News

New districts would shift power on Peninsula

Palo Alto would keep its representatives but may lose some clout in state Senate

View the current and proposed 11th District boundaries.

The map of Sen. Joe Simitian's district in the state Senate currently resembles a rabbit gazing at the sky, its brain positioned somewhere around Los Altos.

The rabbit's body is a spacious blob stretching next to the ocean and encompassing a generous swath of Santa Clara County and smaller chunks of San Mateo and Santa Cruz counties. From its head stretch two ears, one pointing northward and encompassing Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Atherton and Redwood City and another one pointing east and stretching through Santa Clara County and toward San Jose.

The seemingly random design of the district is far from unusual in California, where redistricting has always been the purview of the political party in power. But now, a redistricting proposal, released by the nonpartisan California Citizens Redistricting Commission, aims to kill the rabbit and every other district map that resembles a picture in a Rorschach exam and replace them with boring, amorphous blobs -- which is what the 11th District will become if the commission's recommendations are approved in August.

Under the commission's plan, the map of Simitian's 11th District would resemble a parallelogram with a slightly elongated bottom left corner. Its northern border would start at Brisbane, and its southern border would extend diagonally from the ocean to Sunnyvale. The proposed district would also swallow up various cities that previously fell between the rabbit's ears (Mountain View and Sunnyvale) or stood just above its body (Portola Valley, Woodside, Half Moon Bay).

Meanwhile, cities just west of San Jose, which currently fall on the right ear of the topographical bunny, and those that currently make up the rabbit's tail in the southeast section of the district would switch to another district. Aptos, which stands near the shore of Monterey Bay, would no longer have to share the same district as San Carlos. The portion of Santa Cruz County that now makes up less than a fifth of Simitian's district would no longer be in the district.

Simitian said the new map could create some anxiety for residents in northern Santa Clara County, the part of the county includes his hometown of Palo Alto. With the rabbit replaced by the blob, the county (which currently makes up about 60 percent of the district) would become a minority in the Senate district, and the political center of gravity will shift to San Mateo County.

"It's understandable that people in Sunnyvale will say, 'What do we have in common with Brisbane?'" Simitian said. "But when the districts are this big and when they cover that much ground, each district will have more disparate communities."

These concerns are typical whenever districts get redesigned and counties are forced to share district, he said. He said he generally supports the proposed map, which in many ways makes more sense than the current districts. He noted that under the current setup, he represents Capitola in Santa Cruz County but not Mountain View, which is five minutes away from his house. He responded to concerns from his Santa Cruz constituents by opening an office in their county.

Other state Assembly, state Senate and Congressional districts on the Peninsula are also slated for a major redesigns. Assemblyman Rich Gordon, whose 21st District currently resembles the receiver of a 20th century telephone, would see his turf become more geographically compact even as it spreads east to swallow up Mountain View and Sunnyvale. The district would lose the cities that currently stand on its fringes, including Redwood City in the north and Los Gatos in the south.

Gordon, who took office last year, could find himself campaigning in new areas if the commission's district maps are accepted. He told the Weekly that the proposed district maps makes "geographic sense" and that he supports the results of the commission's work (as did Simitian), even though he does not presume that the drafts released last week would be the ones the commission ultimately adopts.

The redistricting proposal could impact his campaigning in the next election season, Gordon said, though it will not change how he represents those parts of the 11th District that could shift elsewhere next year.

"Under these tentative maps, Los Altos and parts of San Jose would no longer be in my district in the future, but I have to represent those areas during this term of office and I will continue to represent that area and do that work," Gordon said. "When it comes time to campaign, I will be campaigning in some new communities, but I wouldn't presume that I'll be representing those communities."

Analysts say the shifts in districts, while visually dramatic, are expected to have little political effect on the politicians and their constituents on the Peninsula. Unlike in southern California, where Republican Reps. David Dreier and Elton Gallegly now find themselves battling for political survival in increasingly Democratic districts, the changes in the Bay Area promise to be more subtle, said Jim Ross, a political consultant who specializes in state elections.

Several cities in San Mateo County, including East Palo Alto and Menlo Park, would shift from Rep. Anna Eshoo's 14th District in the U.S. Congress to Rep. Jackie Speier's 12th District. This, however, is unlikely to cause a huge stir for the residents the congressional districts, Ross said.

"The Bay Area's congressional delegation is pretty solid," Ross said. "It's not like they're going from one party to another. They're all Democratic and relatively progressive."

Impacts could be more substantive in the reshuffling of state Senate districts. San Francisco, which is currently split between two districts (Mark Leno's in the north and east and Leland Yee's in the West) would be reduced to one Senator -- a move that Ross say could cost the city some political clout.

But this could also spell good news for residents in many sections of San Mateo County, who will no longer have to vie with San Francisco for the attention of their senator.

"San Mateo County and, in general, the South Bay will get more specific representation than it had in the past because the San Francisco seat currently held by Leland Yee moves south," Ross said. "That nexus of power moves south."

In the state Assembly, districts on the Peninsula would become more compact, swapping territory (and largely Democratic voters) in the process. Jerry Hill's 19th Assembly District would lose Half Moon Bay and other coastal communities to Gordon's new 21st District but spread eastward, picking up San Carlos and Redwood City from Gordon's district.

The upshot is that some Peninsula voters who are currently represented by Democrats in the state Assembly, state Senate and the U.S. Congress could find themselves represented next year by a different set of Democrats. Voters in Palo Alto, meanwhile, should see few concrete impacts other than the fact that their district maps will lose those creative shapes that it took decades of gerrymandering to achieve.

"For Palo Alto, specifically, there's not a lot of change," Ross said. "Rich Gordon will still be the assemblyman; Joe Simitian will still be the state Senator until he terms out; and none of the representatives will change."

The redistricting process is being closely watched around the country, where district lines continue to get drawn up by politicians. The 14-member commission, which was approved by California voters, has held 23 public hearings on the subject and is scheduled to vote on the final map on Aug. 15.

Ross, a veteran of many political campaigns, said he's been impressed with the commission's work up to this point.

"This is a real public process," Ross said. "There are public hearings up and down the state.

"They are really paying attention to what people are saying, they're doing a good job, and they're not cynical."

Simitian, who supported the commission's establishment, agreed.

"If you look at the first set of draft maps, they followed the rules, exercised common sense and kept it as apolitlcal as it was possible to do," Simitian said. "I give them high marks."

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by John
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 16, 2011 at 11:26 am

Again--a drawing or two would have made this story much more understandable.


Like this comment
Posted by John
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 16, 2011 at 11:30 am

Sorry for the above comment. I found the maps. Thank you.


Like this comment
Posted by Jared Bernstein
a resident of Professorville
on Jun 16, 2011 at 11:47 am

Well, I looked at the linked-to map before reading the text, but the first posting is essentially correct. On this page and in the print version on Friday, a map will be useful.


Like this comment
Posted by Enough!
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jun 16, 2011 at 11:52 am

So TIRED of rabbit politics.


Like this comment
Posted by Myrtle Walker
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jun 16, 2011 at 3:07 pm

Will there be any future meetings in East Palo Alto before the adoption?


Like this comment
Posted by Mike McMahon
a resident of Meadow Park
on Jun 16, 2011 at 3:56 pm

Myrtle, There is a meeting June 25 at the San Jose City Hall from 2 to 5 PM. For a complete list of meetings go to Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by Bill
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 16, 2011 at 5:25 pm

Sounds like we finally got some reasonable political boundaries without the gerrymandering that has existed too long. I hope the various politicians begin to represent the people needs rather than that of their party.

I know, this would cause our cities to react with shock, but I'd accept that if our legislators would represent the state's best interests, not that which ensures their reelection.


Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2011 at 8:37 pm

These boundaries look amazingly rational.


Like this comment
Posted by Toady
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jun 19, 2011 at 9:48 am

Still doesn't solve the problem of people here being reflexively Democratic without critical thought. As long as that's the case, we'll still have what we have in Sacramento.


Like this comment
Posted by Alfred E Newman
a resident of Atherton
on Jun 19, 2011 at 10:24 am

toady: "Still doesn't solve the problem of people here being reflexively Democratic without critical thought."

Or explain the outright arrogance of those on the fringe right.

Yes, the fringe. By redrawing the districts with no regard for protecting certain districts, California's true blue roots will be more distinct, especially with Congressional seats. The Dems probably will pick up 4 or 5 seats when this is finalized. How many statewide offices does the fringe right hold in California?

Face it, Californians vastly prefer the Democratic party over the alternative fringe. Look at the last republican to hold statewide office and his current poll numbers.

Arnold's in the low 20's, isn't he?

Why? Perhaps because Republicans in California swear fealty to an unelected out-of-stater, Grover Norquist, of Americans for Tax Reform. They cower in fear of his power rather than work together to cut spending and where necessary increase revenue to solve California's problems.

An unelected out-of-stater.

Talk about being reflexively UN-democratic without critical thought.


Like this comment
Posted by Toady
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jun 19, 2011 at 3:41 pm

Alternative fringe?

(yawn)

It's too bad you are more focused on ridiculous labels rather than understand that your party is in the pocket of public sector unions like the SEIU, which is the basis of the problem with the budget in Sacramento.

It's a neat party trick. SEIU funnels their money to Democrats in power, who, in turn, just raise taxes to the point that the state is insolvent just to pay into the paychecks and benefits of union members. With your taxpayer dollars.

The public sector unions are playing Democratic voters like a fiddle. It's actually quite amusing if it weren't so sad.


Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 30, 2011 at 5:30 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

That map looks like just one more gerrymander. What is it about compact and contiguous they don't get?


Like this comment
Posted by svatoid
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jun 30, 2011 at 7:40 am

Map looks like the district will be fairly rectangular shaped now, as opposed to the former district with appendages and invaginations. Looks very contiguous and better now.
[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 30, 2011 at 11:44 am

Walter: I agree. I simply am to simple-minded I guess to understand why we can't just start in the northwest corner of our state, and start drawing contiguous squares around every 100,000 people (or whatever the minimum district population is) until the State is covered in squares. Ok, done! No gerrymandering, no pandering. Just square by square voting.

Toady: I had the same reaction to whats-his-names post about "fringe"..I had to stifle a yawn.. Guess he or she got the memo from Schumer that anyone who wants to spend only what we take in is an "extremist" .... cracks me up. I know most folks understand that basic fact of life that one can not keep spending more than one makes, or we hit bankruptcy. Only in the lunasphere is living within your means "extremist" or "fringe".
Whatever...


Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jun 30, 2011 at 11:46 am

sorry svatoid, didn't mean to overlook including your mandatory use of the word "fringe" with "right" in my post above. thanks for not disappointing.


Like this comment
Posted by svatoid
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jun 30, 2011 at 11:58 am

"sorry svatoid, didn't mean to overlook including your mandatory use of the word "fringe" with "right" in my post above. thanks for not disappointing."

You need to re-read my post and see in what context the term "fringe" and "right" were used. Stop marching in lockstep with Walter, Michelle, Sarah and Rick.


Like this comment
Posted by toady started it
a resident of another community
on Jun 30, 2011 at 12:47 pm

toady started the flamethrowing: "Still doesn't solve the problem of people here being reflexively Democratic without critical thought"

then

"It's too bad you are more focused on ridiculous labels"

Others pointed out he is in a fringe group. Reflexively out of the mainstream. Apparently he disagrees or takes offense. If so, he should offer evidence he is not out in the fringe.

For my money, that's correct, he is in the fringe. He ignored the evidence offered and started whining about unions - what does that have to do with redistricting?

As pointed out, how many republicans hold statewide office?

How many republicans hold office on the Peninsula?

He had one salient point - (yawn)

Enjoy your last day watching Glenn on fox.


Like this comment
Posted by smmmmm
a resident of another community
on Jul 1, 2011 at 12:19 pm

One has to understand toady's arrogance comes from worshiping Glen Beck and that crowd of Coulter wannabes.

"It's too bad you are more focused on ridiculous labels..."

From your favorite black cocktail dress wearing, family values, unmarried columnist, Ann Coulter:

"Liberals are not like most Americans. They are the biggest p***ies on Earth, city-bred weaklings who didn't play a sport and have never been in a fight in their entire lives. " Web Link

What a gal. Good thing she doesn't label, eh, toady?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

He said – she said – who is lying? Justice Brett Kavanaugh or PA resident Christine Ford
By Diana Diamond | 71 comments | 4,126 views

Global Warming Diet
By Laura Stec | 6 comments | 1,376 views

Couples: "Taming Your Gremlin" by Richard Carson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,288 views

Preparing for kindergarten
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 729 views

Let's Talk Internships
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 406 views

 

Race is tomorrow!

​On Friday, September 21, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run, or—for the first time—half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More