Stanford grad at core of SEC suit against Goldman

Fabrice Tourre appears before Congress today

Fabrice Tourre, a 2001 Stanford University graduate who is allegedly the principal architect in a "toxic" sub-prime mortgage scheme that cost investors more than $1 billion, appeared for the first time before Congress Monday. He denied allegations of wrongdoing.

Tourre, 31, who described himself in an e-mail as the "Fabulous Fab" and the "only potential survivor" of the Goldman Sachs and Co. mortgage-backed securities debacle, is the only individual named in a federal civil lawsuit filed April 16 by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).

Tourre is being sued along with broker-dealer Goldman Sachs and Co. for securities fraud in developing a financial "instrument" that was tied to the performance of sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities.

The "synthetic collateralized debt obligation" (CDO), a particular type of financial instrument, was designed to crash spectacularly for the benefit of Goldman Sachs and one investor, the SEC claims.

Tourre, a native of France, graduated from Stanford's Department of Management Science and Engineering with a specialty in operations research -- developing and using mathematical and computational methods statistics, supply-chain management, pricing and financial engineering, according to the department's website.

He is alleged to have created ABACUS 2007-AC1, a portfolio of investments in sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities. Investors receive payments out of the interest and principal on the underlying mortgages.

But while investors expected a positive return on a portfolio of mortgages, Tourre and Goldman Sachs allegedly did not divulge that the company was allowing a large hedge fund, Paulson and Co. Inc., to pick the portfolio's selection.

Paulson wasn't interested in the portfolio's success; rather, the company picked securities it expected to fail, according to the SEC complaint.

By betting on failure rather than success -- known as "shorting" -- Paulson made nearly $1 billion in profit while Goldman's investors lost more than $1 billion, according to the lawsuit. Shorting is not illegal, but failing to disclose Paulson's role is fraud, the SEC noted.

Paulson identified 100 bonds it expected to experience "credit events" in the near future. The selection favored sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities with a high percentage having adjustable-rate mortgages.

The borrowers had relatively low FICO scores, a measure of credit trustworthiness. A high concentration of mortgages were in states such as Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada, which had high rates of home-price appreciation, according to the complaint.

Tourre allegedly devised the ABACUS 2007 portfolio, prepared the marketing materials and communicated directly with investors, according to the complaint.

At the time, he worked as a vice president on the structured-product-correlation trading desk at Goldman Sachs headquarters in New York.

To attract big investors, Goldman Sachs and Tourre allegedly convinced a third-party collateral manager, ACA Capital, to attach its name to the portfolio. Neither ACA Capital nor the investing banks were told of Paulson's role in portfolio selection or its investments in the portfolio's failure.

ACA Capital put up $909 million to protect the credit risk associated with a significant part of the portfolio. One of Europe's largest banks, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., covered ACA Capital's risk.

Tourre allegedly told ABN AMRO Bank in e-mails that ACA Capital had selected the portfolio and never mentioned Paulson's role, according to the suit. ACA Capital's finances collapsed.

A consortium of banks, including the Royal Bank of Scotland, which had purchased ABN AMRO Bank in late 2007, invested more than $840 million. That money was paid to Goldman Sachs, and most was subsequently paid by Goldman to Paulson, according to the complaint.

Another major investor, IKB -- a commercial bank in Dusseldorf, Germany, that specializes in lending to small and medium-sized companies -- bought $150 million worth of notes in the portfolio.

"Within months of closing on the deal, ABACUS 2007 notes were nearly worthless and IKB lost nearly all of its $150 million investment," the complaint notes.

Just months after the deals with Paulson and IKB were closed, 83 percent of the sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities in the portfolio had been downgraded and 17 percent were on "negative watch." By Jan. 29, 2008, 99 percent of the portfolio had been downgraded, according to the SEC.

Tourre wrote to a friend on Jan. 23, 2007: "More and more leverage in the system. The whole building is about to collapse anytime now ... Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab ... standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstruosities!!!" the lawsuit states.

A Paulson employee said in January 2007 that the market wasn't pricing the "wipeout" scenario of sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities, according to the complaint.

"In my opinion this situation is due to the fact that rating agencies, (collateralized-debt obligation) managers and underwriters have all the incentives to keep the game going, while 'real money' investors have neither the analytical tools nor the institutional framework to take action before the losses that one could anticipate based (on) the 'news' available everywhere are actually realized," the employee said.

Goldman Sachs has put Tourre, who was working in London, on paid leave, according to the Wall Street Journal. The company recently announced it has unregistered Tourre with the Financial Services Authority in London, effectively ending his ability to speak with clients or conduct financial business, the Journal reported.

Financial pundits are debating if Tourre is a villain, a fall-guy or a hero. So far, he is the lone individual identified in the SEC suit, which seeks a restraining order against similar activities and repayment to investors of all profits made from the transactions, plus interest and penalties.

Pamela Chepiga, an attorney with Allen and Overy LLP and Tourre's legal counsel, did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Darrell Duffie, a professor in the Stanford Graduate School of Business and an authority on collateralized debt obligation markets (CDOs), described ABACUS 2007-AC1 as "a complicated deal."

But it's not unusual in its structure. There have been many such deals (constructed) in the last 10 years, he said.

"The allegations are the sort of thing that can happen at any time when a bank misstates the product," he said, emphasizing that he does not know if the SEC's allegations are true.

It's much like getting a used car and finding out it's a lemon and not as advertised, he said.

Duffie and Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest, a former SEC commissioner, will speak during a panel discussion, "SEC v. Goldman Sachs: Analyzing the SEC's Complaint," today (April 27).

More information is available at

The venue has been moved to Bishop Auditorium, located at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, 518 Memorial Way.


Like this comment
Posted by qq
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 26, 2010 at 7:46 pm

Remember, at Goldman, you are not a client, just a counterparty...


Like this comment
Posted by people in glass houses
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 26, 2010 at 8:07 pm

fab 5 -the poster with the offensive rant against "immigrants"

I see your post has been removed,

so, you must be native american or hispanic, the only original people of these lands

otherwise surely you also have immigrant heritage in you,

and don't we all have a pirate or a fortune seeker in our ancestry?

Like this comment
Posted by qq
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 27, 2010 at 6:24 am

From CNN:

Web Link

"The e-mail messages Fabrice Tourre sent to a girlfriend in late 2007 make it clear that the glib and sometimes arrogant 28-year-old trader was fully aware that the financial "monstruosities" he helped create at Goldman Sachs were entirely bunk.

But the highly personal messages, released over the weekend by Goldman, also suggest that Tourre had some misgivings about the toxic trades he engineered over two years ago, which are now the subject of fraud charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission."


Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 27, 2010 at 8:59 am

This guy sounds like a charming individual...not.

Like this comment
Posted by Meg
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Apr 27, 2010 at 9:49 am

Meg Whitman was a director of Goldman Sachs.

Like this comment
Posted by Chris Zaharias
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 27, 2010 at 10:29 am

If I were a CEO, I'd make a point of hiring as few Stanford grads as possible and instead getting good people from universities with fewer white collar soon-to-be convicts.

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 27, 2010 at 11:25 am

I am not a Whitman fan --- but how does her tenure at GS have any relevance in the current discussion? She was long-gone before any of this was ever thought of. Further, she had nothing to do with the operation in question. Nice try.

Like this comment
Posted by Your-Loss-Is-My-Gain
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 27, 2010 at 12:26 pm

Wonder how many local papers will be writing editorials excoriating Stanford for not having required its B-school students to take a course on ethics?

Will be interesting to see if anyone ever gets around to accusing the B-schools of having some culpability in the goings-on on Wall Street?

Like this comment
Posted by chris
a resident of University South
on Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39 pm

Your Loss,

Fabulous Fab is not a business school graduate, he is math guy who
got an MS from the engineering school.

Get your facts right.

Like this comment
Posted by chris
a resident of University South
on Apr 27, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Montag (his "sh**ty deal" quoted repeatedly today by Levin and little old lady senators) was a Stanford undergrad (his name is on the admissions building) and a Northwestern business grad.

Like this comment
Posted by chris
a resident of University South
on Apr 27, 2010 at 1:03 pm

When Meg was a director at GS, she paid a $395,000 penalty for stock manipulation and was thrown off the board.

Like this comment
Posted by Your-Loss-Is-My-Gain
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 27, 2010 at 2:21 pm

Dear Mr. Chris ..

The point of the posting was that a failure of ethics from a Stanford grad was at the core of this financial mischief .. are there any ethics courses required of any Stanford grads .. including Math or Engineering?

Which Stanford school he graduated from is not key to the point being suggested .. the fact the ethics failures abound in this meltdown is key. Stanford could take note and start requiring ethics courses for all of its students, however.

Like this comment
Posted by alum
a resident of Downtown North
on Apr 27, 2010 at 2:36 pm

Stanford MBAs do take required ethics courses, and have done so for decades.

Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 27, 2010 at 6:08 pm

Fabrice is the fall guy for this debacle, GS were very quick to release his personal emails that reveal him as a jerk.

But remember--Paulson made 100s of millions of dollars out of these deal.
GS were the casino and they were fixing the tables apparently, Fabrice's emails about defrauding widows and orphans in Belgium and the release of such emails by GS have set him up as the scapegoat and, unless he talks to bring down others, he is in big trouble.
GS appears to want to discredit him to protect the big guys--- so it goes.
Why does the press want to drag Stanfords Management Science Department into this scandal?--- it is a recent reorg of the EES Department-- we do not see the connection

Like this comment
Posted by Meg
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Apr 27, 2010 at 7:37 pm

Meg Whitman apologizes for being a corrupt Goldman Sachs executive: Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by chris
a resident of University South
on Apr 28, 2010 at 7:45 am

GS was doing a trade between consenting rich intelligent adults.
IKB and ACA transferred $1B to Paulson and GS lost money for its efforts. Nobody in the "real" world was affected.

It was Washington Mutual that was exploiting poor unintelligent Hispanics by giving them mortgages they couldn't afford and passing them off to investors while WaMu was making a bundle. These were the real "assets" that failed. GS was dealing in "synthetics",

Who is the criminal in this picture?

In any case, WaMu is gone and GS is still standing. Which company was undercapitalized and a danger to society?

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Nobu Palo Alto eyes next-door expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 2,106 views

By Laura Stec | 33 comments | 2,030 views

Are We Really Up To This?
By Aldis Petriceks | 3 comments | 1,368 views

Joe Simitian talk: Listening to Trump's America: Bridging the Divide
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 823 views

Don't be a ghost
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 567 views