News


Crucial East Palo Alto bridge on track for March opening

Structure offers access to shopping center, schools, other amenities

Electrician Sam Shelton, left, and laborer Ardulfo Duenas, right, install electrical components of a walkway with LED lighting which will line a new pedestrian overpass in East Palo Alto set to open next spring. Photo by Veronica Weber.

The two sides of East Palo Alto separated by bustling U.S. Highway 101 will soon link again for the first time in more than 60 years.

Standing on the midpoint of East Palo Alto's partially constructed bicycle and pedestrian overpass on Thursday morning, East Palo Alto Mayor Ruben Abrica and interim City Manager Sean Charpentier looked out over the columns of traffic below.

"When you are up here, you get a real feel for what a physical barrier the freeway is," Charpentier said.

But the $13 million bicycle and pedestrian bridge, which could open as soon as this March, will give residents of East Palo Alto's west side, which has virtually no amenities, access to its shopping center, schools, churches, city government, parks and open spaces. Residents on the east side, many of whom work in Palo Alto, will soon be able to bike to work and have access to libraries, parks and other local and regional attractions, he said.

The overpass is also a regional asset, Charpentier noted. Shoppers, bicylists traveling to jobs at Facebook and Google, recreational hikers and bicyclists seeking to use the Bay Trail will now have a safe route and a continuous link from the east side of the Dumbarton Bridge to downtown Palo Alto, Stanford University or Embarcadero Road. "It will be the most direct and safest route to the Caltrain station," he noted.

Looking to the future, the overpass will also provide a safe and important link for bike commuters traveling to Bay Road and the future business district.

Abrica, who was one of the founders of the city's incorporation in 1983, said the idea of a bike and pedestrian overpass was one of the early social justice issues identified by city leaders. It remained dormant for many years while the city grappled with other issues and worked to build up a tax base, but the council has been focused on making the overpass a reality for the past decade, he said.

"Our population needs to be connected on a day-to-day basis. Palo Alto doesn't have a lot of population living on the east side, but for us it is a bread-and-butter issue. And we're adding a very needed piece to these regional connections," he said.

East Palo Alto residents own fewer cars compared to the rest of San Mateo County, particularly on the city's west side, he noted. According to the city's 2014 General Use Plan Existing Conditions Report, approximately 9 percent of the city's households lack a car compared to about 6 percent countywide. The bulk of the city's rental housing is also located on the west side, and about 14 percent of renters do not own a vehicle, according to the study.

East Palo Altans already walk and bike more than the county average. Four percent of residents journey to work by bike and 4 percent walk. Countywide, 1 percent use a bicycle and 3 percent walk, according to the existing conditions report.

Abrica and Charpentier said the overpass would encourage more people — and especially students — to bike or walk to school to avoid the heavy traffic congestion going through the city. The overpass could in turn help reduce traffic congestion because fewer parents would need to drive their children from the west side to the east side of the city, which houses the city's schools.

Plus, overpass users will also have a commanding and attractive view of the mountains and baylands as they travel, a stark contrast to sitting in traffic, city officials noted.

Public Works Director Kamal Fallaha said that at 12 feet, the overpass has one of the widest surfaces to accommodate users. The 1,100-foot-long overpass uses 1,500 cubic yards of concrete and 700,000 pounds of steel. It includes a long, sweeping ramp for access from a point along West Bayshore and Newell roads on the west side and another at Clarke Avenue on city-owned property on the east side, adjacent to the Ravenswood 101 Shopping Center. The quarter-mile-long bridge is compliant with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, he said. The overpass has a gentle sloping grade to make travel smoother and expandable joints to withstand earthquakes.

The project was in the planning stage for about three years and included multiple community meetings for residents' input. Its construction phase was funded by an $8.6 million from the state Active Transportation Program, $2.5 million from Facebook traffic mitigation fees, and $677,473 in funds collected through the city's measures A and M.

Another planned bike and pedestrian overpass at University Avenue is currently in the works but does not have funding, Fallaha said. It would cost an estimated $14 million for construction and about $1 million to design.

The existing University Avenue overpass at Highway 101 is the last old interchange in San Mateo County that has not been upgraded. The California Department of Transportation is currently working on the Willow Road interchange to the north that costs $80 million, he said.

Measure A funds will be used to fund the University Avenue interchange, but a project can take up to 20 years until completion, he said. The sidewalk on the existing bridge is only 4 feet wide and must accommodate bikes and pedestrians. Users must cross a ramp where cars enter University Avenue from the freeway.

Instead of waiting for a new interchange, the city wants to construct an adjacent bike and pedestrian overpass that would not be attached to the old bridge. The overpass would start on East Bayshore Road near University Avenue, across from the Chevron gas station, and would end near University Circle, Fallaha said.

Public Works officials plan to hold a community meeting in about two months to discuss the project, Fallaha said.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.

Comments

22 people like this
Posted by resident
a resident of South of Midtown
on Nov 2, 2018 at 5:21 pm

Good for East Palo Alto! I'm glad this important pedestrian route is going to be a lot safer for them.

Why can't Palo Alto get our act together and build a year-round pedestrian route across Hwy 101 in the southern part of town. Lots of people live in southern Palo Alto and work on the other side of the highway. It's a short safe walk or bike ride during the summer, but the bike path under the highway is closed during the winter and alternative routes are far out of the way and/or much more dangerous, especially during the dark evening commute.


4 people like this
Posted by We Are The People
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Nov 4, 2018 at 1:56 pm

The Bridge was needed way back when they took out the
"Underground" passage out!
Leaving the Then Citizens to Fight the Cars over the University Ramp.


2 people like this
Posted by NO DRUGS
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Nov 5, 2018 at 10:28 am

@We Are The People

Wait, There was an underground passage? Where exactly, I'm genuinely curious?


5 people like this
Posted by Great, but...
a resident of Menlo Park
on Nov 5, 2018 at 11:21 am

It's great to see a useful project like this go up. Congratulations EPA on making it happen.

But, please don't waste money on a bike crossing at University. Put the same effort into getting the long term project done. The new bike bridge is way too close to University to make the University one a top priority.

Also, how are bike routes being set up on either side of the bridge? Reference is made to biking to/from Facebook. But what is the path for safe riding from the corner of the shopping mall over there? Routing bikes along the Bayshore with overloaded, over signalled traffic isn't great. But a bike route (lane/bike friendly layout like Bryant in PA, etc.) down Clarke to Bay continuing on University would be great.


1 person likes this
Posted by StarSpring
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 am

StarSpring is a registered user.

@NO DRUGS, The under freeway passage is just North of San Antonio. It is closed during the winter months because it is at creek level.


5 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2018 at 2:06 pm

And yet south Palo Alto still waits for a bridge. Sigh.


Like this comment
Posted by Aletheia
a resident of Green Acres
on Nov 5, 2018 at 3:37 pm

Aletheia is a registered user.

Anybody buying that story?


1 person likes this
Posted by Dave Burckhard
a resident of another community
on Nov 13, 2018 at 2:19 pm

I think that once the Friendship bridge over the San Francisquito creek and connecting trails reopen (hopefully in December), that E. Bayshore Road won't be necessary for many cyclists traveling between Facebook, East Palo Alto, and Palo Alto. Don't forget there is already a bike bridge over 101 at Oregon Expressway.


1 person likes this
Posted by Member
a resident of Downtown North
on Jan 9, 2019 at 12:18 pm

Great to see the pedestrian bridge almost done. When will highway 101 be restriped to add back the lane that was taken during construction? Will go a long way to easing congestion...


9 people like this
Posted by Wary Of This Bridge...
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 9, 2019 at 12:51 pm

> Another planned bike and pedestrian overpass at University Avenue is currently in the works but does not have funding, Fallaha said. It would cost an estimated $14 million for construction and about $1 million to design.

Not a particular fan of this idea as it might enable even more burglaries/robberies in the Crescent Park neighborhood...an ongoing concern amongst residents.


1 person likes this
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 10, 2019 at 12:12 am

> When will highway 101 be restriped to add back the lane that was taken during construction?

Speaking of 101 lanes .... has anyone noticed the weird errors in striping on 101 from Palo Alto all the way to San Jose.

There are stipes that are folded, or curve off to the left or fight. Some of them are too short, some too long. What happened, and why has it not been fixed? Some of the lanes look like someone was really high when they were painting the lanes.


1 person likes this
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 10, 2019 at 12:15 am

Wary Of This Bridge...

I think you are too much of a worry-wart. All they have to do is place cameras on the bridges to record a few days to a week's worth of traffic so they know who was over here at the time, assuming they have reason to think that. I think cameras are a great way to trace crime.


2 people like this
Posted by A Simple Solution...Not
a resident of Barron Park
on Jan 10, 2019 at 9:40 am

> Not a particular fan of this idea as it might enable even more burglaries/robberies in the Crescent Park neighborhood...an ongoing concern amongst residents.

> All they have to do is place cameras on the bridges to record a few days to a week's worth of traffic so they know who was over here at the time, assuming they have reason to think that. I think cameras are a great way to trace crime.

Similarities in clothing & appearance will detract from this surveillance approach.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Rose International Market reopening soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 10 comments | 4,674 views

Eyes and the End of Life: Why Spend Time With the Dying?
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 1,721 views

Downtown Commercial Cap: Once more into the breach
By Douglas Moran | 4 comments | 1,504 views

Can Americans Be Green?
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 1,353 views

The HSR Decision
By Steve Levy | 6 comments | 1,012 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 33rd Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult (15-17) and Teen (12-14) categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 29. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

Contest Details