News

Palo Alto highest in county for disability claims by police, firefighter retirees

Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury tells city to lower its disability rate

More than half of Palo Alto's police officers and firefighters retired with disability benefits over the past five years, a rate that is far higher than in any other surveyed jurisdiction in Santa Clara County and that is almost double the county average, according to a report released Thursday by the county's Civil Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury report was prompted by a 2011 finding by the City of San Jose Auditor that a higher-than-average number of public-safety workers in San Jose had retired with job-related disabilities. Since then, the Grand Jury surveyed 12 agencies, including the county itself, and determined that overall about 27 percent of all public-safety retirements in the county "have been granted as retirements with a job-related disability."

Palo Alto had by far the highest rate, with 51 percent of public-safety workers claiming disability when retiring.

The cost impact of "industrial disability retirements," a term used to describe retirements due to job-related disabilities, varies widely from one jurisdiction to another, according to the Grand Jury, which used questionnaires and follow-up interviews to arrive at its findings. This type of retirement, the report states, is "available for public safety members whose job-related injuries or presumptive illnesses result in an employee being unable to perform the usual duties of their current position."

The new report raises (but doesn't answer) big questions about the safety of Palo Alto's work conditions, the city's process for approving disability claims and the rapidly rising costs of retiree benefits. The lattermost issue has emerged in the last few years as a major council priority, with council members having frequent discussions about ways to curb employee pension and health care costs.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Join

Since 2009, the city has reached agreements with all of its labor unions that increase employee contributions to pension and health care -- expenses traditionally footed entirely by the city. Earlier this week, Utilities Department managers and a seven-member union of police managers became the latest labor groups to join this trend.

The city's new budget notes that the ratio of benefits to salary has risen from 50 percent in 2010 to 63 percent in 2012. The budget notes that the city's costs have "skyrocketed" (and will continue to grow) for a number of reasons, including the economic downturn, the demographics of the city's workforce and the "large retroactive benefits" granted in 2001 to public-safety workers and in 2007 to the remaining workforce.

The Grand Jury report emphasizes that the high number of "industrial disability retirements" helps to drive up benefit costs, though the impact varies greatly from one employee to another. In some cases, financial impact can be zero because the retiree may also be eligible for "service retirement" pay (based on the number of years of service) that is higher than the disability retirement. But the impact can also be significant, particularly when an employee retires with disability early in his or her career. Because these employees haven't contributed as much toward retirement during their careers, their disability claims force cities to raise their annual contributions to CalPERS, which administers the retirement plans for Palo Alto and other public agencies.

"The cumulative effect of the unfunded IDRs (industrial disability retirement) and other pension-fund obligations present a growing burden to entities and therefore taxpayers," the report states.

According to the report, Palo Alto rate towers above the other 11 surveyed jurisdictions, a puzzle that the report fails to solve. For example, Milpitas, Mountain View, San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara County all have rates between 26 percent and 30 percent. Gilroy is a distant second with an "industrial disability retirement" rate of 43 percent.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"Noting the significantly higher IDR rates of Palo Alto and Gilroy compared to those of the other county entities employing law enforcement and fire personnel, one might reasonably ask if Palo Alto and Gilroy public safety personnel encounter a more dangerous workplace than other public safety personnel in the county," the report states. "The Grand Jury could not explicitly answer this question with the information available. Even so, the significantly higher IDR rates of Palo Alto and Gilroy should invite further review by their respective city governing body."

The determination on whether an employee qualifies for this designation is made by each employer agency rather than by CalPERS. The determination is based on "complete reviews of the duties and responsibilities of the applicant's current job, including the physical requirements of the position, competent medical opinion, and all medical and vocational information provided by the applicant, employer and the agency's workers' compensation carrier," the Grand Jury report states.

According to the city's budget data, the city has been spending an average of $1.27 million annually on worker compensation and disability payments in the Fire Department over the past five years. The amount climbed from $735,804 in fiscal year 2009 (which began in July 2008), to $1.3 in 2010 and to $2.2 million in fiscal year 2011 (which began in July 2010), before dropping back to $1.1 million in 2012.

The period between 2008 and 2012 was marked by an influx of retirements from City Hall, prompted in large part by benefit cuts that the City Council was pursuing in response to the economic downturn.

One factor that may contribute to the large number of disability retirements is the high number of firefighters employed by the city, compared to police officers. The fact that the city's Fire Department also serves Stanford University may contribute to the high percentage. Though the causal link is not explained in the report, there is at least a correlation between Palo Alto's high percentage of industrial disability retirements and the high percentage of public-safety personnel who are firefighters.

The Grand Jury pointed out that Palo Alto has both the county's highest industrial-disability-retirement rate (51 percent) and the highest percentage of firefighters in its public-safety force (55 percent).

The report includes as one of its three recommendations that Palo Alto "identify what factors other than its high percentage of firefighters influence its (industrial disability retirement) rate and implement a plan to lower its (industrial disability retirement) rate."

Chief People Officer Kathryn Shen said the Human Resources Department is investigating the issues identified by the Grand Jury and the reasons for Palo Alto's high rate of disability retirements. In an interview with the Weekly Thursday, she pointed to two factors that may have helped drive the trend: the fact that the Palo Alto Fire Department provides a paramedic service (other cities contract out) and the fact that the city's population more than doubles during the day time, increasing activity among public-safety responders.

The paramedic service, Shen said, is "the big theme" when it comes to the high rate of disability retirements. She said the city is "still sorting through our individual people who are in industrial disability."

Furthermore, in addition to serving Stanford, the city's public responders have to deal with a large population of day-time employees, Shen said, pointing to Stanford Research Park companies such as HP and VMWare and Xerox.

"There's a lot of employees who work in Palo Alto -- many more than our residents," Shen said.

City Manager James Keene said the Grand Jury's findings about how Palo Alto ranks in comparison to other cities are new to him. He told the Weekly that the city needs to look at creating a program to bring the rates down. He called the Grand Jury's findings and recommendations "reasonable" and said the city will be working on a formal response.

"Clearly, I don't want us to be an outlier in a negative way on any kind of findings," Keene said. "We take this Grand Jury report seriously and look forward to getting a better understanding and (looking at) how we can change those numbers."

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Palo Alto highest in county for disability claims by police, firefighter retirees

Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury tells city to lower its disability rate

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Fri, Jun 28, 2013, 9:40 am

More than half of Palo Alto's police officers and firefighters retired with disability benefits over the past five years, a rate that is far higher than in any other surveyed jurisdiction in Santa Clara County and that is almost double the county average, according to a report released Thursday by the county's Civil Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury report was prompted by a 2011 finding by the City of San Jose Auditor that a higher-than-average number of public-safety workers in San Jose had retired with job-related disabilities. Since then, the Grand Jury surveyed 12 agencies, including the county itself, and determined that overall about 27 percent of all public-safety retirements in the county "have been granted as retirements with a job-related disability."

Palo Alto had by far the highest rate, with 51 percent of public-safety workers claiming disability when retiring.

The cost impact of "industrial disability retirements," a term used to describe retirements due to job-related disabilities, varies widely from one jurisdiction to another, according to the Grand Jury, which used questionnaires and follow-up interviews to arrive at its findings. This type of retirement, the report states, is "available for public safety members whose job-related injuries or presumptive illnesses result in an employee being unable to perform the usual duties of their current position."

The new report raises (but doesn't answer) big questions about the safety of Palo Alto's work conditions, the city's process for approving disability claims and the rapidly rising costs of retiree benefits. The lattermost issue has emerged in the last few years as a major council priority, with council members having frequent discussions about ways to curb employee pension and health care costs.

Since 2009, the city has reached agreements with all of its labor unions that increase employee contributions to pension and health care -- expenses traditionally footed entirely by the city. Earlier this week, Utilities Department managers and a seven-member union of police managers became the latest labor groups to join this trend.

The city's new budget notes that the ratio of benefits to salary has risen from 50 percent in 2010 to 63 percent in 2012. The budget notes that the city's costs have "skyrocketed" (and will continue to grow) for a number of reasons, including the economic downturn, the demographics of the city's workforce and the "large retroactive benefits" granted in 2001 to public-safety workers and in 2007 to the remaining workforce.

The Grand Jury report emphasizes that the high number of "industrial disability retirements" helps to drive up benefit costs, though the impact varies greatly from one employee to another. In some cases, financial impact can be zero because the retiree may also be eligible for "service retirement" pay (based on the number of years of service) that is higher than the disability retirement. But the impact can also be significant, particularly when an employee retires with disability early in his or her career. Because these employees haven't contributed as much toward retirement during their careers, their disability claims force cities to raise their annual contributions to CalPERS, which administers the retirement plans for Palo Alto and other public agencies.

"The cumulative effect of the unfunded IDRs (industrial disability retirement) and other pension-fund obligations present a growing burden to entities and therefore taxpayers," the report states.

According to the report, Palo Alto rate towers above the other 11 surveyed jurisdictions, a puzzle that the report fails to solve. For example, Milpitas, Mountain View, San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara County all have rates between 26 percent and 30 percent. Gilroy is a distant second with an "industrial disability retirement" rate of 43 percent.

"Noting the significantly higher IDR rates of Palo Alto and Gilroy compared to those of the other county entities employing law enforcement and fire personnel, one might reasonably ask if Palo Alto and Gilroy public safety personnel encounter a more dangerous workplace than other public safety personnel in the county," the report states. "The Grand Jury could not explicitly answer this question with the information available. Even so, the significantly higher IDR rates of Palo Alto and Gilroy should invite further review by their respective city governing body."

The determination on whether an employee qualifies for this designation is made by each employer agency rather than by CalPERS. The determination is based on "complete reviews of the duties and responsibilities of the applicant's current job, including the physical requirements of the position, competent medical opinion, and all medical and vocational information provided by the applicant, employer and the agency's workers' compensation carrier," the Grand Jury report states.

According to the city's budget data, the city has been spending an average of $1.27 million annually on worker compensation and disability payments in the Fire Department over the past five years. The amount climbed from $735,804 in fiscal year 2009 (which began in July 2008), to $1.3 in 2010 and to $2.2 million in fiscal year 2011 (which began in July 2010), before dropping back to $1.1 million in 2012.

The period between 2008 and 2012 was marked by an influx of retirements from City Hall, prompted in large part by benefit cuts that the City Council was pursuing in response to the economic downturn.

One factor that may contribute to the large number of disability retirements is the high number of firefighters employed by the city, compared to police officers. The fact that the city's Fire Department also serves Stanford University may contribute to the high percentage. Though the causal link is not explained in the report, there is at least a correlation between Palo Alto's high percentage of industrial disability retirements and the high percentage of public-safety personnel who are firefighters.

The Grand Jury pointed out that Palo Alto has both the county's highest industrial-disability-retirement rate (51 percent) and the highest percentage of firefighters in its public-safety force (55 percent).

The report includes as one of its three recommendations that Palo Alto "identify what factors other than its high percentage of firefighters influence its (industrial disability retirement) rate and implement a plan to lower its (industrial disability retirement) rate."

Chief People Officer Kathryn Shen said the Human Resources Department is investigating the issues identified by the Grand Jury and the reasons for Palo Alto's high rate of disability retirements. In an interview with the Weekly Thursday, she pointed to two factors that may have helped drive the trend: the fact that the Palo Alto Fire Department provides a paramedic service (other cities contract out) and the fact that the city's population more than doubles during the day time, increasing activity among public-safety responders.

The paramedic service, Shen said, is "the big theme" when it comes to the high rate of disability retirements. She said the city is "still sorting through our individual people who are in industrial disability."

Furthermore, in addition to serving Stanford, the city's public responders have to deal with a large population of day-time employees, Shen said, pointing to Stanford Research Park companies such as HP and VMWare and Xerox.

"There's a lot of employees who work in Palo Alto -- many more than our residents," Shen said.

City Manager James Keene said the Grand Jury's findings about how Palo Alto ranks in comparison to other cities are new to him. He told the Weekly that the city needs to look at creating a program to bring the rates down. He called the Grand Jury's findings and recommendations "reasonable" and said the city will be working on a formal response.

"Clearly, I don't want us to be an outlier in a negative way on any kind of findings," Keene said. "We take this Grand Jury report seriously and look forward to getting a better understanding and (looking at) how we can change those numbers."

Comments

Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:58 am
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:58 am

Questions that need answering:

How these public safety types get disabled?

Palo Alto doesn't have many structure files, so where/how are these injuries being sustained?

Need to know how many of there disability retirements are EMTs and how many firefighters? EMTs might be getting back injuries. However--this would require a comparison between PA EMTs and private sector EMTs.


Need to know the age of each retiree who retires on medical disability. Generally, older people tend to sustain more injuries than younger people.

Need to know if those getting disability retirement were OK six months before retirement?

Need to know the name of the doctors servicing these unions?

--

Nationally, about 100 firefighters die on the job every year. A review of those cases show that about 1/3rd die actually fighting fires, about 1/3 die in traffic accidents in-transit to/from a fire site, and the rest die of ailments attributed to a sedentary life-style, like heart attacts and high blood pressure.

Because Palo Alto runs its own ambulance service, this Grand Jury report is somewhat incomplete, since it fails to provide any details about the actual disabilities.

All-in-all, there does seem to be a problem here in Palo Alto. Sadly, it's not likely one that the Council, which allegedly represents the public, will demonstrate much interest.


Ernesto USMC
Ventura
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25 am
Ernesto USMC, Ventura
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25 am

This is insulting, particularly to anyone who has served in the military and faced real danger. A firefighter's job is statistically much safer than farming, construction, etc. and only a little more hazardous than being a desk bureaucrat.

For every firefighter that goes on disability, the remaining firefighters should have their pensions and/or pay reduced to compensate the costs. Then the fire union would have incentive to actually regulate who applies for disability instead of treating the system like a feeding frenzy.


member
Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:26 am
member, Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:26 am

more civil servants milking the system...epa and san jose should have higher percentages...really?


Martin L
Menlo Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:39 am
Martin L, Menlo Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:39 am

It's called fraud.

But being the heroes of our society, they are untouchable.


cid young
another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:40 am
cid young, another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:40 am

Perhaps the City of Palo Alto should consider taking the same measures that the City of Morgan Hill and the Coastside Fire Protection District did, and contract out for services. Not only is the provider very cost efficient and fair, they don't mess around with abuse from the small bunch that may figure out a way to retire with maximum entitlements. Before CFPD contracted with a State Agency, I have been told that some Firefighters would go out on disability, and flip houses or something else in their "spare" time. When that house was finished, bingo, they'd be back at work and another would go out on a disability. They also would get big pay spikes right before they were ready to retire, so the calculation would be higher when using pay to determine post-retirement income.
As employees of the District, the retirement or disability costs were a large percentage of the budget, as it must be for Palo Alto employees. The beauty of contracting with the State Agency, is they remain employees of the state, thereby lifting the unfunded liability for pensions and healthcare from the backs of the property owners with-in the District, because the State pays for it.

To sum it up I have three words: USE CAL FIRE


neighbor
Greenmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:46 am
neighbor, Greenmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:46 am

One of my biggest concerns about public employee, and particularly safety workers, are those who have not contributed at all to their own retirement system. Their salaries are quite good and there is no reason taxpayers should pay without the individual contributing as well. That makes no sense. Also true for medical benefits.

And btw, one motivation for disability retirements is that their monthly income is then tax-free.


not good enough
Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:46 am
not good enough, Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:46 am

These people are being disabled in the service to our community and you're blaming the victims. This needs a complete overhaul of how the city supports its workers. When this happens in schools we have an uproar. When it happens to our workers we call "fraud"?!!!


Total Scam
Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:49 am
Total Scam, Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:49 am

To a large extent, this is a total scam to receive pension benefits tax-free. I agree with Martin L. - these "heroes" are untouchable. So the large scale fraud will continue.


Taxpayer
Community Center
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:52 am
Taxpayer, Community Center
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:52 am

Unfortunately this is just another example of the union ff's taking advantage of the system and milking the taxpayers. Disgusting!


PaloAlto33
Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:54 am
PaloAlto33, Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:54 am

"The new report raises (but doesn't answer) big questions about the safety of Palo Alto's work conditions, the city's process for approving disability claims and the rapidly rising costs of retiree benefits. "

Safety of PA conditions? That's a joke. Everyone knows it's because the firefighters all angle to get on disability from a bad back, a sore knee, whatever. It's very, very lucrative to get on disability + pension. I know people who've retired on over 100K a year, at age 50-something. If you set up the incentives, people will naturally respond and try to get on disability.

Anyone who's active, whether due to their job or an active lifestyle, will have a few aches and pains by the time they are 50-55. Firefighters just get paid for it.

So by all means, investigate. Tell us what you find. :-)


to "not good enough"
Charleston Gardens
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:55 am
to "not good enough", Charleston Gardens
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:55 am

"Not good enough", you are foolish - hopefully out of touch. Take an educated look at reality and it will shake you up - guaranteed!


Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:57 am
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jun 28, 2013 at 10:57 am

> These people are being disabled in the service to our
> community and you're blaming the victims.

The question is: are they really disabled, or just gaming the system?

Public safety disability system 'ripe for abuse':
Web Link

Anyone who has any doubts can google "public safety disability fraud" and see what comes up.


all levels
Ventura
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:02 am
all levels, Ventura
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:02 am

Stuff happens all over. This IRS contractor takes the cake, okay, not cake, but $500 million, scamming as a veteran:

> WASHINGTON -- On Wednesday, Rep. Tammy Duckworth, a veteran of the Iraq War, dramatically chastised a federal contractor who claimed that a high school sports injury had rendered him a service-disabled veteran.

Speaking during a hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Duckworth vividly described to a committee witness, Braulio Castillo, how she lives in near constant pain after losing both of her legs during her service as a combat pilot.

Castillo cited his foot injury, suffered at a military prep school, as the basis for his IT company's application for special status as a "service-disabled veteran-owned small business." The application was granted, and his company, Strong Castle, was given preferential treatment in federal contract bids.

"Does your foot hurt?" Duckworth asked Castillo, who answered yes.

"My feet hurt too," said Duckworth. "In fact, the balls of my feet burn continuously, and I feel like there's a nail being hammered into my heel right now. So I can understand pain and suffering, and how service connection can actually cause long-term, unremitting, unyielding, unstoppable pain."

"I'm sorry that twisting your ankle in high school has now come back to hurt you in such a painful way, if also opportune for you to gain this status for your business," she added.

Over a six-month period in 2012, Strong Castle won contracts with the Internal Revenue Service worth as much as $500 million. Web Link

re: local civil servants - my father died too young, after 30 years as a firefighter before all the safety precautions (breathing apparatus, etc..) came in that might have helped him live a longer life. We should fight fraud at all levels. We should not throw the baby out with the bathwater because a bunch of anonymous posters have a jones against working people who are part of a union.


bravo to PA Weekly
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:09 am
bravo to PA Weekly, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:09 am

Thank you Palo Alto Weekly for covering this news - this is the kind of information about our local government that we taxpayers need to know about. This needs looking into, both by our local journalists and our city governing officials. To those who say back off, I think this merits investigation because it strongly appears fraud or other gaming of the system is occurring by our union workers, and WE taxpayers have to foot the costly bill. For those who file legit claims, no problem, you should have no issue with shining sunlight on all the claims and payouts, and if gaming of the system and/or fraud is found, I trust you support prosecuting to the full extent of the law.


cid young
another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:15 am
cid young, another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:15 am

After many years using Local 2400 Firefighters, the Coastside opted to use CAL FIRE, and a different Union, Local 2881. The firefighters at CAL FIRE work more days per month, and might get called to cover in another CAL FIRE contracted area, if vacation or sick leave leaves the other area short staffed. This saves money so there is far less unplanned overtime.($$$)
Some Firefighters in the former Department chose to get jobs elsewhere so they could keep their cushy work schedule, (I believe it was 2 (24 hour shits)days on 4 days off.) CAL FIRE Chiefs and upper management are very professional. It seemed the former District under L 2400, allowed things to slip through the cracks. When, after 5 years of switching to CAL FIRE, 3 CFPD Board Members (A majority of the 5 member board) did not wish to renew the contract with CALFIRE.
Guess what? ...after a damning Grand Jury report, and much Citizen complaining at monthly board meetings to please keep CAL FIRE, the three failed to renew the contract on June 30th, 2012, which lead to a Recall of the 3 majority Dirctors, thereby turning into a successful community revolt and a crushing 2-1 t Special Election held April 9th, 2013. The Three Recalles, even with Local 2400 massive financial backing, only garnered 1/3 of the votes needed to hold their seats, while voters turned them out with a stunning 66% of the votes to KEEP CAL FIRE. This week, the new Board voted unanimously to Re-contract with CAL FIRE for 7 years.


Phillip
Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:21 am
Phillip, Crescent Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:21 am

This is a complete scam. They retire off you tax dollars at a young age with outrageous benefits and then scam you further by being "disabled." BART workers do the same thing and yet they have the gall to talk about going on strike. When are the taxpayers of this state going to get a clue??


35 year resident
Old Palo Alto
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:25 am
35 year resident, Old Palo Alto
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:25 am

As a health care provider I have seen some of this abuse in my practice. There appears to be a tactic taken by some PAFD employees to put in enough time for a full pension and then conveniently get injured and placed on disability. I am curious as to how many of these "medically retired" personnel then go on to private sector jobs and double dip.


Josh
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:26 am
Josh, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:26 am

If paramedic services are driving the disabitly rate up, maybe it's time to contract this service out like other cities do.


cid young
another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43 am
cid young, another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43 am

A neighbor of mine once worked for CHEVRON and went out on a disability claim, BUT they had someone watch him coming and going with no visible problems, once he was out on disability. They nailed him for workman's compensation fraud and he actually spent time in jail. Once out of prison, he never was gainfully re-employed, and eventually was suspected of embezzling a local non-profit he became involved with. When they started to investigate the fraud he suddenly left California "due to a sick mother" and later, his home was foreclosed. This is a cautionary tale for those that attempt to milk the system.


Total Scam has it right
Barron Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:08 pm
Total Scam has it right, Barron Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:08 pm

I agree. Would never fly in the private sector..


neighbor
Barron Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:23 pm
neighbor, Barron Park
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:23 pm

disability due to backpain from sitting too much


Bucky
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:41 pm
Bucky, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jun 28, 2013 at 12:41 pm

My first inclination was to say, "Too many hands in the cookie jar." But then I thought: If Palo Alto has some of the highest pay and benefits around for its firefighters, then they're likely to stay in the job forever, and get old on the job, and be prone to more injuries. However, if the pay and benefits were on the low end of the scale, and firemen would get hired and trained in PA, and then transfer to other cities later to get better pay and benefits, then PA would have a younger dept. generally and have less injuries.


Concerned Retiree
Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Concerned Retiree, Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:49 pm

Privatize both the fire and the paramedic "services." We should contract out not only fire department functions (whatever that comes to -- four or five fires a year?) and certainly all paramedic services.

Why should we be indebted to such bloated department? There are far better uses for PA $$.


Concerned Retiree
Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Concerned Retiree, Midtown
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:53 pm

Privatize both the fire and the paramedic "services." We should contract out not only fire department functions (whatever that comes to -- four or five fires a year?) and certainly all paramedic services.

Why should we be indebted to such bloated department? There are far better uses for PA $$.


David Pepperdine
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:55 pm
David Pepperdine, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 28, 2013 at 1:55 pm

Sadly, the efficiency of our city is not a concern of our esteemed city council.


Too Funny
St. Claire Gardens
on Jun 28, 2013 at 4:04 pm
Too Funny, St. Claire Gardens
on Jun 28, 2013 at 4:04 pm

Never mind that understaffing of these fire and police positions add to extra hours on the job per employee,and that the City Manager is clueless and befuddled with the new findings. I am sure he will recommend a blue ribbon committee to address this perplexing issue. What a dysfunctional city. What a pity that city council has hired a city manager who obviously has minimal managerial skills.


PA Citizen
Green Acres
on Jun 28, 2013 at 5:31 pm
PA Citizen, Green Acres
on Jun 28, 2013 at 5:31 pm

This is expected, unfortunately.

I have never, in years of private sector negotiations, found myself so fortunate as to be seated across the table from a negotiating entity as overmatched to the task as the PA city council. This bunch of lawyers and career politicians have about as much business sense as a middle of the pack high schooler with zero training in negotiation or sound business principles. The unions have run roughshod over our low-capability representatives: they just "imposed" a raise on the already overpaid unions while doing nothing about the spiraling pension debt. Leaving a disability system open to such abuse is another.

If anyone with any business sense ran Palo Alto, the unions would be immediately adjusted down to market rate (the salary at which the market will produce qualified workers) which is probably 20-50% downward, and if they were obstinate as expected, the jobs would be outsourced to the private sector entity that could perform the work most efficiently.


Outside Observer
another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Outside Observer, another community
on Jun 28, 2013 at 6:21 pm

All of these disability claims are processed through the City Human Resources Department. I suggest people start looking there and determine if it's fraud, incompetence, or a combination of the two.


Anne
Palo Alto High School
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:16 pm
Anne, Palo Alto High School
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:16 pm

The citizens should look into Cal Fire, mentioned above. The peninsula could have fine fire service for less financial overhead. These future bills will crush us, the kids who will be asked to pay these exorbitant bills in the future.


the_punnisher
Registered user
Mountain View
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm
the_punnisher, Mountain View
Registered user
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm

The original reason that may apply ( my 1st ex was a CPA ) is that a REGULAR RETIREMENT PENSION IS SUBJECT TO FULL TAXATION AT NORMAL TAX RATES..( the CPA helps lower a tax burden with advice ). A DISABILITY RETIREMENT PENSION IS TAX FREE!!! So many people facing retirement in the public sector FAKE SYMPTOMS and get a " wink and a nod " from doctors in on the scam.
What is really biased is that the average disability retirement ( like mine due to TWO strokes and the loss of use on my left side ) MUST GO THROUGH THE SYSTEM TWICE TO GET THE PAID-FOR BENEFITS THE PERSON IS ENTITLED TO!
Yes, my first application was rejected. ( that is why some legal prostitutes know that EVERYONE LOSES ON THAT FIRST APPLICATION! The TV ads you see. )

My SECOND visit ( I was still wheelchair bound at the time ) took only 15 minutes to get the disability benefits I have paid for over the decades.

I think that these examples of " gaming the system " will explain the high disability rate among our supposed " public ( often unionized and union doctors automatically sign the disability paperwork ) servants have screwed the taxpayers they supposedly work for...

Like I said on the homeless issue ( maybe ) THE FREE RIDE IS OVER!!


Gat gat gat OH!
Los Altos Hills
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:57 pm
Gat gat gat OH!, Los Altos Hills
on Jun 28, 2013 at 7:57 pm

Looked in the Yellow Pages under "Doctors, Union" and didn't see any.

Neither was "legal prostitutes".

If everyone thinks there's so much fraud going on, should b easy enough to bring a solid example forward, as opposed to anecdotal gibberish.


Rob Roy
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:27 pm
Rob Roy, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:27 pm

Many, if not most, firefighters retire early with disability issues. it is one of the risks of being in that profession. DUH!


RobRoy
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:29 pm
RobRoy, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 28, 2013 at 9:29 pm

BTW, my brother in law is a paramedic, and he has been shot in the chest twice--by people he was trying to save. Thank God for bullet-proof vests!!!


Annette
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 am
Annette, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 29, 2013 at 6:28 am

It can't be all that hard to establish a system in which REAL job-caused disabilities qualify for a disability retirement and normal/age-related/genetic/lifestyle choice disabilities do not. No one begrudges a truly disabled firefighter his or her due, but the system invites abuse, esp w/the presumption that a condition is job related. There simply aren't enough fires or other potentially physically dangerous situations in this town to believe that the quoted PA disability numbers are legit. Maybe a percentage-based system would work: if 20% of FF time is spent in peril, then assume 20% of the person's disability (if any) is a job-related disability. Consider: if a FF who is also an avid tennis player ends up with tweaked knees or a rotator cuff problem, is that a job related disability or a lifestyle choice-related disability? At some point the pendulum has got to swing back to reasonable territory. If we don't give it a push in that direction soon our financial obligations will be greater than our resources.


Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jun 29, 2013 at 7:32 am
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jun 29, 2013 at 7:32 am

> Many, if not most, firefighters retire early with
> disability issues. it is one of the risks of being
> in that profession

Every job has risks. When there are on-the-job injuries, how many of these injuries are “ordinary”, and how many are debilitating—worthy of a “disability pension”?

Firefighters do not fight many fires, these days. Nationally, the number of fires in which firefighters are involved has dropped to about 3-4% of the total callouts for a given city. Locally, it’s even a little lower. As mentioned in another post, advances in firefighter safety equipment (air tanks, radio identification, robots, and better training) has reduced the number of firefighter deaths and injuries significantly. And, from CalPERS data, it’s clear that firefighters do not die within ten years of retirement.

This issue of fraud and abuse involving disability pensions pops up in the news, from time-to-time:

Monday, May 10, 2004
Sacramento Bee Examines Rising Cost of Disability Pensions for Retired Public-Safety Employees:

Web Link

In a special report, the Sacramento Bee on Sunday examined industrial disability medical pensions for retired public-safety personnel, which are a "growing expense" for the state that have "escaped scrutiny" even as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and lawmakers "wrestle with the record deficit."


More Questions In CHP Disability Fraud Probe (2006):
Web Link

Nov. 24 - KGO (KGO) -- We've been telling you about the CHP turning over nearly two dozen suspicious cases of potential medical pension fraud to the state. But, the state's largest pension fund for public employees is forbidden by law to investigate some of those cases.
---

The public sector pension system has become out-of-control. Disability abuse is small potatoes, compared to the trillions that are estimated to be needed to fully fund the fantasy vision of the public sector unions, and their bought-and-paid-for politicians:

Web Link

Abstract
Across the United States, state and local government-sponsored pension plans are in trouble. They are dangerously underfunded to the extent that their assets are unable to meet future liabilities without either outsize investment returns or huge cash infusions. Over the past several years, estimates of the total size of the public pension problem in the U.S. have ranged from $730 billion in unfunded liabilities to $4.4 trillion. Many financial economists believe that the true size of the total unfunded liability lies closer to the larger estimates than it does to the smaller.
-----

If local politicians are unable to deal with the small number of abuse cases in their own domains, how will they deal with the national problem?


the_punnisher
Registered user
Mountain View
on Jun 29, 2013 at 8:06 am
the_punnisher, Mountain View
Registered user
on Jun 29, 2013 at 8:06 am

[Portion removed.]
That disability fraud problem is nation-wide. I cited my source, where are yours?

You realize that the TRULY DISABLED ( all disabled, both public and private, like myself ) are the real victims.

Or do you get your kicks by abusing the disabled? One has to wonder....


the_punnisher
Registered user
Mountain View
on Jun 29, 2013 at 8:30 am
the_punnisher, Mountain View
Registered user
on Jun 29, 2013 at 8:30 am

BTW, Thanks to the posts with the FACTS about this ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM that no one wants to talk about.

My contribution to society includes creation of the WWW out of DARPAnet ( I trained on the TCP/IP, foundation for both ) and the systems that created the Space shuttle that were used at NASA-AMES and the 747. Both " flew " on the Cray Supercomputers before they were flown real life.

I think that the other advances ( good & not so good ) by use of that fantastic tool is one of my best examples of a contribution to society, wholesale instead of retail like the majority of public employees. It is a small number of public sector employees that game the system and hurt the truly disabled.

These people are causing the underfunded pension problems that hurt everyone. They deserve our contempt and both civil and criminal charges.

Oh, you do not find these other fraud creating people in the YPs. However, if you talk to union shop stewards, you find these people and are steered to them. One of the unseen " benefits " of belonging to a union....


aids
Greater Miranda
on Jun 29, 2013 at 12:56 pm
aids, Greater Miranda
on Jun 29, 2013 at 12:56 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


More Information
Meadow Park
on Jun 29, 2013 at 1:10 pm
More Information , Meadow Park
on Jun 29, 2013 at 1:10 pm

Almost all of the comments above refer to firefighters and their disabilities. Today's Daily Post gave the number of firefighters versus the number of police officers retiring with disabilities - about 1/2 were police officers. This ratio is fairly reasonable since police deal with violence more that do firefighters.

Mt. Martin asked a number of questions and pointed out the Grand Jury report has too little detail to assess the problem clearly. At the least follow up should be made to determine who is gaming the system and who is legitimately disabled.


John
Mountain View
on Jun 29, 2013 at 2:55 pm
John, Mountain View
on Jun 29, 2013 at 2:55 pm

"What a pity that city council has hired a city manager who obviously has minimal managerial skills"

Unfortunately your city manager has managed to pay himself more the the governor, president, senators etc. He has priorities after all.

He also has a "staff" that rivals the same.

Library fiasco, disability scams, across the board raises, developers running wild, bloated manager structure, sustainability positions...

I'd say he's managing very well, if you're not a taxpaying resident.


Terry
Midtown
on Jun 29, 2013 at 9:04 pm
Terry, Midtown
on Jun 29, 2013 at 9:04 pm

This speaks volumes about the character of Palo Alto employees.


Mayfield Child
Green Acres
on Jun 30, 2013 at 4:45 am
Mayfield Child, Green Acres
on Jun 30, 2013 at 4:45 am

ARE you REALLY going to even whisper fraud on my father who went out on disability at the fire department after contracting tuberculosis?????? ARE you REALLY going to fight to lower the disability pay for men like him??? PLUEEZZE...I believe it was the late '40's or early 50's that he filed in high court in San Francisco for his (and every fireman's)legal right for disability from the Palo Alto Fire Department. Bad enough he had contracted the disease ~and having to fight in court was more than wrong that he had to endure. C.Kidder 1917-1979


Frank
another community
on Jun 30, 2013 at 5:22 am
Frank, another community
on Jun 30, 2013 at 5:22 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Michelle
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 30, 2013 at 7:39 am
Michelle, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 30, 2013 at 7:39 am

Nothing will convinced me that being a Palo Alto Firefighter is different than being one in any of the neighboring cities. Someone was not "watching the store". These unfunded pensions will cost Palo Alto millions of dollars for a long time.


bravo to PA Weekly
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 30, 2013 at 12:36 pm
bravo to PA Weekly, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 30, 2013 at 12:36 pm

Will anything come of this - an investigation - Or will city council sweep this under the rug. I think this should be directly addressed by our elected officials.
PA Weekly, please follow up. Thank you.


jake
Community Center
on Jun 30, 2013 at 7:13 pm
jake, Community Center
on Jun 30, 2013 at 7:13 pm
@july
Midtown
on Jun 30, 2013 at 10:33 pm
@july, Midtown
on Jun 30, 2013 at 10:33 pm

One of the recurring stories I hear from doctors is about workers who come to their clinics with the sole purpose of getting disability certificate. Basically, the patient is in the office not to get treatment but to convince the doctor that even a minor condition qualifies him or her for lifelong disability.


thankful
College Terrace
on Jul 1, 2013 at 8:00 am
thankful, College Terrace
on Jul 1, 2013 at 8:00 am

I would just like to thank all the firefighters for risking their health and safety to protect and help me and my family! PAFD is an amazing group of men and women!
Everyone should show your support to these people! And everyone should have the families of the 19 firefighters who died in Arizona on 6/30/13. this tragedy should remind everyone to show more respect to our local heroes!


Nineteen under smoke blankets
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 1, 2013 at 8:55 am
Nineteen under smoke blankets, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 1, 2013 at 8:55 am

thankful,

Good call. Let's retire this back and forth bashing for a day or two out of respect for the tragedy in Phoenix.

We can then spend the rest of the year screaming on and on....


Taxpayer
Community Center
on Jul 1, 2013 at 10:53 am
Taxpayer, Community Center
on Jul 1, 2013 at 10:53 am

i am thankful and appreciate the work done by all folks in our country and around the world. Whether you are a nuclear engineer or a farmworker, I respect all who get up, produce, and earn a living.

I also am sad that 19 workers died in AZ. I am especially sad for their families.

I am also disgusted with the PAFD union employees who sleep more than they work, are overpaid by a factor or 2-3 times, have a relatively safe and sedentary job, and continually whine and wheedle with the politicians to take more money from the taxpayers. Not my heroes. When I see a PA union fire employee i think of a bottomless pit for hardworking citizens.


Time Out
Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 11:17 am
Time Out, Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 11:17 am

Quite a series of posts here! Whereas PA firefighters are paid excessively above and beyond other local firefighters, yes, that should be addressed. But holy-moley! the animosity that goes well above and beyond that!

Leads to a lot of questions, like: do first responders that have their lives shortened or die in the line of duty, do they all get the mythical "union doctors" fantasized above? Did the 19 that got burned alive under some tinfoil fire protection device all have the mythical union doctors?

@taxpayer is having a "sad" about the firefighters burned alive, yet she is "DISGUSTED" about the local boys supposedly "safe and sedentary" jobs. My choice of the word "animosity" appears to be understated.

LMFTFY: "This speaks volumes about the character of Palo Alto (online, anonymous posters)."

All of you: take a time out in your corners for a day.


neighbor
another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 12:03 pm
neighbor, another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 12:03 pm

Thank you for trying to calm things down Time-Out. Unfortunately the daily onslaught of irrationality and excess outrage on this topic, and almost every other topic, on this website won't stop.

Are these writers really a sample of the Palo Alto community or are they just the lunatic fringe? Often the letters are hysterical and way over the line of civility.

The picture of Palo Alto on these pages is becoming one of a dysfunctional, unfeeling, angry, and oft-times racist "community."

Maybe it's good for readership, but it's bad for the community for stimulate the hostility with a careful rotation of hostile "stories" -- while leaving REAL news unreported, or left to the large SF or SJ newspapers/TV stations to report.

BTW -- having worked with firefighters locally and in LA, and also having needed them for a house emergency and for 2 cardiac responses, I have utmost respect for them.

Yes, it is true that there is "down time" just as there is for any emergency responders (police, emergency room personnel), but when these people are called up the work is specialized and often dangerous. Nope--you couldn't do their job.

If there is a salary issue, Palo Alto should enter negotiations and stop screaming.


Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 12:31 pm
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 12:31 pm

> questions, like: do first responders that have their
> lives shortened or die in the line of duty

CalPERS released a study a few years ago that put to bed the myth that firefighters die sooner than other people, once retired:
Web Link


Resident
Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:05 pm
Resident, Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:05 pm

Wayne - thanks for posting the link about ff's longetivity rates. Most folks are aware of that. It is just the ff's and their union supporters who keep trying to muddy the picture by throwing in inaccurate data. The bottom line is that union ff's in the Bay area aren't satisfied just making three times the national average wage for an ff. They contribute to the campaigns of politicians like Price, Shepherd, Chavez (SJ), so these politicians give in to all their demands. They retire years ahead of the rest of us when they have worked relatively easy jobs. They they find ways to claim disability so they can avoid paying taxes. No problem, let the citizens pick up the slack.

Time to vote out the union politicians and get back to government for the people, instead of government for the unions.


Time Out
Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:18 pm
Time Out, Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:18 pm

Worst loss of first-responder life probably since 9/11, and wayne/resident can't give it a rest.

Your news link does not a link to the actual Calpers study. Without the link, it's pretty difficult to verify what's been written in this guys blog.

Here's a report on a study at U of Cincinnati: Web Link (excuse the bad formatting - it's from a PDF)

"One of the most dangerous occupations
in the world is becoming even more hazardous for
its workers — but a new study suggests that the people we
expect to protect us are not being adequately
p
rotected against the risks of their profession.
A study released by the University of
Cincinnati has determined that fi
refighters are at a greater risk of
developing four different types of
cancer than the general population —
and also suggests the protective
equipment firefighters are using is insufficient
in protecting them against cancer-causing agents.
In a report by the university's environmental health
department, researchers f
ound that firefighters are
twice as likely to develop test
icular cancer and have significa
ntly higher rates of non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma and prostate cancer than people in othe
r professions — and overall
found 10 cancers that
were either possibly or pr
obably related to firefighting.
The report also confirmed pr
evious findings that firefighters are at
greater risk for multiple myeloma,
which is a cancer of the bone marrow fo
r which there is currently no known cure.
The research is the largest comprehensive study to
date investigating cancer risk associated with
working as a firefighter and c
oncludes that firefighters need
better protecti
on on the job.
The findings were published in the November issue
of the Journal of Occupa
tional and Environmental
Medicine"


Fed up with typical pa comments
Southgate
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 pm
Fed up with typical pa comments, Southgate
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 pm

You winey shots. Who are you to judge the danger both police and firefighters put themselves in every day to protect you and your family. If you came home from work with hearing loss from the sound of a fire engine you rode on, or endured the pain from wrestling a person on pcp, or try to fall asleep while trying not to think of the child you pulled from the bottom of a pool, or the abused people you face year after year, you might be the one saying you don't get paid enough. What is the most offensive is that you, the people who sit behind a desk, who dont have any idea what it takes to do that job can pass judgement. When there are no more people wanting to do those life saving jobs because of stuff like this, and the response time to save your loved one is slow because no one is there, you will pass judgement on that as well. There people get injured in so many different ways on the job. Give them their well deserved retirement, most never get hired again. Then let's have someone examine your salary.


nice try
Midtown
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:56 pm
nice try, Midtown
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:56 pm

Time out, there's not one shred of evidence to any of your claims. Just another bogus study paid for by firefighters/IAFF so they can add lifetime cancer related medical costs to their already bloated list of medical benefits. What the fire unions are really attempting to do is extend the amount of years, post retirement, that they can still claim cancer is a work related disease.


Mindy
another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:59 pm
Mindy, another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 2:59 pm

To time out,

Still does not answer why Palo Alto has almost the double rate of retired disabilities compared to other Bay Area cities. I wonder if the city has done a breakdown of what type of disability each firefighter has? That would be useful information for them and the public. Also, how much sick leave does Palo Alto empolyees use compared to other cities.


Time Out
Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 3:14 pm
Time Out, Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 3:14 pm

nice try: "Just another bogus study paid for by firefighters/IAFF "

PROVE IT.

- Prove that the University of Cincinnati is a bogus school paid for by firefighters.

- Prove the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is bogus and paid for by firefighters.

You are so far over the line in your inept absurdity, that normal folks must just nod when they hear your rants and just start slowly backing away.

Also prove the UNION DOCTORS you pretend are there. Should be easy the way the whiners go on moaning about it. Here's a list of doctors you already called bogus, maybe it's them!!! Web Link

I have no problem with PA investigating why certain anomalies appear, or looking at if PA overpays, but the vitriol by many on this board is completely disgusting. And they can't even give it a rest for a day.

Sick, sick, sick.


Smokey T Bear
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 3:50 pm
Smokey T Bear, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 3:50 pm
Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:16 pm
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:16 pm

> link to original CalPERS study

Here’s the link:
Web Link

And where’s the link to the U. Cincinnati study?

Not even a date on the extracted text.

By the way, the BLS data shows that crews on fishing trawlers are at a much higher mortality rate than firefighters.

The loss in Arizona is indeed tragic. Everyone is saddened by this event. But being a Vietnam-era Military Officer, I keenly remember our nation experienced young men of the same age and inclination to serve their communities/nation dying in far greater numbers—on a daily basis. Do you remember?


Not an issue
Community Center
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:31 pm
Not an issue, Community Center
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:31 pm

Remember this:
Web Link

Firefighters in palo alto face nowhere near the dangers thatbthe Arizona firefighters faced. And also remember that a certain Sunnyvale council member has alwya pushed for mor and more money for our firefighters.


Resident
Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:40 pm
Resident, Downtown North
on Jul 1, 2013 at 4:40 pm

Time out's antics are pretty standard ff union modus operandi. Call others "sick, sick, sick" if you try to discuss facts. Spread unsubstantiated data and call it fact.

I'm all for safety employees and like another poster said I respect workers in general. I just get so disgusted with the local union ff's and their "i'm a hero", pay me more attitude.


JG
Portola Valley
on Jul 1, 2013 at 5:14 pm
JG, Portola Valley
on Jul 1, 2013 at 5:14 pm

Wayne - appears that was the link to the Cincinnati study Web Link Your study shows firefighters generally live as long as the CALPERS populations, Cincinnati shows more cancers.

But the reason I'm jumping into this is your very poor judgement in starting a bit of a ****ing match with your comments "But being a ... , I keenly remember ... dying in far greater numbers—on a daily basis. Do you remember?"

Is that where you want to go? One death is a tragedy. The 5,000 deaths in Iraq were an abomination. The tens of thousands of injuries in Iraq, the signature wound being traumatic head trauma, are/were obscene.

But for you to bring up the 50K deaths in Vietnam is atrocious. Would it make a difference if I bring up the Seoul? 35K dead? You need to back off, brother.


Why
Meadow Park
on Jul 1, 2013 at 9:43 pm
Why, Meadow Park
on Jul 1, 2013 at 9:43 pm

..do public safety employees get paid these exorbinant salaries and benefits and ALSO get paid overtime that isn't? You'd think people making these wages and extreme benefits would at least have to actually "Work Overtime" to get paid overtime. Apparently the public safety unions have have an exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that requires employees to work more than their scheduled hours. The current FD contract allows for employees to take the week off, fill in for one shift, and get paid their weekly pay rate plus 24 hours at time and one half (36 hours). They don't need to work overtime to get paid overtime.

In the above example the FD employee can take the entire week off by using sick leave, holiday pay, vacation pay, or any combination of the above. The above FD employee would receive 56 hours pay for the shifts he/she didn't work and also receive 24 hours pay (24* times the overtime rate of 1.5 (time and one half)) or 36 hours.

For working one day, under the FLSA exemption, the Fire Department Employee earns 56 hours at straight time plus 24 hours at time and one half (36 hours), for a straight paycheck of 92 hours for the week; even though the employee only actually worked 24 hours.

You just can't make this stuff up, but it does help to explain how some employees make an extra 100K in overtime.


Outside Observer
another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 10:17 pm
Outside Observer, another community
on Jul 1, 2013 at 10:17 pm

Human nature 101:

Palo Alto employees have the same opinion of you as you have of them.

Unfortunately, they have the ability to exploit you, whereas you have no recourse.

What is the fix? I'm not sure there is one. The exploitation has been going on for decades and no one has been able to stop it.


A Noun Ea Mus
Professorville
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:03 am
A Noun Ea Mus, Professorville
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:03 am

If I were a fire fighter and had listened to the "citizens" of Palo Alto with their "eliter than thou" attitudes, snap judgements on anything and everything--- as if their economic success elevated them to some judgmental god status, etc...if there were a fire and I were called I would look for any excuse to drive slow, arrive slow, spray slow. Hell, I'd love to swig back some brew and just watch the fire.

If I were a police officer and had to listen to the same, be talked down to constantly, etc., I'd relish the day for any and all "pay back".

If I were a city employee after Prop D passed, with all the disrespect shown, and some water leak occurred, some storm damage, etc....I'd move SLOW and take my time also.

If I were a PA teacher and had to suffer with the parents here, I'd look for ways to skew the Star Tests such that PA ranked last in the state and then watch the parents and Real Estate Agents go bonkers and form committees and such to deal with the problem.

But that's just me. Probably most city employees still try to do a decent job as they work in this stench of PA.


You all have created the climate, now live in it. But don't stop the whining, it's so YOU!


A Noun Ea Mus
Professorville
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:08 am
A Noun Ea Mus, Professorville
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:08 am

Oh, and of course, if I could sock it to you all with a fake disability claim, that would be SO VERY SWEET!


Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 8:38 am
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 8:38 am

> Cancers

I recognize that possible post-retirement cancers are not the same thing as mortality rates, per se—unless those cancers are all fatal. Medical science has yet to advance to the state where it can identity the source of all cancers—such as those that might have been caused on the job. While lung cancers are attributed to smoking, and people working in close quarters with asbestos have developed other kinds of cancers—the exact source of all cancers, such as in firefighters, with 100% medical certainty is hard to believe. If cancers are also linked to genetics—such studies will ultimately not be all that useful.

Since post-retirement health care data is very hard for the public to come by, these sorts of studies need to be taken with a grain of salt. The City of Palo Alto might be able to do such a study. For instance—how many Palo Alto public safety people have retired with a cancer-related disability that their doctors have certified as “job related”? No doubt other studies will be done, over time. However, one study does not the truth make.

> Would it make a difference if I bring up the Seoul? 35K dead?

The costs of our great society are often expressed in terms of money and lives. We honor those who served, and those who died—but we don’t use their deaths to suppress discussion about the present, or the future.

The poster objected to our discussing Palo Alto disability retirement rates because of the tragedy in Arizona, These two topics have nothing to do with each other. I brought up the Vietnam-era death count to point out that our country has lost young men in great numbers, from time-to-time, in order to live in what we nominally call a “democracy”—where “free speech” is the norm, not the exception.

Hopefully we all can ponder this issue of “freedom”, and its costs, come July 4th.


Hero
another community
on Jul 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm
Hero, another community
on Jul 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm

I'll start by thanking Anon for his continuing support. I'll also express my frustration that so many of you still don't seem to get the big picture. Firemen are not like the rest of you. We are incredbily brave, strong, fearless, and handsome. You all need to learn to value and appreciate the value we bring to your community. We need lots of money so we can have time to enjoy all the toys (boats, ski mobiles, vacation houses etc). With all the time off we have we need to have toys to keep us busy. Because we are special we deserve to eat at the best restaurants. Most of us don't spend a lot of time with formal education so at least you can be happy that we are not bargaining that taxpayers pay for our kids college.

So suck it up and just accept that if you want to employ amazing heroes, you need to be abgle to pay for us!


KKKKKKKarl
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 12:25 pm
KKKKKKKarl, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 12:25 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Ex-Employee
another community
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:41 pm
Ex-Employee, another community
on Jul 2, 2013 at 1:41 pm

My neighbor is a retired PAPD officer living off a plush medical retirement. I'm sure he would give it all back after falling off a second floor parking garage and having a 300 pound man land on top of him. I wonder which quack doctor has done the three back surgeries to cover up the fact that he's cheating the system and ripping off the Palo Alto tax payers.


Wayne:
In the link to the Calpers study they equate safety employees living longer to the fact that there are more disability retirements. So your assertion that ties mortality rates and job duties doesn't directly correlate.


thanks, ex-employee
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 10:31 pm
thanks, ex-employee, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 2, 2013 at 10:31 pm

Posted by Ex-Employee:

"My neighbor is a retired PAPD officer living off a plush medical retirement. I'm sure he would give it all back after falling off a second floor parking garage and having a 300 pound man land on top of him. I wonder which quack doctor has done the three back surgeries to cover up the fact that he's cheating the system and ripping off the Palo Alto tax payers."

The article isn't about the few people receiving legimitate disbility payments during retirement. It is really about about Palo the culture of Alto Police & Fire (especially the Fire Department) coming in as an outlier for disabilityy claims, and by a wide margin, abusing the system. It certianly appears that these employees that are the first to promote increased taxes are working within a culture of employees that are gaming the system in an attempt to not pay taxes on their ALREADY EXCESSIVE PENSION PAYOUTS.

Just one more reason to reduce FD staffing and increase private paramedic coverage. Why does PA have over 100 fire fighters to begin with. Sounds like taxpayers have been sold beachfront property in Nevada. The PD contract is also a bad deal.


follower of Dr. Myron Gananian
Menlo Park
on Jul 3, 2013 at 7:53 pm
follower of Dr. Myron Gananian, Menlo Park
on Jul 3, 2013 at 7:53 pm

[Post removed due to copyright infringement.]


Manny
Mountain View
on Jul 7, 2013 at 7:25 pm
Manny, Mountain View
on Jul 7, 2013 at 7:25 pm

Wow, I love popping over to the PA site and visiting my neighbors! Makes me feel better. Do us all a favor, close a couple firehouses, cut you police force in half, whatever. Make us look better, raising our house values and our criminals will go over there when the pickings get easier!

Love how one disability claim is okay, but the rest are ALL FRAUD!!!! by a wide margin abusing the system! Yeah!

A-maz-ing.


S. Coen
Crescent Park
on Jul 13, 2013 at 8:51 am
S. Coen, Crescent Park
on Jul 13, 2013 at 8:51 am

The firefighters and police officers in Palo Alto deserve better then the childish harassment and immature statements and inaccurate information that has been spoken about. If you really want the truth then you need to review what are the " requirements" that allow a public safety officer ( that is both police and fire) to fit the criteria for a work related disability retirement. This information is readily available through State of California, I believe through the EOC and also each city has the information. There is always a very very minor number of people that may slip through the cracks who really do not qualify but the majority DO qualify. That goes for any work place injury including the private sector, and mostly in the private sector is where this abuse is located. Do you think that if a women firefighter or police officer who is pregnant deserves to go out on disability retirement because during labor she injured her back and even though she "may" have had a previous minor back injury that she deserves this disability retirement? Well that has happened. But will anyone say anything? No.Why? Because that might be seen as some type of discrimination. Yes there are injuries within the police and fire department that have happened DUE to allowing the physical fitness requirements to be lowered thereby allowing LESS qualified police and firefighters to be hired and yes these individuals have an increased injury rate. But that is what happens when the City does not listen to the personnel who oversee the testing and physical agility exams but prefer to sub out the agility tests to a private company. Thats ok because the City saves alot of money doing this and they do not have to pay overtime costs to have the trained, experienced and qualified firefighters or police officers monitoring this. Hey you get what you pay for. Lower standards make's it easier to hire the handicapped and thereby quickly hiring and filling vacancies.
The majority of work related injuries are real and the personnel have been injured in a just and truthful manner . From injuries sustained fighting fires and yes there may not be very many fires but we still have them to medical calls from lifting up the gurneys with patients to helping older folks who have slipped in the shower or tub and our firefighters respond to assist and strain there backs as they are lifting up the elderly to training exercises to falling off a fire engine while stepping out of the cab at 2 am rushing to a heart attack call and many more. If you are querious then maybe the city can share with you how many of these injuries occur. Rather then be critical, why not first see first hand what is involved and how the accidents happened before condemning the firefighters and police.
Quite ripping our employees apart.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.