Community Notebook: County to hear concerns on Stanford GUP

Officials to listen to residents' demands as they negotiate development agreement

Residents will have a chance to voice their opinions on what benefits they would like to see from Stanford University's proposed expansion at a community meeting in Palo Alto this Thursday, when Santa Clara County officials will gather feedback as it begins negotiating a development agreement with the university.

County Board of Supervisors President Joe Simitian, Board Vice President Cindy Chavez and county planning staff will listen to the public's concerns on the wide-ranging plan as it negotiates with the university. Stanford is seeking the county's approval for a permit that would allow it to build up to 2.275 million square feet of academic space and 3,150 housing units or beds by 2035. The board expects to make a decision on the permit application next year.

Development agreements are two-way negotiations between the applicant, in this case Stanford, and the public agency, which in this case is Santa Clara County. The university is expected to provide certain community benefits, such as transportation, housing and schools, among many other services that could be of aid to residents, and in turn, the county will agree to certain requests made by the applicant.

In what Simitian describes as a "listening session," residents of Palo Alto will have the opportunity to voice their suggestions on possible community benefits to be included in the development agreement.

"It's a negotiation, so there's the potential to negotiate benefits for the community above what may be available through a traditional land-use process," Simitian said

The meeting comes following the unanimous Nov. 14 decision by the Palo Alto school board to approve a resolution demanding that the Board of Supervisors request Stanford to provide the district with both land and money in an effort to balance the impacts of additional district students that the expansion plan will bring. The Board of Education's requests could be benefits negotiated in the development agreement.

Stanford and county officials began discussions on the development agreement at the university's request last year.

Additionally, the county is also working with consultants to produce the Final Environmental Impact Report, though a Draft Environmental Impact Report is already available for residents to view. The university aims to use the expansion to progress the long-term growth of the school.

Simitian said that throughout the process, members of the community have come forward with ideas about what they would like to see from the development agreement. Holding the meeting in Palo Alto, as opposed to San Jose where the county's offices are located, can guide further discussions with Stanford, as officials are aware of what the community desires.

"It'll be a better and more productive conversation if we have an idea of what the community's priorities are," Simitian said.

The community meeting is scheduled for Thursday, Nov. 29, 6:30 p.m. at Palo Alto City Hall, 250 Hamilton Ave.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


18 people like this
Posted by Will the city act?
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 26, 2018 at 11:45 am

Will the city act? is a registered user.

Nice to see the school board take thoughtful, proactive and formal action to get PAUSD interests on the table (and inform the public about why/how the impacts of Stanford's plans matter)! That is exactly the kind of civic leadership we deserve from elected officials.

Can we expect City Council to take similar action? Or will they sit on their hands and leave it to regular residents, alone, to carry water for protecting Palo Alto's interests?

5 people like this
Posted by Extortion experts
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 26, 2018 at 12:40 pm

Sounds like this one of those "let's see what we can extort from the cash cow Stanford" meetings. Good financial management is not one of palo alto strong suits so they expect users to pay for their malfeasance and pipe dreams. And when you give them money...... ( remember the funds for the bike bridge?)

4 people like this
Posted by NO growth is the best benefit
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 27, 2018 at 12:17 am

The only benefit that I would like to see is that the Santa Clara board of supervisors refuse to let them build one more square foot of anything!

Stanford is smothering us with development and people. They are not a university - they are the largest real estate/development corporation in this area and they use the coverage of the university to not have to pay taxes while greedily utilizing the streets, schools, infrastructure and other amenities of our community.

They need to be stopped. They are big enough and this area doesn't have the environmental capacity to support more people. The pollution is bad, the traffic is bad, the water sources are going to get worse with global warming and we should plan to be sustainable. Stanford is so far past sustainable that they are a joke.

No more growth is the only benefit we need!

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Contemporary Indian restaurant, Ettan, headed to Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 6,237 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,481 views

Two degrees can do all that?
By Sherry Listgarten | 15 comments | 1,214 views

Is racism also a local problem?
By Diana Diamond | 41 comments | 1,206 views

Tame, Maim and Claim the Wild Sea Vegetable
By Laura Stec | 9 comments | 703 views


Register today!

‚ÄčOn Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More