Candidates for Persky's seat steer clear of Turner case | News | Palo Alto Online |


Candidates for Persky's seat steer clear of Turner case

Private attorney, prosecutor vying to replace embattled judge

In order for all area residents to have important local information on the coronavirus health emergency, Palo Alto Online has lifted its pay meter and is providing unlimited access to its website. We need your support to continue our important work. Please join your neighbors and become a subscribing member today.

For those working to recall Santa Clara County Superior County Judge Aaron Persky, everything centers on his infamous six-month sentence against Stanford University swimmer Brock Turner.

But the Turner case is the last thing that the two candidates running to replace Persky want to discuss. Both women campaigning for Persky's seat explicitly avoid any mention of Turner or any other criminal case to ensure they don't appear prejudiced while aiming for a job that depends entirely on fairness.

Instead, Assistant District Attorney Cindy Hendrickson and civil attorney Angela Storey are competing largely on their legal pedigrees. In a race that hinges entirely on whether or not Persky is recalled, both candidates are positioning themselves as the best qualified to step into the potential vacancy.

Cindy Hendrickson

Hendrickson, who has been preparing to run since last July, is quick to assert that she is the strongest candidate in the election. To back that claim, she points to the thousands of cases she has successfully prosecuted over her 23 years at the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office.

Roughly 97 percent of those criminal cases result in a plea bargain, she said, which often puts her in a position similar to that of a judge. Weighing the factors of each case, she frequently is charged with figuring out the right penalty to fit the crime. It's like "second nature" now for her, she said.

Without mentioning the Turner case, Hendrickson indicated judges do need to take community reaction into account as they issue rulings from the bench. In concept, she supports recalling a judge, saying it will not harm judicial independence.

"It's important that judges, who are making decisions about people's lives, that they reflect the values of the community they serve," Hendrickson said. "If people in a community feel that a judge ceases or has never reflected those values, they have their right to use the tools of democracy."

After completing her undergraduate degree at Stanford University, Hendrickson went to law school at the University of California at Los Angeles, and she served as the student board president for El Centro, a pro bono legal clinic. She later worked as a legal clerk for Johnnie Cochran Jr., best known as the lead defense attorney for the O.J. Simpson case. Her time at Cochran's firm was well before the Simpson case.

After five years as a civil trial lawyer, Hendrickson joined the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office in 1995 as a deputy prosecutor.

"From the first day I knew that it was where I wanted to be," she said. She received special recognition twice for her skill and was promoted to supervising deputy district attorney in 2011 and to assistant district attorney in 2015.

Hendrickson said she never considered being a judge, but she now feels she is the most qualified person to replace Persky if he is removed.

Being a prosecutor "has been training me for it for 23 years," she said. "I've always tried to stay open to where I can be of the most use to the most people, and I'll keep that attitude."

Angela Storey

Angela Storey says she has aspired to a judgeship for years, even though she declared her candidacy just three months ago. Once it became clear the recall election would make it onto the June ballot, she said she decided to run to ensure that voters have a choice between as many qualified candidates as possible.

She describes her legal experience as broad, encompassing both civil and criminal matters inside and out of the courtroom. After growing up in Sunnyvale, she went down to UCLA for college and later completed her law degree at Santa Clara University.

Her first job out of school was as a trial attorney for Farmers Insurance. She later worked on construction and business litigation before launching her own practice with her husband in San Jose, Storey & Storey. Her husband largely works in criminal defense while she handles civil cases. She has worked as a temporary small-claims court judge, a dispute mediator and a tournament administrator for Santa Clara County's high school mock trial program.

With a nod to her opponent's career in criminal prosecution, Storey said that she has the more diverse legal background.

"I can come to the bench without an inherent unconscious bias because I haven't done just one side during my career," she said. "My temperament and varied qualifications make me more qualified to be a judge."

Storey is open about sharing her own history as a victim of a sexual assault during her college years. Given that experience, she said she understands the anger focused at Persky by those who believe he was too lenient, yet she is opposed to the campaign to recall him. If the recall goes forward, she worries that judges will be intimidated against making unpopular decisions, leading them to hand down harsher sentences. Those ramifications would fall hardest on people of color and the poor, she said.

"My concern is that this campaign will put pressure on judges to consider public backlash and fear of a recall when they're making their decisions," she said. "We're making strides in criminal justice reform, and this could potentially put us backward in those efforts."

In interviews, both candidates indicated they are trying to keep distance from the Persky recall effort, yet there is some overlap.

Hendrickson made at least two campaign contributions last year to the Committee to Recall Judge Persky. Michelle Dauber, the chair of the pro-recall campaign, said she is supporting Hendrickson for judge.

On the other side, recall opponents favor Storey, said retired judge LaDoris Cordell, a member of the No Recall of Judge Persky steering committee. No formal endorsement has been made, she said.

The election of Hendrickson or Storey will occur only if a majority of voters support Persky's recall in the June 5 election. In that event, the candidate with the most votes will immediately assume his seat on the bench.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Mark Noack writes for the Mountain View Voice, the sister publication of

We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?


16 people like this
Posted by Everyone Has Bias
a resident of Midtown
on May 11, 2018 at 11:36 am

Everyone Has Bias is a registered user.

@ Quote from candidate Angela Storey: "I can come to the bench without an inherent unconscious bias."

That statement is both illogical and presumptuous. Unconscious bias is just that, unconscious! Everyone, including judges, needs to be open to the fact they may have bias. Anyone who claims to have no unconscious bias just lost my vote.

13 people like this
Posted by MyOpinion
a resident of Community Center
on May 11, 2018 at 1:32 pm

MyOpinion is a registered user.

Agree everyone has bias, bizarre statement, in any case voted against the recall so replacement judge may not be elected anyway.

19 people like this
Posted by Everyone Has Bias
a resident of Midtown
on May 12, 2018 at 8:48 am

Everyone Has Bias is a registered user.


I agree. My family also voted against the recall so I'm hoping we don't have to vote for a candidate running for judge who claims to have no unconscious bias. Vote No Recall!

3 people like this
Posted by NancyJ
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on May 13, 2018 at 10:36 am

NancyJ is a registered user.

Not a very well worded statement I agree. But having heard her speak at an event, her point has been that someone who has only represented one position or side of the majority of their career is more likely to have a bias for that side, unconscious or not. Having represented both victims and defendants she will likley have less of a bias (unconscious or conscious) towards either side in a dispute. When I heard her speak she clearly stated that everyone has unconscious bias and that judges in particular need to ask themselves the hard questions about why they are ruling a particular way to help counter those biases. I'm voting No on the recall and Yes for Angela Storey. We need more judges with with both civil and criminal experience.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

Coronavirus Food Safety Update + New! Insider Tips
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 5,166 views

A Pragmatic Approach to A Trillion Trees
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 4,085 views

Singapore's oldest cafe was about to open in Palo Alto. Then, the coronavirus hit.
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 3,784 views

Repairing a Disagreement with your Beloved & “Physical” vs. “Social” Distancing
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 2,757 views

The University of California’s flexible policies during COVID-19
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 6 comments | 2,682 views



The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by April 10, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details