Palo Alto adopts parental-leave policy

City to offer parents six weeks off at full salary

Palo Alto took a baby step last month toward improving City Hall morale when it approved a new policy that grants employees six weeks of parental leave at full salary.

The policy, which the council approved on Dec. 10 with no discussion or objections, followed a series of meetings between then-City Manager James Keene and city employees. According to a report from the Human Resources Department, employees identified a paid parental leave policy as a "top priority of the workforce" and said that the absence of such a policy is "negatively impacting recruitment, retention and employee morale."

The new policy provides parental leave at 100 percent salary for six weeks, a period that can be supplemented with additional time, as accrued by the employee. It applies to all genders and it offers coverage for birth, adoption and foster placement.

Employees will be able to take the paid time off at any time during the 12-month period immediately following the birth, adoption or placement of a child with the employee.

The new policy will replace a prior one that aligned with federal and state laws, which provided job protection and continuation of benefits for new parents for up to 12 weeks. That policy did not, however, provide pay for employees during their leave unless they use their banked vacation time or sick leave.

Under these circumstances, the report states, employees who have not banked enough time will "find themselves making the difficult choice of taking time off without pay or returning to work sooner than desired."

The new policy, the report states, "is better than the benefit currently provided by other local government employers and is progressive in that it is gender-neutral and not impacted by the employee's marital status or sexual orientation."

Several Palo Alto employees attended the meeting to voice support for the policy, in some cases bringing their babies and toddlers along.

Elise Sbarbori, a manager in the Public Works Department, was among those who encouraged the council to support the new law. Sbarbori, who joined the city six years ago, told the council that she was shocked to learn three years ago when she was pregnant that the city has no paid-leave policy.

The lack of a policy, she said, "seemed out of step with the city I know Palo Alto to be."

"Palo Alto means a healthy city, healthy families, healthy communities. It seemed like such a strange oversight. It's incongruous with who we are."

The experience of giving birth to a son and recovering from childbirth was very difficult, both physically and emotionally, even absent any complications, Sbarbori said.

"I've seen colleagues in less fortunate circumstances return to work earlier than is recommended or be dealt a huge financial blow if there are complications or if they, their partner or the infant require additional care," Sbarbori said.

Lacey Lutes, an account representative in the Utilities Department, concurred. Lutes, who joined the city more than six years, told the council that she diligently saved all her leave time since starting her job. Then she had to use it all when she joined the Air National Guard, which required her to go through basic military training and technical training.

"When I got back, my husband and I decided to start our family and I had absolutely nothing," Lutes said.

Holding her daughter, she thanked the council for the new policy, which she said will directly impact many city employees.

"A lot of people have not been here for six-and-a-half years. This policy makes a huge difference to use," Lutes said.

According to staff, the policy provides stronger benefits than most local governments, which utilize State Disability Insurance, a program that provides up to 70 percent of salary for up to six weeks with a cap of $1,216 per week. As such, Palo Alto's new policy offers more benefits than competitor employers such as the cities of Mountain View, Redwood City, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara.

Palo Alto officials estimate that the program would cost somewhere in the $100,000 to $200,000, which would be used to backfill certain positions by hiring temporary workers or having other employees work overtime to fill in for colleagues who take parental leave. This would apply mostly to police, fire and utility positions, according to staff. The majority of positions would not need to be backfilled.

"There are also short-term productivity impacts, when people are out of office and positions are not backfilled," the Human Resources report states. "We are convinced that the positive benefits of this program outweigh that impact."


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


22 people like this
Posted by Joe
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 3, 2019 at 10:53 am

The Staff Report fails to provide the Council and the public any information about the cost and use of such a new benefit. How hard could it be for those preparing this report to list the number of employees who were on maternity leave over the past five years, the cost of the current leave benefit and the cost of the new leave benefit? It would also have been illuminating if the Staff Report had provided some sense of the number of employees who are likely to use this new leave benefit in the next five years.

City of Palo Alto Staff Reports time and again fail to deal with fundamentals—such as total cost to the City and ultimately, the taxpayers.

It’s clear that few on the City Council care about the cost of running the government. By not demanding better accounting of costs, the problem just grows yearly.

12 people like this
Posted by Ryan
a resident of University South
on Jan 3, 2019 at 12:42 pm

In regards to the Fire Department, there are many new young employees (starting familes) in the last 10 years. Also, did the city take in account that the firefighters and police are pay 1 1/2 times their hourly salary when working for the employees on paid parental leave?

11 people like this
Posted by Yes!
a resident of University South
on Jan 3, 2019 at 1:52 pm

> It applies to all genders and it offers coverage for birth, adoption and foster placement.

As a city employee who happens to be a gay male, I welcome this new provision. My partner and I have been hoping to start a family and this will allow the two of us to adopt a young child and then take an extended vacation together as a 'getting to know you' family experience.

Since we are both eligible for three-weeks paid vacations, it will be nice to take some time off for over two months. It's almost like a European vacation program!

1 person likes this
Posted by Madrone
a resident of Ventura
on Jan 3, 2019 at 5:32 pm

Madrone is a registered user.

It is long overdue to have the City of Palo Alto offer paid parental leave!!

For those Palo Alto employees that have previously worked at other companies and paid into the state disability program, it is REALLY frustrating to learn that there is NO PAID DISABILITY for City employees unless you are disabled for over 90 days! Human Resources does NOT disclose this major difference in benefits to new employees. Almost ALL public and private employers offer some type of paid leave for new parents.

It will continue to be challenging to recruit and retain quality talent to City of Palo Alto jobs given the extremely high cost of living on the Peninsula, so this new benefit program will help.

6 people like this
Posted by PA City Employee
a resident of another community
on Jan 5, 2019 at 3:01 pm

It would be nice if the City also extended this program to pet adoptions as some couples have chosen not to have children and could also use some time off to get acquainted with their animal companions.

Not so much aquatic pets like fish or caged animals but maybe in regards to pet dogs, cats, monkeys and ferrets.

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jan 5, 2019 at 3:45 pm

^ Off-topic: ferrets are a misdemeanor in Palo Alto last I heard.

6 people like this
Posted by R.Davis
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 5, 2019 at 5:34 pm

R.Davis is a registered user.

QUOTE: ^ Off-topic: ferrets are a misdemeanor in Palo Alto last I heard.

Poster is PA employee living outside of Palo Alto where ferrets are apparently OK to have as indoor pets...I guess.

Along with pot-bellied pigs, who would want a ferret roaming around the house?

5 people like this
Posted by
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 5, 2019 at 9:37 pm

“Since we are both eligible for three-weeks paid vacations, it will be nice to take some time off for over two months. It's almost like a European vacation program!”

So that’s how our tax dollars are being spent. Socialism on the horizon for the YOLOs.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Palo Alto, rejoice. Mike's Cafe is back.
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,153 views

Premarital and Couples: Musings on Life
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,548 views

Why we are Warming
By Sherry Listgarten | 27 comments | 1,406 views

Cap On? Cap Off? The Cities Respond
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,205 views

The summer bucket list
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 882 views