Odd or Even Years for PA Elections? Measure S | Nose Under the Community Tent | Paul Losch | Palo Alto Online |

Local Blogs

Nose Under the Community Tent

By Paul Losch

E-mail Paul Losch

About this blog: I was a "corporate brat" growing up and lived in different parts of the country, ending in Houston, Texas for high school. After attending college at UC Davis, and getting an MBA at Harvard, I embarked on a marketing career, mai...  (More)

View all posts from Paul Losch

Odd or Even Years for PA Elections? Measure S

Uploaded: Oct 7, 2010
Should there continue to be the practice in Palo Alto that local issues and choices of City and School District candidates take place on odd numbered years, rather than being included in the even numbered years general ballots that include candidates from the President of the United State on down?
As best as I can tell, the people favoring Prop S, which would move the local issues and candidates voting to be part of the larger ballot such as what we are about to deal with, are advocating it as a cost savings measure.
As best as I can tell, those opposing Prop S are providing the point of view that voters will be better focused and able to get more information is they are not also dealing with all the stuff that we get in even numbered years, from General Election information.
I lean with the opponents.
I get accused at times as being a Palo Alto insider. I may be guilty as charged, but I lived here for many years before I got to know those people who do paid and sworn volunteer work on behalf of Palo Alto.
The more I learn, the more I take the point of view that too many of us were like me, not really knowing the issues Palo Alto faces. We live in a wonderful community, and also in an important globally significant City.
It may cost CPA a little more money, and I think it is worth it. NO on S
We need your support now more than ever. Can we count on you?

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of ,
on Oct 8, 2010 at 1:25 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

No extension of any elective term by ballot proposition! If they want the change, chop terms to reconfigure.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of ,
on Oct 11, 2010 at 3:31 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Paul, why not answer my objection. Or do you like Venezuelan politics here?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Paul Losch, a resident of ,
on Oct 11, 2010 at 3:42 pm

Walter,

I don't have strong POV about either approach


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter walter walter, a resident of ,
on Oct 12, 2010 at 6:43 am

Walter--you seem to like North Korean politics here.
Why do you feel that every posting of yours deserves an answer (most don not, BTW)?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of ,
on Oct 12, 2010 at 12:26 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

I believe that a politician who extends a term of office by other than another election is playing banana republic politics. As for Nork politics, I understand even some of Kim's get are questioning the monarchy.


Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.

Email:

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Get the most important local news stories sent straight to your inbox daily.

After 10 years, Shalala Ramen to leave downtown Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 10,383 views

Thinking of moving? You're not alone.
By Sherry Listgarten | 22 comments | 6,228 views

Ballot propositions have problems
By Diana Diamond | 16 comments | 1,871 views

Changing Our Focus
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 871 views

Premarital and Couples: I’m not getting what I need. How can I get him/her to change?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 439 views