Palo Alto Falls Behind - again
Original post made by Fred on Dec 30, 2012
Others have started to ban single-serve water and other drink containers. Why are we allowing our town to fall behind? These items litter our street and roadsides, and can be replaced by re-usable containers that virtually all already own. We should ban all single-serve drink containers - sale or possession - in our town. Do we have to wait before this begins to impact property values before attending to this critical issues?
on Dec 30, 2012 at 9:05 pm
i like single serving bottles. It will never affect property values. Don't be silly.
on Dec 30, 2012 at 9:40 pm
Society would be much better served by a mandatory death penalty for littering than it ever will be served by any bag bans, or bottle bans or any such lowering to the "lowest common denominator" we have for behavior in current society.
If littering is the problem, address it directly and effectively.
Getting the perps off the earth, and their DNA out of the genome solves the problem, and also raises the "lowest common denominator", improving society for everyone.
on Dec 30, 2012 at 10:46 pm
> Society would be much better served by a mandatory death penalty for littering
That seems a bit extreme, but it does seem like "society" should really start taking a serious look at certain types of petty crime and seeing what it says about perpetrators. I agree that most people who litter are just missing something in their brains about citizenship and they should get some kind of serious punishment and counseling or something. Graffitti is another thing. It see,s sometimes that everything that is not 24 hours in the pubic eye and some things that are are getting vandalized by graffitti all over. Sometimes I think they ought to go back to the rack and whipping people in the town square for stuff like this ... nothing seems to make an impression on these thugs.