News


Palo Alto's Midtown Shopping Center parcel sold for $15.26 million

'Underutilized' center could be redeveloped, statement indicates

A portion of a shopping center that has long been the centerpiece of Palo Alto's Midtown neighborhood has been sold to a private investor.

The 18,555-square-foot center at 2615-2699 Middlefield Road was built by the Haley family, which has owned it since 1956. But family members are aging and decided it was time to sell, Michael Haley said this week. The family took great pride over the years in maintaining the center, which has served the neighborhood through small, mostly mom-and-pop stores, he said. Current tenants include Palo Alto Cafe, Baskin-Robbins, School of Rock, The UPS Store, Core Studio, Classy Salon, Monica Foster Salon, Jen Bradford Hair, among others.

The property includes two buildings and sits in between the Walgreens and CVS, which are also regarded as part of the Midtown Shopping Center.

The family received many offers from developers who wanted to raze and redevelop the land, Haley confirmed. The family sold it for $15.26 million -- or $822 per square foot -- "well above the listing price," said Marcus & Millichap associate David Cutler, who also represented the family in the sale.

Though the property transfer was completed in October, Cutler said, the company made the announcement this week.

Haley said he hoped the new owner would retain the stores. That owner is identified by the deed filed with the Santa Clara County Clerk Recorder's office as Telly Chang, a broker-investor, E & R Investment Properties, LLC and CWKT, LLC. Chang is listed as the manager of CWKT, according to the California Secretary of State corporation registry.

Chang can do what he wants with the property; there are no deed restrictions, Haley said.

Though residents and shop owners have expressed fears the center will be razed, Keyvan Alikermanshahi, owner of Palo Alto Cafe, said the new owner confirmed he does not have plans to redevelop the site.

"We were worried four months ago when the building was up for sale," Alikermanshahi said.

Those concerns were also stoked by Marcus & Millichap's announcement this week, which said the center has potential for redevelopment. Its "neighborhood commercial" zoning designation allows for a mixed-use redevelopment that could include 26 multi-family residential units and a commercial space of at least 18,500 square feet, the company said.

"Located within a prime infill area, the center is currently underutilized but will provide a stable income stream while new ownership pursues redevelopment approvals," said Kirk Trammell, senior vice president investments for Marcus & Millichap's Palo Alto office.

Chang declined to speak on the record regarding the purchase, but Cutler said that the new owner plans to hold the property long term.

Only one 950-square-foot space in the two buildings is vacant. It is advertised for lease on the website LoopNet at $4 per square foot. The center also has a vacant parcel that is currently used as a community garden.

Cutler said if the new owner chooses to develop the site, he would likely not have to wait many years.

Tenants "all have pretty short-term leases. If they had a few years left, some had termination options," he said.

The Midtown shopping district encompasses retailers on both sides of Middlefield between Moreno Avenue to the north and south of Colorado Avenue. Walgreens, CVS and Safeway are the anchors of the district.

According to public records, the various parcels have five different owners (not including Chang).

Buy-in or approval from surrounding property owners is not required for redevelopment of the parcel, City of Palo Alto Planning Department officials said.

Some small business owners and shop patrons said they would be opposed to the construction of homes on the retail site. Midtown Residents Association Chairwoman Sheri Furman said she doesn't think housing would be a good fit, since the land isn't close to employment centers and some residents are concerned about additional traffic and parking spilling over onto their streets.

"The idea of neighborhood centers in the city's Comprehensive Plan is that it has neighborhood-serving retail," she said.

She's also concerned the small shops could be replaced by high-end chain stores. Even having to move out of the center during construction could spell the end of the small businesses, she added.

"We would lose (them) and never get them back," she added.

A longtime employee at a local cleaners predicted that lease costs will increase, especially because the property owner will have to pay more property taxes than the Haleys were paying, she said.

The previous net assessed property value was $236,134 as of June 30, 2016, according to the Santa Clara County Tax Assessor.

Alikermanshahi, who has owned Palo Alto Cafe for 22 years, said he and others have worked very hard to make the center thrive.

"There was nobody here when I came here," he said. But now, "We never close the shop -- not one day in 22 years."

Patron Lisa Medoff, a Stanford University employee, likes the cafe so much that she comes from East Palo Alto to enjoy its offerings and ambiance.

"I think this place is important to the community. There's a reason people come here. I wrote my dissertation here 10 years ago. It's like a family," she said.

Joyce Schmid also said the Midtown center should continue to serve the neighborhood. Adding housing or offices "would bring too much traffic. They would be building larger buildings."

When she and her husband, City Councilman Greg Schmid, moved to the neighborhood in 1973 they enjoyed shopping at Bergmann's department store, which she said they still miss. Since then, the center's mix of stores has improved, and many have served generations of patrons, she said.

Her family has come to Baskin-Robbins for decades.

"When our son was in Little League, every time he hit a home run, we would take him to Baskin-Robbins to celebrate," she said.

Comments

102 people like this
Posted by Dan
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:05 am

"Located within a prime infill area, the center is currently underutilized but will provide a stable income stream while new ownership pursues redevelopment approvals,"

bye-bye remaining useable local neighborhood retail, I will miss you. Hello contentious over-development application for zoning exceptions.


82 people like this
Posted by TorreyaMan
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:33 am

TorreyaMan is a registered user.

Undoubtedly the small businesses at this location, which we patronize on a regular basis, will ultimately be priced or kicked out.


18 people like this
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:34 am

We need about 3 more traffic light signals on that stretch of Middlefield.


21 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:35 am

Everyone loves to hate the poorly designed parking lots and non-continuous sidewalks in this shopping center, but it could get much worse with new owners. What kind of city permits and zoning changes will the new owners need to remodel the shopping center?


24 people like this
Posted by Mutti
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:36 am

So sorry.... Good long-term tenants will be kicked out, and the new shopping will be as crowded as former Lucky's -- now Grocery Outlet -- on Alma by Meadow. At least it looks like Safeway is not part of this deal. Hopefully we won't lose our grocery store like Edgewood Plaza did. More townhouses on tiny lots -- but maybe that's a good thing. We need more housing.


54 people like this
Posted by Let the complains begin
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:42 am

No plans have been announced yet, but already the usual suspects are posting with unfounded speculation and complaints. Pretty soon we will be hearing about how the owner should have consulted the resdients before selling their private property. How very palo alto


Like this comment
Posted by al munday
a resident of another community
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:47 am

[Post removed.]


37 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 19, 2016 at 10:54 am

Midtown is thriving apart from one corner where real estate brokers used to be situated but work is going on there at present but the other businesses adjoining are doing well. This is the only part of Midtown that is underutilized. All the other businesses on all four corners are busy and parking shows that it is being used by people who drive as well as those who live near enough to walk.

Apart from the silly idea of having two drugstores, Midtown is extremely useful to the present residents who use it. Safeway could be improved by being full service, but the various eateries and small businesses do well.

This part of Middlefield has lots of traffic, inadequate parking and is thriving. We do not need it to change and be "redeveloped" with the loss of what we already consider useful retail and businesses.


19 people like this
Posted by Hugo
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Dec 19, 2016 at 11:12 am

Underutilized!!?? Parking is frequently non-existent.
The current entrance/exit configuration does need change though as it can create traffic backups when there is no traffic.


58 people like this
Posted by Another disaster
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Dec 19, 2016 at 11:21 am

Some were hoping that at least some parts of Palo Alto won't be butchered. I guess, no. Bye-bye, small businesses. Another chicken coop development.
Those who say Palo Alto is complaining too much before anything has happened ... you have got to be kidding. Where in PA did it happen not in favor of offices, or town-homes? In Mountain View - yes, San Antonio is getting a so much needed - bwa-ha - hotel and a movie theater. We'll see how that traffic situation will be.
Another prediction - the buildings 5 ft from the road-way, Alma Village style. Middlefield has two lanes so narrow in that area that drivers honk each other because they freak out.


4 people like this
Posted by Chris
a resident of University South
on Dec 19, 2016 at 11:44 am

Who controls the parking between CVS and the shopping center?

More housing is a positive.


19 people like this
Posted by My cup of Tea
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:00 pm

My cup of Tea is a registered user.

Ah I remember my consternation when Bergmans closed... but all was ok...Lets wait and see what is happening..... probably won't suit us "oldens but the "silicon youngsters" will love it. Remember when Palo Alto was a sleepy Proffessor enclave , with proffessional hippies everywhere? Yep I was a teacher, now retired, and certainly these changes come with good and bad deals. Just as the traffic gets awful..I had to stop driving, walking is still great.


59 people like this
Posted by Neighbor
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:04 pm

We complain because we have seen the destruction wrought by the moneymakers all over town. We have learned from experience, bitter experience. Haven't you noticed?

Ask the people who use Edgwood Plaza and ask non-investors around downtown.

'Underutilized' = we can milk this site for more money.
Money, money, money. Nothing else matters.


54 people like this
Posted by Barbara
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:07 pm

How DREADFUL!! Imagine more condo/apartment units bringing at least 2 cars per living unit. Palo Alto will continue to become an ugly mass of building, adding more traffic just to satisfy the need for the investor/builder to add to his wealth!!


21 people like this
Posted by wally
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:23 pm

wally is a registered user.

The irony of people complaining about new money when they live in the area that was created by a robber baron as a memorial to his own family


21 people like this
Posted by Larry
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 pm

$15MM seems really inexpensive even just for the land. Don't some homes sell above this price on the north side of town or in the hills?


11 people like this
Posted by janisw
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Dec 19, 2016 at 12:41 pm

If they decide to redevelop the property, hopefully they will keep the same retail businesses on the bottom floor of new mixed use buildings that will continue to provide the retail shops we already love in Midtown along with more much needed housing. Could be a huge win-win!


22 people like this
Posted by novelera
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 1:28 pm

The Midtown Residents Association worked hard to get a retail set aside for this area. We can hope that City Council will honor this long-ago commitment to having neighborhood serving retail in the Midtown Shopping Center.


56 people like this
Posted by Whoops!
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 1:35 pm

Oh, well, here come the developers.

There goes the neighborhood!


20 people like this
Posted by Fond memories
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 19, 2016 at 2:46 pm

I lived on Middlefield in the late 70s when I was in high school (Paly) and fondly remember a dress shop in that small shopping center where I could always find the perfect dress. I purchased a dress there for my first prom and first date. It was nice to be able to walk there since I didn't yet have my driver license. I also remember sitting in the sun while eating an ice cream cone in front of Baskin Robbins. Such great memories.


18 people like this
Posted by PAmom
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 19, 2016 at 5:48 pm

Does any else remember a shoe store that was there called Children's Bootery during the 60's? How about the outdoor candy dispenser? Baskin-Robbins has been there ever since I can remember. That strip of stores used to be called Shoppers World. I'm really going to miss the place if it's torn down.


11 people like this
Posted by Bill
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 19, 2016 at 6:22 pm

@larry: $15MM seems really inexpensive even just for the land. Don't some homes sell above this price on the north side of town or in the hills?

The article say it's only 18,555 sq ft or a cost of $822 per sq ft. By comparison, the Buena Vista Mobile Home park site is 4.5 acres or about 196,000 sq ft. So at $822 per sq ft, the Buena Vista Mobile Home park site would be worth over $161 million.

(Just sayin', so you know how to feel when the Housing Authority of Santa Clara County makes their offer.)


9 people like this
Posted by jh
a resident of Evergreen Park
on Dec 19, 2016 at 7:56 pm

jh is a registered user.

Whether the new owners rebuild the Midtown shopping center or not, given their cost to buy the property they will have to increase the retail rents. Perhaps the kind of retail that can afford high rent will be similar to the kind of retail at Town and Country Village.


6 people like this
Posted by Marrol
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Dec 19, 2016 at 8:44 pm

Perhaps a good location to begin building more affordable, government subsidized housing.


28 people like this
Posted by Midtown
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 19, 2016 at 8:46 pm

We as a community need to dig in on the parking and make sure it is not under parked. They need two parking places per unit. Otherwise all of midtown is going to be buried in cars...


21 people like this
Posted by Online Name
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Dec 19, 2016 at 11:51 pm

They need at least 2 parking spots per unit plus more than enough parking for the retail and commercial spaces so that employees, shoppers and visitors are accommodated.

Enough with under-parking.


1 person likes this
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 20, 2016 at 2:12 am

@Bill, that 18,555 sq ft is not the lot size, it's the floor area. I'll take a stab at retail-space rent being $4 per sq ft per month, or $48 per year on the $822 price, which would be an annual return of 48/822 = 5.8 percent. I don't know enough to say what taxes, maintenance and depreciation might do to that figure, or whether utilities are included. Or what it would cost to build 26 condos and sell them for $1M each.

@PAmom, in those days all my shoes were from Children's Bootery. Eddie's coffee shop was next door, where I'd get an ice cream cone for a dime. I believe Baskin Robbins came much later, but I don't recall what had been at that end earlier. Seems there was a toy store in there somewhere, besides the one (Toy World?) where 7-11 is now.

And I remember a great hardware store across the street for the longest time...


7 people like this
Posted by stew
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Dec 20, 2016 at 7:33 am

hmmm
maybe an outrageous condo for 10s of thousands of dollars a month


26 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 20, 2016 at 9:37 am

I enjoy Midtown, the retail, the coffee shop and restaurants and the drugstore. I also use Safeway.

If they dare to spoil that then they will lose existing customers. Unless I can park as part of an errand run or on my way home, what's the point? I have walked or biked there in the past but that is not a good use of my time when I am driving in that area anyway. A 15 minute delay on the way home is very different from driving home and then walking there and back which would make the 15 minute quick errand turn into an hour's chore to put into my routine.

Does anybody have any sense? This is getting totally ridiculous. I will be forced to use the Internet more, not out of choice but out of necessity. And as for meeting a friend I may bump into and deciding to have coffee and a chat, forget it! It won't happen as I won't see anyone I know anymore amongst the newbies.

Saying that they want to build high density near transit is supposed to be the goal. This is a mile at least away from Caltrain with the need to cross Oregon Expressway to reach the station. Saying that this has easy access to 101 and 280 proves that they are expecting car driving commuters, not bike riders without cars.


1 person likes this
Posted by Steven
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Dec 20, 2016 at 6:16 pm

This will be an opportunity to improve a very dangerous stretch of road for bicyclists.


17 people like this
Posted by BP
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 20, 2016 at 7:39 pm

I bet the new city council is drooling on how they will overbuild the site, all in the name of progress and being a global innovative center.


2 people like this
Posted by Gus L.
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 20, 2016 at 10:18 pm

I really Hope they put in a Starbucks.....DOH..


2 people like this
Posted by @Steven
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Dec 21, 2016 at 7:32 am

When VTA eliminates the 35, one lane of Middlefield can be converted to a bike lane.


26 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 21, 2016 at 9:23 am

Does the city's "retail protection law" apply to Midtown? I don't mind if they build offices and condos upstairs, but keep the ground level merchants. Without shops and restaurants in Midtown, residents will have to drive to other parts of town or other cities to do their business, putting much more traffic on the road.

I still regret when they shut down the only gas station in Midtown, forcing residents to drive miles out of their way to get gas. This is not just an inconvenience, but more traffic on the roads and more air pollution.


3 people like this
Posted by Chris
a resident of University South
on Dec 21, 2016 at 10:15 am

Who makes a separate trip to buy gas? You buy gas when you are driving, not when you are home.


22 people like this
Posted by cm
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 21, 2016 at 10:35 am

And the destruction of Palo Alto continues! Until we elect more city council people who understand how to protect the city and its residents we will have more destruction. Despite what you hear from some around here, they will never be able to add enough "density" to the small cities along the peninsula to make mass public transit viable. If you want to create a city with mass transit you need Manhattan. We need to stop development in outlying areas and drive all development to San Francisco or San Jose. These are the only reasonable places that can be turned into massive urban centers. I feel sorry for the people who live there and whose lives will be destroyed but if we must sacrifice to please the "urbanistas" who want to live in stack and pack housing then at least drive them all to one or two areas rather than letting them destroy an 100 mile strip up and down the peninsula. I hope that if a massive development is proposed for this area we can rise up like Mayfield did and get a referendum to halt all development over two stories in this area.


15 people like this
Posted by Midtown
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 21, 2016 at 11:49 am

Yes, there used to be a gas station in Midtown and also on Alma where Grocery Outlet is situated. These were both useful as en route to places we were going particularly Central Expressway or highway 101. Now for many living in Midtown, if gas is needed before venturing onto the highway or similar, a detour is needed. This creates more traffic as cars remain on neighborhood streets longer rather than going to the most direct route to get out of town.


5 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 22, 2016 at 12:40 pm

fyi - the Daily News says the sale only applies to the two small buildings between Walgreens and CVS (not including either of those). Presumably, the buildings with Subway, Sanchos, Starbucks, and Wells Fargo are not included in the sale either. Will be really strange if they put condos or offices in the middle section if the outer sections remain retail. What is the existing height limit for this block? Is it possible they are thinking about building a 4 story building?


3 people like this
Posted by Optimist
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 22, 2016 at 2:16 pm

I don't see this as necessarily a bad thing. The current buildings are essentially strip malls, and the parking lot is awful (how often do you see people going the wrong way into the shopping center?)

Assuming any new development will be mixed use, then they could build something that looks much nicer , hopefully with parking in the back and wide sidewalks for outdoor seating and walking.

Ok, I know I'm an optimist, but one can hope!


5 people like this
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 22, 2016 at 4:12 pm

@Optimist, "they could build something that looks much nicer"

Like where JJ&F was? Or like Grocery Outlet?
I'd expect another high wall right at the sidewalk.
All of Middlefield will then become zero-setback.


8 people like this
Posted by Old Head
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 22, 2016 at 6:45 pm

Toy World was on the end before Baskin Robbins. Eddies Coffee Shop, Shoe Store, Midtown Pharmacy in the 60's. Purity was the former Grocery store on the end next to Toy World. Super Market Basket across the street. Crocker Bank on the corner of Middlefield & Colorado. Variety Store before 7-11, A&W before Safeway. 2 gas stations, Cy Pennel's Chevron next to Round Table, Texaco Opposite corner. Goodwill store across from current Safeway, next to Hoover School. Most of all miss the fresh baked Bread and pastry from California Bakery next to Bergman''s. Midtown is toast. No more Hardware store.


18 people like this
Posted by Gus L.
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 22, 2016 at 7:19 pm

Funny how people say we need more housing, No infrastructure to support it, Still in a drought, Not enough schools.
Yet people hope for low cost, High density.
Lots of room to expand in Atherton, Try building BMR apartment there.. Talk about NIMBY...


4 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 22, 2016 at 7:49 pm

@Gus L. - nowhere in the article is BMR mentioned. You are the only one to suggest that as a possibility. Everyone else is talking about losing popular retail businesses, which is a huge difference. I am not opposed to a project the preserves local retail and adds housing upstairs.


Posted by HUTCH 7.62
a resident of Portola Valley

on Dec 22, 2016 at 8:12 pm


Remember me?
Forgot Password?
Due to violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are only visible to registered users who are logged in. Use the links at the top of the page to Register or Login.


Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 23, 2016 at 12:12 am

@Old Head, thanks for the refresher. I remember them all now, plus Duca & Hanley.


7 people like this
Posted by History Buff
a resident of another community
on Dec 24, 2016 at 1:25 pm

> "When VTA eliminates the 35, one lane of Middlefield can be converted to a bike lane."

Obviously you don't remember December 2004 when Joe Kott, then Palo Alto’s transportation chief, did a test of narrowing Middlefield to one lane in each direction – during rush hour.

Drivers were ticked off at the huge traffic jam. Cars trying to turn on to Middlefield from Oregon were also blocked. And traffic wasn't nearly as bad as it is today.

Kott quickly gave up on the idea and the test was cut short.


2 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 24, 2016 at 1:42 pm

Bicyclists are not welcome at the Midtown Shopping Center anyway. There is only 1 small bike rack in the rear parking lot with no real safe way for bicyclists to get there from the street. I do see some kids bicycle down the Middlefield sidewalk and then leave their bikes unlocked in front of the ice cream shop where there are no bike racks, but they need to watch them closely to keep them from getting stolen.


2 people like this
Posted by Bike racks
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 24, 2016 at 3:36 pm

There are bike racks near Subway/CVS and more near the dry cleaners and nail salon. There may be more, but unfortunately they are not well marked. Perhaps a few signs or even Google could help to find bike racks around towns.


9 people like this
Posted by @History Buff
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 24, 2016 at 5:18 pm

"Drivers were ticked off [in 2004] at the huge traffic jam....."

The City Council no longer cares of they cause traffic jams by reducing traffic lanes.


6 people like this
Posted by Oldster
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Dec 29, 2016 at 11:39 pm

The community garden in the back of Midtown shopping center is gone. I'll miss the big old prickly pear cacti. ¡Adios!


Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 30, 2016 at 4:41 pm

Yes, noticed this today. Sad.


3 people like this
Posted by Marc
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 30, 2016 at 10:11 pm

It is interesting to me that all the discussions about the sale focus on how the buyer is "greedy" and will have to replace the existing structure with something denser to justify what they paid for the property.

Why doesn't any talk about how "greedy" the seller is. They could have sold the property for 5 million or 10 million and still made a large profit on the original investment. But they didn't. They got the maximum price they could get. And now they have driven up the value of all the other properties in midtown.

Why blame the buyer? It is the all the greedy property owners (both residential and commercial ) that expect to get top dollar for their property that has made the cost of living in Palo Alto so high.

Instead of blaming new owners, let's put a stop to long time property owner from gouging buyers. Let's put a cap on what all property owners can sell their property for.

/marc


5 people like this
Posted by parent
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 30, 2016 at 10:42 pm

@Marc - The only comment above to use the word "greedy" is yours. Is this FAKE NEWS?


6 people like this
Posted by Citizen
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 31, 2016 at 10:00 am

Everyone concerned about saving neighborhood friendly retail from the fate of Alma Plaza and California Avenue should rally and come up with an initiative now. Greg Schmid is a wealth of knowledge. Talk to a good land use attorney (you'll need $$ for that and someone to take the lead). You do not have to just accept the hollowing out of Palo Alto. Your neighbors across town will help you if you lead and create collaborations. Get together, come up with a plan, talk with Schmid, reach out to neighborhood leaders across town. Neighbors next door who have been considering major solar installations should step up their schedules, so they at least have some other legal protection for their sky and sunlight.


3 people like this
Posted by Question
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 12, 2017 at 7:24 pm

The old community garden is overgrown with weeds and trash. The sidewalk on Middlefield has plants overgrowing and blocking pedestrian space. There has been new striping in the parking lot. There is a new tea shop about to open and work being done on a dance studio in the building that has supposedly been sold to developers.

Sue Dremann, please can you do an update to this article and let us know what is happening to our shopping center.

Thank you.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Salt & Straw Palo Alto to open Nov. 23
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 4,295 views

Lakes and Larders (part 2)
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,462 views

Can we ever improve our schools?
By Diana Diamond | 8 comments | 1,346 views