News

Trustees supportive of social-emotional proposals

Committee recommends phased roll-out for new curriculum

School trustees were supportive on Tuesday of a committee's proposal to bring a districtwide social-emotional curriculum to Palo Alto Unified, though they probed still-to-be-formed plans for implementation and evaluation.

The district's Social Emotional Learning Curriculum Committee has recommended the district take a phased approach to what they described Tuesday night as not simply selecting a new curriculum focused on social-emotional skills, but a shift in culture that will require sustained leadership, resources and commitment. While some schools are ready to jump in headfirst — primarily the district's two high schools, committee members said — others will need time to prepare.

Gunn High School, for example, has already prepared a draft "action plan" to pilot new social-emotional curriculum with freshmen and sophomores this fall, Principal Denise Herrmann told the board. She said she plans to merge this work with a plan to bring a teacher-advisory program at Gunn, started this year with the launch of a new cohort program called Titan Connect. Palo Alto High School is also looking at how to integrate further social-emotional learning as part of its existing teacher-advisory program, Herrmann said.

Social-emotional learning is already present at many Palo Alto schools in dedicated programs and individual classrooms, but they lack a cohesive, aligned focus, committee members said. Adopting a districtwide curriculum would mean providing direct instruction on social-emotional learning, or SEL, at all grade levels as well as integrating an overall commitment to the philosophy behind it — "how we do what we do in addition to what we do and when," explained committee member Josh Bloom, a Paly teacher on special assignment (TOSA) focused on social-emotional learning.

"Too often SEL is viewed as simply adopting a curriculum," he said. "In short, the research is crystal clear: If we're going to do SEL effectively in this district, we have to all commit to supporting each other and doing it together, and that means using these standards to re-examine our practice and culture and provide the support and education necessary for us all to grow and learn with our students." 

Given the breadth of this approach, board members asked for more specific ways to measure and monitor any new efforts put in place.

"It would be helpful to know what success metrics we are expecting," trustee Melissa Baten Caswell said. "Where are we today and where would we like to be?"

Some board members expressed dismay that the committee was not yet recommending a specific curriculum for the district to adopt — a charge that this group was given but said it was unable to complete given time restraints and the rapidly growing number of programs in this field. (The committee did recommend a "framework" that includes broad guiding principles and learning standards for this work.)

Some trustees also questioned the value of a recommendation to create three new district- and school-level committees to oversee next steps, including vetting and choosing a curriculum. Committee members said they felt a fresh group with more teacher-members would be better suited for that work. The success of their overall recommendations, members said, would depend on a level of communication and coordination that new committees could provide.

"Our charge is basically to make this a really strong commitment of the whole district and integrate it into the business that we're doing so it's sustainable beyond the commitment that are able to maintain — that it survives past our committee," said committee member Miriam Stevenson, an assistant principal at Gunn.

The shift toward social-emotional learning will require a significant financial investment over the next several years, staff said Tuesday. This year, the district estimates planning efforts could cost a total of $23,400. The price of training, curricula, materials and other implementation costs is estimated to start next year at $69,000 and ramp up through the 2019-20 school year to more than $200,000. Some costs can be covered by an Educator Effectiveness grant from the state Department of Education, staff said.

Herrmann told the board that despite any sticker shock — especially for a district in the midst of making serious budget cuts to address an multi-million dollar shortfall — investing in social-emotional learning makes financial sense, and could even result in savings down the road. She cited research that has shown social-emotional learning is directly tied to improved academic achievement and can help close the achievement gap.

Several parents and educators also urged the board to prioritize funding for social-emotional learning.

"If a child's social emotional needs are met, the rest really follows," said parent Kiran Gaind, also a former Bay Area high school teacher. "I think sometimes we get that backwards."

The board will discuss costs associated with the social-emotional proposals as part of a budget study session next Tuesday, March 7, at 8 a.m. Trustees asked staff to provide more specifics around staffing needs, stipends and other costs.

As next steps, Superintendent Max McGee said he hopes the board will approve a budget figure and the charge for a new curriculum committee who can then start that work. Staff will also return with an overall "charter" capturing the social-emotional committee's recommendations for board approval later this spring.

Moving forward, the board's role, said Vice President Ken Dauber, is "to be supportive of the direction and to understand the resources that need to be committed in order to make it work."

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Comments

2 people like this
Posted by CW
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 1, 2017 at 2:40 pm

[Post removed.]


5 people like this
Posted by Marc Vincenti (Save the 2,008)
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 pm

Dear Folks,
I believe our high schools won't be socially-emotionally healthy places until we shrink the routinely overcrowded classes, undo the relentless grade-reporting, stop the demoralizing cheating that our studies tell us a majority of our overburdened kids engage in, give students a practical nightly voice in homework amounts & require guidance counseling about the realities of college admissions before enrollment in multiple APs (thus returning sleep to our children's lives), and rescue our teens from the all-day siren song of social media that they now rely on, even during class-time, to not feel so alone during the school day.
M.V.


2 people like this
Posted by HS
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Mar 2, 2017 at 10:45 am

A Social-Emotional Awareness/Learning Curriculum has been alive and well at the Ohlone Elementary School for decades. The District has incorporated many of the ideas from Ohlone in many of the District Schools for decades. A Social-Emotional Curriculum will only work when the Palo Alto Adult population embraces and practices it. Please contact all the Retired Principals and Teachers of Ohlone and the other District's Elementary Schools such as Nixon, Addison, Palo Verde, East Meadow, Barron Park, and others plus, the Middle School's Jordan in the 1990's, JLS in the 2000's, and Terman when it opened who have experience with the Social-Emotional Curriculum. In addition, the Palo Alto High School has had the TEAM program which as I understand was an off shoot of Ohlone's initial experiment in the 1950's (from the Binge School Educators at Stanford), to Jordan (which also had a 'choice' social-emotional curriculum), to progress to the TEAM program in high school for the Freshman year.

Kudos to the District Administration for doing their homework to make our schools more progressive again! The answers the Board Members ask below, can be answered by all the Retired Principals and Teachers; and the adult students who were in the district wide programs; and the parents who had their children in the choice programs. Conduct a District wide survey and the answers to a Social Emotional Awareness Curriculum will stream in like a bubbling creek with clear fresh water.

["Given the breadth of this approach, board members asked for more specific ways to measure and monitor any new efforts put in place.

"It would be helpful to know what success metrics we are expecting," trustee Melissa Baten Caswell said. "Where are we today and where would we like to be?""]


2 people like this
Posted by HS
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Mar 2, 2017 at 10:46 am

Please read this too.

Web Link


8 people like this
Posted by George
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 3, 2017 at 7:51 am

SEL is junk. It's the latest excuse for failed parenting and a school system that fails to prepare children to live in the real world. It's the latest baloney idea sold by PAUSD. PAUSD and Palo Alto adults should stop fantasizing about 'feelings' and give their kids the gift of real skills and real knowledge. It's astonishing that Palo Alto's parents fall for such drivel.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Populism: A response to the failure of the elites: Palo Alto edition
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,694 views

Mountain View's Hangen Szechuan to close after 25 years
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,402 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,400 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,179 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 948 views