Palo Alto moves ahead with new garages | News | Palo Alto Online |

News

Palo Alto moves ahead with new garages

Despite some concerns about traffic impacts, Council agrees to pursue new structures downtown and near California Avenue

In order for all area residents to have important local information on the coronavirus health emergency, Palo Alto Online has lifted its pay meter and is providing unlimited access to its website. We need your support to continue our important work. Please join your neighbors and become a subscribing member today.

Palo Alto officials on Monday reaffirmed their commitment to building new parking structures downtown and near California Avenue, despite concerns from some critics who argued that these facilities will encourage more driving and exacerbate the city's parking woes.

By a unanimous vote, the council approved two design contracts, one for a public-safety building and a new parking structure on city-owned parking lots near Sheridan Avenue and Birch Streets and another for a new downtown garage on a lot at Hamilton Avenue and Waverley street. Both facilities were included in the infrastructure plan that the council approved in 2014, when it asked voters to approve a hotel-tax increase to pay for infrastructure improvements.

In making the case for the new garages, city officials characterized them as one leg in a “three-legged stool” that also includes transportation-demand management (policies that provide incentives for people to switch from cars to other modes of transportation) and technological improvements that increase the capacity of existing garages.

Several residents urged the council on Monday to reconsider its plan for new parking structures and to focus its energies on finding ways to discourage driving. Neilson Buchanan, a long-time proponent of protecting residential neighborhoods from commercial intrusion, asked the council to hold off on the approvals and to hold a more in-depth discussion about housing policies and ways to reduce traffic problems by narrowing the city's famously large ratio of jobs to housing.

“Spending more money on parking garage to house a horseless carriage seems to me make no sense at this point in time,” Buchanan said. “Now is the time to turn your priorities to housing and traffic situation.”

Michael Hodos, a resident of Professorville who like Buchanan served on the stakeholder group that helped design the downtown Residential Preferential Parking Program, told the council that there is a range of opinions in his neighborhood about the proposed parking structures, with some people worrying that more parking will encourage more traffic and others feeling like it's a good idea.

Hodos told the council that garage projects are much more likely to get support from adjacent residential neighborhoods “if those parking elements are used to reduce the amount of non-resident parking in those neighborhoods.”

The council, for its part, agreed on to stay the course. While acknowledging the residents' concerns, council members agreed kept the contracts on its “consent calendar,” a list of items that get approved by a single vote without discussion.

City Manager James Keene made the case for moving ahead with the parking structures, noting that downtown's parking-permit program has drastically reduced the number of all-day parking spots available to non-residents.

“We're not talking about building three of five or 10 parking structures. We're talking about one with 300 spaces, when we lost 1,600,” Keene said of the downtown structure.

He also noted that the city has made a commitment to further reduce over the next few years the number of employee cars that park in residential neighborhoods. The city's program calls for the number of permits sold to non-residents to go down by 10 percent every year.

“We have to realize that the parking still has to go somewhere and this garage provides that opportunity,” Keene said.

The council agreed and swiftly approved a $1.9-million contract with Watry Design, Inc., for design and environmental-assessment services associated with the new downtown garage. Council members were also unanimous in approving on consent a $7 million contract with RossDrulisCusenbery Architecture, which is charged with designing and performing environmental analysis for the city's proposed public-safety building and parking garage near California Avenue.

---

Follow the Palo Alto Weekly/Palo Alto Online on Twitter @PaloAltoWeekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?

Comments

9 people like this
Posted by resident
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2016 at 12:01 pm

How much will these garages cost and where is the money coming from? Will the city create a special tax on businesses near the garages? Will parking fees be high enough to pay for the garages? Is the city considering a privately-funded for-profit garages with no subsidy from taxpayers?


5 people like this
Posted by Mark
a resident of Community Center
on Dec 13, 2016 at 3:03 pm

I reiterate my question from last week's article about the garages. Were self-driving cars discussed?

I plan to get rid of my family's two cars as soon as Uber has self-driving cars operational in Palo Alto. I hope that's within five years. I'm disappointed that the city at the heart of silicon valley doesn't realize that technology is going to address this problem and render these garages useless.


5 people like this
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 13, 2016 at 4:24 pm

I see no mention in this article of how drivers are supposed to find an empty parking space?

I see no mention of how to help people park all day on an occasional basis.

Palo Alto can build more garages but they can't do a thing to help people park who need to find a space or park all day once a week!

Technology is available to pay by phone for all day parking! Technology is available to be able to know whether there are empty spaces and where they are before a car enters a garage! This is available in other places, but not in Palo Alto! When are we going to enter the technology age with our parking?

Let's have no more discussion on how to prevent parking on the street and have some details on where these cars are going to park today! Can we please get the main thing the main thing.


15 people like this
Posted by SA
a resident of University South
on Dec 14, 2016 at 2:00 am

I have lived downtown University South far longer now than I care to remember. I only say this because the last five years have been HORRIBLE! There has been more construction and all the toxic riff that goes with it in the last half decade probably more than any other time. Day in day out. I've witnessed the almost complete and tragic destruction of a beautiful, bike friendly, walkable and charming downtown reduced to the whims of high rollers and their ilk. I have lost friends in small business and neighbors to displacement. Yet, look no further than downtown Burlingame and one will see a good example of how to re-design a downtown for society without bulldozing history. They have retained small retail there while creating a friendly pedestrian experience for all walks of life. Downtown Burlingame has Palo Alto beat by lightyears. Now, in yours truly, my new neighbors will be non other than, you guessed it, a parking garage. Tone deaf.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay up to date on local coronavirus coverage with our daily news digest email.

'A devastating impact:' The coronavirus claims Clarke's Charcoal Broiler, Mountain View's oldest operating restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 20 comments | 6,528 views

The first few seconds after awakening; before I remember the virus
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 3,064 views

Can you stay healthy without making more trash?
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 2,453 views

Think about helping others in our coronavirus-affected area
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 2,281 views

Remember the failures for when it's time for fixes: COVID-19
By Douglas Moran | 15 comments | 1,778 views

 

DEADLINE EXTENDED

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by April 10, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category. Sponsored by Kepler's Books, Linden Tree Books and Bell's Books.

Contest Details