Herman "Tim" Van Bragt pleaded "no contest" today in Santa Clara County Superior Court in San Jose for the March 7, 2008, stabbing death of his mother's friend, prosecutor Lane Liroff said.
"We admitted that he is not guilty by reason of insanity," Liroff said.
Van Bragt, 46, who has a history of mental illness, is charged with the murder of Robert Haggquist, 72. Sentencing is scheduled for June 11 in San Jose.
Van Bragt could be sentenced to 26 years to life in a mental hospital, Liroff said.
"The law provides that he will be sentenced to a mental hospital and potentially could stay there for the rest of his life. He will have an opportunity after a number of years to try to seek a trial claiming his sanity has been restored. He has the burden of proof and that is a difficult thing to prove," Liroff said.
Haggquist was killed by a stab wound to his heart, court records show. Van Bragt received "several non-life-threatening slash-type wounds" in the fight, according to the records. Van Bragt was arrested and charged with murder while being treated at Stanford Hospital.
According to Van Bragt's mother, Electra Van Bragt, her son drove from his home in Auburn to her Palo Alto home on Waverley Street on March 6 because "he had a dream that Bob was trying to kill me. He was trying to protect me."
Electra Van Bragt and her son's girlfriend went out to dinner that night, and Tim van Bragt and Haggquist fought in the house while the two women were out.
The case established that the killing was done for "obvious irrational motive," Liroff said. Prior to the killing, Van Bragt was expressing an unreasonable homicidal ideation and was examined by two court-appointed doctors confirming that he met the statutes for insanity, Liroff said.
Comments
Midtown
on May 22, 2009 at 9:22 pm
on May 22, 2009 at 9:22 pm
So Sorry to see this. All the best to the Van Bragts.
another community
on May 24, 2009 at 3:17 pm
on May 24, 2009 at 3:17 pm
She whent out to dinner with Herman's friend instead with her Son?? By the way Herman is 47 Years old now
College Terrace
on May 25, 2009 at 4:38 am
on May 25, 2009 at 4:38 am
Lawyers from opposing camps will have the final chance to convince the jury during the closing arguments. Typically, the prosecution will prove guilt while the defense will argue innocence. Then, the judge will give instructions to the jury.It’s now time for deliberation and conclusion. Some cases will take a few minutes while some take a few days. Upon reaching the verdict, the courtroom clerk will read it aloud.With this process, it would be unwise to hire a lawyer who doesn’t specialize in DUI law. And don’t even try to defend yourself. A DUI charge is a serious matter and should be given to the hands of the expert.
=========================
henrymaquli
[url="http://www.legalx.net"] lawyer directory [/url]
Community Center
on Jul 9, 2010 at 9:11 pm
on Jul 9, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Its a sad incident,the cops should make sure no such incidents happen again.And help the victim to find justice.
============
Erik
http://www.taxsolutionsnetwork.com
Professorville
on Oct 8, 2010 at 7:58 am
on Oct 8, 2010 at 7:58 am
It is nice to find a site about my interest. My first visit to your site is been a big help. Thank you for the efforts you been putting on making your site such an interesting and informative place to browse through. I'll be visiting your site again to gather some more valuable information. You truly did a good job.
[URL=Web Link Tax Attorney[/URL]