Shooting in East Palo Alto leaves one dead

Scedrick Tippins Jr., 31, shot multiple times Wednesday night

A man was shot and killed in East Palo Alto late Wednesday night, police said.

Scedrick Tippins Jr., 31, of East Palo Alto, was shot multiple times in the 2500 block of Gloria Way at around 11:45 p.m., police said. Police responded to a ShotSpotter activation alerting them that shots had been fired and discovered Tippins.

He was transported to Stanford Hospital where he was later pronounced dead. Anyone with information about the shooting has been asked to call East Palo Alto police at 650-321-1112.

— Bay City News Service


Like this comment
Posted by Sylvia
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 7, 2012 at 5:18 pm

Two Palo Alto online news stories today. Two shooting deaths. It's beyond discouraging the stranglehold the National Rifle Association has on our lawmakers. Even the slightest attempt to curb the Wild West availability of hand guns and/or assault rifles is met with no-holds-barred resistance.

The number of shooting deaths in this country is a disgrace. And the tired old line about "only outlaws will have guns" just doesn't work. Every day we read about persons killing their family members. If they had to get up close and stab them, the victims might have a chance to defend themselves or run away.

Like this comment
Posted by Ronnie
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 7, 2012 at 7:25 pm

Guns are quite common in many places, and there is little to no crime. On the other hand, places with severe restrictions have terrible crime. Its not the gun, its the person who uses it to kill or harm another. I don't speak for anyone, but I am pro-gun rights, but very anti violence!
The issue as I see it is the cycle of poverty, hopelessness and a lack of love and family. Better schools and students motivated to learn and discover the wonders of the world mean less crime.
Consider this analogy: drugs are illegal. I mean, they are basically completely and totally illegal. Does that "curb availability?" No, it does not. It provides a very profitable and violent black market. They drugs come from other countries, and when they supress the flow from one, they come from another. If they don't come from outside the US, they are made right here in our backyard.
So, why would a murder, or some drug lord care if guns are illegal? He's still going to get it, or get someone to make it for him. He won't care how much it costs, because it will be worth it, and plenty of people will be willing to provide them and make a handsome profit. Meanwhile, law abiding citizens like you or me will have no way to protect themselves. Sure, I'll call the police first - of course. Defending yourself with a gun is an absolute last resort, and even then there will be hell to pay (look at George Zimmerman), but I'd still rather be prepared than at the complete mercy of civil unrest and continuing police cutbacks.
What some call "common sense gun control" has never been shown to work. Look at Chicago - guns were subject to the highest levels of control, but there are still 600 murders a year there.
Gun control has a surprising history embedded in racism and anti-immigrant sentiment. ,

Sylvia, I respect your opinion. I bet you are motivated by love for your fellow human beings as am I. You may just be surprised how many gun owners and NRA members abhor violence as much as you. The last thing we want is guns in the hands of criminals!

Like this comment
Posted by Tired of the BS
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 am

There is very little in common between these two deaths. One victim is a career criminal, the other a promising young high school student. One shooting is likely retaliation, the other probable mental illness.

Like this comment
Posted by Sylvia
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 8, 2012 at 12:17 pm

Neither of the commenters following mine addressed what I said. That the easy availability of guns makes it easier for angry family members, spousal abusers, etc., to kill their "loved ones".

Of course I am aware that stricter gun laws would not really inhibit known criminals from getting them.

And, Ronnie, what statistics do you have to back up your claim in the first paragraph that there are places with lots of guns and no crime and places with gun restrictions that have lots? [By the way I appreciate your respectful stance toward my comment!]

Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 8, 2012 at 12:33 pm

In Switzerland people are required to high powered assault rifles and semi automatic hand guns in their homes.

The personal weapon of militia is kept at home as part of the military obligations.

All males a in the militia.

Switzerland has one of the highest militia gun ownership rates in the world.

Police statistics for the year 2006 records .Police statistics for the year 2006 records 34 killings or attempted killings involving firearms, compared to 69 cases involving bladed weapons and 16 cases of unarmed assault., compared to 69 cases involving bladed weapons and 16 cases of unarmed assault.

Switzerland has a population of 7.5 million with lots of high powered guns, even automatic assault rifles, in private homes

Yet only 34 killings or attempted killings involving firearms per year.

Like this comment
Posted by svatoid
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 8, 2012 at 12:52 pm

Maybe, Sharon had you tried to get all the facts:

Web Link

"In October 2007, the Swiss Federal Council decided that the distribution of ammunition to soldiers shall stop and that all previously issued ammo shall be returned. By March 2011, more than 99% of the ammo has been received. Only special rapid deployment units and the military police still have ammunition stored at home today"


"The sale of ammunition – including Gw Pat.90 rounds for army-issue assault rifles – is subsidized by the Swiss government and made available at the many shooting ranges patronized by both private citizens and members of the militia. There is a regulatory requirement that ammunition sold at ranges must be used there."

Maybe the number you cite for killings is due to a lack of ammunition.
An idea to consider in the US.

Like this comment
Posted by Chris Rock
a resident of Green Acres
on Jun 8, 2012 at 1:15 pm

svatoid - geez, Sharon is so sad with the way she pontificates as if she is informed, yet always with mistakes and fibs. But that was downright funny how you took her apart this time.

to lighten it up, Chris Rock's solution:

Guns can be cheap. Bullits are $5,000 apiece. "I'm gonna think twice before I decide to cap yo @**..."

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,772 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,021 views

Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 979 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 638 views