Palo Alto hopes to fix flawed business registry

After critical audit, city officials hope to improve registry's accuracy

Faced with a damning audit showing that Palo Alto's nascent business registry is riddled with data that is inaccurate, incomplete and inconsistent, a City Council committee agreed on Tuesday night to take a fresh look at the program's reasons for existence.

According to the audit, which was performed by the office of City Auditor Harriet Richardson, the registry showed business trends that "were inconsistent with comparable economic data." Houman Boussina, the senior auditor who performed the review, noted that the registry shows the number of businesses dropping between 2015 and 2017, which seems to contradict data from other data sources such as the U.S. Census Bureau.

Earlier this year, the city contracted with the firm MuniServices LLC to take over the administration of the program, a switch that officials hope will improve data reliability. Councilwoman Karen Holman recommended further strengthening the program by requiring businesses to register when they sign up for utility services or apply for use-and-occupancy permits.

But even if these reforms help with accuracy, council members and staff indicated Tuesday that they have some broader questions about the registry and its goals.

"We know there's an issue with the philosophy of the business registry," Committee Chair Adrian Fine said. "I suggest we bring that to the council."

The council introduced the program in late 2014 as a way to get data about the number of businesses and employees in Palo Alto, information that was intended to inform the council's efforts to implement new transportation and parking programs. Starting in 2014, businesses were required to fill out an online form that asks questions about employee counts, commuting trends and available parking and pay a $50 fee (later raised to $54).

Councilman Tom DuBois also recommended that city staff conduct further analysis about why the number of businesses had appeared to have dropped (at least according to the registry) and conduct "spot checks" on businesses to see if they had registered. Fine said he cares less about the year-to-year trends and more about the broader questions about the program.

City Manager James Keene agreed that the city's purposes for the registry aren't clear. He acknowledged the errors and attributed them, in some part, to confusion over the registry's purpose and insufficient resources to properly administer the program.

"Clearly, the neighborhoods aren't satisfied, you guys aren't satisfied," Keene said.

To date, the city has not been using the registry's data, Keene said. He noted that since the registry came online, he hadn't looked at its data once.

But even though city departments haven't been using the data, that does not necessarily mean that the program is useless, DuBois said. Given how unreliable the data has been, he said he was not surprised that the people aren't using it.

"I think we should spend the time to get the data," DuBois said.

The committee voted to accept the audit, require the additional analysis about gaps in the data and then return in November with the new information, before the issue goes to the full council.

Several neighborhood leaders also supported the idea of improving the registry, which they see as an important tool to address the city's transportation challenges.

"With parking and traffic issues continuing to plague Palo Alto, we believe the registry is an extremely valuable tool," Sheri Furman and Rebecca Sanders, co-chairs of the group Palo Alto Neighborhoods, wrote in a letter to the council.

If managed properly, they wrote, the program can provide important data about parking requirements, traffic demand and displacement of community-serving businesses.

"We hope the city councilmembers and incoming city managers will voice strong support to improve the Business Registry, as well as the larger process of using registry and other data to better inform city planning," the letter states. "Such support will help encourage staff and contractors to ensure the Registry improves in quality and usefulness."


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


15 people like this
Posted by Question
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 13, 2018 at 10:53 am

Question is a registered user.

Is it possible the number of businesses has, in fact, reduced because many small, community serving businesses have been replaced by larger tech businesses that fill their former sites like a growing cancer?

Tech is the boon and bane of our existence. It would be nice if they looked up from their computers occasionally to consider carefully the societal affects of their "disruptive" tactics.

19 people like this
Posted by Clean Up Palo Alto
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 13, 2018 at 10:59 am

So the pro-development council members and the City Manager want to stop collecting data that could reveal which businesses aren't providing enough parking and which are creating our traffic problems.

It reminds me of Trump wanting to stop the Mueller investigation.

We desperately need the registry! And we shouldn't let pro-development councilmembers shut it down.

8 people like this
Posted by Designed to fail
a resident of Downtown North
on Sep 13, 2018 at 11:44 am

_Charging_ businesses to sign up? Perfect way to discourage participation. Normal data collection _rewards_ people who take the time and effort to give you their information.

And you do not ask intrusive questions at the beginning. Easy to ask them later when you have their basic information, email addresses.

What a farce, thank you Mr.City Manager for your obstruction.

14 people like this
Posted by New City Manager
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 13, 2018 at 11:50 am

New City Manager is a registered user.

We have a new city manager. Perhaps he can make this important register activity more successful by learning from the mistakes of his predecessor.

2 people like this
Posted by Radius
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Sep 14, 2018 at 10:00 am

[Post removed.]

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Why is it becoming increasingly impossible to open a restaurant on the Peninsula?
By Elena Kadvany | 29 comments | 5,378 views

Firing Judge Persky as a tennis coach was a big mistake
By Diana Diamond | 23 comments | 2,999 views

Skeptical of the "skeptics" but not the advocates?
By Douglas Moran | 5 comments | 1,118 views

An Easy Emissions Win
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 925 views

Helping Partners Become Couples (vs. Helping Couples Become Partners)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 742 views



On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Register now