News

No mere child's play

Playtime is crucial to child development, experts say -- but it's slowly disappearing

It may look like 4-year-old Dori Filppu is just playing house with other children at a preschool class. But she is also learning to cooperate with friends, a skill that will serve her well later on, her mother, Lucy Filppu, said.

"She's learning for later grades. ... [She will show less competition and more cooperation later in high school," she said.

PreSchool Family, the program Dori attends, promotes play as a crucial part of a healthy childhood.

"Children learn through play. ... For them to be successful in school later on they have to have real experiences and we believe you can do that through play," said Sharon Keplinger, director of the program, which is offered through Palo Alto's school district.

Pediatricians agree that freetime plays a vital role in child development.

Play allows kids to learn about their own personalities, make decisions and become more creative, according to a report released this year by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Yet the question of how to best prepare children for success is leading some parents to deprive children of valuable playtime, said the authors, a group of doctors led by Philadelphia-based Kenneth R. Ginsburg.

Feeling more pressure than ever to prepare kids for high-achievement lives, parents sign kids up for supervised, structured activities they perceive as skill-enhancing and necessary, they said.

By scheduling children and shuttling them to and fro, parents neglect valuable playtime and downtime, noted the report, which was entitled, "The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bonds."

The report concluded by calling on pediatricians to promote play to parents.

The advice may be well-heeded in Palo Alto, where the nationwide trend of over-scheduling children is deeply embedded, local experts and parents said.

"I see kids racing into a gymnastics class taking off their shin guards from soccer," said Nancy Brown, a researcher at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.

"[Palo Altans want well-rounded, high-achieving children ... starting in preschool," she said.

Packed schedules are a fact of life here, agreed Enoch Choi, a Palo Alto dad raising two children.

"It's pretty different from where I grew up in the Midwest [where there's much less expectation of having so many activities at a young age," said Choi, a doctor who also writes for parenting Web site Silicon Valley Moms Blog.

"Parents really have ... a lot of hopes and dreams. ... And sometimes that leads to going from gym to ballet to judo to karate," he said.

Local entrepreneur Mike Lanza was disturbed by the strangely quiet lull that hung over his Palo Alto neighborhood's backyards.

"I was kind of horrified by the life I saw kids having here. It was so structured and devoid of any play and spontaneous fun," he said.

So last month he launched a pro-play Web site, Playborhood.com, as a place for parents to swap valuable play information and foster informal fun.

The site features blogs, article links and lists of books about parenting, child development and play.

Most recently, Lanza posted a survey about playtime whose results confirmed his suspicions that kids aren't playing like they used to.

Of the 64 parents with local ZIP codes who completed the survey, about a third reported their children do not play with others from the neighborhood.

And 80 percent of parents allow their children no unsupervised playtime at all.

Lanza, who has two young sons, is contemplating developing an index on Playborhood of how kid-friendly different neighborhoods are, a topic about which there is a dearth of data, he said.

He and his wife have been searching for a kid-friendly house and neighborhood for more than a year, he said. Out of that experience, he realized Realtors don't typically collect information about how particular neighborhoods suit kids, aside from data about schools.

For Maria Roschelle, a Palo Alto mom of two sons, over-scheduling her children is a chicken-and-egg problem -- she wouldn't need to sign them up for after-school activities if other kids hung around the neighborhood.

But those children are busy with their own activities.

"It's hard to go out on the street and play. Other kids are so scheduled there's no neighborhood play," she said.

So her 8-year-old son Jake goes to soccer one day a week and flag football another, plus taking cello and piano lessons.

Fears of child abduction make some parents truly uncomfortable with the idea of completely unsupervised play, Lanza said.

But the chances of kidnapping are slim, he said, noting it is statistically more likely a child be injured in a car accident on the way to or from an extracurricular activity than be kidnapped in their neighborhood.

Feedback about Playborhood from local users shows the ranks of pro-play parents are swelling -- they just don't know it, he said.

"They feel isolated. ... Social stigma makes them feel compelled to enroll their kids in extracurriculars and sports," he said.

Menlo Park mom Sarah Granger realized she was pro-play after receiving an e-mail Lanza sent to the Parents' Club of Palo Alto and Menlo Park, asking for interested parties to help craft Playborhood.

Granger has become an occasional contributor and said parents with whom she discusses play receive the message positively.

Often times, parents said, the drive to do more doesn't come from the parents but from the children.

Roschelle's son, Jake, begged to start learning cello, so she broke her own one-instrument-a-week limit and recently let him start lessons, she said.

Yet she plans to ask him to cut out one instrument to balance out scheduled and unscheduled days, she said.

And try cutting down 8-year-old Tyoma Albrecht's activities and you'll be met with hefty resistance, said his mother, Yana Tkachenko.

Her son asks to be signed up for activities and has trouble entertaining himself on his own in their Palo Alto home, she said.

"I get really bored when I don't have anything to do," Tyoma agreed.

So he has violin three times a week, soccer once and capoeira once, Tkachenko said.

Despite his enjoyment of activities, he sometimes complains he doesn't have time to do his homework, she said.

"But it's time management," she said, adding that keeping busy would teach her son to balance responsibilities.

Yet her kids don't always know what's best for them, she indicated.

Her son and daughter were too tired to get up for school last year when they participated in Palo Alto Children's Theater on top of other activities -- but they loved it anyway, she said.

"I couldn't wake them up for school in the morning. ... But despite the fact that it was so much, they were so happy," she said.

That happiness was not enough to convince her to sign them up again this year, she said.

Despite what kids may want -- or think they want -- parents need to set limits, medical researcher Brown said.

A balanced approach is favored by Choi, who limits his children to one or two lessons a week because "school provides enough structure," he said.

"We recently gave up piano lessons. We told my daughter, 'Do you like piano or do you like ballet more?'" he said.

Brown urges parents to give kids priorities, such as making sure they get at least nine hours of sleep a night, she said.

Fatigue is only one side-effect of over-scheduled kids -- packed schedules also eliminate valuable family time, she said.

"[Kids get tired and cranky and they melt. ... By keeping them so busy, you've really reduced the quality of family time," Brown said.

Roschelle, whose son will have to choose between cello and piano, agreed.

"When my kids are over-scheduled they're tired, grouchy and anxious. And I'm tired and grouchy. The interactions aren't as fun," she said.

Parents and children form deeper bonds through unstructured time together, the American Academy of Pediatrics' report said.

"Some of the best interactions occur during downtime -- just talking, preparing meals together, and working on a hobby or art project, playing sports together, or being fully immersed in child-centered play," the doctors said.

Downtime helps kids develop a sense of parental love that deepens into a feeling of security and self-confidence -- confidence that will help them meet future challenges, they said.

It's a philosophy Roschelle believes in. Last summer she let her kids skip summer camp. Instead, they made their own "sewing camp" at home, which allowed them to have fun and be creative, she said.

The informal, at-home sewing camp was a wonderful experience for the family, Roschelle said.

"It was really enjoyable to be at home with them. I loved slowing down and just having more time with them and having fun."

Yet the idyllic image of parents and children harmoniously sharing the house may waver when held up to the reality of full-time working parents for whom activities double as childcare.

That's one reason why it's important to team up with other parents, play promoter Lanza said.

Parents can form groups where members take turns corralling kids for unstructured playtime, he said.

Aside from the Internet, a more straightforward way to find like-minded parents is walking around the neighborhood and seeing where kids are playing together in backyards or parks, Lanza said.

For now, he is encouraging moms and dads to join his online network of play enthusiasts.

Lanza and other parents aren't completely knocking organized activity, though.

Roschelle seeks out sports for her kids since public schools don't provide much exercise, she said.

"[My kids only have a half hour of physical education a week in school. ... They need to do some physical exercise," she said.

The more important task, said Menlo Park-based educational consultant Jim Lobdell, is find balance between structured and unstructured activities.

A former water polo player and high-school swim coach, Lobdell is no stranger to teams, games and structure.

But he does believe that too many organized sports cheat kids of developmental opportunities.

"They lose out on the byproducts of free unstructured play, which include leadership skills like, 'What are we going to play and what are the teams going to be,' [and like resolving conflict over ... whether there's been a foul," he said.

He suggested parents limit children to one organized sport and otherwise encourage kids to play together informally in the park.

Still, sometimes it is the parents who push their children to achieve, fearing that not doing so will hinder their futures.

According to the medical center's Brown, the first step to combating societal pressure to groom high-achieving kids is to recognize it.

"Somehow the bar has just gotten out of our grasp, and it's too high," she said.

Parents can't plug their ears, disconnect the television and ignore their fellow parents and friends. But they can avoid comparing themselves to other parents who keep their kids humming with activity, she said.

"It's really easy for us to compare ourselves to others. ... Somehow it's really easy for those messages to get in," she said.

One solution to over-scheduling is recommended by Jeanne Lepper, director of Stanford University's prestigious Bing Nursery School.

Parents should pencil in time for their kids to do absolutely nothing, she said.

Bing runs play-based classrooms where games are center stage and children are rarely told what to do. Ironically, spots at Bing are highly coveted by local parents.

But downtime outside of school may be just as valuable as playtime within, Lepper said.

"We should all try to plan some time when children can just kind of cogitate, or think about things. Children do need some time to process all these experiences they're having," she said.

Parents could also remind themselves doctors and researchers have found that participating in five or six activities at a time won't necessarily create successful adults in the future.

A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2003 reported a high incidence of depression and helplessness across American campuses. It was called "Mounting Student Depression Taxing Campus Mental Health Services."

This depression comes from perfectionist tendencies to achieve, according to studies cited in the pediatricians' report released this year.

And those who did extremely well in school don't do well in the workplace if they never learned to take creative risks, Stanford researcher Denise Pope said.

Pope leads the "Stressed Out Students" initiative in which both Palo Alto and Gunn high schools participate. She spends a lot of time trying to convince students who have likely been over-scheduled since grade-school to simplify their lifestyles.

Silicon Valley's business leaders have told her that recent hires with sparkling resumes don't always do well, she said.

The young employees spent their formative years in structured, regulated achievement efforts and they're afraid to think outside the box, she said.

Lanza is hopeful it's not too late for the kids of Palo Alto to get out and play some stickball. Or invent a stickball field out of a vacant lot, as he did as a kid growing up in Pittsburgh, Penn.

"One thing I admire about Palo Alto is people really have their brains turned on. They're open to new things and they will embrace an idea if it's a good idea," he said.

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 21, 2007 at 12:45 pm

A couple of my own observations.

Play time is important, and there should be plenty of playtime that does nto involve a screen of any description. I have seen friends come over and they spend the whole time watching one person play a video game. That is not play. If they can't play outside, how about board games, scrabble, monopoly, plus some of the newer apples to apple type games are great for kids to play on their own.

Sticking preschoolers in front of Sesame Street and similar shows for hours on end is not teaching them anything. The tv is not a babysitter and shows should be watched by parent and child together for no more than 30 minutes at a time and then parent and child should be talking about the show as they watch.

Chores are an important family or friendly way of kids spending time together. Get them raking leaves, washing the car, baking cookies. It is not too important how well the job is done until they are older, it is getting them to learn that doing their share of the chores makes them useful and can be fun.


Like this comment
Posted by typical
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 21, 2007 at 6:22 pm

It is smart for your children to hae guidelines but do not be so enforceful like on a 30 minute tv schedule? cmon, there kids. You need to set guidelines and let the children make their own decisions and if they do something wrong make then think about how what they did was wrong.


Like this comment
Posted by PA_rent
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 21, 2007 at 6:39 pm

When I was a kid, we use to just run out the back door and be home by dinner time. Now there are too many dangers (or we are aware of these dangers more) and cannot just let our children roam and run around the neighborhood. Even during my childhood, I noticed a change in attitudes when drug problems started becoming an issue at our local schools. Things have changed gradually, but parents just need to find ways to let their children have unstructured playtime. Perhaps less after-school lessons and more playdates in the park.


Like this comment
Posted by Parent
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 21, 2007 at 7:03 pm

Typical

I will explain my 30 mins. tv. For a preschooler, watching say Sesame Street, 30 mins with a parent for that stint is good, and if it turns into 40 mins, I am not complaining. Then the tv can go off for a couple of hours and maybe later in the day, another 30 mins watching with a different parent, or a disney movie or some such. I am not advocating that 30 mins for everyone and I am not saying that that is all for one day, just for one stint. I have come across too many parents that leave the tv on all day for their preschoolers and then complain when they are older and won't turn it off. Get into the habit early that one show or 30 min. stint is sufficient at one sitting and then it will be easier to set limits later.


Like this comment
Posted by Terry
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 21, 2007 at 7:17 pm

Maybe it is just us, but our kids are not "over-scheduled" and, asking them and my wife, we don't really know many who are. There are almost always kids looking to play on our block and the blocks adjacent and the kids around here spend hours upon hours just hanging out. My kids each have an activity or two, depending on the season; other kids seem similar.

My kids did allow that there are some kids who are sports-oriented who perhaps are doing two competitive sports a season or going to out-of-town events during the week year around, and that those kids have tight schedules. There is a young swimmer on our block like that. But that seems to be a small minority, and sports is at least reasonably close to "play" in my book.

I'm sure these over-scheduled, play-deprived kids exist, but are they as widely spread as is often implied?


Like this comment
Posted by PA mom
a resident of Community Center
on Nov 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm

Most kids I know who are a 4-5 grade Walter Hays students play at least one sport per season, usually at a club/competitive level, often more than one sport, this leaves little time for "just play". Terry - I envy your neighborhood - there are seldom kids just playing around here.


Like this comment
Posted by Paly parent
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Nov 22, 2007 at 3:13 pm

Everyone at Paly is tremendously busy with school as well as extra-curriculars -- not much time for hanging out.


Like this comment
Posted by Mike Lanza
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 22, 2007 at 10:51 pm

Terry:

I'm in the middle of publishing statistics for the Playborhood survey on Web Link. It's clear from these that very few kids are playing outside in their neighborhoods more than a couple days a week. As for Palo Alto in particular, the results are even more bleak. Our statistics show that fewer than 5% of kids here play outside unsupervised at least three days a week.

So I, like others, are envious of you and your situation. A big part of what we're doing at Playborhood is exposing great "Playborhoods" and parents who want to find them. Because there are so few real Playborhoods, yet there are so many parents who want to find them, we believe we can facilitate some solutions to this problem. I'm working on it nonstop...


Like this comment
Posted by Jennifer
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 24, 2007 at 7:50 pm


I would like to add that children need time to play with their parents. If mom and dad don't unplug, leave the cell phone at home, and relax, how are the children supposed to learn to do this? Children need extended play time with their parents - we are the model. Our children value what we value. This is not about the parks and the neighborhoods, it is about the whole famlily.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Su Hong Palo Alto's last day of business will be Sept. 29
By Elena Kadvany | 19 comments | 6,145 views

Firing Judge Persky as a tennis coach was a big mistake
By Diana Diamond | 23 comments | 2,064 views

Premarital, Women Over 50 Do Get Married
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,932 views

Electric Buses: A case study
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 1,780 views

Natural Wines?
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 1,717 views

 

Register now!

On Friday, October 11, join us at the Palo Alto Baylands for a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon! All proceeds benefit local nonprofits serving children and families.

More Info