Guest opinions: For and against the recall of Judge Persky | News | Palo Alto Online |

News

Guest opinions: For and against the recall of Judge Persky

Community members weigh in on effort to remove Brock Turner judge

In order for all area residents to have important local information on the coronavirus health emergency, Palo Alto Online has lifted its pay meter and is providing unlimited access to its website. We need your support to continue our important work. Please join your neighbors and become a subscribing member today.

With less than four weeks until the June 5 primary election, when Santa Clara County voters will decide whether Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky will continue serving on the bench, the Palo Alto Weekly is publishing opinion columns for and against the issue.

Persky has been under scrutiny since his June 2016 sentencing of former Stanford University student and swimmer Brock Turner to six months in county jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious and intoxicated woman outside a campus fraternity house in January 2015.

The effort to recall Persky was launched by Stanford Law School Professor Michele Dauber. Recall organizers collected nearly 100,000 signatures to qualify the recall petition for the ballot.

Organizers have asserted Persky has a pattern of bias toward white, privileged and male college athletes in cases involving violence against women. Persky's supporters have argued that the judge displays no such bias.

Persky launched his own campaign, "Retain Judge Persky--No Recall," in 2016 but has stayed out of the public eye while his supporters have spoken on his behalf.

With the recall election approaching, Persky this week held a press conference in Palo Alto at which he argued that if the recall succeeds, it will threaten judicial independence.

Click the links below to read the guest opinion columns:

Guest Opinion: Judge Persky should be recalled

Guest Opinion: We need reform, not a recall

Related articles:

As recall vote nears, judge defends his record

Analysis: the 'pattern' cases

We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?

Comments

8 people like this
Posted by GE
a resident of Barron Park
on May 11, 2018 at 3:56 pm

It’s funny that two PAUSD members would call for Persky’s removal for his leinant sentence for a sex offender. It was their school district who let a convicted sex offender return to Paly. School board menbers shouldn’t be pointing fingers at Persky.
[Portion removed.]


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

Coronavirus Food Safety Update + New! Insider Tips
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 5,008 views

A Pragmatic Approach to A Trillion Trees
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 3,887 views

Repairing a Disagreement with your Beloved & “Physical” vs. “Social” Distancing
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 2,588 views

The University of California’s flexible policies during COVID-19
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 6 comments | 2,584 views

Coronavirus: my early April thoughts – and fears
By Diana Diamond | 10 comments | 2,328 views

 

DEADLINE EXTENDED

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by April 10, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details