http://paloaltoonline.com/square/print/index.php?i=3&d=&t=905


Town Square

Iraq

Original post made by Jag Singh, Duveneck/St. Francis, on Jan 30, 2007

29, January 2007

This story contains 239 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 2, 2007 at 4:35 pm

Evaryone knows that Saddam was our ally, or we were his ally, in the war against Iran. When someone comes out wih an expose' of the obvious, it is time for the department of So What to take over.


Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 2, 2007 at 5:24 pm

We were Saddam's ally when he was using poison gas and deadly chemicals against the Kurds and the Iranians, we didn't have any moral repulsion then. At the very same time he was committing heinous crimes against his own people, Donald Rumsfeld was visiting him in Baghdad, knowing very well what he was doing. As a matter of fact, US corporations were providing him with some of the materials. Since we know now that the WMD excuse was a hoax and that there was never any connection between Saddam and 9/11 and islamic terrorism, most of the invasion supporters now claim that we had to invade because, can you believe this:'he used poison gas on the Kurds and Iranians'.


Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 3, 2007 at 8:41 am

Iran was and is at war with the United States and it was not in our interest to have them also rule Iraq.


Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 3, 2007 at 10:07 am

There had never been a possibility of Iran ruling Iraq until the US made it possible by invading Iraq and help the Shi'ite ascend to power. Now we have a government with close ties to Iran whose power base is Shi'ite religious militias. Just what we needed. Bush turned out to be Iran's best friend and benefactor, making the impossible come true for Iran. The only decision by a head of state that can be compared in its hubris and sheer madness to the decision by the Bush regime to invade Iraq, is probably Hitler's order to invade the USSR in 1942.


Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 3, 2007 at 7:00 pm

There was indeed a war between Iraq and Iran, and Iraq would have lost without help from us. It would not have been in our interest then or now for Iran to rule the Middle East.


Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 4, 2007 at 9:12 am

Saddam was our best friend in the ME viz-a-vis Iran. He kept them in check and provided a counter balance to their ambitions. The Iranians were so concerned about Saddam that they concentrated all their energy on him and not on their historic ambition of becoming a regional power. Since we were so concerned about Iran, we had to remove their greatest enemy and now Iran is free to become more and more influential, has a friendly government in Baghdad and the ME has never been so hostile to us. Now I really see the logic in the invasion...


Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Feb 4, 2007 at 10:01 am

It helps the argument for some to forget Kuwait.