Frontrunners emerge as City Council slate is finalized at 12
Original post made on Oct 5, 2007
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, August 17, 2007, 12:00 AM
on Oct 5, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Hi, this is Tim Gray, candidate for City Council. I just wanted to mention that at the time this story was written, I had just filed my papers of intent with the City Clerk's office. My campaign of ideas has come a long way. I was not available for comment at the time this story was written, but now I have a lot of information at: www.Vote4gray.com. Please visit me, and help me keep learning.
on Oct 8, 2007 at 11:23 am
What are you going to do about the huge developments that the council keeps approving? Will you go along with that trend?
I'd appreciate a straight answer, not on the one hand and on the other hand.
on Oct 9, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Thank you for the question. Please check out my www.vote4gray
As a late entrant, I am still learning about the City of Palo Comprehensive Plan. One thing we know is that it involved great citizen participation and really is the "constitution" we have agreed to follow as new issues are presented.
I view it as a "constitution" of sorts. We have made a collective decision as a community, and we need to honor it... continue reading the text at Web Link .
I would welcome additional perspectives. It is widely believed that our City has participated in "spot zoning" and those actions must stop. The idea is that we have made an agreement as a community about what kind of growth will be acceptable in our future. I am a big advocate for keeping agreements, or... if those agreements are not working out, then let's go back to the table and make some new one's in the full light of day.
I will take a stand for creating a level playing field. Fairness is not a naive and idealistic concept. From my corporate advisory work, I have seen power politics used to manipulate changes one little exception at a time. It's called incrementalism, and it is wrong. I don't want to wake up in the future and say, "How in the h... did we get here?" Our best line of defense for avoiding the outcomes you are talking about is to unite around principals that have a foundation in fairness and balance. Then, on an ongoing basis being defenders of the principals.
And then on the other hand... just kidding. I offer this with respect and welcome your suggestions. In the areas of the past where the Comprehensive plan's intent seems to be ignored, I would have voted no. But a minority vote is only symbolic. The bigger picture solution is the one I have previously described.
And then on the other hand... (just kidding.) Please go to www.vote4gray.com and click on the Comprehensive Plan tab.