The home of Palo Alto’s former city manager, Frank Benest, was extensively damaged in a fire on Saturday afternoon.

The fire broke out in a laundry room. The home is in the 2200 block of Bryant St., between North California Avenue and Oregon Expressway. Flames quickly spread to the second floor and the attic, Deputy Fire Chief Catherine Capriles said. The home became fully engulfed in flames, and it is a complete loss, Capriles said.

Benest’s 15-year-old daughter discovered smoke and called 911. She, a friend and a nanny escaped unharmed, according to Benest, who was not home at the time the fire broke out.

The blaze jumped to an adjacent home, causing minor damage to the roof and attic. Firefighters evacuated an elderly woman and two dogs. They were not injured, Capriles said.

The three-alarm fire began at 11:57 a.m. Palo Alto, Mountain View, Menlo Park and Santa Clara County fire departments responded to the blaze, which was extinguished by 12:50 p.m. Firefighters were putting out hotspots at 3 p.m. Police Chief Dennis Burns and City Manager James Keene were on scene.

The fire was stubborn, and it was tricky to contain, Capriles said. The back part of the home had been remodeled and had numerous small spaces containing smoke and flames. It is common for fires to begin with a clothes dryer, she added.

Benest and his daughter are the sole occupants of the home. Their insurance carrier will take care of supplying them with another place to stay, he said. He was on Caltrain on his way home from San Francisco at the time of the fire.

Benest was Palo Alto’s city manager for 8 and a half years, starting in 2000. Since his retirement, he has been allowed to stay in the house he co-owns with the city until his two children have graduated from high school, according to the city.

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

  1. So glad no one was hurt!

    How very sad for Mr. Benest’s family to experience the loss of their home.

    This incident can serve as a reminder for backing up our computers to the cloud as well as cleaning out the dryer vents.

    I am hopeful the Palo Alto community will reach out and offer the Benests our support.

  2. I was there!! The police evacuated us all!! And then had to keep the street shut while the firefighters ate pizza??? I appreciate the firefighters but lets give credit where credit is due. Police saved lives today, firefighters saved property

  3. To the person who knows little about what firefighters do and how they operate; maybe you should read up and talk to a firefighter about what takes place at a fire and how without them many people could die from fires.

  4. Hey neighbor, I said I appreciate what they did!! Love them, great work! Just wanted the set the record straight, the police evacuated us not the firefighters. And your right. I don’t know much about either profession. Good to know that the police stop traffic so firefighters eat pizza! I just thought it was funny no harm to anyone. I love our public safety group. Great job done by all! Now make mine with extra cheese please.

  5. Why is the city providing housing for an employee who quit six years ago? The usual response when we complain about the lavish compensation by the city is that they have to pay so much to keep talented employees. But this guy is retired. We must have had some dumb council members to make a deal like this. I’m sorry about the fire, but the fact that the city is providing him with housing doesn’t seem right … especially when we have so many needy transients who want housing.

  6. >I am hopeful the Palo Alto community will reach out and offer the Benests our support.

    We did several years ago. The city owns that house. Benest occupies it by a special dispensation.

  7. According to the Weekly story upon Mr. Benest’s retirement: “He shares ownership of their Bryant Street home with the city, which owns 58 percent of the residence. He has the right to remain there until 2017, when his children will finish school in Palo Alto.” So the city owns part of the house. Mr. Benest did quite lot of good for the city and endured personal tragedy (early death of his wife and his own tongue cancer). Now this. It take small, cheap minds to carp about his housing arrangement in this circumstance.

  8. Had a few tussles with Frank over union issues, but he was always honest and fair. Good luck on your rebuilding.

  9. Great job PAFD! It was a great job done by all firefighters! This is why our fire department is so very valuable! Every engine was needed PLUS other engines from other departments. Thank you all for risking your lives for doing your job. Your JOB is so valuable and not everyone can do it!! I am very thankful for all firefighters and what they do for OTHERS!

  10. This house burned very quickly. It moved up and toward the front with amazing speed. By the time PAFD arrived, it was fully engulfed and flamed by wind.

  11. David Burns…unfortunate. James, take a knee. I thought it would have been more serious than this. I was expecting a gas fire for the amount of resources.

    There once was a fire

    It put me aside the lire

    But when duty calls

    I know who’s too tall

    The situation is always dire.

  12. I was fortunate to work for Frank for several years and he is a first class guy who treated his employees with honesty and respect, even in difficult times. As others have said, Frank has experienced more than his share of personal tragedy. My best wishes and prayers for Frank and his family. He set a very high standard for other city managers to follow.

  13. > He set a very high standard for other city managers to follow.

    It’s hard to know what any City Manager does, or how well they do their jobs. There is virtually no paper trail of real accomplishments for Benest, or any of the other City Managers. People who may have come into contact with him, as an employee, or other City business, are certainly free to express their opinion, but what’s the truth?

    The City Charter states that the job of the City Manager should be a full time job. Benest, shortly after his arrival, asked the City Council to allow him some time off to pursue other interests—such as giving classes on “Entrepreneurial City Management”, which he charged money for.

    Benest made a mess of the first Storm Drain fee/tax increase—leaving the impression that he thought the people of Palo Alto were not very intelligent. He did, on the other hand, put together a decent review of the City’s finances and its financial needs during his first year. He made the rounds through the city’s neighborhoods, offering this information first hand, and answering questions honestly. He did not, on the other hand, do much to deal with the so-called “infrastructure” problem, which more than one resident pointed out during these outreach efforts.

    After the first year, Benest seemed less interested in the job. He managed to get his name in the paper, from time-to-time, claiming to be a “modern” City Manager. Rumors originating at City Hall suggested that he was an absentee land-lord, giving all of the work to Asst. City Manager, Emily Harrison—who was clearly a control freak, and someone who seemed to have no respect for employees, or residents, alike. At one point, Benest had to suspend her for two weeks, and released a rather large file on her, and her behavior, to the public to justify his actions. Harrison was mortified, and threatened to sue—but she managed to find a better job in the County Government. Benest and the City was saved another embarrassment when she slithered out of City Hall and disappeared.

    Benest was out-of-the-office due to his being diagnosed with some sort of cancer, and about the same time his family suffered the loss of his wife. The City Council awarded him a $50,000 a year pay raise as a result of his misfortune.

    All-in-all, it’s hard to look back at the Benest years and say: Frank Benest did this, and that, and the other. He was able to significanly reduce the cost of government by reorganizing this division, or that department. While it’s probably true that he was more organized, and more effective than his predecessor—June Fleming—he clearly did not leave much of a paper trail for the future to consider in trying to understand his performance, and place in Palo Alto history.

    It’s very hard to say: Palo Alto is a better place because of Frank Benest. For that reason, it’s really difficult to understand why the people of Palo Alto are invested in any home, or homes, to help Frank Benest stay here, or anywhere. This is particularly true since Benest is receiving $177,186 from his CalPERS retirement account (this year). With likely additional income from consulting—it’s hard to believe that he isn’t making well over $200K a year–and possibly even $300K (or more) a year. With that kind of income—why are the taxpayers still subsidizing this man?

    Enough is enough! If he comes back to the well for more public money, in order to buy a new, bigger, home—then the answer should be a resounding NO!

  14. The inaccuracy of this article is ridiculous. The nanny wasn’t there. The only people who were there were the two girls, one of whom (I assume the friend) was on the phone with the emergency services, and the other was breaking down outside. We all saw the nanny run up afterwards.

  15. I am glad to hear that everyone is safe. Still, this is terrible. I work at First Baptist Church which is located almost across the street from the house. If there is anyway we can be helpful, please let us know.

  16. I got there the same time as the first fire truck. We saw the flames from Page Mill and Foothill Expressway. The fire truck passed us when we were waiting for a left turn on Bryant. I do not know about how to fight a fire but would certainly like to know why it took so long for the firemen to put water on the fire. To say that the house was “fully engulfed” when they got there is just not true. It is true that there were flames on the roof so it was clearly serious. I have pictures and a movie if anyone doubts what I say. My wife said the firemen did not look like they were “going to a fire”. But I assume they were doing the right thing. They put up a ladder and entered the second story, perhaps to see what was going on before putting it out. I believe the first thing they put water on was the house next door.

    Basically, it looked like they wrote off the 2257 hours and focused on making sure everyone was out, and keeping the fire from spreading. But it just did not look like the house was “fully engulfed in flames” when they got there, which someone said was 10 minutes after they were called. That also seems like a long time if true.

    What I am asking is for the fire department to explain to us laymen what happened, what the priorities were and why they did not seem in a hurry to put out the fire. I trust they were doing the right thing but I would like everyone who watched to believe that. I heard a lot of negative comments and I want the FD to defend what they did.

  17. So glad Mr. Benest and his family are OK. He was an outstanding city manager. For those who carp about his housing arrangements – can you think of a better investment of city funds? The return when he sells will far exceed any other investment of city funds by PA or PERS.

  18. Most fire departments (I’m assuming this includes Palo Alto) use either the acronym RECEO or the acronym REVAS when prioritizing actions after arriving at the scene of a building fire. The R in both acronyms is for Rescue which is always first priority. This includes rescuing victims and searching for possible victims in a building. The E is for Exposures. That means placing priority on protecting the neighbors house from exposure to the fire. The C in the first acronym is to make an effort to Confine the fire. The V in the second acronym is Ventilation (usually accomplished by putting a hole in the roof to ventilate the smoke and hot/explosive gasses that build up in a fire. The second E in the first acronym is Extinguish the fire. The A in the second acronym is Attack the fire. The O is to thoroughly Overhaul/Salvage the building to assure complete extinguishment after the fire is put out and to salvage peoples possessions (usually an ongoing process from beginning to end. The S in the second acronym is Salvage/Overhaul. In either case one can see that actually putting water on the fire is not necessarily the first priority when arriving at a fire, especially when short staffed. Of course, depending on the situation, it is possible that first priority items can be dealt with by getting water on the fire immediately, but that is not always the case…

  19. My choral group had an all day choral workship at the First Baptist Church across from the fire. Our vantage point was seeing the back of the house with the flames getting more intense, higher and higher from the wind.

    I used to volunteer with the Red Cross in Disaster Services so knew that this was a serious 3-alarm fire. We saw Menlo Park responding and other engines were brought in. The incident commander doesn’t call for mutual aid unless it’s serious. It goes to show you what challenges firefighters have with access to the part of the building burning and trying to keep it from spreading to adjacent buildings. Glad no one was injured esp. the firefighters. We are lucky to have such great resources.

  20. @AllenE,

    I’m not sure when you got there, but I was there before the first fire truck and the whole right side of the house was already up in flames and through the roof.

Leave a comment