News

Contentious road project heads toward final phase

Planning commission votes to support new crosswalks, bike lanes, medians on Charleston-Arastradero

After more than a decade of work, a deeply controversial effort to transform Palo Alto's Charleston-Arastradero corridor into a "complete street" full of bike lanes, crosswalk improvements and other traffic-calming measures is now entering its final stretch.

The Planning and Transportation Commission on Wednesday night gave its blessing to the last phase of a traffic project that continues to polarize Palo Altans. While bicycle advocates and school representatives laud the project for calming traffic, critics blame it for enraging drivers. PTA leaders see Charleston-Arastradero as a critical bicycle corridor for the children who attend the 11 schools nearby, but many residents in the surrounding neighborhood consider it a sclerotic artery and blame it for driving traffic into the adjacent neighborhoods.

The changes being proposed are the third phase of a project that began in 2003. The first phase, along Charleston Road between Fabian Way and El Camino Real, was completed in 2006 and the second phase, on Arastradero Road between El Camino and Gunn High School, followed suit in 2010.

The most dramatic and controversial component of both phases was the reduction of lanes from four to two at various segments of the corridor. The third phase will further cement these changes through hardscape improvements. It will also add a slew of new traffic-calming measures, including two crosswalks near Gunn High, one of them leading to a new multi-use path going toward Los Altos. There would also be new bike lanes crossing El Camino; a new right-turn lane near Terman Middle School; a new concrete median on the west side of Alma Street near Park Boulevard to prevent left turns to and from Park; and a landscaped median island near Hoover Elementary that prohibits left turns and U-turns.

Both supporters and opponents made their cases before the planning commission voted 6-0 to support the project. Cheryl Lilienstein, president of the citizens group Palo Altans for Sensible Zoning, said that she understands the importance of having "so-called 'complete streets,' these streets are not complete if cars can't pass." Recently, she said, it took her son 30 minutes to get from the Page Mill Road and Arastradero intersection to her house, 3 miles away.

Suzanne Keehn cited a recent morning when the traffic turning left from El Camino onto Arastradero was backed up for two blocks.

"By making less lanes and making more 'calm,' I think you will add to a lot of frustrations and stress for people," Keehn said. "You want kids to be safe, but you will not get people out of cars by making (driving) harder and harder."

Some critics blamed the recent traffic improvements for diverting traffic onto their blocks. Jim Jurkovich was among them.

"This plan, where we limited the lanes of traffic along Arastradero, has really caused traffic to shift into the neighborhoods and that doesn't achieve the goals," Jurkovich said. "The plan presented tonight doesn't really address the concern of the neighboring community about how we will handle the current traffic load as well as increased traffic load on the street."

But city staff and supporters of the project said it's wrong to blame the traffic problems on the changes on Charleston and Arastradero. Jim Lightfoot, the city's interim chief transportation officer, acknowledged the worsening traffic on this and other local corridors, a trend that he attributed to the growing economy and increased employment. This specific project, he said, will not make traffic any worse.

"The specific Charleston-Arastradero project will not change the capacity or the operation in the corridor," Lightfoot said. "We analyzed and looked at the level of service in the corridor and that doesn't change with the improvements being provided."

The project, he said, includes a number of things with benefits to "all modes" of transportation.

The city had studied the impacts of recent road changes in 2012, just before the council voted to make the Arastradero reconfiguration permanent. At the time, the city's study indicated that traffic volumes on Arastradero and adjacent streets "have shown a consistent increase in traffic compared to other streets in Palo Alto, consistent travel time between pre-project and project conditions, a reduction in high traffic speeds during off--peak hours, and a substantial reduction in pedestrian and bicycle related incidents."

The report also noted that bicycle traffic on and along the corridor has increased since the changes were implemented.

Andrew Volmer, who lives in the area, was one of many supporters who spoke at the meeting. Volmer, has two children who attend Fairmeadow Elementary School and called Charleston-Arastradero a "community street." He encouraged city officials to "move forward with a new plan for a permanent solution for this traffic."

"In whole, it will benefit all users of the street and make a better community," Volmer said.

Some supporters acknowledged that the new changes may force cars to go slower but argued that this is a price worth paying for safety. Peggy Kraft, one of more than 50 people who attended the hearing, said she sees the increased traffic as a natural byproduct of city growth. In praising the changes, she recalled her recent experience of bicycling on Arastradero.

"I was happy to go slowly and I was happy that the cars were going slowly; that people were biking next to me," Kraft said. "I feel like everyone is safer."

The commission spent more than two hours considering various issues raised by critics, including left-turn access into various properties along the street and potential worsening of the traffic conditions. In the end, all six commissioners went along with the staff recommendation to support the project, which will now go to the City Council for approval. Historically, the council has enthusiastically supported changes on the corridor. Last year, the council included $7.5 million for improvements on Charleston-Arastradero in its infrastructure-funding plan.

"I'm really excited about the idea that we can close the book on a 13-year-long effort," Commissioner Michael Alcheck said Wednesday. "In an ideal world, we make the process of improving our streets and our community as accessible as possible and as efficient as possible. I just hope that we can move forward with these conceptual plans and turn them into reality."

Commissioner Mark Michael concurred.

"The tradeoff for increased safety and traffic calming is worthwhile, which is why I support the motion (to recommend the concept)," Michael said. "I think it's the right thing to do."

Comments

9 people like this
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 30, 2015 at 2:26 am

OK, the bicycle advocates win. I get that. People lose and the activists win. But what is the city going to do about all the people honking their horns, like they do now? If you eliminate lanes and create gridlock, how do you stop people from honking?


33 people like this
Posted by Mila Z
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Apr 30, 2015 at 5:59 am

People are the first and foremost consideration in this project. The final components of this longstanding, thoroughly vetted project will make my neighborhood so much more safe for all - people walking, biking & driving. I live one block off this corridor and my entire family uses it all the time in a bunch of different ways. Absolutely the safety of everyone deserves our enthusiastic support.


22 people like this
Posted by road rage
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 30, 2015 at 8:59 am

The road ragers who blame school children in crosswalks and bike lanes for causing road rage really need to look in the mirror first. Obey the speed limit and pay attention to the road and we can all get to work or school safely.


9 people like this
Posted by Cheryl Lilienstein
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 30, 2015 at 10:59 am

Everybody needs a safe and functional roadway.

Several bike safety advocates mentioned the increase in residential and business population as the reason the traffic is infuriatingly slow in peak hours, and, unfortunately for motorists, they chose to to disregard that fact in favor of the bike safety issues. The Planning and Transportation Commission apparently agreed, and produced no suggestions that would improve matters for motorists.

Nevertheless:

It's wrong to see this simply as a "win" for student and bike safety, or to claim, as one commenter does, that this is "safe" and thus good for everyone. The price of that "win" is more pollution, and inefficiency for everyone else...

Community well-being is the heart of this issue, and perhaps folks who are proponents of bike safety and a liveable community will help support a moratorium on the construction of new buildings-- including in the Stanford Research Park -- since existing and projected job and population growth adversely affects all of us --including schools and students--on this corridor and throughout the city.
_______________________

Gennady, staff claimed the traffic "had not changed" but did not provide data.
At rush hour, is it "level F" ?
If so, there is literally "nowhere to go." (Since there is no "level G")
Might this be a well-known and commonly used trick?
My friend --a former transportation engineer --says it is.


Posted by Concerned Palo Altan
a resident of Crescent Park

on Apr 30, 2015 at 2:07 pm


Remember me?
Forgot Password?
Due to violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are only visible to registered users who are logged in. Use the links at the top of the page to Register or Login.


Like this comment
Posted by APROGRSSIVE
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Apr 30, 2015 at 6:40 pm

ALL CARS AND TRUCKS should be completely BANNED in Palo Alt

This is the trend, and the goal.

ALL movement of people and goods and wayfinding can easily be carried
about in electric vehicles, driven by city employees,

biking, walking will be GREAT!

AIR CLEARER!

SAFER!


Like this comment
Posted by Gunn Mom and frequent walker, biker and driver on the corridor
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 30, 2015 at 11:35 pm

Many alternatives were studied. This road serves eleven public and private elementary, middle and high schools. It also provides connections to after-school destinations, including Mitchell Park Library & Community Center, Cubberley Community Center, the Campus for Jewish Life and Elks Club, multiple playing fields and parks, as well as multiple preschools, affordable housing facilities, two senior residence facilities, thousands of other residences, Abilities United rehabilitative programs, and a shopping center. Charleston-Arastradero connects community residents of all ages and abilities who walk, bike, ride transit, and drive to all of these important destinations. Safety is a key concern. I support the project.


Like this comment
Posted by share the road
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 30, 2015 at 11:39 pm

Always amusing when the people who drive everywhere everyday get all hot under the collar claiming that the congestion they don't like is caused by people who choose to use footpower! Friends, you're not stuck in traffic, you ARE traffic. Maybe you must drive -- but be grateful to those who make a different choice whenever they can.

Think it through: each student or research park commuter who gets where they're going by two wheels rather than 4 during the peak morning rush means one less car aggravating the motor vehicle back up. It takes 10 cyclists to fill the space that one medium passenger vehicle takes up when stationary, more than twice that when moving at 25 mph. So drivers, you should be thanking the cyclists for not driving at peak periods, each one could have been in a car like you, one less car times about 1000 means a whole lot less congestion impacting you!

And Cheryl, if your neighbor took 20 minutes to "drive 2.2 miles on the corridor from the Page Mill and Arastradero intersection to the Gunn High traffic light", that has very little to do with the Charleston/Arastradero project, which only extends from Fabian to the Gunn driveway.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

He said – she said – who is lying? Justice Brett Kavanaugh or PA resident Christine Ford
By Diana Diamond | 69 comments | 6,278 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 979 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 799 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 735 views

Populism: A response to the failure of the elites: Palo Alto edition
By Douglas Moran | 0 comments | 454 views