Parents seek reconsideration of 2012-13 school calendar

State budget shortfall, elementary math task force, also on tonight's school board

An organization of Palo Alto parents is urging its members to write letters or turn out at tonight's meeting of the Board of Education to seek reconsideration of Palo Alto's academic calendar for 2012-13.

In a hotly debated decision in May, the board voted 3-2 to change the district-wide academic calendar, moving to a school-year start date earlier in August and an end to the first semester before the December holidays.

The majority favoring the calendar change cited the need to give high school students a stress-relieving, clean break over the December holidays. Nearly all other public and private high schools in the area already have shifted to pre-break final exams.

Under the new calendar, the academic year 2012-13 will run from Aug. 16 to May 30, with first-semester finals ending Dec. 21, with a similar structure the following year. The current academic year, by contrast, began Aug. 23 and runs to June 7.

At the time of the vote in May, 74 percent of Gunn High School students polled said they preferred an "early start (to the school year) with exams before winter break" and 78 percent saw "less stress with exams before winter break."

Opponents of the calendar change, including a group of parents now organized under the name Time to Thrive Palo Alto, argued that rather than relieving student stress, the new calendar will create more of it. They cited, among other things, uncomfortably hot classrooms when students return to school in mid-August and the added stress of high school final exams in the busy pre-holiday period.

Superintendent Kevin Skelly tonight will present a list of "mitigations" to address concerns about impacts of the calendar change -- a list specifically requested by the board at the time of the May 10 vote.

In a report to the board to be discussed tonight, Skelly addresses what he will do about worries that classrooms will be too hot for a mid-August start date, that unequal semesters necessitated by the calendar change will create problems for teachers and that pre-break finals will be unduly stressful for high-school seniors in the process of applying to colleges.

Time to Thrive members said Skelly's report does not adequately address their concerns.

In other business tonight, the board will discuss an estimated $2.5 million loss to the district triggered by the state's $3.7 billion budget shortfall, hear a report from the Elementary Math Task Force and discuss the proposed formation of an advisory committee to oversee the short-term lease of recently acquired district property at 525 San Antonio Ave.

Following a closed session, the public session of tonight's meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. in the board room of school district headquarters, 25 Churchill Ave.

Chris Kenrick

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by care
a resident of Southgate
on Nov 29, 2011 at 10:02 am

Skelly does not care,he can go either way, it is us our parents and seniors and middle and elementary students who will suffer.

Like this comment
Posted by Civility, please.
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:03 am

With all due respect, Dr. Skelly has at least one high school age child I know of who will be personally affected.

Please state your opinion on the issue and the facts that support it. Personal attacks are not helpful to an informative public discourse and good decision making.

Civility starts with individual citizens.

Like this comment
Posted by Give It a Chance, Already!
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:05 am

This dog in the manger, I did not get my way focus is just so tiresome. Please give the new calendar a chance! There must be some reason that dozens of districts around us have adopted it. And you may not have high school students yet, but you WILL. I do now, I can promise that the stress levels over breaks are astronomical with the current calendar.

Please, just give this a chance! Flex. Deal with change. Try to help our older kids.

And August is statistically not NOT HOTTER than other months so the whole stifling classroom thing is ridiculous.

Like this comment
Posted by Reality Check
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:05 am

Seriously people, don't these people have anything more important to discuss? You're beating a dead horse to death!

Like this comment
Posted by parent
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:11 am

I think many of the people who don't want the new calendar are fighting to block it so they don't have to change vacation plans but are using the "stress" as a cover.

Like this comment
Posted by Mom of 3
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:18 am

With all due respect, this is a serious issue, and does deserve continued scrutiny.

As a mother of two high school students, I can assure you that they very much prefer the current schedule -- which is not at all stressful for the high school students during the Winter Break (there is no need to study for finals, which don't start until 2 weeks after the end of break!)

They are dreading the change to having finals before break -- which basically would mean that they'd be studying NOW (and for those who claim they currently study over Winter Break, that means they would have been studying over the Thanksgiving holiday).

This is going to pile work on high schools students at a very stressful time (early December) -- when there are a lot of other things also going on -- including finalizing college applications for Seniors (most of which are due at the end of December/January 1).

The Board recognized that there would be issues with this calendar, and asked for some detailed plans to deal with those issues. The document that they just received doesn't have detailed plans (just denials of any issues) -- and that's a real problem.

It is really critical that we listen to the high school students themselves -- particularly those that have just gone through the process of college applications (last year's graduates). There were some very articulate students who spoke at the earlier meetings who explained in detail how this would create MORE stress. We do need to listen to those students.

Like this comment
Posted by David Pepperdine
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:24 am

My heart bleeds for the people who argue that we shouldn't change the calendar because the three additional school days in August are too hot. Give me a break. What about students in Phoenix and Sudan? If anything, we should push students to learn to deal with the heat. The "too hot" argument is just so much hot air. I hate to say it but this is one time I agree with Skelly. Let's get on with the new schedule. Enough BS already.

Like this comment
Posted by Gotta Cry
a resident of South of Midtown
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:26 am


The calendar change was in process for more than three years.

It has been fully vetted and discussed.

From all rational positions, it was found to be a progressive and good thing for the vast majority of high school kids.

Could it be that those who originally were against the calender change or ignored the District's pleas to participate in the process are now attempting to get their way by starting an "after the fact" campaign?


Where were you guys when we were discussing this months and months ago.

Just saying...

Like this comment
Posted by nonofyourbusiness
a resident of St. Claire Gardens
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:50 am

They were waiting in the trafic jam around university ave...

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Community Center
on Nov 29, 2011 at 11:53 am

There are several legitimate concerns with the calendar change, all of which concern the likely increase in stress for students.

There are other ways to achieve a work-free break, such as quarters (aligning with Stanford and other schools) rather than semesters. Simply moving finals for 2 classes while the other classes are year-long is really not going to achieve a work-free break. The idea of "work-free" was apparently used to promote the special agenda of a group of people who wanted this calendar change for their own reasons, not really to reduce student stress -- they co-opted stress as their reason and managed to narrowly convince 3 of the board members, several of whom had serious concerns about the change. This is why tonight's "plan" will be discussed.

The "plan" is not a plan. Read it, and you will see. The concerns remain valid and the board needs to seriously consider reevaluating this change.

Like this comment
Posted by overcrowded
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:06 pm

The vast majority of parents have been against this change. The board has pushed it through in spite of the genuine opposition.
The "plan" for mitigation in elementary schools is a joke:

1. Use fans.
2. Keep the lights off.
3. Yard supervisors use squirt bottles to cool off kids who want a few squirts!
4. Take the class to read under the shade of a big tree.
5. Plan for less intense, more hands-on learning activities for a hot day (or time of day), when possible.
6. Visit your buddy class (in a portable or other location with A/C) and do a project together.
7. Plan a P.E. activity like a water balloon toss — low energy, in the shade, fun if you get wet!
8. Ensure students continue to drink lots of water — have them bring in water bottles on very hot days.

I love the "visit a buddy class in a room that has A/C" approach! What brilliance!

This calendar change wouldn't survive if high-schools students didn't have AC in their classrooms. Why do our youngest kids in the district have to suffer? Provide REAL mitigation before you prematurely introducing this change.

Like this comment
Posted by What is the big deal?
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:14 pm

For an intellectual community, why so resistant to change? Perhaps it's just the loudmouths and the majority are fine with the new schedule. Los Altos and Mountain View High Schools begin on August 15, Castilleja and M-A begin the next week.

The new schedule has us beginning only one week prior to this year: Web Link

I think we should extend the year into June so the students can have even more days off per month. Those extra days really help to de-stress.

Like this comment
Posted by Big Al
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:30 pm

Would it be to unking to suggest that this group of parents is most likely upset because the new schedule impacts their own schedule (not their kids) and because they take themselves just a tad bit to seriously, or perhaps both?

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 12:39 pm

This was not just a parents against the calendar issue.

True, many parents spoke up at the last meeting against the calendar. But, there were teachers (including sports coach) and students who also opposed the change.

The change means not just the number of school days decreases in the first semester, but also the number of days (including homework time) in the semester and these days are fewer to get through the same amount of homework. So it is not squashing the same curriculum into less number of teaching days, but squashing the same amount of homework into a lot less days overall. Many students use weekends to catch up or get a good start on long term projects. With less weekends and no non-school days there is less available time to do homework, let alone all the other activities that need to be done for an active high schooler.

This is not just about being afraid to try a new plan. It is about the fact that the plan doesn't exist. It is fine for the board to say yes do it, but it is the teachers who have to implement it and I don't think there is any structured plan for how the teachers are to implement it.

And to those who say let's try it and see, you probably don't have a student who will be a senior who doesn't have a chance to go through senior year a second time if it doesn't work well. Their senior year only happens once.

Like this comment
Posted by Mom
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Nov 29, 2011 at 1:17 pm

An eight week I the only one who finds THAT very stressful for our entire family?

Like this comment
Posted by Try it
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:02 pm

This issue has been thoroughly discussed. There is no new information. There is no reason to bring it up again until we try the new schedule. It's a divisive issue and should not be needlessly rehashed.

Like this comment
Posted by Observer
a resident of South of Midtown
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:20 pm

The new calendar will remove any chance for my high school students to fit in a summer vacation. Starting school so early will be exhausting for them. They'd rather take time then instead of a long winter break. Next summer will be terribly short for them if this goes ahead. Also, being a senior trying to get applications in in a short fall semester will be overwhelming. Talk about stress. When proposed, this went through because there was little concrete information out there about what it would actually mean. Don't use the excuse that it got pushed through so fast many of us missed the chance to weigh in. That makes it twice as wrong.

Like this comment
Posted by What's the big deal?
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:25 pm

@Parent: Oh, I see, you are fighting this because YOUR child is directly impacted by senior year. For change to occur some students are going to get screwed!

We all get screwed with the shorter upcoming summer.

The only classes that really get screwed are the semester classes, of which there aren't many, and they are electives or Living Skills.

The arguments of less vacation time, hot weather, too many holiday activities are worthless.

The Board checked with other school districts and those schools are happy with this schedule. MIT is happy with finals before Winter Break too.

My only beef is, why has PAUSD taken so long to change the schedule to finals before Winter Break? Finally, the BoE is making a good choice by passing this calendar!

Like this comment
Posted by Am Engaged
a resident of Barron Park
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:26 pm

I laugh at the notion that the "Vast Majority" are against the change in calendar. In what world?

I say the entire preponderance of parents, students, teachers, clergy and unborn fetuses are totally in favor of the new calendar.

Sounds more like a vocal minority of sore losers.

Like this comment
Posted by A parent and GHS alum
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:35 pm

Palo Alto isn't exactly jumping into an unknown abyss; finals-before-break has already been implemented and well received at many other high-achieving districts and private high schools, whose seniors face similar issues. If anything, they've lagged behind in implementing this.

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:41 pm

@what's the big deal

Yes, I do have a senior who will be impacted. I am not speaking for myself against the calendar alone, but if you read my post, there were many parents who spoke against it, many teachers including the sports coach and many students who spoke against it.

I do have a senior who will be impacted and I don't like my student being used as a guinea pig.

I don't see how with summer school and sports obligations, that we will have much of a summer next year.

I don't like the calendar change because it doesn't suit our family or the family of many, many, students who are unable to take family vacations in June which is the busy time for many companies when August has traditionally been the off peak time for companies in the global market.

We will all be impacted, and most of us negatively.

Like this comment
Posted by care
a resident of Southgate
on Nov 29, 2011 at 2:45 pm

The last time we were in los altos and mountain view schools, they had already remodeled their classrooms, such as egan and santa rita, they have better classrooms and supporting environment.Look at our gunn high, it is so old so unupdated uncomfortable,especially during hot summer days and allergy seasons.

Like this comment
Posted by Paly Parent
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:11 pm

The question on the table tonight is whether or not the district did what it assured the board it would do when the board agreed to calendar change: namely, protect the students from collateral damage, which is potentially worse than the problems the change was intended to fix. I read the report, and essentially, the district ducked this charge and and provides no indication that it has any intention of providing this protection.

So, the board has two options: say, OK, that's fine then, we've identified all these kids who are going to be negatively affected, and you didn't even try, but no problem, we'll just say we don't care about them.

or, the board can freeze the change, protecting the students it identified as being worse off under the new calendar, until the district takes its requests seriously.

Unfortunately, I see no option in between these two.

Like this comment
Posted by care
a resident of Southgate
on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:21 pm


It is not our school district's fault, they have limited resourses , can not do any thing without those.

Like this comment
Posted by What
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 29, 2011 at 3:32 pm

What kind of "protection" were you expecting? I'm unclear about what a plan would look like. The impact of the changes seem minimal, aside from finals coming earlier.

Like this comment
Posted by Sophomore Sue
a resident of Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Nov 29, 2011 at 4:08 pm

Ok...from a student's perspective.

I LOVE the new calendar.

The thought of getting two weeks off without the pressure of finals hanging over my head.....WOOT WOOT.

Please, my friends all think it is a good idea too (though one of our mom's seems upset that it means shorter summer vacation for their family)

Its only a couple of days in big deal. The really hot weather does not typically show up until the end of September and beginning of October anyway.

Who's listening to us?

Like this comment
Posted by parent PA
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 29, 2011 at 4:44 pm

We've been over this ground before, and it's just plain false to conflate the early start with having the exams before finals.

We COULD start later AND have finals before break. We would then have uneven semesters. Other schools do this.

We can commit to having finals before break (a wildly popular choice), and then decide whether the early semester start is unacceptable and a later start more important than having even semesters. Then depending on the decision, take steps THEN to mitigate the problems.

The reason this isn't the choice is because having uneven semesters is unacceptable to SKELLY, because he doesn't want to have to deal with all the educational changes that would entail. I can't blame him, he has to deal with the teachers, we don't. I just wish he was a little more honest and up front about those things. If felt for awhile there like he wanted to couple the change in finals with the early start in order to sink the whole thing and avoid change. However, I respect that he went forward with the change despite the controversy, it is in the best interest of the students.

Instead of attacking finals before break, is this group's beef about the early start? Because that's a separate issue. Instead of changing the finals schedule, they should be looking at uneven semesters -- other schools manage that way, too.

Like this comment
Posted by Paly Parent
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 5:22 pm

Multiple beefs, but what we have now is an early start, plus semesters that are uneven, however, because the teachers didn't want uneven semesters we're pretending they're not, instead, we've taken all the rest and homework days we could out of the fall semester in order to cram the normal fall material into a shorter time period. So the crunch, which many of us feel was problematic anyway with finals before break, is made far far worse than anyone intended going in to this.

So yes, had we been looking at a traditional start, real curriculum adjustments to accommodate uneven semesters, and finals before break in that context, not all of us might have been jumping for joy, but we wouldn't feel that we were about to embark on the most disastrous two school years we could imagine and we would have been willing to try it out. With this mess we have in front of us, we hope someone on the board is brave enough to say--we had good intentions, but this is not what we intended, and stop it now.

Like this comment
Posted by What
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 29, 2011 at 5:33 pm

Paly Parent, you may be right, but I suspect you are not. "The most disastrous two school years we could imagine" - that's pretty stiff stuff. My guess is the kids and teachers are more flexible and resilient than you give credit for, and that things will work themselves out. Perhaps some hiccups the first year, as usual when there are changes, but nothing that can't be handled. And yes, I have a freshman and senior as so-called "guinea pigs" (I believe the superintendent also has two high-schoolers, and at least one board member has one), but we are not losing sleep over the risks associated with school calendar change.

Like this comment
Posted by Gunn Knutt
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:23 pm

I'm a Gunn student.

I love the idea of no final stress during Christmas break.

The symmetrical semesters are a must.

All the hysterics...typical Palo Alto helicopter parents.

The Superintendent, Parent Advisers an School Board have it right this time.

Titans RULE!

Like this comment
Posted by care
a resident of Southgate
on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:28 pm

Then keep the original calendar,make the finals of the most subjects before break,only leave uneven ones after the break(any other besides english?),make it less important when compared to regular tests,then problem solved.

Like this comment
Posted by Vianica
a resident of Palo Verde
on Nov 29, 2011 at 6:58 pm

I am sorry. It is laughable that among the concerns against the calendar change are hot classrooms, and pre holiday stress! Get real people. Palo alto is not a desert and our kids do not have tin or asbestos roofs over their heads! And we wonder why people in India and China who dont have any say in the school calendars and who sit and study in far less comfort and pandering not only suceed academically and professionally but also adapt well.

Like this comment
Posted by GunnGrad
a resident of Gunn High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 7:43 pm

I supported the calendar change throughout my entire time at Gunn. Of course, as a graduate, it will never impact me. But I can tell you that in college, the semesters end BEFORE WINTER BREAK. For all you Palo Alto parents who shell out thousands of dollars for test prep and college essay workshops so that your kids can get into good schools, look at this as just another way to prepare them for the big leagues. When they get to university, they'll find that there is no negotiating exam dates, and nobody cares that they're stressed out and want to go home. Start doing it right, the way it makes sense: semesters divided by a break.

Like this comment
Posted by great advice
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 29, 2011 at 8:53 pm

Yep, Vianica, we should sweat-shop our kids starting at age 5!

Like this comment
Posted by C'mon....
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 29, 2011 at 10:07 pm

Okay, so you're surprised that the District Office didn't do their homework? C'mon...REALLY? REALLY?!!

Time to stick a fork in it, folks...this is a done deal, there's still time to put plans in action and the school sites will come through. All will be well. Just like it's "well" in every high school in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties (well, minus those high schools in PAUSD and our sister district in Campbell) REALLY.

Instead of blitzing our school board meetings again and again, please use your energy and desire to do what's best for students by working with the school sites.

Like this comment
Posted by Casey
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Nov 29, 2011 at 10:10 pm

Our family traditionally vacations with friends on the east coast during the 3rd week of August. My memory is that parents by and large were never in favor of this change.

Like this comment
Posted by Paly Alum
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 29, 2011 at 10:49 pm

Paly Alum is a registered user.

My goodness, Casey! Good thing you aren't a lawyer! What kind of argument is that?!

Parents of elementary schools were not in favor of the new calendar. However, elementary students do not have much to learn besides basic reading, writing, and math. Not much stress there or problems if they miss school.

High school parents, however, who have experienced the stress of academics understand that their children need a stress-free break.

Like this comment
Posted by observer
a resident of South of Midtown
on Nov 30, 2011 at 1:50 am

There's just some really sanctimonious and rather nasty sentiment in some of the pro calendar change comments here. Can we try and be civil as we debate these very real issues and concerns? I have still to hear one solid argument for making this change. The source of the student stress is not having something hanging over them while on vacation, it's pressure from their parents to bring them glory by getting into a status school. Shame on you for using your children to puff yourselves up and then squabbling over phantom issues this creates. You know who you are.

Like this comment
Posted by What's the big deal?
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:03 am

Observer, I find your postings humorous: complaining about less summer vacation (one week), complaining about postings being uncivil, and then yelling "shame on you" at others!

Like this comment
Posted by i'm with you
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 30, 2011 at 8:11 am

"However, elementary students do not have much to learn besides basic reading, writing, and math. Not much stress there or problems if they miss school."

Yeah, who cares about the needs of elementary students. They should just suck it up.

Like this comment
Posted by C'mon...
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:02 am

Dear Observer... I allowed my post to be more off-the-cuff and less care-full than it probably should have been. But it came not so much from a pro calendar stance as my disbelief in observing yet another blitz and harangue of our school board by parents seeking a reversal of the calendar decision.

The tone I picked up by reading others' posts is that many people were reacting - as I was - to the public theater of a group that is unwilling or unable to accept a Board decision. That's how it comes off at this point, I believe.

And the calendar merits and demerits have been debated incessantly. There are no new points, no stone unturned. To write otherwise or claim there has been "no solid argument for making this change" to date is not only disingenuous, it's disrespectful to the Board and a process that was beyond fair.

Our common denominator has always been our concern for our children - no argument there. There's an opportunity to shift from the energy of arguing positions to one of working together to make the best transition to this new calendar. No sanctimony intended. I really believe this can be done - and that this kind of energy is exactly what our school community and children need right now.

Like this comment
Posted by Good grief
a resident of Greater Miranda
on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:26 am

Good grief, people. Can't you all accept the vote of the Board? Why are you trying to re-open and overturn years of battling? It is DONE!!!Stop trying to bully us into "your way". Just stop!!

I am sitting here imagining us resubmitting the Board and the Community to an attempt to overturn every vote by this Board.

Geez. Feels like a tantrum or something by those who didn't get their way.

Like this comment
Posted by parent
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Nov 30, 2011 at 9:55 am

The board identified key issues with the calendar in May and asked for specific plans by November to alleviate those issues. (Yes, even the board members who voted in favor of the calendar agreed that these issues exist and gave specific instructions on their expectations for the report.) The November report did not provide the details requested by the board.

Parents are trying to hold the board, staff and teachers accountable because, without plans in place, the board understands that students will be the ones who deal with the consequences. The board, last night, gave an extension on developing those plans. Whether anything materializes in the next few months remains to be seen. Many parents remain skeptical that it's possible to hold anyone (board, staff, teachers) accountable to what they say they will do. Words are very easy to say, it's the actions that are much more difficult to carry out.

The whole calendar issue seemed to arise because students want a carefree winter break. If it wasn't possible to enforce the no homework policy over winter break before (students reported doing an average of 4 hrs of homework over winter break), how can they enforce the necessary homework/project reductions with fewer teaching days and 22 fewer study days?

Like this comment
Posted by who?
a resident of St. Claire Gardens
on Nov 30, 2011 at 10:18 am

The whole thing requires a considerate amount of resources and powers that can not be controlled by the board members and district,with limitation of the resources and power,how would the district and the board come up with a practical solution that remains largely unreal.

Like this comment
Posted by Observer
a resident of South of Midtown
on Nov 30, 2011 at 1:17 pm

Thank you, C'mon, for a civil and thoughtful reply to my comment. While the new calendar will be awful for my students, I agree with your assessment of the current situation.

To, "...big deal?" The thing is, anything that impacts our students like this is a big deal. I'm glad you find humor in this. For me, while perhaps too confrontational to you, it is essential to point out the greater hypocrisy that underlies so much of the activism 'on behalf of students.' Their welfare is so often thrown under the bus by those who profess to care. This is something actually worth fighting over.

Like this comment
Posted by Marty
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 30, 2011 at 2:37 pm

People! Relax, it's going to be all right. Please don't repeat your arguments again, they have all been heard many times. A decision was made. Let's give it a rest. It *will* be all right. We can adjust. Really. It is not the end of the world.

Like this comment
Posted by Michele Dauber
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 6, 2011 at 8:36 am

@Lurker -- actually we're both right. The submission period opens November 1 and closes November 30. So kids can apply as early as November 1 but in any event, will have final drafts of essays completed long before Christmas break, that they can easily repurpose for the common app. So it is not the case that they will be racing to do them from scratch over the break -- most will already have complete drafts from the UC apps.

Like this comment
Posted by Questionnaire
a resident of Meadow Park
on Dec 27, 2011 at 6:09 am

Just told my visiting college student, Gunn graduate, child that Gunn is going to end the semester before winter break and s/he said " Finally!!".

Spoke to a Senior from another school in San Jose who was surprised Gunn wasn't already doing this. She asked "how do the students rest over winter break?". No prompting.

I am so happy we are at least going to give this a try.

I would love a pre-change questionnaire and a post-change questionnaire of students, to be done in January, re: their thoughts and reactions to both ways of being.Is this in the works?

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 27, 2011 at 9:36 am


The issue is not just about the timing of finals, but the timing of the start of the school year in early August and the ending of the school year in May with winter break right before Christmas and taking the first week of January.

Other school districts may have finals before break, but they also have a calendar more in line with the calendar we have at present. If they are able to do it, then we should look at why they can do it and we can't.

There is more to it than just giving the students a real break (because we know that most classes are year long classes and the students will be expected to put in work on projects etc. over break).

Like this comment
Posted by Gunn student
a resident of Gunn High School
on Jan 1, 2012 at 6:49 pm

As a student at Gunn, I regret that this calendar change is taking place. True, I will be glad to have a more relaxing winter break next year, but it comes at the expense of a lot more stress before break.

Think about it: most kids will be studying for approximately the same number of hours for finals regardless of the schedule change. So is it better to pack all this studying into late nights of cramming before break, or spread it out leisurely over the 2-week break? I think the latter. There is plenty of time to both study and have fun over winter break, and most people don't spend much time studying for finals over break anyway.

The schedule change also means losing 2 weeks of this coming summer break. Summer is a time for students to relax, de-stress, and explore hobbies/interests. And 2 weeks means a lot, considering that it's a quarter of our summer break.

I realize that we can't do anything about it now that the school board has decided to change the schedule, but I hope you'll consider an opposing point of view all the same. Happy 2012!

Like this comment
Posted by critic
a resident of Gunn High School
on Jan 2, 2012 at 6:37 pm

@gunn student: Theyve already made their decision to change the schedule, so any further arguments are useless, sorry.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Why is it becoming increasingly impossible to open a restaurant on the Peninsula?
By Elena Kadvany | 27 comments | 4,940 views

Firing Judge Persky as a tennis coach was a big mistake
By Diana Diamond | 23 comments | 2,755 views

Electric Buses: A case study
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 2,120 views

It just takes time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 506 views

Helping Partners Become Couples (vs. Helping Couples Become Partners)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 273 views



On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Register now