Residents want state to reject Stanford toxics plan

College Terrace group seeks testing in their neighborhood for TCE contamination

The state agency tasked with regulating hazardous materials should reject Stanford University's plan to deal with trichloroethylene (TCE) under 1601 California Ave., a College Terrace Residents' Association subcommittee studying the site has told the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Stanford recently found the hazardous TCE vapors in the middle of its University Terrace construction site in the Stanford Research Park, which is slated to become 180 homes. The discovery caused Stanford to alter its building plans, moving a number of residences from atop the most contaminated "hot spots" to another location on the property. The university also proposes to cap some of the TCE areas with roads, add vapor barriers to new homes to prevent TCE seepage, and not build on some areas of the property.

TCE, which is most often used as a degreaser for industrial use, has been linked to kidney, liver and cervical cancers, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Members of the subcommittee for College Terrace, which lies across California Avenue from the construction site, include a research chemist, a NASA environmental scientist and a toxic-vapor-control expert. In a Jan. 26 letter, the neighborhood association stated that it wants the state department to require Stanford to remove the contaminated soil and take other safety measures. The residents are concerned that TCE may be migrating or will migrate into the groundwater during rains or that it could be in the soil under their homes. Stanford has not tested for TCE along the site's border closest to their neighborhood along California Avenue nor in College Terrace itself, they said.

But Stanford denies that the underground TCE is a problem for College Terrace. The TCE soil levels are below limits for residences, they said in an email to the Weekly.

"The site investigation and testing demonstrates that the TCE in the soil vapor would not contribute to TCE in groundwater, and there is no presence of TCE in surface soil that would cause contamination of rainwater runoff," Stanford spokeswoman Jean McCown said on behalf of the university's project team. "There is no TCE in soil, at any depth, above residential screening levels. There is TCE in soil vapor only and it is limited to the area under a prior building location."

But upon hearing of the TCE discovery, the neighborhood association reviewed a hazard-assessment plan and other documents by Stanford and its consultants and launched its own evaluation. College Terrace association Vice President Ed Schmitt, a retired research organic chemist and polymer scientist, took the TCE locations maps made by Stanford's consultants and studied the relationships of the areas deemed unacceptable by the consultants.

While Stanford's FAQ sheet states that TCE is contained in well-defined, isolated locations, Schmitt said the areas, based on the consultant's data, "are not so well-defined. They are not so isolated and it spills over onto the other property" at 1501 California Ave., which is adjacent to the contaminated area. The 1501 site is also part of the redevelopment project. About 15 homes on the 1601 Stanford site would also still be touching high-concentration areas, Schmitt said the data show.

During a CTRA board meeting on Wednesday night, Schmitt said residents are concerned that rainfall moving water downhill might move TCE to a collecting pond that Stanford is planning. The man-made ravine would send water over one of the highest concentrations points of TCE, he said.

"TCE generally travels in soil or soil vapor in a radius from a source, we were informed at the Jan. 6 meeting (with DTSC Hazardous Substances Engineer Jovanne Villamater). So it appears quite implausible that a spill emanating from a high concentration spot on the 1601 California Ave. site would be suspected of leading to elevated TCE levels several hundred yards away on the 1501 California Ave. site, but not anywhere in much closer to College Terrace," the group wrote to DTSC.

TCE vapors can also cause a risk through indoor air, which has prompted Stanford's proposed addition of vapor barriers. But homes in the College Terrace neighborhood are not equipped with vapor barriers nor any other protective measures, the association stated.

The College Terrace Residents' Association wants the state agency to require monitoring of the border of Stanford Research Park at California Avenue by taking measurements over the foundations of 13 new homes that will face California Avenue.

Regarding the possible movement of TCE in groundwater, if it is present and cannot be removed, the association asked the state agency to come up with mandated strategies to deal with it, such as soil and groundwater removal.

A Jan. 25 report by the watchdog group the Center for Public Environmental Oversight regarding the 1601 California contamination supports the residents' positions. More groundwater testing should be done, the report concluded.

"College Terrace may be subject to vapor intrusion from contaminated groundwater flowing from across California Avenue," Executive Director Lenny Siegel, an expert in toxic-vapor control, wrote.

Stanford's 1601 Risk Assessment notes that the area along California Avenue has subsurface meandering water channels, which indicate that it is possible for contamination to have migrated hundreds of feet from the contaminated source areas.

Some attempts to locate groundwater contamination at 1601 California have come up dry, but Siegel said that does not mean contamination hasn't migrated. Chemical movement may have occurred during wetter years, and collection attempts may have missed the subterranean channels.

"Sampling at 1501 California, just to the north, found groundwater between 30 and 55 feet beneath the surface," he said.

Siegel said that at a Mountain View Superfund site with similar pollution plumes, the adjacent residential area was not initially monitored. But unacceptable levels of TCE vapor were found inside a resident's home in 2002. In 2013, two more homes required cleanup in the same neighborhood after denser groundwater monitoring was conducted, Siegel said.

"The protective approach would be to install groundwater monitoring wells along California Avenue and/or conduct indoor air sampling in nearby homes," he concluded. "I don't want to panic people. I don't think vapor intrusion in College Terrace is likely. But thus far not enough has been done to rule it out."

But Stanford argues that the state agency has already said the university's plans are adequate.

"DTSC, the regulatory agency with the authority to approve the proposed actions, has concluded that given the measures proposed by Stanford, there is no significant exposure risk to future site users," McCown said.

She added that the university would have a comprehensive response to the questions posed by the College Terrace and Siegel letters to the DTSC within the next couple of weeks.

"All of the questions can be answered based on data and assessments in the extensive investigation and risk assessment report previously provided to DTSC," she wrote.

DTSC spokesman Russ Edmondson said the agency is in the process of reviewing the College Terrace association's comments and will respond.

"To this point, no conclusions have been made regarding the site," he wrote in an email.

Other locations in Stanford Research Park where contamination has been found include the former Hewlett-Packard sites at 620-640 Page Mill Road, which were designated a Superfund cleanup site; the former Varian Medical Systems, Inc. at 601 California Ave. and the former HP facility at 395 Page Mill Road. An underground plume of heavy metals and hazardous chemicals known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) formed under these sites. The plume affects groundwater under parts of the Research Park, the Stanford/Palo Alto Community Playing Fields, Palo Alto Square, Fry's Electronics and the Palo Alto Courthouse, according to the 2010 California Regional Water Quality Control Board report.

Schmitt noted that at the HP sites, Stanford remediated the hazards.

"Stanford has put in the effort to rid the area of polychlorobiphenyls or PCB. They did remove 130,000 tons of dirt in which the PCB was adhered. They don't seem to be putting in the same level of effort to marginalize the TCE contamination," he said.

Stanford, however, maintains that the exposure risk is not the same and does not require the same treatment.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


19 people like this
Posted by Annette
a resident of College Terrace
on Feb 21, 2016 at 1:12 pm

Actually there have been comments on this article but they somehow didn't track to this location. Perhaps this is due to the "choose a category" requirement. I suggest the moderator offer the option of choosing a predesignated issue category.

One poster wrote that there are two Stanfords. That is sadly true and as of now it appears the "Land Stanford" is handling this problem in a way that reflects poorly on Stanford University. Fortunately it is not too late for the right measures to be taken.

I previously posted: Have to give a nod to the conscientious group that is paying close attention to this. I attended a recent meeting and observed the charts created by Stanford and those created by Ed S. It is concerning that Stanford's chart appears to be deliberately deceptive in the way that it uses small markers to depict large problem areas and larger markers to depict smaller problem areas. The non-Stanford charts take the opposite approach, telling a much clearer story. I urge the powers that be to require Stanford to solve the problem via comprehensive remediation (rather than parcel by parcel) so the problem is removed instead of just contained.

24 people like this
Posted by Annette
a resident of College Terrace
on Feb 21, 2016 at 1:28 pm

I just reread the article. Stanford is arguing that the state agency has said that Stanford's plans for dealing with this problem are "adequate" . Would anyone out there want an "adequate" anesthesiologist? Or an "adequate" surgeon? Adequate is not a word normally associated with Stanford University. This problem - TCE - requires a better than "adequate" solution. I suggest Stanford do what is known for and take the BEST approach.

36 people like this
Posted by Ahem
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 22, 2016 at 9:59 am


For some reason the article seems to have been posted twice with a slightly different URL, that encodes a different date. The earlier posting can be found at the URL below:

Web Link

My comments about Stanford Land Management re-posted below:

Great analysis by Ed Schmitt, and very disappointing that Stanford Land Management has decided to take the low road, instead of coming forward with a plan to re-mediate the carcinogenic TCE contamination on the property, and in all likelihood under adjacent properties across the street in College Terrace.

People need to realize there are two Stanfords. The academic institution we all know, and Stanford Land Management which is just another sleazy real-estate developer, that would do, or say, anything to push its project forward.

Stanford Land Management is also responsible for the ghetto of McMansions crammed onto the property along Stanford Avenue, and the play-fields at Page Mill and El Camino which were built on a toxic Superfund site, and then covered with a type of "crumb rubber" artificial turf, that has been linked to a cluster of rare childhood cancers in soccer goalies.

When is Stanford (the academic institution) going to realize the damage Stanford Land Management is doing to the Stanford brand?

"How Safe Is the Artificial Turf Your Child Plays On?"
NBC News ~ October 8, 2014 Web Link

10 people like this
Posted by Groundswell Technologies
a resident of another community
on Feb 22, 2016 at 10:01 am


My colleagues and I have developed automated web based near real-time monitoring and alerting capabilities for resolving TCE vapor intrusion challenges. The system is capable of monitoring both indoors as well as subsurface concentration distributions, and can collect and analyze from up to 16 locations with a single platform. The system analyzes >100 samples/day. Response capabilities are on the order of minutes and all the data can be available through an intuitive web dashboard. This seems like it could immediately answer key questions raised, assist with mitigation design and provide remediation performance confirmation. For more info please see: Web Link.

21 people like this
Posted by Erin
a resident of Stanford
on Feb 22, 2016 at 4:33 pm

Very disappointing corporate attitude concerning these toxic contaminates from Stanford Land Management. Also disappointing that Stanford (the academic institution) demands A+ performance from its students, but is willing look the other way and accept C- performance from Stanford land Management.

11 people like this
Posted by Been there, seen that
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 23, 2016 at 9:52 am

I remember Standford before Stanford Development Corporation / Standford Land Management was created and have witnessed the continual building on campus since then, much of which has had a negative impact on surrounding communities. This is a development company whose soul reason for being is to develop Standford land for the benefit of Standford coffers Like Mrs. Winchester, they will continue to build out every last parcel of open space left on the campus, and then they will tear down and start over. Their indifference to the impact of Stanford development on Stanford neighbors has been event for some time, so the fact that they are resisting a full scale review and clean up of this site it not at all surprising. Stay vigilant, always question, and hold Stanford (both the university and the developer) accountable.

9 people like this
Posted by Fred Balin
a resident of College Terrace
on Feb 24, 2016 at 12:09 pm

Fred Balin is a registered user.

Detailed and excellent coverage of a complex topic and in a specific situation, i.e. homes planned for Stanford junior faculty and families on a portion of the University Terrace site.

Ed S. (i.e., Schmitt) has done another remarkable piece of work for the community, as you know, Annette. His visual on the potential spread of TCE contamination on the project site is directly adjacent to the article in the print edition. The concept he came up with, the data reduction techniques he employed, and two other visuals he created (including the proposed locations of homes in relation to the TCE potential spread) are in the appendix of the CTRA submittal to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). That as well as the reports of both the Stanford and CTRA consultants and other related items can be found within the public folder I created at Web Link .

The potential danger from TCE rising from soil vapors is when it is trapped within buildings. The topic of "vapor intrusion" of hazardous substances will be the subject of a presentation workshop by Lenny Siegel, cited in the article and an expert in the area. A date will be set and announced shortly after we secure a venue. The topic could be of interest to folks outside of College Terrace, including prospective purchasers of homes on the site.

While the article highlights specific College Terrace concerns, the Residents' Association submittal also focuses to a large extent on the situation on the project site itself and therefore to the homes that are planned to be built there. While a good deal of material is now available with regard to hazardous materials on the University Terrace site, as well as plans, analysis, and commentary, if anyone would like to discuss this matter further with me and in confidence, feel free to contact me at .

4 people like this
Posted by Fred Balin
a resident of College Terrace
on Feb 24, 2016 at 10:30 pm

Fred Balin is a registered user.

This following is correct path to public folder I created: Web Link

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Legends Pizza Co. replaces Palo Alto Pizza Co.
By Elena Kadvany | 10 comments | 2,623 views

Premarital and Couples: 10 Tips for the Holidays
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,352 views

What is a "ton" of carbon dioxide anyway?
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 2,246 views

Do city officials ever consider giving taxpayers a break?
By Diana Diamond | 18 comments | 1,159 views

By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 975 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 26 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $7 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.