News

PUBLIC AGENDA: historic preservation, 385 Sherman Ave.

 

CITY COUNCIL ... The council has no meetings scheduled this week.

HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD ... The board is scheduled to discuss its upcoming joint meeting with the City Council; Professorville design guidelines; and matters relating to the Historic Preservation ordinance. The meeting will begin at 8 a.m. on Wednesday, July 2, in the Council Conference Room at City Hall, 250 Hamilton Ave. Read the agenda here

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD ... The board plans to discuss 385 Sherman Ave., a proposal by Daniel Minkoff to demolish a one-story office building and construct a new 55,566-square-foot, three-story, mixed-use building with two levels of underground parking. The meeting is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 3, in the Council Conference Room at City Hall, 250 Hamilton Ave. Read the agenda here

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Palo Alto Native
a resident of College Terrace
on Jul 1, 2014 at 10:20 am

Do not approve the 385 Sherman commercial building expansion. If the owner wants to upgrade his/her site with a new building, all good. But to expand to 55,000 square feet, three stories, and underground parking- no way. Another example of overdevelopment, more traffic, more employees coming to Palo Alto, and more ABAG pressures for us to build stack and pack housing structures to meet the housing to job imbalance. The city council must not approve any commercial expansions. Or, our new city council will set the new tone of our city and reverse any decisions with referendums until they retake the city this November! And not a day too late!


Like this comment
Posted by Are They Deaf, or What?
a resident of Mayfield
on Jul 1, 2014 at 4:03 pm

Read our lips: NO NEW BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT!


Like this comment
Posted by Sense
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 2, 2014 at 10:37 am

Before you go tonight, come on over to the corner of Arastradero and El Camino (leave about 75% more travel time if you haven't been lately) and look at that monster hotel the Council approved. Where once there was single story business block, 3500 square feet, there now is a 22,000 square foot structure that is even out of character relative to Arbor Real, and towers over everything.

Do you want something 2.5 times bigger than THAT at 385 Sherman??

And as you are leaving, realize also that the proposed development at Maybell would have been more massive than that right in a residential neighborhood. And then remember, it is possible to stop this, hopefully before we are San Jose Mini-Me (with San Jose's corresponding property values). The developers are literally stealing our quality of life and property values for their own short-term gain. You can fight back.


Like this comment
Posted by palo alto resident
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 2, 2014 at 10:45 am

Regarding the Sherman Ave expansion, it looks like the only issue is the request to eliminate the set back on Sherman Ave. Does the project fall under current zoning requirements otherwise?


Like this comment
Posted by Sense
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 2, 2014 at 11:37 pm


Quick question --

Why don't we charge a large, large fee to anyone who proposes any development outside of zoning rules? Everyone thinks they deserve an exception, when none of them do. We spend a lot of time dealing with these requests.

Why don't we just charge for it up front? Do we already do this? If so, I'd like to see that money committed to parkland and open space apportioned by where the zoning exceptions were granted.


Like this comment
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 21, 2014 at 9:43 am

I spoke out against 385 Sherman proposal just two minutes ago, at ARB, as did Bob Moss, Bill Ross and a dozen others.

I wrote up my notes of the earlier ARB hearing here

Web Link

Too massive, too disruptive, not in keeping with our General Plan...protect neighbors first!


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

He said – she said – who is lying? Justice Brett Kavanaugh or PA resident Christine Ford
By Diana Diamond | 69 comments | 6,645 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,023 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 882 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 788 views

Populism: A response to the failure of the elites: Palo Alto edition
By Douglas Moran | 1 comment | 776 views