Stanford expansion comment period extended

Planning Director accedes to requests from Palo Alto, Menlo Park

Responding to requests from Palo Alto and Menlo Park, Santa Clara County planners have agreed to give the public 60 more days to comment on the environmental analysis of Stanford University’s 2018 General Use Permit application.

The new permit would allow the university to build up to 2.275 million square feet of academic space, 3,150 housing units and 40,000 square feet of child care space and other supporting facilities between 2018 and 2035.

The comment period for the EIR was set to conclude on Monday. But given the scale of the project and the voluminous Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Palo Alto and Menlo Park officials both asked for an additional 60 days to review the document. The Palo Alto Unified School District and the Service Employees International Union, Local 2007, had also requested the extension.

Stanford has objected to the extension request, calling it "unwarranted" and inconsistent with the California Environmental Quality Act.

On Thursday night, Planning Director Kirk Girard said he has decided to grant the request for the extension. He made the announcement at the beginning of the county Planning Commission's special meeting at the Palo Alto Art Center – the final scheduled meeting on the EIR.

The meeting brought more than 100 people to the Art Center to offer comments to the Planning Commission, which is scheduled to review the GUP application next year, before it goes to the Board of Supervisors for final approval.

"We want to err on the side of public interest and public input in the project at this stage of the game," Girard told the crowd, in explaining his decision.

Comments on the draft environmental impact report may be sent to David Rader, Santa Clara County senior planner, at

They can also be mailed to: County of Santa Clara Department of Planning and Development, Attention: David Rader, County Government Center, 70 W. Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110.


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


17 people like this
Posted by Thanks Joe
a resident of College Terrace
on Nov 30, 2017 at 11:19 pm

County Planner: "We want to err on the side of public interest and public input in the project at this stage of the game."

Winners: the public and County Supervisor Joe Simitian (who probably gave a significant behind-the-scenes push to make this happen)

Losers: Stanford and Palo Alto Mayor Greg Scharff, who literally argued Stanford's interest for them, like the real estate attorney he is. It's pretty embarrassing when the county planner calls defying the city's mayor "erring on the side of public interest." Not that anything embarrasses Greg Scharff.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Chick-fil-A quietly starts delivering out of DoorDash kitchen in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 59 comments | 9,519 views

Palo Altans and their Virtue Signaling
By Sherry Listgarten | 24 comments | 2,759 views

Differentiating Grief from Clinical Depression
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,484 views

Halloween with grandma
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 724 views

A Voter Warning from a Wise Friend
By Diana Diamond | 14 comments | 709 views