Original post made by Just Thinking Out Loud on Mar 2, 2007
I hope not, but it would be uneven enforcement if not.
on Mar 2, 2007 at 3:10 pm
The article says
"It was discovered Wednesday after 6 p.m. by a man who pulled over to relieve himself,"
which only documents intent, so maybe he is only guilty of
Intent to commit Public Urination.
I'm sure he would be relieved to find his time in any penile institution would pass very quickly. ;^)
on Mar 2, 2007 at 3:41 pm
I listen to 1590 on the AM. They did a segment on sex offenders recently, talking about the need to track them. The woman they were interviewing complained that too many offenses get lumped into the "sexual offender" pile and the system does not track the differences. She said someone who is arrested for urinating in public gets the same treatment as a violent rapist.
I really don't consider this to be a laughing matter. Apparently, if that was correct, his life could be ruined.
on Mar 2, 2007 at 3:48 pm
You are right. It is a shame that crime leaked out in public. ;^)