'I thought he was going to ... shoot me next' | News | Palo Alto Online |


'I thought he was going to ... shoot me next'

Explorer Scout on a ride-along testifies emotionally of witnessing shooting incident when Officer Richard May was killed

"I thought he was going to come and shoot me next," Marco Marquez, a key witness who rode along with Officer Richard May the day he was killed, testified Tuesday afternoon in the murder trial of Alberto Alvarez.

Marquez, 19, an Explorer Scout with East Palo Alto Police Department, testified for more than three hours in the San Mateo County Superior Court trial in Redwood City, sometimes choking up and having to dab his eyes as he recalled the Jan. 7, 2006, killing.

Alvarez, 26, of East Palo Alto is charged with first-degree murder under special circumstances (killing an on-duty police officer). He could face the death penalty if convicted on that charge.

Marquez wore a blue police Explorer uniform complete with a badge and East Palo Alto Police Department arm patches during his testimony -- the same uniform he wore on the ride-along . The Explorers program allows youths aged 14 to 21 to experience police work.

Under direct testimony with questions from prosecutor Steve Wagstaffe, Marquez said he arrived early at the East Palo Alto Police Department and asked May if he could ride along.

"Officer May always liked to have a ride-along with him, so we would always ask him," Marquez said. He recalled listening to a NASCAR auto race with May that day, which was uneventful until May received a call at about 4:30 p.m. regarding a fight at the Villa Taqueria restaurant at 2380 Cooley Ave., near University Avenue.

As May drove toward the restaurant, they saw a man in a black jacket walking on the sidewalk. May slowed down and "tried to make contact" but the person took off running across University into Weeks Street, Marquez said.

Marquez identified that man as Alvarez.

He said they then saw Alvarez trying to unlock a gate at an apartment complex but he ran across the street when he saw May's car stop behind him.

Marquez said he remained in the car when May got out to pursue Alvarez to a driveway on Weeks Street. May caught up with Alvarez and struck him twice with his retractable baton but Alvarez kept running, Marquez said.

Marquez said he opened the car door and leaned out to see what was happening. There was a vehicle parked on the sidewalk near the driveway that partially obscured his view, he said.

May placed his right hand on his gun but did not draw it, Marquez said. Marquez then saw Alvarez reach into his jacket and pull out a silver object he thought was a gun.

Marquez said he ducked when he saw the object. He heard the first gunshot as he was getting down behind the car door, he said.

"I stayed down. More shots went off," Marquez said. He said he did not see either May or Alvarez shoot.

Then there was silence. Marquez said he raised up and saw Alvarez limping towards the squad car, a gun in his right hand.

"I thought he was going to come and shoot me next," Marquez said, tearing as he recollected the incident. He said they made eye contact but Alvarez walked past toward the apartment complex. He opened the gate and walked through.

Marquez said he then radioed dispatch to report that an officer was down before going over to May.

"I just ran over to where Rich was, and I saw him lying there on his back," Marquez said, his voice cracking. He could not see May's wounds because there was too much blood, he said.

But during cross-examination defense attorney Eric Liberman challenged Marquez' testimony based on inconsistencies with earlier testimony to a grand jury in August 2006 and statements to investigators.

Liberman said Marquez told San Mateo County sheriffs in earlier interviews that he saw May take out his gun and point it at Alvarez' chest.

Marquez told deputies he saw Alvarez fire the first shot at May before he ducked, Liberman said. Marquez also told East Palo Alto police officers on Jan. 7 that Alvarez fired three times and May fired once, Liberman said.

Marquez said he was mistaken then and maintained he did not see May draw his gun or witness any shooting.

"You're in a stressful situation. There's stuff you see you forget," Marquez said. "There's so much going on, you really can't tell."

Marquez' testimony is critical because prosecutors are using it to claim Alvarez executed May, Liberman said.

Defense has maintained and will establish that May shot first and Alvarez responded, he said.

"I very clearly understand this was a terrible and traumatic event for him, but I do not understand why he would repeatedly make things up to three separate police officials the night this happened," Liberman said after the trial was adjourned for the day. "That concerns me greatly because our client's life is at stake."

Four other witnesses testified Tuesday morning: Rafik Shuman, owner of the nearby Pal Market on Cooley Avenue; two San Mateo County 911 dispatchers, John Carillo and Linda Pegliese; and Maria Loya, another customer who witnessed the fight at the taqueria.

The trial is expected to resume Monday. Alvarez remains in custody without bail.

Related story:

Defense disputes 'execution' murder of May

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.


Like this comment
Posted by 707ROB
a resident of another community
on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:56 pm

Hang in there kid, you witnessed the slaying of a good man.

Never forget him and never forget what happened. Inconsistencies are a byproduct of stress. Do your best to remember everything as accurately as possible....be truthful in your answers and this will being Officer May justice.

God Bless

Like this comment
Posted by anon
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Oct 21, 2009 at 4:00 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Like this comment
Posted by Respect Law Enforcement
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 21, 2009 at 4:15 pm

Why does it matter if May shot first? Officers are allowed to shoot if their life is in danger. Alvarez was already not cooperating with law enforcement. How can anyone favor the criminal in this circumstance? Anyone who has the disrespect to shoot a police officer, whether they kill him or not, should be put to death. Don't waste our tax dollars on such a person.

Like this comment
Posted by Koa
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 21, 2009 at 5:55 pm

I'm very impressed with Marquez. It's not easy to testify against these scumbags. I hope he still wants to become a LEO.

Like this comment
Posted by PaloAltoresident
a resident of Professorville
on Oct 21, 2009 at 6:50 pm

This should not be a death penalty case.

Like this comment
Posted by anon
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Oct 22, 2009 at 9:18 am


I agree with you. Alvarez should have been executed a long time ago...

Like this comment
Posted by Mr. Ironic
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 22, 2009 at 10:49 am

This is exactly why nobody calls the cops he was the guy the cops were coming to help and they end up shooting him. He was buying some food when some guys started a fight with him. He did the right thing and walked away but the cops fallowed him (do they even listen to the descriptions that they are given about the suspects) began to beat him with a baton and after he broke lose he shot him. Who is going to stand there and get beat by a baton. Its and eye for an eye. If you pull a gun and shoot somebody dont be surprised if they shoot you back. And everybody in EPA knows May he was not the great guy everyone likes to say he is/was ask his wife.

And why did they fallow him for blocks without flashing the lights? or a siren? that would have scared me and I would have ran also EPA cops dont have the cleanest track record.

And why do they respond to violent calls with teenagers in the car? thats not very safe.

Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 22, 2009 at 11:21 am

You know, only God knows what really happened, neither persons story about what happened is going to be believed. Therefore bless Officer Mays family, the young man testifying and the young man behind bars. Whatever Gods will is that's what it will be, period.

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Oct 22, 2009 at 1:39 pm

Alvarez was a known gang member, and he was in violation of his probation. The cop knew who he was and followed him- perhaps he knew he'd violated probation, or that Alvarez, a gang member, got into a fight. What happened to the person w/whom Alvarez was fighting? Was he also in a gang?

May is not on trial for not being the best cop, or for having a poor reputation. He is not on trial for whatever went wrong at his previous place of employment, nor is he on trial for what he may have allegedly said to his wife.

Alvarez is on trial for killing May and it doesn't seem that the defense is denying what Alvarez did. Alvarez also had a concealed weapon, which is illegal. If he'd been caught for just that, or shooting a civilian, he'd be in big trouble, esp. given his priors and gang affiliation.

So whatever the problems w/the local cops, and/or May, none of them are on trial. Remember that.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Anne Le Ziblatt, formerly of Tamarine and Bong Su, is back with a Vietnamese noodle bar in Redwood City
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,163 views

Local Pols Debate Climate
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 2,583 views

Edible Education – Free Course - UC Berkeley Online
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 2,539 views

Letting Christmas Linger
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,365 views

The E.R.A. – no real equality yet. Why not?
By Diana Diamond | 13 comments | 832 views