News

U.S. Representatives kick off national innovation meeting

Education, immigration reform are top topics at Stanford roundtable

Seeking to build on a national innovation strategy that she helped craft 10 years ago, U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo urged a second round of strategic development centered on technology and Silicon Valley during a conference at Stanford University on Tuesday.

Eshoo, who was flanked by House of Representatives Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Zoe Lofgren, said the country must continue to move forward through enhanced education and immigration reform if it wants to stay ahead of the global pack. On Tuesday, they met with Bay Area academics, students, entrepreneurs, high- and bio-tech leaders and venture capitalists to discuss Innovation Agenda 2.0.

The new agenda, which is in the early stages of crafting, will build on the 2007 Innovation Agenda 1.0, a 22-point program that included legislation that advanced renewable energy and efficiency projects, reduced reliance on foreign oil, created the largest college-aid expansion since the 1944 G.I. Bill and increased funding and investment for scientific research and small business and technology development.

The program also expanded fiber-optic cable to nearly 26,000 schools and hospitals and trained 4 million Americans to use high-speed broadband, connecting more than 670,000 people to high-speed Internet for the first time.

House Democrats have led forums across the nation in the past two years with business and technology leaders to develop programs and legislation to advance American business and economic leadership and improve national security, Eshoo said. Tuesday's meeting kicked off a new round of forums expected to take place during the next three months.

The Stanford meeting, which was not open to the media, was "a diamond in the rough," Eshoo said. With expanded programs and a more refined agenda, she hopes to build the country's innovation prowess so that "at the end of this century it will be the American Century," she said.

Eshoo, Lofgren and Pelosi were short on specifics, but encouraging American students to get science, technology, engineering and mathematics degrees was the prominent topic during the discussion, they said. As a result of Innovation 1.0 legislation and policies, 527,000 American students took Advanced Placement exams in math or science in 2013, a 33 percent increase from 2008; and 818,000 students graduated with bachelor's, master's and doctorate degrees in science and engineering that year, a 28 percent increase from 2007. The agenda also encouraged the passage of legislation to provide funding for teacher training in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) professions. American women's progress in these fields was also a topic at the 2.0 roundtable, they said.

But one of the biggest topics of the day centered on immigration, which was second in importance only to education, the congresswomen said.

"There was a universal expression of disappointment that we have not managed immigration reform -- the driver of our country," Lofgren said.

Eshoo and Pelosi echoed that sentiment, adding that the country can only remain exceptional by incorporating the best ideas in the world. The congresswomen said that roundtable participants were steadfast in their concern for immigration reform and the need to expand admission of foreign-born workers. Currently, all of the country's H1B visas, which allow foreign professionals to work in the U.S., are filled inside of a week, Eshoo noted.

According to the 2016 Silicon Valley Index, 75 percent of tech workers in Silicon Valley are foreign born. With the national debate and rhetoric among some groups turning sour on imported labor, the congresswomen said that immigration should not be considered a threat but a necessity toward continued economic prosperity, to keep America on the cutting edge by bringing in the best and the brightest with their innovative ideas.

Eshoo said that it is those ideas, not immigration based on religion, race or ethnicity, that should be the basis of the debate on immigration reform.

"To continue or to attempt to stop it the latter really tears at the fabric of the country," she said. To "tear at that very DNA" of America, a country built on immigrants, would be to contribute to its economic decline, she added.

Lofgren agreed.

"Having worked on immigration reform, (I think) there is a real mischaracterization of the challenges. At the roundtable, there was more discussion about the education of American students than immigrants. We need both," she said.

"If Google was founded absent of immigration, it would have been founded in Moscow," she said, referring to co-founder Sergey Brin, a Russian-born computer scientist who started the company in Menlo Park.

The congresswomen said that Innovation 1.0 achieved legislation and advanced policy in 21 out of 22 planks. By the numbers, here is their brief rundown of its achievements:

Broadband:

#149; 4 million Americans trained to use high-speed broadband

#149; 114,697 miles of fiber-optic cable laid

#149; 25,768 schools, hospitals and other institutions connected and became hubs for high-speed broadband in rural and underserved areas

Energy:

#149; 19.5 gigawatts of new solar energy capacity since 2007. More solar was installed in one week in 2013 than in all of 2006

#149; 54.4 gigawatts of new wind energy, a 300 percent increase since 2007

#149; $850 million in private investment for clean energy and efficiency technologies

Education:

#149; A 33 percent increase in students who took AP exams in math or science in 2013

#149; A 28 percent increase in graduates with four-year college or higher degrees in science and engineering since 2007

Research and development, since 2006:

#149; A 49 percent increase in funding for the Department of Energy's Office of Science

#149; A 42 percent increase in funding for the National Institute of Standards and Technology

#149; A 34 percent increase in funding for the National Science Foundation

Comments

3 people like this
Posted by Matthew Lennig
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 18, 2016 at 10:18 am

The U.S. should stop undermining our tech industry by forcing Apple to provide a backdoor to defeat the iPhone's security. Such actions put all users at risk of a data breach. These actions also undermine the global competitiveness of our technology industry.


6 people like this
Posted by Well, well, well
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 18, 2016 at 11:14 am

You know what they say about the government and industry: the left hand ( gov't) doesn't know what the right hand ( I dusty) is doing.


2 people like this
Posted by Benditis
a resident of Monroe Park
on Feb 18, 2016 at 12:08 pm

I'm an economic refugee from CA; because (according to a 60 min report on 2/14/16)
The USA is the biggest money laundering country in the world, the cost of living in Palo Alto
+Then the rest of the Bay Area became more than I could afford!
Foreign nationals and the lack of reporting resposibility have allowed this. Who else can afford to pay millions of $ with a one week closing, but those with criminally -gotten gains?
US banks are required to report $ transactions over 10,000$ to the Feds. Since
the real estate deals made with all cash (no mortgage) don't go through banks, no one is checking.
I love the CA congresswomen I've left behind (I was an early member of Emily's List), and moved to a backward area of OR
'cuz it was affordable,I'm sad to see the Palo Alto/Bay Area I lived in for most of my life become un-affordable for young people
And Seniors!
Congress could reform economic policies to prevent the flight of native-born.


2 people like this
Posted by herzing girl
a resident of Monroe Park
on Feb 18, 2016 at 1:03 pm

herzing girl is a registered user.

My parents taught me that 'you' can fight City Hall. In the 1960's, "Monroe park" (Later designated this name by realtors) was unincorporated Santa Clara Co. Palo Alto and Mtn. View were vying to become 'the' city, but my parents lead a petition drive
to allow PA to annex us because PA had better regulations over development than Mtn View.
Palo Alto won.
Then, PA wanted to:
* make a 'freeway' over the creek (that would ruin the family neighborhoods)
* construct a huge condo/apt complex at the intersection of said hwy with Monroe Dr

Instead, my parents initiated a petition drive to thwart these plans...and WON!
Now there is a pedestrian/bike bridge over the creek AND a neighborhood pocket park on the site of the apt. Complex.
Sure, those who didn't want to be in PA with regulations opted for Mtn View 'cuz they wanted to build more homes on their large property OR run a business in a residential neighborhood,...they still weren't allowed. My parents were disliked by these people, but the neighborhood quality remained and real estate agents and foreign investors have profited immensly.
When my parents died, I would have loved to buy their property from the family trust, but at over 1 mil $, no way.
I'm sad to see the historic Eichlers are being bought by those who have no appreciation for their history in order to raze and rebuild bigger homes...go buy a McMansion elsewhere if that's what you want and leave US history alone!

I would like to see the PA Weekly do stories on PA history to instill appreciation of the history of the Bay Area.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Populism: A response to the failure of the elites: Palo Alto edition
By Douglas Moran | 10 comments | 1,514 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,364 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,100 views

Mountain View's Hangen Szechuan to close after 25 years
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 936 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 900 views