By Steve Levy
E-mail Steve Levy
About this blog: I grew up in Los Angeles and moved to the area in 1963 when I started graduate school at Stanford. Nancy and I were married in 1977 and we lived for nearly 30 years in the Duveneck school area. Our children went to Paly. We moved ... (More)
About this blog: I grew up in Los Angeles and moved to the area in 1963 when I started graduate school at Stanford. Nancy and I were married in 1977 and we lived for nearly 30 years in the Duveneck school area. Our children went to Paly. We moved downtown in 2006 and enjoy being able to walk to activities. I do not drive and being downtown where I work and close to the CalTrain station and downtown amenities makes my life more independent. I have worked all my life as an economist focusing on the California economy. My work centers around two main activities. The first is helping regional planning agencies such as ABAG understand their long-term growth outlook. I do this for several regional planning agencies in northern, southern and central coast California. My other main activity is studying workforce trends and policy implications both as a professional and as a volunteer member of the NOVA (Silicon Valley) and state workforce boards. The title of the blog is Invest and Innovate and that is what I believe is the imperative for our local area, region, state and nation. That includes investing in people, in infrastructure and in making our communities great places to live and work. I served on the recent Palo Alto Infrastructure Commission. I also believe that our local and state economy benefits from being a welcoming community, which mostly we are a leader in, for people of all religions, sexual preferences and places of birth. (Hide)
View all posts from Steve Levy
I Will Vote No on Prop 10
Uploaded: Oct 5, 2018
Some residents locally and throughout the region have experienced very large rent increases in recent years. These increases often create emotional and financial hardship. Still, I think that Prop 10 (the repeal of current restrictions on rent control) is a bad solution and will be voting no on Prop 10 in November.
Three are three major reasons I oppose Prop 10.
The first reason is that Prop 10 does not add to the stock of rental housing and will probably have the opposite effect. The second reason is that Prop 10 does not reduce rents and will probably have the opposite effect.
The third reason, which I hope readers will comment on, is the ethical and implementation challenges of deciding whether to impose rent control on single family homes and small apartment complexes.
The incentive to build or retain rental housing will be diminished if Prop 10 is passed. Some prospective developers of rental housing may choose not to build or convert rental properties to condos if Prop 10 is passed depending on what is done about rent control for homes. I could see some owners who are thinking about adding ADUs reconsider if rent control is imposed. In no case do I see rental housing being increased as a result of Prop 10.
Rent control limits the future increases in rent. It does not roll back rents that are already out of reach for many. And it is likely that Prop 10 will put upward pressure on rents. This will happen if rent control takes rental units off the market through conversion to condos or discourages some new construction. Rents are high in the first place as a result of a shortage of rental housing so adding to the shortage is not a way reduce rent pressures.
And then there are the dilemmas poised by imposing rent control on single family homes and condos and small apartment complexes. On the one hand, why should renters in homes not be protected while renters in large complexes are protected? Many people do rent homes, particularly when groups of people get together to share the rent. So I see no rationale for creating two separate groups of renters depending on the type of structure they rent.
But the implementation challenges of monitoring rent increases in hundreds or thousands of small rental units seem difficult and intrusive and could by themselves discourage owners from renting. Is this something that the residents of Bay Area communities want to add to the workload of already stressed city staffs?
I do favor additional rental protections and policies to reduce the cost of building rental housing and will discuss these in a future column.
What is it worth to you?
Post a comment
Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.