News

Federal judge declines to lift injunction blocking Trump order on sanctuary cities

Court also declines Department of Justice's request to dismiss suits from Santa Clara County, San Francisco

A federal judge in San Francisco Thursday denied a request by President Donald Trump's administration to lift an injunction blocking the president's executive order on sanctuary cities.

U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick's decision reaffirms his order from April that bars the administration from enforcing most of Trump's executive order seeking to deny federal funds to cities and counties considered to be sanctuary cities.

The Justice Department argued the injunction was not needed because a two-page memo by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions clarified and narrowed the executive order.

"I conclude that the (memo) is functionally an 'illusory promise' to enforce the executive order narrowly and, as such, does not resolve the constitutional claims that the counties have brought based on the order's language," Orrick wrote in his decision.

Orrick also denied a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to dismiss the lawsuits against the executive order filed by San Francisco and Santa Clara counties.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

"Once again, the District Court has sent a message to President Trump that he cannot use the threat of withholding funds to coerce local governments into becoming federal immigration operatives," President of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors David Cortese said in a statement Thursday.

Forty-eight cities and counties nationwide joined in a friend-of-the-court brief urging Orrick to keep the injunction in place.

"The Trump administration tried to use a two-page memo from the attorney general as window dressing to cover a patently unconstitutional executive order. It didn't work," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement Thursday. "The law doesn't allow the administration to do what it's trying to do, and no memo from Jeff Sessions is going to change that."

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

— Bay City News Service

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Federal judge declines to lift injunction blocking Trump order on sanctuary cities

Court also declines Department of Justice's request to dismiss suits from Santa Clara County, San Francisco

Uploaded: Fri, Jul 21, 2017, 2:02 pm

A federal judge in San Francisco Thursday denied a request by President Donald Trump's administration to lift an injunction blocking the president's executive order on sanctuary cities.

U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick's decision reaffirms his order from April that bars the administration from enforcing most of Trump's executive order seeking to deny federal funds to cities and counties considered to be sanctuary cities.

The Justice Department argued the injunction was not needed because a two-page memo by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions clarified and narrowed the executive order.

"I conclude that the (memo) is functionally an 'illusory promise' to enforce the executive order narrowly and, as such, does not resolve the constitutional claims that the counties have brought based on the order's language," Orrick wrote in his decision.

Orrick also denied a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to dismiss the lawsuits against the executive order filed by San Francisco and Santa Clara counties.

"Once again, the District Court has sent a message to President Trump that he cannot use the threat of withholding funds to coerce local governments into becoming federal immigration operatives," President of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors David Cortese said in a statement Thursday.

Forty-eight cities and counties nationwide joined in a friend-of-the-court brief urging Orrick to keep the injunction in place.

"The Trump administration tried to use a two-page memo from the attorney general as window dressing to cover a patently unconstitutional executive order. It didn't work," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement Thursday. "The law doesn't allow the administration to do what it's trying to do, and no memo from Jeff Sessions is going to change that."

— Bay City News Service

Comments

R. Winslow
Crescent Park
on Jul 22, 2017 at 10:30 am
R. Winslow, Crescent Park
on Jul 22, 2017 at 10:30 am
Like this comment

There 38 states in the US + DC that have sanctuary cities and more power to them if that is what their citizens wish or prefer.

California is one of them and what I have noticed is that their designated sanctuary regions are primarily liberal urban cities of high population densities or rural conservative towns/counties.

What this obviously conveys is that some concept of social idealism and/or cheap labor access are the primary deciding factors.

The irony is that many of the more liberal and wealthier suburbs in CA are not sanctuary cities (i.e. Palo Alto, Marin County, affluent parts of LA etc.) so in other words, many of these residents are probably pro-sanctuary city but don't want to be living or associating with those who might be seeking refuge under these protocols.

Sounds pretty phony to me.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.