing under this new superintendent," referring to Superintendent Gloria Hernandez-Goff.

KIPP, which serves both East Palo Alto and Belle Haven students, anticipates enrolling 558 students this fall. Since securing its charter three years ago, KIPP has intended to grow each year to include eighth grade by 2021.

Maria Krauter, communications director for KIPP Bay Area Public Schools, said in a previous interview that the charter's "No. 1 preference" is for a long-term, single site where elementary and middle school students, many of them siblings, can attend school together.

Hernandez-Goff said district staff are still gathering more detailed information about school-by-school enrollment and capacity in advance of a board study session on the KIPP request scheduled for this Monday, Feb. 11, at 6 p.m. The board is set to vote on a preliminary facilities proposal at its Thursday, Feb. 14, meeting in order to meet a mandated deadline the next day. Both meetings will take place at the district office, 2120 Euclid Ave., East Palo Alto.

KIPP can respond to the preliminary proposal. The district is required to make a final facilities offer to KIPP on or before April 1.

The remaining community meetings are set for Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday. View the times and locations here.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


5 people like this
Posted by East Palo Alto employee
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 6, 2019 at 4:49 pm

The closing of a Ravenswood school and future changes are inevitable as working families are priced (pushed)out of East Palo Alto,Belle Haven & Redwood City,by big money and the housing needs of tech workers. The specific issue here is the mismanagement by current Superintendent & prior school trustees that sped up the matter. Also companies like Facebook & Google share blame as most of their service jobs are carried out by 3rd party contractors that don't pay a living wage, forcing service workers,teachers or anyone not an engineer to commute from Modesto, Stockton,Tracy just to make a living

1 person likes this
Posted by resident of EPA
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 8, 2019 at 12:04 pm

In view of substandard public schools and especially the mess that the Ravenswood school district has been in, I believe that alternatives, a healthy competition and “better” options for our students are a good thing. Therefore, I support Charter Schools.

6 people like this
Posted by Terique
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 8, 2019 at 3:20 pm

I would like to see a private university established in East Palo Alto.

One with outstanding academics & a major sports program.

This endeavor would put EPA on the national map & increase property values.

The Gates have enough money to help start one. It could even be named after them.

4 people like this
Posted by Ladamian
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 8, 2019 at 7:11 pm

> I would like to see a private university established in East Palo Alto.
One with outstanding academics & a major sports program.

Yes. It would be like Stanford but not as uppity.

The key would be getting top educators to come to EPA along with an established football & basketball coach as successful sports programs contribute greatly to university developmental aspirations.

In time, EPA could become a college town like New Haven, Cambridge & Palo Alto.

2 people like this
Posted by Ask Questions
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 8, 2019 at 8:57 pm

Dear Resident - I highly encourage you to visit these "better" charter schools. I have been HORRIFIED by what I have seen with my own eyes. When you do please ask them about teacher qualifications. Please ask them about the children that are left outside the room without supervision in the cold constantly. Please ask them about screaming at an belittling young children. Additionally, while RCSD may have some serious areas of growth I have been blown away by the exceptional instruction that I see inside each of the district school sites and the positive community of families, students and teachers. RCSD also does not kick children out - the same cannot be said for charter schools.

2 people like this
Posted by shaq
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 9, 2019 at 2:09 pm

Why won't someone financially assist or promote building a university in EPA?

The land is there & this would be the greatest redevelopment concept/project in the history of the city.

I suspect that there are 'some people' who wouldn't want to see this happen.

2 people like this
Posted by Pro-Public Schools
a resident of Mountain View
on Feb 15, 2019 at 11:29 am

Charter schools do not have publicly elected school boards, yet they are allowed to use taxpayer money. They drain resources away from vulnerable public school students and place undue burden on school districts. Repeal Prop 39!

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Chick-fil-A quietly starts delivering out of DoorDash kitchen in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 60 comments | 9,454 views

Palo Altans and their Virtue Signaling
By Sherry Listgarten | 24 comments | 2,704 views

Differentiating Grief from Clinical Depression
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 2,438 views

Halloween with grandma
By Cheryl Bac | 1 comment | 689 views

A Voter Warning from a Wise Friend
By Diana Diamond | 14 comments | 667 views