Palo Alto moves ahead with police body-worn cameras | News | Palo Alto Online |

News

Palo Alto moves ahead with police body-worn cameras

City Council approves buying 50 cameras for Police Department

Seeking to boost transparency in police operations, Palo Alto has approved the purchase of 50 body-worn cameras for its Police Department.

The City Council voted on May 7 to approve an expenditure of $110,000 for the 50 cameras, which are manufactured by the company WatchGuard Video, as well as for video storage, warranties and upgrades to the department's video library.

The council's decision to buy the cameras came at the heels of a six-month experiment that the department conducted with the WatchGuard cameras. The city already uses a WatchGuard video system on its patrol vehicles, which capture video footage from five different in-car cameras.

The addition of the body-worn cameras means that the department will now be able to review all police interactions using six cameras -- the five in the vehicle and the one worn by the officers -- on the same WatchGuard platform.

According to a report from the Police Department, the city bought 10 body-worn cameras from WatchGuard last year for a pilot project, which netted generally positive results. In many cases, the report states, the video "has provided clear documentation of what occurred during incidents in the field."

"The video evidence has exonerated officers of false accusations, enhanced training and, in rare instances, provided the basis for corrective action," the report states. "The Department believes body-worn cameras will further enhance police transparency and improve accountability and interactions within the community."

The report noted that the only issue that the department experienced during the pilot program had to do with battery life. To get around this issue, the department plans to charge body-worn cameras in kiosks that will allow officers to swap the equipment during their shifts.

The council approved the purchase of the body-worn cameras on its "consent calendar" by an 8-0 vote, with Councilman Greg Scharff absent. The cameras are expected to be purchased and installed within the next six months.

Related content:

Commission questions police-video transparency policy

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

7 people like this
Posted by JohnStnfrd
a resident of Professorville
on May 15, 2018 at 11:44 am

JohnStnfrd is a registered user.

Just because the police have cameras does not mean that any video footage they obtain they will use when that video footage shows that they themselves have violated the law and there is no mechanism in place to ensure that they do not destroy that that video footage.
Web Link
Web Link
Web Link


2 people like this
Posted by transparency
a resident of Evergreen Park
on May 15, 2018 at 1:23 pm

Will they be required to both wear the camera, and keep it turned on no matter the circumstance?


4 people like this
Posted by Great News
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 15, 2018 at 10:57 pm

This is great news, it will protect our police officers from ignorant public judgement [portion removed.]


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Anne Le Ziblatt, formerly of Tamarine and Bong Su, is back with a Vietnamese noodle bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,894 views

Truth Matters (and so does good beer)
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,531 views

You Can Help: Scents and Migraines
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,417 views

Can you Pay to Reduce your Carbon Footprint?
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 1,414 views

The E.R.A. – no real equality yet. Why not?
By Diana Diamond | 15 comments | 1,110 views