News

Court upholds murder conviction in 2003 shooting

Owner of Keke's Diner in East Palo Alto was shot four times in April 2003

A federal appeals court in San Francisco Tuesday upheld the murder conviction and sentence of life without parole of a Vallejo man in the fatal shooting of an East Palo Alto diner owner in 2003.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a claim by Brian Lee Parker, 36, that San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Barbara Mallach gave a coercive instruction to a deadlocked jury in his 2005 trial.

Parker was convicted after a six-week trial of charges including murder, robbery and assault with a firearm in the fatal shooting of Kenneth "Keke" Hamel and the wounding of his neighbor, Katie Williams, on April 10, 2003. He was sentenced by Mallach in 2006 to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the murder, plus an additional 37 years for other charges and enhancements.

Hamel, 30, who owned Keke's Diner in East Palo Alto, was shot four times in his West Bayshore Road apartment. Williams, then 71, lived in an adjacent apartment and was injured when a fifth bullet pierced the apartment wall and hit her in the stomach as she sat on her couch.

Kevin Clarke, 47, also of Vallejo, was convicted of similar charges in a separate trial in 2005 and was also sentenced by Mallach to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Prosecutors said at the time of the trials that the two men hoped to steal as much as $90,000 from Hamel but ended up with $27. Police investigators found marijuana, cocaine and several thousand dollars in cash in Hamel's apartment, according to an earlier court ruling in the case.

Parker appealed through a habeas corpus petition in the federal court system after losing his state court appeals. He contended in his federal petition that Mallach gave an unfairly coercive instruction when she urged the jury to continue working after being informed on the fourth day of deliberations that there was a holdout juror who declined to convict.

Jurors were told in the instruction to undertake a "full and complete consideration of all of the evidence with your fellow jurors." The jury reached its guilty verdict the next morning.

In Tuesday's ruling, a three-judge panel of the appeals court said the instruction met U.S. Supreme Court standards allowing trial judges to give deadlocked juries supplemental instructions that encourage, but do not coerce, a verdict.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by G TOWN
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Dec 29, 2011 at 11:10 am

R.I.P Big Ken,nothing will bring him back at least these punks want be back either.Ken was a good guy in my eyes.Many might say different,but I know better.The way of life some chose swallowed them whole.I hate that.So I changed.


Like this comment
Posted by TINA R
a resident of East Palo Alto
on May 23, 2012 at 6:31 pm

I HATE THESE PUNKS THEY JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY TOOK.. I MISS MY BEST FRIEND.. I COULD TALK TO HIM ABOUT ANY AND EVERYTHING AND HE NEVER JUDGE.. WISH I COULD HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM ONE LAST TIME.. I HATE SAY'N RIP SO I'M SAY HE LIVE IN PARADISE MY LOVE.. SEE U AT THE CROSSROAD..


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

He said – she said – who is lying? Justice Brett Kavanaugh or PA resident Christine Ford
By Diana Diamond | 69 comments | 6,642 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,022 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 882 views

Zucchini Takeover
By Laura Stec | 1 comment | 787 views

Populism: A response to the failure of the elites: Palo Alto edition
By Douglas Moran | 1 comment | 768 views