Guest opinions: Arguments for and against weighted GPAs

Paly seniors weigh in on district issue

As the school district resumes its discussion of the practice of reporting high school students' weighted grade-point averages (GPA), Palo Alto Weekly is publishing two opinion columns from Palo Alto High School seniors on the topic.

Superintendent Max McGee is expected to make a recommendation this spring on the district's long-term policy for weighted grades, subject to final approval by the school board. He is currently soliciting feedback from students, parents, teachers and staff through a series of public forums, starting Wednesday afternoon and extending till Feb. 13, as well as an online webinar and survey.

In November, the school board unanimously approved a short-term solution for this year's seniors: to report both cumulative unweighted and weighted GPAs on their official transcripts, giving an additional grade point for each honors and Advanced Placement class, as designated in the schools' course catalogs. The board also voted to give Paly seniors the option of reporting an additional weighted average calculated using the University of California/California State University method.

Paly has historically used the UC/CSU methodology for weighting, which doesn't count freshman-year and non-UC approved courses. Gunn uses its own cumulative weighting method.

While neither school reports weighted GPAs on students' official transcripts, Gunn counselors report the weighted average in counselor-report sections on college applications, while Paly's do not.

In their respective guest opinions, Paly seniors Rima Parekh and Joelle Dong make arguments for and against reporting weighted grades.

Parekh argues that weighted grades will benefit students, particularly in admissions and scholarship eligibility, and would not harm their mental health and well-being. Dong argues that reporting weighted GPAs should be the exception, not the norm -- only for merit scholarships, to avoid sending the message that "numbers define my academic worth."

Click the links below to read their columns.

Guest opinion: Why I support reporting weighted GPAs

Guest opinion: Raise students, not GPAs

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Rose International Market reopening soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 11 comments | 4,906 views

Eyes and the End of Life: Why Spend Time With the Dying?
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 1,756 views

Downtown Commercial Cap: Once more into the breach
By Douglas Moran | 4 comments | 1,515 views

We need a new garage downtown Palo Alto -- forget about being politically correct
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 841 views

Know Before You Buy: Understanding Senior Living Facility Agreements
By Max Greenberg | 0 comments | 171 views


Short story writers wanted!

The 33rd Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult (15-17) and Teen (12-14) categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 29. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

Contest Details