School board approves civil-rights agreement, resolution | News | Palo Alto Online |


School board approves civil-rights agreement, resolution

Trustees take key steps forward in relationship with federal agency

In order for all area residents to have important local information on the coronavirus health emergency, Palo Alto Online has lifted its pay meter and is providing unlimited access to its website. We need your support to continue our important work. Please join your neighbors and become a subscribing member today.

On Tuesday evening, the Palo Alto school board closed a chapter and opened a new one with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, unanimously approving a resolution agreement in two Title IX investigations and repealing by a 4-1 vote a controversial 2014 resolution that sharply criticized the federal agency.

All board members expressed an eagerness on Tuesday to move forward on both accounts. Melissa Baten Caswell, the only sitting board member who served on the board that unanimously approved the 2014 resolution, hesitated before casting her vote but ultimately supported the repeal "in the interest of moving forward."

President Terry Godfrey, however, cast the sole dissenting vote. She, too, said she wanted to be forward-looking rather than "go back and re-litigate 2014."

The board also unanimously backed a new resolution proposed by Baten Caswell that commits the district to working collaboratively with the Office for Civil Rights, a reflection of the district's current, more positive relationship with the agency. Before adopting, the board made some small changes, including expanding a list of groups protected from discrimination and striking a clause that stated all "authorized action" from the 2014 resolution "has been concluded."

The resolution agreement, the result of yearslong investigations into multiple reports of sexual harassment, misconduct and violence at Palo Alto and Gunn high schools, commits the district to corrective actions to address its failure to comply with anti-discrimination law Title IX.

While the Office for Civil Rights has not yet disclosed specific legal violations it found in its investigations, the agency will release a formal letter of findings after the resolution agreement is signed.

By approving the agreement, the district has agreed to address missteps that may have occurred at the time these reports were first made. The district will be required to hire an independent investigator, to be approved by the Office for Civil Rights, to conduct proper Title IX investigations into former Paly Principal Phil Winston's alleged sexual harassment of students, former Paly teacher Kevin Sharp's alleged consensual sexual relationship with a former student and reports of off-campus sexual violence between 2012 and 2014.

The agreement asks the district to provide all investigative reports, underlying documents and interviews related to Paly teacher Ronnie Farrell, who will be sentenced this month for allegedly touching a student inappropriately in a classroom at the end of the last school year, and former Ohlone Elementary School teacher Michael Airo, who was arrested last year for alleged child sex abuse that occurred more than a decade ago.

The district will also be required to create an online system by which it can maintain its own confidential, detailed tracking of complaints and through which students and parents can anonymously report concerns, among other tracking and reporting requirements.

Per the agreement, the Office for Civil Rights will monitor the district for a minimum of three years, or until it is in compliance with Title IX.

At the request of board members, Superintendent Max McGee provided on Tuesday rough cost estimates for some stipulations in the agreement — between $19,000 and $22,000 for staff and teacher training and as much as $60,000 in staff time to manage reporting requirements and related paperwork. He said that the district is simply paying now for what it should have done when the investigations were first conducted.

"Had the investigations been as thorough and detailed as required now, we would have incurred these costs earlier," he said. "This is a cost that, frankly, should have been encumbered ... on the books years ago."

McGee also disagreed with the notion that approving the resolution agreement is in essence signing a "blank check," a criticism voiced by a California Teachers Association attorney who reviewed the agreement on behalf of the teachers union.

Most board members appeared to be unswayed by last-minute objections raised by this attorney, Chris Schumb, at the meeting about the agreement's commitment to update district policies on sexual harassment, discrimination and complaint procedures. Schumb said he was representing the teachers union and at least one other party, presumably an individual teacher who he declined to identify, citing attorney-client privilege.

The board also narrowly approved a last edit to the resolution agreement — to remove references to discipline as a potential outcome of investigations into allegations of employee sexual harassment or misconduct, with the understanding that removing that language doesn't preclude disciplinary action if necessary. Teri Baldwin, president of the Palo Alto Educators Association, said the union was concerned not about discipline itself, but if it came as a result of "reopening cases that were already investigated."


Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?


17 people like this
Posted by Finally
a resident of Green Acres
on Mar 1, 2017 at 1:28 pm

The school board is finally acting responsibly. Thank you Mr. Dauber for pushing for repeal and to the other trustees for supporting it. I am disappointed in Mrs. Godfrey's vote. If there was ever a time to take a stand on civil rights it is now. I think she will regret that vote. I am glad though that all 5 trustees voted for the settlement agreement with OCR.

17 people like this
Posted by Bored Watcher
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 1, 2017 at 6:39 pm

What an embarrassment for Terry Godfrey. She made no sense and it was clear she was far more concerned about Melissa Caswell's feelings than she did about anything else. What was she even talking about, she's going to go find the bigots of Texas and tell them to stop citing our Resolution that's also bigoted and still on the books, y'all just stop that! [Portion removed.]

She is not on the board to protect Melissa Caswell's feelings. Her false equivalence between a powerful elected official being accused of making false accusations against a poor Latina and that poor Latina being falsely accused by a powerful elected official was absolutely sickening. [Portion removed.]

So grateful for Dauber and Collins. Finally some people who understand what being on a board means. I'm also loving the procedural improvements of motions and voting and rules of order. It's hilarious watching them trying to teach the class how to amend a motion. High comedic value.

[Portion removed.]

Like this comment
Posted by Board Watcher
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Mar 1, 2017 at 8:53 pm

[Post removed.]

10 people like this
Posted by Marielena
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Mar 1, 2017 at 11:15 pm

Thank Mr. Dauber, Mr. Collinns and Ms. Debrienza for for aproving this resolution and doing the right thing. Again I feel like if you were board members at the time I and our child came to ask for help, things would have been differently, and our child's mental helth would had probably in better shape. I am dissapointed to hear that Ms. Godfrey felt pitty for Melisa and did not do the right thing. [Portion removed.]

Hopefully this step will help our family to start part of the healing process, even though our girl is far away from healing. The bullying experience at PAUSD has caused tremendous damage. Some of her postings at night are: Can I please talk to you, I am very very scared becuase I was bullied at middle school... and so on. I am wondering if the kids who bullied her and thought it was funny, ever think about what they did to her, or if they feel guilty about it. Do they still do bullied people with disabilities or if they stop. Just wondering how do they deal with that, or if they do not even realize the big damage they did. I know I do not blame them so much as I blame Ms. Baker and her team, after all they were children and nobody pointed to them that it was wrong and mean to do that to a child who was not so lucky to be born "normal" as they were.
Thanks to Palo Alto Weekly for the support you gave us during those difficult times.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get fact-based reporting on the COVID-19 crisis sent to your inbox daily.

Singapore's oldest cafe was about to open in Palo Alto. Then, the coronavirus hit.
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 7,573 views

A Pragmatic Approach to A Trillion Trees
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 4,374 views

Repairing a Disagreement with your Beloved & “Physical” vs. “Social” Distancing
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 3,083 views

Coronavirus: my early April thoughts – and fears
By Diana Diamond | 12 comments | 2,818 views

Profiteering off medical equipment and its export unimpeded (COVID-19)
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 2,130 views