Palo Alto's largest union agrees to pay freeze

City Council extends its contract with the SEIU; agreement includes salary freezes, two-tiered pension system

With fiscal deficits looming on Palo Alto's horizon, pay freezes have become the new normal for the city's largest workers union.

The City Council voted Monday night to extend its current agreement with the Service Employees International Union, Local 521, which represents 582 city employees. The contract, which the council approved 8-0 with Greg Schmid absent, extends the city's current agreement with the SEIU until June 30, 2012.

The council's vote took place after a brief discussion and no public opposition from the union, which includes police dispatchers, utility workers, building inspectors, city planners, library clerks and representatives from just about every department in City Hall. It extends what has now been the council's three-year trend of reducing benefits and containing salaries of some of the city's lowest-paid employees.

The council and the union clashed over the benefit reductions in 2009, at which time the union staged a one-day strike (members called it a "self-imposed furlough") and a protest at City Hall. In October 2009, after negotiations between management and the union had hit an impasse, the council imposed the new conditions on SEIU members.

Since then, tempers have cooled. The council and SEIU agreed on a contract last year and in May the union voted to ratify a one-year extension of the contract. The new agreement includes a pay freeze; an employee contribution of 5.75 percent toward pensions; a second tier for pension calculations that would be applied to new employees; elimination of two floating holidays; elimination of tuition reimbursement and a requirement for employees to pitch in for their medical costs.

Marcie Scott, assistant director in the Human Resources Department, told the council Monday that these conditions would save the city about $3.4 million in the current fiscal year.

"Staff recognizes the continuing contributions the group has made in assisting the city through the Great Recession and its aftermath," Scott said.

The workers, she said, aren't just facing the second consecutive year of frozen salaries and reduced benefits. They are also "adjusting to changes in the working environment as a result of position elimination and staff turnover."

Palo Alto had eliminated close to 10 percent of its full-time positions in the General Fund over the past three years to close a sequence of budget deficits.

Members of the council on Monday expressed appreciation and gratitude to the SEIU workers, who have been in the vanguard of the city's cost-reduction efforts. Councilwoman Nancy Shepherd said she had recently met with union officials, who she said were "very accommodating with this contract."

"They understand the city is under a lot of stress," Shepherd said. "These guys are the ones that generally don't make as much money as others in city staff. I'm sorry they have to continue to roll over their contract when others haven't gotten started on theirs."

Vice Mayor Yiaway Yeh and Councilwoman Karen Holman also said they were grateful to the union for agreeing to extend the terms of their contract.

Meanwhile, the city continues to square off with its main firefighters union. The two sides began their contract negotiations in May 2010 and could not reach an agreement. The dispute is scheduled to go to arbitration this fall. The council also agreed last week to place on the November ballot a measure that would eliminate binding-arbitration from the City Charter.

Palo Alto officials are expecting budget deficits of close to $7 million in each of the next two fiscal years, largely because of sharp increases in pension and health-care costs. The city's current budget, which the council approved last month, assumes $4.3 million in concessions from the police and firefighter unions.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Taxpaying Public
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 26, 2011 at 10:43 am

This is good but it does little to solve the structural issues that will be passed to our children. We need to put them all on 401Ks or defined contribution plans like the rest of the world. We can no longer afford defined benefit plans, at taxpayer expense, for a privileged class of workers.

And the fire union needs to listen to the public anger at its usual selfish antics. We should save millions and outsource or privatize fire services.

Like this comment
Posted by Bill
a resident of Barron Park
on Jul 26, 2011 at 11:09 am

In the fire fighter's union, it's one man, Mr. Spitaleri, who is causing the impasse. The fire fighters should vote him out of office and regain the good will of the community they have lost. That is what puzzles me; doesn't the rank and file recognize what this bully is doing to their image? Remember Proposition R and it's resounding defeat?

Like this comment
Posted by Taxpayer
a resident of Downtown North
on Jul 26, 2011 at 11:19 am

My guess is that the fire union employees are pretty satisfied with Spitaleri. He comes across as a union boss type, but look at the results. The PA fire safety employees are paid 2-3 times the national average (for a fire safety employee), they work significantly less hours than Cal Fire employees, and the dept is over staffed where they often have shifts where they mostly sleep. I'm not sure any of the PA fire safety union employees live in PA. Most live in distant communities and commute in a few times a month. I'm not sure they care much about connecting with the PA community. It is about the $'s and benefits and Spitaleri is bringing home the bacon at taxpayer expense. Measure R was so over the top that the community is now starting to question the relationship with the fire safety employees. So Spitaleri may have over reached on that one.

Like this comment
Posted by Outsource-Them-All
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 27, 2011 at 8:03 am

> The workers, she said, aren't just facing the second consecutive
> year of frozen salaries and reduced benefits.

And what have the "workers" (a nice Marxist term, rather than a good capitalist term--like employees) done to justify these yearly salary increases? Any productivity increases? Any increased attendance on the job?

Maybe its time to outsource the HR work to the private sector, so that the taxpayers actually have people representing their interests, rather than the "workers" interests.

Like this comment
Posted by Michael
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jul 27, 2011 at 9:10 am

Thousand times agreed. The requirement to produce value in the private sector is what makes the American private sector the most productive in the world. If you don't create value for your employer, you don't survive long.

In the public sector we have unfortunately little incentive to produce (the unions protect the lazy and the ambitious alike), and a sense of entitlement to wages and benefits that exceed their more productive private sector counterparts. A 1 year wage freeze in this economy is a pretty good deal, hardly a "sacrifice."

We should definitely privatize where we can. The current workers can be given consideration for the new positions, but the lower producing ones certainly won't survive the transition, and our government will deliver more value to its constituents as a result.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 5,332 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 1,976 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,766 views

"Better" Dads and "Re-invigorated" Moms: Happier Couples
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,297 views

The kindness of strangers
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 571 views


Register today!

‚ÄčOn Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More