Ravenswood seeks parcel tax, braces for cuts

May 3 deadline for mail-in ballot that could raise funds for strapped district

Voters in East Palo Alto and eastern Menlo Park have until Tuesday (May 3) to mail in their ballots for a parcel tax in the Ravenswood City School District.

Passage of the tax, which requires a two-thirds majority vote, would help to lift the school district out of a disastrous budget hole, supporters said.

The specter of class sizes rising from 20 to as high as 30 -- or the addition of five to 10 "furlough days" in which schools would close -- haunts the district if some of the possible budget scenarios were to come true.

The parcel tax, Measure B, asks voters to renew an existing $98-per-parcel-per-year tax and to add another $98, bringing to total to $196 per parcel per year.

If passed, Measure B would generate about $1.2 million for the district.

Currently, the district is planning for a $3.2 million -- or 17 percent -- cut to its $18 million unrestricted operating budget for 2011-12, district Business Manager Megan Curtis said.

Additionally, the district receives about $22 million in highly targeted federal and state "categorical funds" to address specific conditions, including poverty and the more than 60 percent of students who are English language learners.

The projections for a 17 percent operating cut are based on the $330-per-student cut envisioned by Gov. Jerry Brown in January, Curtis said.

Curtis said she'll know a lot more in a few weeks when Brown unveils the next iteration of a state budget, known as the May revise.

She has heard rumors that per-student cuts could be as high as $500 to $1,000, requiring far more drastic local adjustments, she said.

About 80 percent of Ravenswood students are considered low-income. Sixty-one percent are English-language learners, and about 30 percent of students each year are new enrollees, according to the Ravenswood Education Foundation.

Ravenswood Teachers Association President Aaron Williamson, a math teacher as well as district-wide math teaching coach, said community members have been working through phone banks and local churches to boost support for Measure B.

"In the interests of students, we don't want to cut any of the school year away," Williamson said.

"Also, increasing class size is especially difficult in a district like ours because we have full inclusion for special-education students. There is no special day (separate) class," he said.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by Reconstitute Ravenswood
a resident of another community
on May 2, 2011 at 6:51 am

> The specter of class sizes rising from 20 to as high as 30

Notice the bias in this reporting. "Specter" is a word all too often used with "ghosts", and other apparitions .. harbingers of evil and no good. What gobbledygook. Most of the world goes to school in classes bigger than twenty. Of course, it takes three teachers (and who knows how may aides) to teach sixty kids when the class size is twentry, but only two teachers when the class size is thirty. That's where the "cuts" are--cutting the number of teachers that expect well-paying government jobs.

And how is the Ravenswood School District doing?

Here are API scores for the district:

Number of
Students API
Ravenswood City Elementary 2,511 666
Elementary Schools
Belle Haven Elementary 449 653
Costano Elementary 236 670
East Palo Alto Charter 322 842
Edison-Brentwood Elementary 264 740
Green Oaks 336 627
James Flood Magnet Elementary 214 692
Willow Oaks Elementary 376 696
Middle Schools
Cesar Chavez Elementary 321 659
Ronald McNair Academy 289 621
High Schools
Stanford New School 370 606

Only one of the schools is performing above the 800 level, which is "Proficient"--and that is the Charter school, which has been the target of Ravenswood animosity since before its inception.

So .. where is this additional parcel tax money going? How is it going to produce kids that can read and write at the level of "proficient"? Answer--it's not!

Rather than throwing more good money after bad--what about a reconstitution of the school district, and start over with new management, and new teachers?

(Sorry about the formatting, but the Weekly's web-page processor doesn't handle tables at all.)

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Verve Coffee to start brewing in Palo Alto this Friday
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 1,924 views

Premarital and Couples: Musings on Life
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,062 views

The summer bucket list
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 730 views

Cap On? Cap Off? The Cities Respond
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 675 views

Why we are Warming
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 608 views