News

Barron Park neighborhood outraged over donkey attack

Donkeys attacked by same dog twice since Sept. 24

Barron Park's beloved donkeys have been attacked by a dog for the second time. The donkeys, Perry and Miner Forty Niner, were placidly residing in their pasture near Bol Park when the attack occurred the evening of Nov. 6, according to Barron Park Association Board Member Doug Moran.

The donkeys were attacked by the same dog on Sept. 24 after the dog got away from its owner. The owner stayed until head donkey handler Bob Frost arrived. Perry, the smaller donkey on which the donkey in the movie Shrek was modeled, suffered injuries, including a 2-inch-square patch of skin torn from his face and cuts on his front legs in the first attack. The wounds took about 10 days to heal.

During the Nov. 6 attack, the same large dog again headed for the donkeys. Perry again suffered wounds to his face that were "somewhat more serious" than the previous instance, Moran said. The veterinarian decided against trying to suture in the dark in the pasture and had Perry transported to his facility.

Palo Alto Animal Services was notified of the attack. Some residents told the Weekly in emails that they want the animal euthanized, fearing it could also be a danger to people. Connie Urbanski, City of Palo Alto Animal Services acting superintendent, said the German Shepherd mix was removed from the city, but she declined to say where it was taken.

An investigation is ongoing, she said.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Palo Alto Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

"It's really sad all the way around I feel really bad for everybody," she said.

Head donkey handler Bob Frost said the attack was the third by the same dog. The first time the dog did not hurt the animals. Perry is slowly starting to eat again, but still has some drainage from his wounds. He is expected to have his sutures removed on Nov. 20.

Frost said the owner of the donkeys' pasture might help to make the area more secure. Frost expects the dog's owner will pay the veterinary bills, as he did after the September attack.

"This time it was much worse. I had to send him to the equine hospital for a few days," Frost said.

Karla Kane, former Palo Alto Weekly editorial assistant, musician and animal lover, wrote to say her band, The Corner Laughers, were saddened by the attack. They have created a five-song album that can be downloaded. All proceeds will go to help the donkeys, she said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

One of the songs is about Palo Alto and the donkeys. The extended-play album is called "To the Donkeys of Barron Park." It is available at http://cornerlaughers.com/album/to-the-donkeys-of-barron-park-ep.

Tax-deductible donations can also be made through the Palo Alto Donkey Project, Acterra, 3921 East Bayshore Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Checks should be made out to Acterra Palo Alto Donkey Fund.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly and Facebook for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Barron Park neighborhood outraged over donkey attack

Donkeys attacked by same dog twice since Sept. 24

by / Palo Alto Weekly

Uploaded: Thu, Nov 15, 2012, 9:37 am
Updated: Fri, Nov 16, 2012, 5:24 pm

Barron Park's beloved donkeys have been attacked by a dog for the second time. The donkeys, Perry and Miner Forty Niner, were placidly residing in their pasture near Bol Park when the attack occurred the evening of Nov. 6, according to Barron Park Association Board Member Doug Moran.

The donkeys were attacked by the same dog on Sept. 24 after the dog got away from its owner. The owner stayed until head donkey handler Bob Frost arrived. Perry, the smaller donkey on which the donkey in the movie Shrek was modeled, suffered injuries, including a 2-inch-square patch of skin torn from his face and cuts on his front legs in the first attack. The wounds took about 10 days to heal.

During the Nov. 6 attack, the same large dog again headed for the donkeys. Perry again suffered wounds to his face that were "somewhat more serious" than the previous instance, Moran said. The veterinarian decided against trying to suture in the dark in the pasture and had Perry transported to his facility.

Palo Alto Animal Services was notified of the attack. Some residents told the Weekly in emails that they want the animal euthanized, fearing it could also be a danger to people. Connie Urbanski, City of Palo Alto Animal Services acting superintendent, said the German Shepherd mix was removed from the city, but she declined to say where it was taken.

An investigation is ongoing, she said.

"It's really sad all the way around I feel really bad for everybody," she said.

Head donkey handler Bob Frost said the attack was the third by the same dog. The first time the dog did not hurt the animals. Perry is slowly starting to eat again, but still has some drainage from his wounds. He is expected to have his sutures removed on Nov. 20.

Frost said the owner of the donkeys' pasture might help to make the area more secure. Frost expects the dog's owner will pay the veterinary bills, as he did after the September attack.

"This time it was much worse. I had to send him to the equine hospital for a few days," Frost said.

Karla Kane, former Palo Alto Weekly editorial assistant, musician and animal lover, wrote to say her band, The Corner Laughers, were saddened by the attack. They have created a five-song album that can be downloaded. All proceeds will go to help the donkeys, she said.

One of the songs is about Palo Alto and the donkeys. The extended-play album is called "To the Donkeys of Barron Park." It is available at http://cornerlaughers.com/album/to-the-donkeys-of-barron-park-ep.

Tax-deductible donations can also be made through the Palo Alto Donkey Project, Acterra, 3921 East Bayshore Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Checks should be made out to Acterra Palo Alto Donkey Fund.

Comments

no more dogs
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17 am
no more dogs, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17 am
1 person likes this

If owners cannot control their dogs, then dogs should be banned from this park. Children use the park too and they are at great risk from these aggressive dogs.


duck duck GOOSE
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:25 am
duck duck GOOSE, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:25 am
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Too many dogs
Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:45 am
Too many dogs, Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:45 am
Like this comment

Dogs have become a fashion accessory. You can't live in Palo Alto without one.


artbuilder
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:45 am
artbuilder, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:45 am
Like this comment

" somewhat more serious " is a Massive Understatement
perry was taken to the donkey hospital for a few days,
this may spell the end to his movie career. perry is clearly suffering from post traumatic stress
the owner of the dog allowed the dog off lease for what in fact is the Third Time it has attacked the donkeys, the first time there were no visible injuries but there are witnesses to all three attacks
the third incident the dog attacked both donkeys but only physically injured the smaller " miniature " donkey.


rem
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52 am
rem, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52 am
Like this comment

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Check out "Dog Whisperer" with host Cesar Millan on NGWILD every Saturday night. Check you channel listing for correct time.

Owners NEED to be TRAINED. Problems are never with the dogs the problem it the owners...


Don't hate the dog...
another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52 am
Don't hate the dog..., another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52 am
2 people like this

A dog is the owner's responsibilty. If the owner can't control the dog, it should NOT be outside of it's home. If the owner doesn't want to keep the dog penned up, he has 2 choices: find someone who can control the dog, or move the dog to a location where it can't hurt people. Or Donkeys.

There is no excuse for negligent pet ownership. I hope the owner is paying for poor Perry's vet bills. It's his responsibilty.


Harris
another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:56 am
Harris, another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 11:56 am
1 person likes this

Well this is not new. We lived in Barron park and it was the thing to do i.e. let your dog run off leash behind Gunn ( of course always under control ). The city does have a law:
Leash required
Any dog or puppy must be controlled on a leash by an able-bodied person, at all times, even when under supervision, whenever the dog is on public property. This includes all parks, sidewalks, streets, school grounds and the Baylands marsh areas or while on an unenclosed lot. The leash law is strictly enforced, but certain dog exercise areas have been created as playgrounds for exercising your dog off leash.

But the phrase " strictly enforced" is non existent. The owners are the problem!


member
Los Altos
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:09 pm
member, Los Altos
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Like this comment


obviously the owner has no control of the dog and should pay for Perry's vet bills.

euthanize it.


Anon.
Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:11 pm
Anon., Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:11 pm
Like this comment

Dog should be put down and the owner charged and fined, maybe jail or a requirement to apologize and explain to the city and his neighbors.

What kind of dog ... dare I ask ??????


Anon.
Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:19 pm
Anon., Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:19 pm
1 person likes this

Oh, owner should be preventing from having another dog as long as he/she lives here.

It is an outrage that this should happen once .. .but twice? It is clear there is a dog policing problem in Palo Alto.

When I am walking out at the Baylands, or even in the city, how am I supposed to know what dogs are dangerous or what owners are responsible?

If the city and our community cannot take responsibility to come down and inspire responsibility in people, then the community is not advanced enough to be able to manage having dogs in it.

What this does is to lower the standards for even being in public space, forcing civilized good people into their homes or protected places and droping the overall level of civilization in our city.

Like the constant random crimes I read about in Palo Alto against people just walking around the city and then robbed or attacked?

Somehow in this modern technological age we seem to have forgotten the basic rules of society, or indeed that society needs rules and used to have them that were not draconian or oppressive to allow everyone to enjoy Palo Alto without fear of the lone idiots who don't get it.

Now the lone idiot is the rule, the lone idiots set the standard and seem to be in charge.

It makes me frustrated and mad.


maditalian_1492
Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:29 pm
maditalian_1492, Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:29 pm
2 people like this

In farming communities, I believe an owner of livestock can shoot an animal that is attacking his/her animals.


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:32 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:32 pm
Like this comment

I was visiting the egg laying chickens nearby and someones loose dog just ran right up to the enclosure and scared the chickens and looked like it was about to jump into the yard where some other chickens were walking around. I grabbed the dog, the owner came up sheepishly acting sorry and put the leash on his dog.

I'm really sick of this situation of dog owners flagrantley violating leash laws. The dog that attacked Perry should be euthanized. This is the third attack and I don't understand why the owner is being given special treatment when anyone else's dog would have been euthanized for the THIRD TIME!!!


Concerned
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:35 pm
Concerned, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:35 pm
1 person likes this

Since the authorities know who owns the dog, why wasn't the person named? Perhaps exposure could help curb this kind of behavior.


Leash Em
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Leash Em, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:36 pm
Like this comment

I was once jumped on by a couple of dobermans in Bol park, whose owner ARROGANTLY let run off leash. Not sure the attack was violent, but they were lunging toward my chihuahua which I'd quickly scooped up in my arms. It's beyond repulsive to see dog owners behaving in such an arrogant and entitled way letting big dogs run in the park off leash.


MP Dog Park fan
Menlo Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:39 pm
MP Dog Park fan, Menlo Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:39 pm
2 people like this

Attacked 3 times? Really?? This is asinine (no pun intended vis-a-vis the donkeys). Why wasn't the dog's owner held liable for the first two attacks given that there are leash laws in place to prevent exactly this kind of thing? And where have the authorities that are responsible for leash law enforcement been all this time? Didn't anybody call to complain in order to prevent recurrences of this type?

I agree with others who have stated that the problem is not the dog but the owner and the owner should be taken to task and fined or jailed or both for his/her arrogance and stupidity by allowing this dog to continue attacking other animals. It amounts to criminal negligence and should be treated as such. Oh, and paying the vet bills should be an absolute requirement. Put a lifetime ban from Bol Park on the owner and his dog because, after three attacks, it should be obvious that this person's irresponsible behavior is incorrigible.


South PA
Charleston Gardens
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:40 pm
South PA, Charleston Gardens
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:40 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:41 pm
Like this comment

This is the deal: the dog owner is negligent & so is donkeys' owner. Many dogs will return to the place of an attack in prey.

What is PA Animal Setvices doing to ensure it won't happen again? What is the dog owner doing about it? The donkeys' owner? Is the dog getting a vicious dog hearing? How hard can it be to fix the fence & leash the offending dog? How hard is it for the dog owner to NOT bring their dog back to the scene of the crimes? Horrifying. Just as upsetting is the lack of remediation to percent the second attack.

How can locals help?


call the police
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42 pm
call the police, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42 pm
Like this comment

Please park users, if you see dogs running off leash and especially if you feel threatened by the dogs, then call the police immediately. Call 911 if there is an attack or threat of one. This is a criminal issue.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:44 pm
Like this comment

BTW, as a dog handler I say the dog is also the problem, not just the owner. Both should be banned from the park to prevent further attacks.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Like this comment

I didn't know til now that Acterra owns the donkeys. They've been negligent in providing a safe structure for the animals, IMO. Don't know if the authorities would agree. Sorry for all the posts, I'm concerned & angry - these attacks were so easily avoidable.


Cindy
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 1:05 pm
Cindy, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 1:05 pm
Like this comment

I am very upset by this. 49er is now alone without Perry. This kind of attack should not happen once, let alone twice. And I agree, it could be a child just as easy as a donkey. I am tired of all the dog owners who take their dogs off leash along the bike path and Bol Park. The owner of the dog needs to have stiff punishment.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 1:52 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 1:52 pm
Like this comment

Cindy - don't confuse animal aggression w/prey drive. This was likely prey drive. You have no idea if this dog has shown aggression toward kids.


Dangerous Dog
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:02 pm
Dangerous Dog, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:02 pm
Like this comment

There are legal remedies. The California Food and Agriculture code defines


31602. "Potentially dangerous dog" means any of the following:
(a) Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions
within the prior 36-month period, engages in any behavior that
requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury
when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or
keeper of the dog.
(b) Any dog which, when unprovoked, bites a person causing a less
severe injury than as defined in Section 31604.
(c) Any dog which, when unprovoked, on two separate occasions
within the prior 36-month period, has killed, seriously bitten,
inflicted injury, or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic
animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog.

This dog definitely qualifies. The code then goes on to say:



31621. If an animal control officer or a law enforcement officer
has investigated and determined that there exists probable cause to
believe that a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, the chief
officer of the public pound or animal control department or his or
her immediate supervisor or the head of the local law enforcement
agency, or his or her designee, shall petition the superior court of
the county wherein the dog is owned or kept for a hearing for the
purpose of determining whether or not the dog in question should be
declared potentially dangerous or vicious. A proceeding under this
section is a limited civil case. A city or county may establish an
administrative hearing procedure to hear and dispose of petitions
filed pursuant to this chapter. Whenever possible, any complaint
received from a member of the public which serves as the evidentiary
basis for the animal control officer or law enforcement officer to
find probable cause shall be sworn to and verified by the complainant
and shall be attached to the petition. The chief officer of the
public pound or animal control department or head of the local law
enforcement agency shall notify the owner or keeper of the dog that a
hearing will be held by the superior court or the hearing entity, as
the case may be, at which time he or she may present evidence as to
why the dog should not be declared potentially dangerous or vicious.
The owner or keeper of the dog shall be served with notice of the
hearing and a copy of the petition, either personally or by
first-class mail with return receipt requested. The hearing shall be
held promptly within no less than five working days nor more than 10
working days after service of notice upon the owner or keeper of the
dog. The hearing shall be open to the public. The court may admit
into evidence all relevant evidence, including incident reports and
the affidavits of witnesses, limit the scope of discovery, and may
shorten the time to produce records or witnesses. A jury shall not be
available. The court may find, upon a preponderance of the evidence,
that the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious and make other
orders authorized by this chapter.

So why hasn't the PAPD taken appropriate steps here?


Barron Parker
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:08 pm
Barron Parker, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:08 pm
1 person likes this

3 attacks on the donkeys! Not sure whether the dog or its owner should be euthanized. Or both. I do find it surprising that nobody has called for jail time. So I'm doing so -- it is NOT a sufficient deterrent or punishment for the serious and escalating damage done to our community pets that this person be required simply to pay the vet bills.

This is CRIMINAL negligence. Name the owner and throw the book at him or her.


the_punnisher
Registered user
Mountain View
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:16 pm
the_punnisher, Mountain View
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:16 pm
Like this comment

" In farming communities, I believe an owner of livestock can shoot an animal that is attacking his/her animals. "

In Colorado ANY person is allowed to use his OPEN CARRY weapon to kill attacking animals, and the TWO LEGGED animals as well. If that Aurora movie theater HAD NOT TAKEN AWAY THAT RIGHT, there wouldn't have been a mass murder and the following lawsuits...

Back OT: The dog owner must pay the vet bills on the donkey AND either have the animal killed or spend $$$ to have him and the animal TRAINED properly.

When you use public places, you share the RESPONSIBILITIES when using them. Obeying all the laws protect ALL who use that public space.


moi
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm
moi, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm
1 person likes this

This dog has tasted donkey blood at least twice.

Further attacks by the same dog are only a matter of time.

I agree that the dog's "human" (I dare not use the term "guardian" under this circumstance) should be fined as well as named. Shame is a powerful thing.

Both of the donkeys are surely dealing with PTSD. This is not a joke. I witnessed it when a neighbor's dog twice brutally attacked my companion goats, almost killing one of them the second time. Although their physical injuries healed eventually, my goats never recovered from the shock and terror.




mj
College Terrace
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:48 pm
mj, College Terrace
on Nov 15, 2012 at 2:48 pm
1 person likes this

This dog has now "tasted" blood and learned it can get away with this. Dog should absolutely be euthanasiad. Even if this is "prey" behavior he is now a real danger to other dogs, possibly humans too. Lesson to owner that his responsibility has killed his dog. Hope he has to pay all the medical bills too. Maybe the owner of the dobermans referenced above will take note, and other irresponsible dog owners in Barron Park.

Unfortunately many dog owners are so ignorant about the nature of animals they believe their dog would never attack, or think it is no big deal. I was raised with dogs and am a dog owner myself. We once tried to adopt an older dog that turned out to be extremely aggressive in certain situations, even after working with a dog behaviorist. We all loved that dog. But with many tears and much heart ache for the whole family I had the dog euthanasiad.

In the UK farmers can shoot a dog, certainly once a dog has tasted blood, but even just chasing can cause pregnant animals to abort. Although in my experience the dog owner is warned by the farmer the first time.


Ducatigirl
Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:06 pm
Ducatigirl, Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:06 pm
1 person likes this

Where on earth have Animal Control and the PAPD been in all this? I understand that PAPD were called twice, after the first two attacks, and did NOTHING!
Donkeys and mules are extremely intelligent (far smarter and less reactive than horses)
social animals. Companionship is extremely important to them. They are probably n ow suffering from separation anxiety as well as PTSD. They are also creatures that are preyed upon in the wild, "flight animals" they are called, as are deer and horses.

Dogs, on the other hand, are predators, and their very scent is frightening to a flight animal. Now that dog has been "blooded", as they say of hunting dogs, and will always try to prey upon equids, never be trustworthy around flight animals.

The donkeys probably will never get over this emotionally, and I am sure that Perry's life has been shortened as a result.

This whole thing is sickening, and I sincerely hope that charges are filed against the dog owner. She must be forcd to pay for the vet bills and extra care that Perry will require. I would hope that punitive compensation is in order, too, since this is the third attack.

The public can help by googling "Bol Park Donkeys". They have their own web site and it includes the name and address of where to send contributions. Equine vet bills are very expensive, because you pay for the vet to drive out to the patient. This means a mileage and gas charge on top of meds and treatment. If Perry had to be hauled to the vet's place, that is another big charge. Then there is the cost of boarding him there while he recuperates, on top of his meds and treatments and the additional cost of administering those meds and treatments. My "guesstimate" is that the second attack cost upwards of $1000. The third, probably at least triple that, depending on how long the hospital stay is (I am experienced in these things, having had horses most of my life).


Crescent Park Dad
Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:11 pm
Crescent Park Dad, Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:11 pm
Like this comment

I am outraged at all of this. Dog owners who allow their dogs off leash are selfish and disrespectful to the greater community. Apparently city codes and laws don't apply to them.

I am so PO'd right now.


duck duck GOOSE
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:30 pm
duck duck GOOSE, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 3:30 pm
Like this comment

donkey "separation anxiety as well as PTSD"

Really? That's the issue?

How about getting rid of the dog and prosecuting the owner?

Why, on my visit to Rome, I also have vast experience with horses....


gone to the dogs
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:24 pm
gone to the dogs, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:24 pm
Like this comment

I'm trying to imagine the mindset of this dog owner: "My dog has attacked these donkeys twice; let's see what happens today!" Was it a game? A dare? Some sort of enjoyment in the suspense of seeing if the dog would attack a third time? It's mind-boggling. As is the fact that the dog was not impounded the very first time it attacked the donkey and the owner charged.

I wonder if Acterra or someone else connected with the donkeys' care asked the police not to press charges after Perry was wounded the first time? If so--and this is pure speculation, I have no idea if such a thing occurred--then knowing there was a dangerous dog and an irresponsible dog owner frequenting the area, why didn't they put up some animal fencing ASAP? Rolls of 2x4 welded wire fencing are not expensive--50' for about $25. Why not do the donkeys a favor and give them a bit more protection? There's always the possibility that another clueless, irresponsible dog owner and another vicious dog will turn up in future.

In the meantime, who is this dog owner?


Nora Charles
Stanford
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Nora Charles, Stanford
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Like this comment

The dog owner should be prosecuted, pay all vet costs and then some for the donkeys, and banned from any P.A. park. Someone above wrote that there are "too many dogs in Palo Alto." I believe there can never be enough dogs, but they must all have responsible owners.

I wish Perry a swift recovery, and send him much love, poor little guy.


stretch
another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:57 pm
stretch, another community
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:57 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Anonymous
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:58 pm
Anonymous, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 15, 2012 at 4:58 pm
Like this comment

Why does Palo Alto require license for some animals (chickens) and not others (dogs and cats)? This particular dog owner should have his license to have a dog revoked.


Mark
University South
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Mark, University South
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Like this comment

There are donkeys in Barron Park!?


spike
Esther Clark Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:19 pm
spike, Esther Clark Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:19 pm
Like this comment

Owner's name, please.


Cur Mudgeon
Greenmeadow
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:20 pm
Cur Mudgeon, Greenmeadow
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:20 pm
Like this comment

Unbelievable. I had a dog who did not like other dogs in her space.
I was walking her ON LEASH behind Gunn. A loose dog started to run up to her. The owner said "oh he's friendly." I asked him to call his dog, saying mine was not. He told me I should DROP MY DOG's leash. I understand the rationale behind this, but NOT in a public area where a dog fight could ensue and where the law says dogs much be leashed. I told him Palo Alto has a leash law, and he needed to respect it. He became very hostile, like I should not be out with my leashed dog.

Now why is Animal Services not acting on this dog and its owner? I was accidentally bit by my own dog while breaking up a food fight between our two dogs. I went to the ER for sutures and two days later, an ACO showed up at my door, wanting proof of rabies vaccination and telling me the dog was quarantined for 10 days. My friend was scratched or bitten by HER OWN CAT and sought medical attention. An ACO showed up at her house as well and made her quarantine the cat. So the lesson is, don't get accidentally bitten by your own pet, but your pet can inflict harm on another helpless animal several times and there are NO consequences???

As for the donkeys, know that there are coyotes and foxes in our town at night. They do need better protection, if all that keeps predators out is a fence that allows dogs in.

I've often thought that one solution to this problem of off leash dogs would be to have a fenced area that groups could rent for the sole purpose of dog play. This way, known groups of friendly dogs could interact without interference from potentially unsociable or reactive dogs, as can be the case at dog parks. The horse park in Woodside allows people to run dogs off leash if they pay an annual fee.

Palo Alto does require dog licenses, and recommends cat licenses.

Shame on the donkey biting dog's owner for not being a good pet guardian.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:50 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 5:50 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Carlos
Green Acres
on Nov 15, 2012 at 6:06 pm
Carlos, Green Acres
on Nov 15, 2012 at 6:06 pm
Like this comment

Reminds me of the arrogance and lack of concern for others from those dog owners whose presa canarios killed the lacrosse coach in the city 10+ years ago.

Hope we don't have to face a similar tragedy for some dog owners in town to be more responsible.


HUTCH 7.62
Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 7:36 pm
HUTCH 7.62, Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 7:36 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Ducatigirl
Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Ducatigirl, Old Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Like this comment

As far as I know, the police were called after the first two attacks, but did nothing.

Maybe now?


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:18 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:18 pm
Like this comment

Cur Mudgeon, you know in your situation that it has to do w/public health, not fault, right? The ACOs aren't there to judge you re your dog biting you - accidents happen & they know that. Ditto the cat - people can get cat scratch fever & rabies from cats, as well as other infections & diseases, which is why it's a public health issue which has nothing to do w/fault.


resident
Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:56 pm
resident, Barron Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:56 pm
Like this comment

I frequently visit the donkeys with my young child in a stroller and I am always surprised at how many dogs I see along the path, in Bol Park as well as behind Gunn that are off the leash. I would say that most are not on the leash and I have never seen animal control or the PAPD enforce the leash law, only talk to the dog owners. I worry that one of these days it will be a child that gets hurt or someone running, biking or roller blading along the path. It wouldn't take much, one or two days of enforcing the leash law out in the park or back by the donkeys and I'm sure people would leash their dogs. I have a dog but don't walk him much beyond the park as sometimes there are too many dogs roaming freely.


Menlo Park
Menlo Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Menlo Park, Menlo Park
on Nov 15, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:45 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 15, 2012 at 10:45 pm
Like this comment

A Story in the Mercury has more complete details (excerpt below)


Palo Alto Animal Services Acting Superintendent Connie Urbanski deemed the dog dangerous following the most recent attack and police Chief Dennis Burns agreed. The owners were given the option of either having the dog euthanized or removed from the city. They chose the latter.

Web Link

There should have been no option, the dog is dangerous, euthanization should have been the only option...the dog has been removed -where?
Wonder if this psychotic dog runs all the way from wherever the hell it's been removed to and does it again!

The Donkey enclosure should have better protection, chickenwire around the fence so it is much harder for a dog to get in.


been there, done that
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:09 am
been there, done that, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:09 am
Like this comment

Carry pepper spray. Use it, liberally.


Otto
Midtown
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:01 am
Otto, Midtown
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:01 am
Like this comment

I routinely encounter dogs off leash in this area as well as in other PA parks. Politely asking dog owners to put their dogs on leash results in the following (based on a fairly large sample size): 1) being yelled at by the dog owner and told to mind my own business (about 25% of the time), 2) being ignored and the dog owner who does nothing (about 25% of the time), and the dog honors my request (about 50% of the time). So, even when politely asked for compliance with the law and public safety (did I mention my wife was attacked by an off leash dog, though I was impressed when animal services took it seriously) about half of PA dog owners with either yell at you or ignore you. Given this, we can fully expect further incidents such as the one described above.


Anon
another community
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:13 am
Anon, another community
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:13 am
Like this comment

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

COME ON PEOPLE! There are actual problems in this world. Surely you can find one and post about that instead.


Anonymous
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:21 am
Anonymous, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:21 am
Like this comment

This particular dog owner should be prevented from replacing this dog with another one. He has shown willful negligence in allowing his off lease dog to attack these donkeys multiple times.


Gisele
College Terrace
on Nov 16, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Gisele, College Terrace
on Nov 16, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Like this comment

According to the Daily News, Perry is back with Niner, but he is not doing well, not eating and acts depressed. The dog owner paid for the second attck, but this third one is going to cost a lot. Peninsula Equine Hospital is very, very expensive.

Animal Control, according to the Daily News, deemed the dog vicious, and gave the owner a choice of euthanasia or move the dog out of town. They chose the latter.

@duck duck goose: You seem a little undereducated for a Palo Altan. All social and herd animals, even cattle and sheep, are susceptible to PTSD and separation anxiety. Surely you have experienced dogs with it? Elephants, whales, wolves and humans suffer most from it, but do not trivialize what any animal suffers. They are sentient beings.


Thanks
Green Acres
on Nov 16, 2012 at 5:43 pm
Thanks, Green Acres
on Nov 16, 2012 at 5:43 pm
Like this comment

All these posts about a donkey and possible "separation anxiety as well as PTSD"

Then Gesele decides someone "seem(s) a little undereducated for a Palo Altan."

Good thing there aren't hundreds or even thousands of local kids who will not have enough food this Thanksgiving week.

Happy Thanksgiving, all y'all.

Web Link

"a little undereducated"

Gimme a break. You can take your education and....


lindaloo
Barron Park
on Nov 16, 2012 at 5:53 pm
lindaloo, Barron Park
on Nov 16, 2012 at 5:53 pm
Like this comment

Completely, utterly outrageous!! I am sickened.

Some years ago an off-leash dog killed a goose in the area where laying chickens used to be. That put the end to this sweet, unique area of Barron Park.

Really, what is with these selfish, clueless dog owners? I'd really like to know.


Gisele
College Terrace
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:04 pm
Gisele, College Terrace
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:04 pm
Like this comment

I do not remember seeing any local children looking undernourished. Quite the opposite, I see kids walking to and from school looking rather portly and overfed.

We do as a matter of fact, contribute monthly to Second Harvest. There are needy kids in other neighborhoods.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:43 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 16, 2012 at 6:43 pm
Like this comment

Gisele - thank you for your reminder re PTSD/separation anxiety w/herd & pack animals. I've had dogs w/both issues, & it can be very troublesome. We all know this has nothing to do w/kids going hungry. I live in a city where kids experience hunger ongoingly. Responsible people do what they can to address both issues whenever possible. My rule for giving to the hungry: If I can't afford to donate to the hungry, I need to be on the receiving end of the help - every little bit helps.


Love 'em and Leash 'em
Community Center
on Nov 16, 2012 at 7:11 pm
Love 'em and Leash 'em, Community Center
on Nov 16, 2012 at 7:11 pm
Like this comment

What concerns me upon hearing all these reports of unleashed dogs roaming freely is that dogs are pack animals and will revert to this kind of behavior in a flash. I had a friend who lived in Saratoga and was attacked by a group of neighborhood dogs when he was attempting to retrieve his mail from a roadside mailbox. These were dogs that he recognized who were normally mild-mannered family dogs. Apparently when the right circumstances occur these normally harmless family pets can get vicious in a pack. As soon as a child (or anyone for that matter) is attacked by a pack of these neighborhood dogs there will be a public outcry with stern measures taken to enforce the leash laws. I have been bitten by a dog before and many dogs can sense my fear of them. This scares me as I never had fear before the first bite and I really do love animals but can't turn off those fear vibes around certain dogs in certain situations. Dog owners, please be respectful of others and leash your pets unless you are in an area where they cannot have access to people (special area designated for dogs to run free).


Sharon
Midtown
on Nov 16, 2012 at 7:29 pm
Sharon, Midtown
on Nov 16, 2012 at 7:29 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


member
Barron Park
on Nov 16, 2012 at 8:14 pm
member, Barron Park
on Nov 16, 2012 at 8:14 pm
Like this comment

Been complaining about dogs off leash for years. Why would'nt anyone listen ? Grew up with these donkeys. This attack is sickening.
Why do dog owners in Palo Alto believe they are above the law ?


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 16, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Like this comment

The owner of the dog that attacked Perry may be a big donar to ACTERRA and that is why she is getting special treatment...this is just a hunch but it would explain why after three times, her dog has not been euthanized. So some other lucky community will be faced with this psychotic dog. The Donkey enclosure should be made more secure with chicken wire around the barbwire fence making it more difficult for dogs to get in.


happydogowner
Barron Park
on Nov 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm
happydogowner, Barron Park
on Nov 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm
Like this comment

There is a huge problem with off leash dogs at Bol Park. They run loose both on the grassy areas and on the path. Asking politely to have the owners leash their dogs results in responses ranging from simply rude to down right aggressive and threatening. I have avoided the park with my young son because he has been knocked down twice by a large dog. Owners either no where in sight or talking to the other off leash dog owners, and not paying attention. I really wish the PAPD would enforce the leash laws so all people can enjoy the parks,.


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 17, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 17, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Like this comment

Maybe complainers about the off leash dogs at this park can call PAAS to ask for some routine enforcement, if THREE attacks on the poor donkey didn't get them to enforce the leash laws there. The rest of us who want to take our dogs to socialize off leash go to the local dog parks, even when it means driving there. And get this - there are those of us who don't take our dogs off leash in public areas because there's good reason NOT to. Even if my dogs didn't knock down kids or scare people, I wouldn't want to deal w/the whiners complaining about my dogs being off leash - it's not worth it. Heck, people whine & complain even when dogs are leashed & not bugging anyone, why invite more petty drama & problems?


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 17, 2012 at 11:57 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 17, 2012 at 11:57 pm
Like this comment

Another update to Perry in the Mercury that is doing it's job far better than Palo Alto online is (excerpt below)

_________________________________________________________________
In response to community outrage over the attacks, Urbanski urged compassion for the owners of the dog. They didn't set out to hurt Perry and their carelessness has cost them a family member, she said.

"As awful as it is, there are multiple sides," Urbanski
Advertisement
said. "No one wanted this to happen."
_________________________________________________________________

I really have no patience for this softpedaling demeanor by Urbanski which could be accepted after the first attack...but after the third attack! Special treatment is being doled out liberally and there is some back room dealing going on here which might be that the dog owner is a big donar to Acterra which would explain this special treatment being doled out. Any other persons rogue dog would have been euthanized. This problem is just being transfered to another neighborhood. These owners should be criminally charged after the third time. Come on, lets have some equal justice and have this psychotic dogs lights put out. This Palo Alto Marshmellow justice doesn't pass the smell test.


Web Link


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 18, 2012 at 12:35 am
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 18, 2012 at 12:35 am
Like this comment

If you wish to contact Connie Urbanski, acting superintendent of Palo Alto Animal Services who allowed the dog to escape euthanization, send an email to: connie.urbanski@cityofpaloalto.org


Bruce
Crescent Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 9:04 am
Bruce, Crescent Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 9:04 am
Like this comment

Yes, by all means, just kill something you have a problem with. Nice approach. Would you be so forcefully pushing for one of the donkeys to be euthanized if it attacked a dog? I think not. Keep the dog away from other animals -- especially the donkeys -- and let it live peacefully with the family that loves it.


Ted
Menlo Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 9:51 am
Ted, Menlo Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 9:51 am
Like this comment

The dog should absolutely be euthanized and it's [portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff] owner(s) fined and jailed...


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 19, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 19, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Like this comment

@Bruce....-Bruce, tell me, did the Donkeys attack any dogs? Have they ever attacked any dogs? Bruce, any thing relevant to say about this matter?

And if the dog had attacked a child or person causing lacerations of this nature, the dog would've been put down pronto.
The Donkeys weren't roaming loose with no handlers at their sides, the Dog was off leash (illegal) and attacked THREE TIMES drawing blood.

I am astonished at Palo Alto animal controls marshmellow justice and kicking the can down the road by having the dog removed from the city into another community where the problem will be passed down and what will this dog maul next.

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Bruce
Crescent Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 1:55 pm
Bruce, Crescent Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 1:55 pm
Like this comment

@Odo -- I don't condone the killing of dogs unless absolutely necessary, which I don't think is the case in this situation. Certainly, the owners should be penalized for allowing the dog to run off leash, especially in an area used by the donkeys. I simply don't think euthanizing the dog is the answer. It is the responsibility of the owners to control the dog -- why should the dog suffer for the owners' irresponsibility?


Hmmm
East Palo Alto
on Nov 19, 2012 at 5:27 pm
Hmmm, East Palo Alto
on Nov 19, 2012 at 5:27 pm
Like this comment

The euth argument is moot since the dog's been rehomed. Let's hope the new owners are a better match for the dog's drive & they keep it on leash.


member
Barron Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 8:19 pm
member, Barron Park
on Nov 19, 2012 at 8:19 pm
Like this comment

Where can we track Perry's progress ?


Odo
Charleston Meadows
on Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04 pm
Odo, Charleston Meadows
on Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04 pm
Like this comment

The best way find out what is going on with Perry is just drop by to see him on Wednesday when the handlers take him out for a stroll for most of the day. I saw him this Monday 19th, talked to one of the handlers and he is getting his appetite back, so Perry is pretty resilient.


Odo
Charleston Gardens
on Nov 19, 2012 at 11:13 pm
Odo, Charleston Gardens
on Nov 19, 2012 at 11:13 pm
Like this comment

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.