http://paloaltoonline.com/square/print/index.php?i=3&d=1&t=19280


Town Square

Answering Weekly's call on Prop 37

Original post made by Pete Whelan, Greenmeadow, on Oct 26, 2012

Regarding The Palo Alto Weekly's recommendation to vote no on Prop 37,10/19/12,I submit the following:

This story contains 407 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 1, 2012 at 7:07 am

I agree with you Pete. I'm a little shocked with Weekly's stance. If only people would do some research. So much for "investigative journalism". I guess the weekly enjoys supporting the destruction of the Amazon forest from genetically modified soy.
To each his own.


Like this comment
Posted by just thinkin'
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 1, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Most of the veggies I buy are frozen. That counts as "processed" by the text of the law - READ IT.
Why are school lunches exempt if the reason for the law is to protect children? "Prosessed for immediate consumption" is exempt -please read the text.
Waiting a year or two to get it right is a better idea than rushing something flawed and no enforcement for yearsssss of lawsuits over the nits........