Palo Alto to ask for $1.5M for California Avenue

Valley Transportation Authority grant could revitalize shopping district but would reduce street lanes to two

A $1.5 million grant could transform California Avenue in Palo Alto into a European-style boulevard with two lanes, a park/plaza at the east end near the Caltrain station, additional landscaping, kiosks and a 20-seat mini-plaza near Ash Street.

The city plans to submit an application Tuesday to the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) for a Community Design for Transportation Grant, which is designed to help cities improve transit connections, calm traffic, promote bicycle and pedestrian uses and increase economic development.

The city would add $500,000 in matching funds. The city previously applied for VTA funding in June and was turned down.

The latest California Avenue streetscape plan -- its eighth iteration -- is based on feedback officials received during a Sept. 23 community meeting. The Palo Alto City Council will hear an informational presentation on the plan and grant application Monday night.

The streetscape proposal adds "bulb outs" to extend the sidewalk in some places but does not uniformly widen the sidewalks. Shade trees could be added in places. An outdoor plaza with seating for up to 20 tables could be added west of Ash Street, Chief Transportation Official Jaime Rodriguez said Thursday.

The plan would redesign diagonal parking at a 60-degree angle; cars currently park at 45 degrees. A 3-foot buffer zone between the cars and traffic lane would be added. Parking spaces would increase to 135 (from 111) with two loading zones. Each 16-foot traffic lane would be marked as a shared bike lane, he said. Colored crosswalks and parking areas would alter the "sea of asphalt" look of the current roadway, he said.

He estimated the total cost would be $1.7 million. Three other improvements would require separate funding: street resurfacing costs $500,000 and is funded already to take place in the next two years; lighting costs $500,000.

A permeable-paving area for the diagonal parking that could reduce contaminated water from the street draining into the San Francisco Bay would cost $400,000, he said.

City officials are also considering additional parking structures on side streets, but that concept has not reached the costs or locations stage, he said.

Rodriguez said the council could direct staff to hold off on improvements, in which case the grant application would be withdrawn.

Some residents and business owners who turned out to a community meeting Sept. 23 gave the plan a yellow light and urged the city to slow down. Reducing the street from four lanes to two is a major sticking point, they said, expressing fears of traffic backups as cars attempt to pull in and out of the diagonal parking spaces.

The city has asserted that reducing the number of lanes would slow down traffic and make the area more pedestrian and bike friendly.

Some people last week also questioned the feasibility of trying to "brand" California Avenue as a destination-shopping district, similar to University Avenue. The mix of stores serve local residents and would attract few outside shoppers, they said.

"California Avenue is the last local downtown of Palo Alto. It would be nice to have something smaller scale and more personal," said William, a resident who asked not to be identified with his last name.

Other people felt the plan caters to vehicles, not pedestrians.

"I like the idea of getting parking off California Avenue -- period. It's short-sighted to approach with a car-centric concept," Becky Fuson said. A more "long-lived idea" should be developed with "a more human scale," she said.

But others said the four-lane concept is outdated and they did not agree with fears that two lanes would jam up traffic or be any more dangerous to pedestrians.

James Cook said he liked the idea of beautifying the area.

"It has a tired look. The four lanes must be a remnant of another time. It's like a freeway look," he said.

Some residents of the adjacent Evergreen Park neighborhood said they welcome the changes and questioned some assertions that "if it isn't broken, you shouldn't fix it."

"We need a more pleasant place to visit. Beautifying the street has got to be a goal. We should be careful. We don't want to kill this thing. To say it's not broken -- I would question that," a resident said.

But Terry Holzemer, of the Palo Alto Central Homeowners Association near the Caltrain station, said a survey of residents there found people did not want to change the four-lane configuration. Bikes sharing lanes with cars is "a recipe for disaster," he said.

Rodriguez said the Architectural Review Board, Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council still must review the concepts this fall and could modify the designs.

Other municipalities have converted shopping districts form four lanes to two, including Menlo Park, Los Altos and Mountain View. Those cities had greater retail sales afterward and were satisfied with traffic flows and pedestrian and bike safety, Palo Alto Chief Planning Official Julie Caporgno said.

Rodriguez said a thorough traffic analysis is expected next year.

Updated drawings of the plan will be posted this week on by searching under "California Avenue."

The survey of other cities can be viewed on the same page by finding "General Public Meeting - September 9, 2010" and clicking on "economic survey data."

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by David
a resident of another community
on Oct 3, 2010 at 7:00 pm

I wonder, if they didn't cut down all those trees would we need to spend more money?

Like this comment
Posted by Robbie
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Oct 3, 2010 at 8:14 pm

This is a great and badly-needed plan. 4 lanes are not needed. Give the extra space to those outside cars.

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 3, 2010 at 8:19 pm

Can someone explain the theory behind changing from 45 degree parking to 60 degree parking? I could understand 90 degree parking which is probably how to get most cars into the space, but where do we have 60 and 45 around Palo Alto so that we know what is being proposed?

Like this comment
Posted by Mark
a resident of University South
on Oct 4, 2010 at 1:09 am

So...if the city can pitch in $500,000...the budget crisis is over I take it? Seriously?

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 4, 2010 at 11:35 am

The geniuses that reduced Arastradero to two lanes and created bumper to bumper traffic all hours of the day now want to do the same to California Ave where even more carbon can spew into the atmosphere from all the idling engines?

Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:18 pm

Go take a look at downtown Mountain View. Some time ago, they made a lot of changes to make Castro a slow, more pedestrian-friendly street. Yes, it pushed a lot of traffic over to Shoreline, but, scores of restaurants and other foot-traffic businesses sprouted. California Avenue used to be more dynamic-- if we could just plant some full grown trees :-(

Like this comment
Posted by Too Much Traffic
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:34 pm

"Some residents and business owners who turned out to a community meeting Sept. 23 gave the plan a yellow light and urged the city to slow down."

Yes, we must give California Avenue the "Alma Plaza-PA process" treatment. Maybe in another 10 years we can make a final decision,.

Like this comment
Posted by P.A. Native
a resident of Mountain View
on Oct 4, 2010 at 4:25 pm

I was thinking about the trees the other day and the whole thing still pisses me off. Were all the trees diseased? Were they all due to fall over soon? Did the redwood at the train station really need to go too?

And you know it was done in one fell swoop purposefully to deny the citizens their right to object. It's just not the same now.

Like this comment
Posted by Donald
a resident of South of Midtown
on Oct 4, 2010 at 9:29 pm

A dose of reality needs to be injected into this thread. This project has nothing to do with the trees; it was in the planning stages a year or two before that fiasco. Also, it doesn't take a genius to notice that Cal. Ave is not Arastradero and has no through traffic for more than a few blocks. Any problems on Arastradero exist for only about 30 minutes a day, not all hours of the day as Resident claims. Exaggerations like that don't do anybody any good and only serve to damage your credibility. The 4 lanes on Cal. Ave are severely underutilized, and 2 wide lanes should do the job. The extra width allows room for cars to back out and for bikes to avoid them without impacting traffic in the through lane. The 4-way stops will be much safer and saner with only one lane of drivers in each direction. Most people can't keep track of multiple drivers in each direction in such situations, which leads to confusion and danger for everyone on the road.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

After experiencing harassment, owner of Zareen's restaurants speaks out about Islamophobia, racism
By Elena Kadvany | 28 comments | 7,379 views

Don't Miss Your Exit (and other lessons from an EV drive)
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 2,465 views

Goodbye Food Waste!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,400 views

Premarital and Couples: Tips for Hearing (Listening) and Being Known
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 929 views

Is racism also a local problem?
By Diana Diamond | 25 comments | 717 views


Register today!

‚ÄčOn Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

Learn More